Hello.It’s a new year, with new shit happening, and I wanted to connect with /tg/ regarding the 1d6chan wiki.There have been several major developments in the new Miraheze wiki, and for starters: we have expanded the mod team to eight. There’s me, I’m the Archwizard, then new person TimeTrx, who is the Dumpist, responsible for making site rips and backups. Below us are the six Wranglers, who are: Colonel Klink, Forever DM, Ow My Sanity, Saarlacfunkel, Ophiuchus and the new guy, Gilten.The transition has worked as well as I had hoped, and I’m quite satisfied with the continuation of service. Right now, the more active moderators and users are focused on deleting seventeen years of cruft, like: images that aren’t linked to pages, redirects that are redundant or oversaturated, and WIP pages that haven’t seen any progress since the Noughties.The site’s regular activity has levelled off, which is perfect, and we now regularly see upwards of four hundred edits per day.The wiki pages that have seen the most traffic by far are the Tactics pages and the Space Marine Legions pages, at least for the past month or so.Miraheze has been an excellent host, and hasn’t exerted any editorial control over us, and we intend to never give them a reason.The Story, Campaign, Setting, and Project namespaces are up and running, so people can now feel free to add their homebrew whenever they want.Anything people want to ask?
>>94857110>images that aren’t linked to pagesThey fixed this? I could finally go back then. Images not loading was one of the biggest problems that made me stay away.
>>94857161No, I mean there were literally thousands of files on the database that weren't on any page. They were just there, taking up space and bandwidth on our backups, not linked nor ref'ed anywhere. Useless. Some people just used 1d4 as a file server.
>>94857110Did you put the removed content back in, or are you still moralfagging?>Miraheze has been an excellent host, and hasn’t exerted any editorial control over us, and we intend to never give them a reason.Oh, never mind.
>>94857110>Anything people want to ask?Ever been to the Star Wars Wookiepedia? On some articles they have a legends and canon option.If possible it would be nice to see if the website can have an "original 1d4chan version page" and a "post 1d4chan now 1d6chan version page" of the same articles. Obviously with better naming conventions. If possible could something like that happen? Essentially the idea is for the old website data to be kept in tact for archival purposes (I know the internet archive exists) but also to allow for future edits to be made without damaging the old stuff. A sort of "meet in the middle" compromise if you will. Lastly can there be a guideline page to writing articles with obvious rules stated on them like no personal information, no spamming, and no e-begging?I haven't visited 1d4chan in a long time and so I never saw or recall such a page and it has been a while since I visited 1d6chan.I don't recall fan theory essay autism articles being a thing for the wiki. Maybe that's covered under writefaggotry, but I never bothered writing one because I felt that it would either get deleted in the name of preserving the archive's authenticity and/or it would be posted in the wrong place.
>>94857833They probably understand that if they don't take some stuff out there is very good chance 1d4chan will get taken down. I get that people want all the stuff the original site had but sometimes you have to pick between not having everything and having nothing.
>>94857874Well now that you mention it that is true given how laws are more restricting these days than they were in the days of yore. Could OP basically confirm this is the case, please?
>>94857833>Canon vs LegendsWhat? We didn't restart the /tg/ continuity, we just moved to a new host. It's fine. We aren't interested in splitting the worldlines.>GuidelinesWe have a rules page, and it covers things well.>'TismWe've had massive pages on topics since the Bush administration. There's nothing new there.>>94857883Laws? No, nothing of the kind. The largest wiki on our host is the Drawn Feet Archive, with the most trafficked being the Monster Girl Encyclopedia. We just don't want the community that hate pages, doxxing, and loli draw.
>>94857177Anything that'd get the attention of the feds or just random shit?
>>94857969Overwhelmingly just random shit. A lot of it MIGHT have been meant for some page or other but never tagged to the right page so they were just purged to clean up space.
>>94857969There was very little that was outright illegal, but I won't say there was nothing. There were also a few disturbing images of technically legal but not host-compatible loli which we deleted, and also a hundred images of Holo from Spice and Wolf naked because somebody wanted to recreate Gelbooru on our image server. Honestly, though, it wasn't a lot. There were over 46,000 images on the server, and we deleted a bit over 200. The vast majority of images weren't deleted when we moved.Since then, our diligent new moderator, Gilten, has been looking through the list of unlinked images - that is, images that aren't on any pages in the whole wiki. If he finds one that has no immediately obvious page to be deposited on, he might delete it if nobody on the Discord has any particular use for it.I do still have the original 1d4chan master image archive on a solid state drive in my place, so if it came to it, I could restore the images if I had to, but I haven't had to yet.
