We don't starve around this woodsPreviously: >>97167981▶ Thread Task: nightmarish art before Christmas(Gen Gothic & Burton-esque art)▶ Generatorshttps://bing.com/images/create/https://sora.chatgpt.com/https://gemini.google/overview/image-generation/https://perchance.org/ai-text-to-image-generatorhttps://civitai.com/Curious about local genning? Check out /g/'s stable diffusion OP or ask one of our friendly locals.▶ Perchance pastebin of generators and links:https://pastebin.com/XRGqaW4W (embed)▶ Sora artstyles/tips:https://rentry.co/29r5k2vo▶ /slop/-approved styles, prompts and perspectiveshttps://www.rentry.org/tgslop▶ Other useful resourcesColor identifiers -- https://www.htmlcolorcodes.com/List of art movements -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_art_movementsList of hair styles -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hairstylesWorld folk clothing -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_costumeWorld body armors -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_armorNames for general clothing styles (PDF) -- https://files.catbox.moe/3r0ux6.pdf▶ Related boards>>>/h/hdg>>>/e/edg>>>/d/ddg>>>/b/degen>>>/vt/vtai>>>/aco/sdg>>>/u/udg>>>/tg/slop>>>/trash/sdg>>>/vp/napt>>>/r/realistic+parody
>>97176693>Related boardsEat shit OP, enjoy the thread being nuked for a call for invasion ("raid").
>TT
>>97176693Challenge is still up. Let's see if at least one of you sloppers can disprove that you all lack any sort of artistic eye or creative talent, by quoting the one image in this thread >>97149410 that is worth a second look.So far, only one person has managed to narrow it down to 4. I was initially amazed the rest of you have been so incapable, but this does seem to be a trait of the lowly transartist.
Don't feed the troll
Like anyone cares about it.And considering all your trolling for the last three threads, I could bet that the actual answer is "none".
>>97177354>can't complete the challenge
>>97177343What is it you're trying to prove? I love AI art because it gives me a free source of good quality images to use for my games. I absolutely do not have the talent to create them myself, and even bottom tier artists cost far too much for the quantity I need. The entire point of consumer AI tools in general is to put otherwise difficult or tedious skills in the hands of the layman. Pic related as an example. Bare minimum $40-50, if you're lucky. And what do I get for that? A character portrait. Now theres 30 odd other NPCs that need some sort of image, not including images for objects, locations etc. Sure, I could get some random shit off google, but they rarely get better than "close enough" to the concept I have in my head.
>>97177356>gets told there's an answer>"I bEt ThErE iS nOnE"
>>97177440>good quality imagesHa! Which is why the challenge exists. There is ONE image in that thread that can be remotely considered to be good. The challenge is there because transartists like you lack an artistic eye to such an extent that it will never be completed.
>>97177440>I love AI art because it gives me a free source of good quality images to use for my gamessame hereI use AI-generated pictures as placeholders for my card game, to give it a more finished look
>>97177448thats okay. they're good enough for my purposes and, more importantly, free, quick and easy. the level of artist i can realistically afford to commission doesn't even come close. some line sketches maybe. >>97177465hell yeah man. i could just go full TOTM, but i like having images, especially since one of my players has aphantasia. helps him a lot.
>>97177465>I use AI-generated pictures as placeholdersYou're not, though, my ESL friend. Placeholder implies you're going to swap it out. You're using them as the final article, generated by stealing from the work of real artists because you transartists aren't capable of producing it yourself. Hence, the challenge, hence none of you plebs having completed it. There is quite literally no artistic ability in your blood, it's hylic beyond belief.
>>97177471>the level of artist i can realistically afford to commission doesn't even come close. some line sketches maybe. Thank you for confirming you have no artistic ability at all if simple line sketches are so beyond you.I can see this challenge is going to be around for a long time to come.
>>97177474This is all absolutely true. You are correct and I have no shame about it. Its just not where my talents lie. What now?
>>97177484Then you are just one of the many examples that prove my point, so thank you.Challenge still to be completed by any transartist who thinks they might have even a flicker of a soul, though.
>>97177496okay but i dont think theres anyone on here that actually considers themselves a real artist because they push a generate prompt button. they do it because its fun, or they have a purpose/need.so what are you trying to accomplish?
>>97177474>You're not, though, my ESL friendyeah... I'm ESL, so what?and you are assuming far too much, dear anonI will swap them out if / when my game gets published>There is quite literally no artistic ability in your bloodbecause designing a game from scratch requires no skill at all, right?
>>97177502>gets the situation explained multiple times>still can't understand it
>>97177503>yeah... I'm ESL, so what?So... that's why I told you what a word meant. You're welcome.>I will swap them out if / when my game gets publishedThat's hilarious. Yeah, you, a person with quite literally no artistic or creative talent, will achieve something that requires artistic and creative talent. I'd say "dream big" but I don't think your kind can actually dream at all. When you sleep, does it literally just go all black for you, or does it feel like you time-jumped to waking?>because designing a game from scratch requires no skill at all, right?The sarcasm doesn't work because you genuinely have no skill at all, so yeah, you're not going to get far.
>>97177521fair enough. alls im saying is from my perspective you're just trying to prove that the wind blows, the sky is blue etc. just seems like wasted effort.
>>97177503>Guy knows only one language>Thinks he's master race and shows disdain to anyone who isn't English native speakerTypical amerimutt.