>>94857996>There was very little that was outright illegalA better question would be what was actually illegal. As far as I'm aware the wiki never had any CSAM.
What's the rubric for adding a new page to the wiki? As in stuff that wasn't in 1d4chan
>>94857897>What? We didn't restart the /tg/ continuity, we just moved to a new host. It's fine. We aren't interested in splitting the worldlines.Sorry I must have botched my explanations. I meant a pre-1d6 version of the more popular articles and a post-1d6 version of the articles.But I did put some thought into it and I feel that the task may be too monumental with too many articles. Don't know how the Star Wars community did it with their wookiepedia article. The whole reason I suggested such a change is just in case 2d4chan goes down or this site gets in hot water and the internet archive removes the 1d4chan archived pages.>Laws? No, nothing of the kind. Thanks for being transparent. I hate it when community representatives be they mods, admins, operators, or staff in general act so vague. >Guidelines>We have a rules page, and it covers things well.Well please pardon my retardation as I might have missed it. Are you referring to the "conduct" paragraphs on the front page?
>>94858010There's plenty of prisons you can hang out in if you like preteens that much.>>94858023Porn of real people. I'm not saying more.>>94858024Rubric? We don't give a fuck. There's a Conduct section you can check any time you want, but go make shit. We get new pages every other day or so, nobody minds.>>94858030Yep!
buy an ad
>>94858067>Yep!Thanks for clearing that up.I'm probably not gonna try for an article at the moment, but I'll try my best to make sure it follows the rules if I ever decide to.The 1d6chan discord jannies are open to guide a newcomer in properly linking pages to appropriate articles and categorizing them, yes?I haven't been to the 1d6chan wiki, but I imagine that they might get a lot of those. For this sort of thing is the golden rule just to have obvious well intentions to keep things organized?
>>94858172The Discord is packed with people who can help. Honestly, it's pretty self-explanatory.
>>94858216Thanks!>Honestly, it's pretty self-explanatory. The only reason I asked is because the website is from an old format and I fear my zoomer brain is too used to "userfriendly formats." But I'll try my best if I decide on being a wiki article writer in my spare time as there are just days where I don't want to paint my miniatures in my spare time.
The problem with 1d4chan and its clones is that it's 90% Warhammer and 10% everything else. Even pages that have nothing to do with Warhammer reference Warhammer in some form. Of course /tg/ has the same problem but that doesn't make it not a problem.
>>94858911Nah, I'd say RPGs have overtaken Warhammer thankfully.
>>94858067>There's plenty of prisons you can hang out in if you like preteens that much.You have a wiki page of the fucking daemonculaba on your website. That's far more obscene than something like cultist chan, you puritan cunt.
>>94858911/tg/ has always been rpg dominant, all the way back to the first days. 40k is just more annoying because the 40kids think they have carte blanche for spamming whatever they want as often as they want as long as its 40k related.
Oh and you fucks deleted the rape-the-baby-to-death machine from the Cthulhutech page despite it being the funniest grimderp thing about the setting. It's not even offensive.
>deleting literal game content off an archive site and then having the gall to call it a /tg/ archivejesus wept
>tfw 1d4chan is getting the SCP wiki treatmentI now know how those original SCP writers from /x/ felt now. It is not a good feeling.
>>94858966It was done by a group of people, anon, and a large one at that. I think it was a couple of dozen of people. No one really spoke out against it, they either did not care or they thought it didn't need to be there (especially due to where the servers are based which is in the UK where loli is actually illegal). If you're that concerned I am certain someone somewhere might be willing to share a copy of the OG archives if you actually take the time and effort to look but all you're doing is just boo-hooing over a fraction of a percent of the total number of images that were on a few pages being removed (many of which were removed before 1d4chan even went down because even root, the creator of 1d4chan, thought they didn't belong on the site but which were caught up in the archiving process).
>>94858987If you really don't care then post the actual archives so actual human beings can actually use the actual archives you fucking skinpuppet
>>94858966Why don't you just grab the OG archives yourself?>>94859001Or you just incapable of doing that yourself and just want someone else to do that for you and/or waste their time and effort?I'm guessing your incapable of figuring that out for yourself.
>>94859019Where would I grab these archives? They don't exist anywhere.
>>94859028Third fucking post on Google when you type in "1d4chan archive"Holy shit you're so fucking lazy you couldn't even Google it.
>>94859058The 3rd post is 1d6chan. The Internet Archive has the sanitized version.
>>94859065Oh, I didn't know you could skim an entire fucking archive in seconds anon to see it was "sanitized." You should work for the government, they'd have you analyze data since you're so good at it.
>>94859058Post the actual archives or stop shitposting
>>94859078Anon, just fucking Google it. It's fucking out there. Stop demanding to be spoonfed by some randos on the internet like they're your mommy.
>>94859065Anon, I'm looking at the Internet Archive and I see a 1d4chan archive from 2016, long before 1d6chan was a twinkle in anyone's eye.
>>94859089I only found the 2020 one. I'll take a look again tomorrow.
>>94857110You are doing God's work, Someone else.
>>94857110I only use 1d12chan
>>94859186The OG archive not the sanitized one.
>>94859195Anon, do you know how a public wiki site works? You can look up what has been created/changed/modified/deleted on the wiki...
>>94858835Post an image of what you want on the wiki here right to see if its really that appropriate.
>>94858067>We get new pages every other day or so, nobody minds.You fool. I'm going to autistically post about my homebrew TTRPG
>>94857110ty for the site
>>94857110Thank you for keeping it alive. I still visit it sometimes.
How do you add anything to the site?Made a creation table some time ago, it's not the best thing of all time, but don't want it to be forgotten. Could just add it to the site.
Doing some edits on the Battletech pages, cut out some /pol/ twitter nonsense and updated the "starting battletech" page I wrote back in 2022.
>>94860032Update: I tried and it went down immediately, so I guess I won't
>>94857833Lmao at that first paragraph this fag is completely retarded.Bitch you want all THAT shit you do the work yourself, on another site, you pay to host.
>>94859078> I hate you and everything you have done> but also spoonfeed meLegit kill yourself my fag.
I was gonna ask for them to put an article about Root. (The board game)
>>94857110Can you make the button for darkmode a bit bigger and noticeable?
>>94858873Cute dog
>>94857110Thanks for backing up the ood website, don't listen to the loud minority. They wouldn't be happy even if you did appease them.
i actually like 1d6 and I was delighted it existed so I could use it for old shitpost articles I couldn't find on the internet archivei only ask that some cultured Daughters Of Khaine guy updates the tactics so I can play better. or perhaps i'll try myself, though my tactics are dogshit.
>>94860950Anyone can a create a page. Do you need specific help?
>>94861768Well, aside from not knowing HOW to make said page, or even how it works. Let's just say I don't exactly trust myself operating Wiki Pages.
>>94862031Denying? What are talking about?https://1d6chan.miraheze.org/wiki/Loli_Daemonette
>>94862017If I create the page and help you with the formatting, would you flesh it out?
>>94862115half the gallery is missing
>>94857110i've been around for quite some time, what happened to 1d4? what the fuck is 1d6, why does it exist
>>94862242TL;DR: 1d4chan disappeared. We gathered what we could find, and build 1d6chan with it.
>>94862242Guy running 1d4 gave up on maintaining it, but refused to hand over admin access to anybody else, some grifters smelled opportunity, cloned 1d4 into 1d6 (some with light censorship and revisionism) and put themsleves in charge.
Whatever happened to the 'Post Cold War' page as part of the historical reference section? I'm sure it was an endless source of skub given it covered contemporary topics that are bitterly divisive, but if people want to run games set after the cold war and and are looking for interesting tips and advice on how the world has unfolded since the Soviet Union fell, there's nothing on there that can be used as a handy reference. Its removal also makes it feel like the cold war was the 'end of history', which is a load of bullshit. Much as some might like it to, the world didn't end in 1989 when the Berlin Wall fell and we're not living in Fukuyama's utopia.
>>94862242As one of the mods for the new site basically>root, the owner of 1d4chan, never had any mods on the site and only one other admin>the other admin stopped showing up on the site>root stopped maintaining it which led to a lot of edit wars>finally got a 1d4chan server, root even joined but still refused to interact or do anything the vast majority of the time>site goes down, people panic>people scrape the site when it comes back up "just in case">site goes down again, a few mirrors go up but those close when the site goes back up>1d4chan AGAIN goes down, this time for even longer>people in the 1d4chan discord server finally say "fuck it, if root doesn't care then we'll handle it">make 1d6chan but remove unused files (not attached to any page, just kind of sitting there taking up space) and a few porn pics that even root had started deleting back when the site was up>find a host for the server, it goes online>post that the site is up, that it's effectively the same as 1d4chan but with a few pages locked (ones that always had edit wars going on) and some of the loli pics deleted (only the overtly pornagraphic ones) and some thing reworded but still present>most people go "meh" some go "cool" and one anon constantly has absolute shitfit meltdowns because his precious loli porn was deleted
>>948622421d4 is kill, there was a 2d4 for a while then it died, 1d6 was made and is hosted on a service that doesn't really fit well as a place to archive 4chan culture. 1d6 doesn't feel like a proper archive since they are willing to remove things. it doesn't matter if it was something unused or unpopular or redundant, changing or removing things makes it not an archive of the original anymore and just a clone that continues down a different path. So at this point there does not exist a online archive of 1d4, just a knock off.
>>94862276A splitting image of the imperium they love so much, ironic
>>94858067reddit ass bitch
>>94858949
>Oops! Can't show that in a christian wiki!
You know what, maybe 1d6chan does perfectly represent the current state of /tg/.
>>94863360A few old grogs trying desperately to hold onto a past that has long since passed them by, while the new faces don't give a shit and all they care about is throwing shit in the culture wars like it gives their lives meaning.
>>94863397Sad, but this analysis is correct. I sympathize with the preservationist view, and when someone else used the term "board culture" it really reminded me of my twenties. Feels both good and bad, man. Good that I was there. Bad that I grew out of it and have a sense of loss.
>>94857110>Anything people want to ask?When - not if, when - you plan to boot Ophiuchus?Your entire mod team is shit, but this guy makes everyone else look super-competent and reasonable by sheer comparison.>>94862276This.root was a neglectful cunt, but the people in charge of 1d6 vary between simply incompetent, through bunch of pussies and ending with openly abusive faggots, that are trying to "show everyone their place", missing the memo they are running a repository and archive of old shit.Which wouldn't be half bad if they actually had both the balls and will to enforce their wills, but it's a bunch of idea guys that start something and then abandon it after few initial steps, so everything looks like a construction site non-stop, except nobody is working.
>>94861405>10% and counting of the whole content got slashed>This is ok2d4 at least had the same idea of being repository, while it lasted. 1d6 is just a clone run by bunch of faggots with ego that requires a separate server.
Honestly I hope you run out of money and shut the site. A grotesque censored record of /tg/'s history isn't worth preserving.
>>94863595Unlikely. Maintenance is peanuts and the mod team are the people who are doing it for ego trip.What will happen is that nobody but underage b8 and the mods will be using that place and it will become their echo chamber, separated from /tg/ (which is already happening).
>>94857110Fuck off, niggerfaggot
>>94863763The point is that 1d4 existed as an archive. And unless the host company explicitly asks about any kind of content being outside their policies, removing any part of the site is not just wrong, it's a sign of a truly stupid behavior - trying to please people that don't even register your existence. If the host company flags some content, then fine, go with it. But if they didn't and you still censor the page (while using the host as an excuse for it), you are a moron, plain and simple
>>94863859A wiki is not an archive, an archive is an archive.
1d4chan/1d6chan were never supposed to be strictly archival. It's ludicrous to suggest otherwise; A) we already have Sup/tg/, and B) it's a *wiki*, which is specifically designed to be editable.Pages of a certain age may go un-edited for years, which is fine, but it's not locked in amber. Also, aside from two pedos having a psychobilly freakout, nobody seems to have many questions, so we're good.
>>94863916>we already have Sup/tg/Who the fuck is "we?" You have nothing to do with suptg.
>>94863612Always possible some schizo will just put it under a long term DDoS attack. Other than that you're probably right.
>>94863980The collective "we" as in the community. If you want an archive, it is right there. 1d6chan is a wiki. If you demand things be one way or the other, then join the discord or in the talk page of the article and (in a civilized manner) make your case but know that the loli porn is not coming back, but since you seem so concerned about other topics then you can argue for them on the discord or in the talk page.
>>94863989It's on Miraheze, so long-term DDoS is not really gonna work, while their page traffic is too low for anyone even noticing a day or two of disruption.
>>94864053There's no point in arguing with this dude. He uses the same rhetoric every thread he makes, hoping /tg/ has forgotten, and ignores when called out. Wasting your time.
>>94863916People are not saying they want a wiki as an archive of /tg/, they are saying they want an archive of 1d4chan as, even if it was a wiki, it served as a repository of /tg/'s culture and history in a way that thread archives do not replicate. That does not seem to be what you want to provide, but the use of 1d4chan's existing content and the timing of the creation of 1d6 had made people think that was what would be provided which is why people are unhappy with the current situation.What many of the users of /tg/ would prefer would at this point be more of a 3d4chan, since 2d4 has already come and gone, that is simply the content of 1d4chan on the day it died without any further modifications whatsoever, and likely without the ability for anyone to make modifications to it and its pages while having a separate wiki that tries to keep up with new things. Basically one place for everything old to remain untouched, and a second place for new things and further development.
>>94864006>then join the discord
>>94863916>Also, aside from two pedos having a psychobilly freakout, nobody seems to have many questions, so we're good.112 posts have been deleted from this thread so far.
>>94862133Well, least it would be maybe a smidge better then having the page be redirected to some page involving a Gay Purple Man which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
>>94864179>newfag doesn't know about Penis Guy>therefore, it should be removed
>>94864211I like this guy.Carpet-bombed with "troll post" reports? He reposts his stuff before even ban evaluation wrapped up.
>>94864192It used to be literally the only place to find like 90% of /tg/'s copypasta dating back to the board opening, stuff that stopped getting reposted. But most of that got lost or trimmed maliciously long before 1d4chan went down.I'm gonna be honest, by the end, the only thing I found enjoyable on 1d4chan was watching someone vandalize the Archaon article, and I only know that was happening because the guy who "ran" that article came to the /wfg/ and threatened them with retaliation.
>>94864215There are many things newfags don't know about.For instance, penises.
>>94864179lurk forever, stupid newfag
>>94863916You're trolling, aren't you?
>>94863421Preserving for the sake of preserving is just as retarded as change for the sake of change.If the content has a purpose, keep it. If it needs updated, update it.
>>94864250>If the content has a purpose, keep it.I'm confused, anon. Are you saying an article kept as a time capsule of an old meme, in the exact style that it was made, is not having a purpose and thus should be removed?Because by that logic, we should remove 1d6. It serves no purpose.
So, is there a full archive anywhere?
>>94864232I was asking about an article for the Root Board Game, not about the former admin!
>>94864304Wayback is pretty much the closest thing in current year, as the other copies got taken down and people managing them ghosted. You can forget about mods of 1d6 sharing their base, because then their shitty clone would become redundant.
>>94864304Internet Archive has a copy of the site from 2016 and one for 2020. Unless you mean an actual archive then kinda with suptg but there isn't a full on museum-like archive of /tg/ anywhere.
>>94864304Several. Wayback has a fairly recent one, for instance. We got our own from a backup off of 2d4chan, which has since collapsed.
>>94864322I feel like while no one really wants 1d4chan replaced, no one who was around back then actually cares enough to genuinely replace it. And really, who's the audience? A handful of bitter oldfags who want a little sip of nostalgia? There's a huge cultural disconnect that started in 2011 with you-know-who and only got worse in the decade+ to come.
well this is just a whole lot of pointless bickering
>>94864391A voice of reason
>>94864413Different guy. I don't support censoring 1d4chan's archive. I also don't think anyone actually really cares about it any more enough to truly restore it, because while no one wants some redditized copy, no one's stepping up to rebuild it in proper form, either.>>94864382It's amazing how brightly you glow. Where do you guys actually come from? GitP? RPGnet?
>>94864397It's twice as funny when you read the full, uncensored version. This thread is in reality close to a sage limit.
>>94864451I'm going to assume that you're a different anon than the manchild that's been throwing a temper tantrum about not being allowed to goon to CSAM:Why not just readd it? It's a public wiki, you could just put the stuff back up right now. I'm looking at the discussion page, and unless you're complaining about the removal of trademarked material (the rules, which GW has sued people for hosting) I don't see any evidence to suggest that there's some massive purge, and even then the edit history goes back to 2008, so you could just migrate it from there, you wouldn't even have to go on archive.org or whatever.
>>94864498Why are you not replying to>How do you know a third of it was cut? Do you have proof or are you just pulling this right out your ass?
>>94864747Why have you still not said what was removed? You keep saying that 1/3 of the Space Hulk content was removed.What specifically was removed? How do you know content was removed, and how much? And if it is such a big deal that it was removed, why don't you host the content you care so much about yourself?Seriously Anon, in ten months you could have found your own copy, built your own fucking server, and made your own 1d4chan knock off if it was that important to you to maintain it with no edits.
>>94864637I assume that you mean "mid-to-late-March of 2023" as nothing happened in the spring of 2024. The 2023-03-04 revision's only difference from the current one in the addition of one line of text and the fixing of links. So, I also checked the 2023-05-30 edit, and that just involved some changes to the Categories, not actual content changes. I checked every edit after that, and none of them remove anything. So I checked a bunch of stuff before that, and it's just 8 years or so of people arguing about whether or not Space Hulk is still playable and/or purchasable and how to do that. For about 8 years (late 2008 to 2016) the article was more or less the same. The article has been the same since 2016 in terms of content, it's just gained and lost backend formatting, images, and a random dropdown about Ork units in 40k (for whatever fucking reason). So, when exactly did this take place? Because if anything, it's during 1d6chan's tenure that the article has actually gained content.
>>94864391Well, it's nice that even though we disagree, we can agree on "fuck that other guy."
>>94864777That's odd, not only does that post not say what you're claiming it does, but you also haven't said when this supposed heinous crime occurred.
>>94864791>How do you know content was removed, and how much?Not him but you do know how to use a wiki right? You can check that sort of thing very easily.
>>94864811Sure I can. I can also see that there are no significant differences when comparing the revisions you showed, and what differences there are, lean towards the newer versions having significantly more content than the "classic" versions.So again, what has been removed?
>>94862164A few images, not half. Small price to pay for 99.5% of the site being preserved. You can find the loli stuff in a separate archive, big deal. I'd love to have 100.0% preserved but life is full of little compromises. +1 RAGE, faggot
>>94864889I'm not the guy arguing, I just picked two arbitrary revisions to take a screenshot of because I don't care about any 40k content either way. And if you are the one I replied to then why were you asking a question that you already know the answer to? You could have saved both yourself and the person you are arguing with time by not asking a pointless question.
>>94865015>why were you asking a question that you already know the answer to?Because he hasn't told us what's been removed and when. See >>94864798. At no point was a third of the article deleted.
>>94865015I'm trying to find out exactly what the nerd raging Anon is sperging out about.
>>94865080That isn't a particularly good reason for including extra questions outside of what you actually want to know. Him not answering "what" doesn't connect to asking "how" when you already know the answer to "how".
>>94865175why?
>>94865217Troll
>>94865116You're acting like he's a 60-IQed retard. If that's the case, then this entire discussion is pointless and he's wrong for being a retard. He's spent fucking hours in this thread ranting and raving about some incident, but cannot provide any information about it when asked. So, he should either put up or shut up.
>>94858949>>94858964This is why you gatekeep.
>>94864006Disingenuous. 1d4Chan is dead and you're just playing with its corpse.
>we had to clean up the wiki some, it was too icky and yikes>it's 2025, people!>also we deleted game content too>come join our cool Discord club>if you disagree then you're just a pedo angry about the loli, so >>>/woodchipper/ XDDoes he feel no shame?
>>94865623There have still been no examples of deleted content in this thread.
>>94865672The fucking Warhammer rules?
>>94865678So you are upset that English copyrighted material got removed from a site that is hosted in England to keep the site from getting taken down?
>>94865714Yes, actually, clearly hosting it in England isn't adequate.
>>94865733So make your own server. That was always an option.
>>94857110Why does the Always Chaotic Evil page act like everyone turned against the concept? Only a few projecting tumblrina weirdos, who want all villains to be straight white christian men, get autistic if you suggest some fantasy species may be morally incompatible with humans
>>94865865Hey now, that Xvart or Gibberling could have gone on to become a Cleric or Paladin!
>>94865865Because whomever wrote the article wrote it that way. It's a fucking wiki.
>3 day ban on all boards for asking about cut Space Hulk stuff>carpet-bombed with "Troll post" reportsMy fucking sides.Oh look, 15 minutes and the ban is no longer in effect, while you look even dumber than before, squatting over self-created ruin. Your powers don't even cover for "your" site, and you want to play ball on /tg/? Good luck with that
>>94865865If you don't like it, change it. It's a wiki
>>94866079So, what was deleted and when? We're waiting.>b-b-but-Show us which edit flustered your fanny. https://1d6chan.miraheze.org/wiki/Space_Hulk?action=history
>>94857110Sweet. Thank you for keeping it up.
>>94866308Already told you what. Maybe if you read my replies instead of reporting them, you would know amd wouldb't need to re-ask
>>94866578I just got here and your replies are gone, what's missing?
>>94866855Him demanding that they host his loli porn