>>97177529I've got some time to kill at the moment, not enough solid time for any projects but just enough to poke at transartists a bit. The more of you I get to admit you're worthless, the more entertaining it is. Based on what I've seen so far, that's 2 of you down, and probably only 3 more to go, because at most there's only about 5 of you that post slop in these worthless threads.
>>97177528>you're not going to get farwe'll see about thatwait until April... if everything comes out as planned, I'll have good news to share with you
>>97177530Presumably, you misquoted there, which is understandable given your IQ issue, but I'm English, and I'm correcting English being used. Sorry it upset you, little buddy!
>>97177547Yeah, I'll just mark that in my calendar, it's definitely going to happen.
>>97177541so is anyone that does anything for fun or as a side objective to something else, worthless? that logic doesn't track. i know you're just trolling but like you, i've got some time to kill. I'm sure you have your own lack of talent in given areas. that doesn't make you worthless. you don't HAVE to be good at something to partake and still have your time be fulfilling.
>>97177557>so is anyone that does anything for fun or as a side objective to something else, worthless? Anyone that passes that fun over to a machine to do instead is worthless, yes. It's that complete inability to understand this that makes your kind so fundamentally broken. You know what normal people do if they want to do something creative? They participate in creativity. You know what transartists do? They avoid it entirely and then try to show off slop like it means anything. You have no value. None. It's innate for you. It's probably even pointless me explaining it to you, you quite literally lack the mental faculties to understand it.>that logic doesn't track.Of course it doesn't, that's your logic.
>>97177568NTA but you should probably at least use reaction images that aren't from 10 years ago. Showing your age. Gifs too. Jesus Christ.
>>97177581I've got gifs from before you were born.
>>97177584And you don't see any irony in calling people worthless, at your age, shitposting on 4chan?
>>97177590Nope, already explained why. Do try to keep up.
Behold some epic misses.
Janny really wants /slop/ to die since he ignores all reports on this offtopic POS.
/Slop/ Character Generator 2.0Race: Half OrcClass: Paladin (Redemption)Background: Mercenary VeteranRandom Oddity: Mute. You can’t or won’t speak; you may know some form of sign language.>"Like most of the orcs that have joined the pilgrimage, Threkka is a half-blooded apostate. She betrayed her kin, renounced her dark gods, and was subjected to the Unfanging; a punitive rite involving the excision of the tongue and the filing down of the tusks."
>>97177757Then he's not the only one.
PF2e Random Character GeneratorAncestry: TanukiHeritage: BeastkinBackground: DeputyClass: MonkArchetype: Eldritch Archer (Divine needle darts)>“Oi, wot’s that lil’ squirrel gonna do wiv those twigs?” — Grondak Skullmaw, moments before bleeding out from a severed carotid.
>>97162938There's a troll on the bridge that never shuts up,and everyone wants to leave. He barks out a riddle, demanding an answer;but no one pays him heed.But don't get him started! Just leave him discarded! Because frankly we think he might be retarded.
>>97177928Oh look, it's the trash again. Want another "compliment"? Here you go: you're pond scum!
Reminder: People are happy to admit they gen images as a hobby. Nobody admits to being a troll as a hobby. It is the most pathetic role one can play.
>>97177992>getting a machine to pump out slop is a "hobby">even happy to admit itThe level of creative bankruptcy you're at is incredible, and you don't even realise it.
>Rapid responseAngrily sitting there hitting refresh. Pathetic. People are happy to admit it because it's not embarrassing. Being a troll is. You have to be a damaged person to be a troll.
>>97178056>People are happy to admit it because it's not embarrassing.Oh it definitely is, you're genuinely just too empty to realise it.Auto refresh exists by the way, newfag.
>>97178049>heh you should see the other guy
Trolls are empty. Just rage and spite. You genuinely have my pity.
>>97177481>I can see this challenge is going to be around for a long time to come.Seems to be a result of disinterest rather than because you have any kind of cogent point.
>>97178088I personally am deeply invested in the favorite image of the renowned Some Guy
>>97178081Which is worse, the supposed troll, or the moron pumping out slop that keeps replying to who he thinks is a troll? You don't have to answer, I know you won't get it, you physically can't.
>>97178088Doesn't seem to the the case, though. I get plenty of replies, but none of them can complete the challenge because they're incapable. You'll bitch and moan that someone is here that you can't get rid of, but won't do the simple thing of identifying an image that would end it all. Why? Because you can't. You know it, I know it, so it'll carry on.
>>97178095Have you made your guess yet?
It's "to whom", you sad little ESL, and definitely the former. Which is why people admit to using AI gen but never to being trolls.
>>97178110Still no guess, then?
Of course not. You're too much of a coward to reveal anything of yourself but your language skills, and even at that you fail. You have only my pity. That doesn't tempt me to engage with your childishness.
>>97178146Oh look, more excuses to avoid not making a very easy guess that anyone with creative ability could make.
Christ that guy is still malding ? its what the 3 day ? or thread ?
That's just a picture of a (very) retarded fantasy troll. Not everything is about you, you weren't even tagged!
I've also decided that the fat retarded troll on the bridge is a virulent homosexual. He's my creation so I get to decide that. It's called worldbuilding.
>>97178163He "kills time" (a lot of it) trolling, because he doesn't value his time, and he doesn't value his time because he doesn't value himself.
>>97178108>but none of them can complete the challenge because they're incapableOr, because no one cares to because the fairness of the challenge, and your integrity, cannot be established.To expand: the challenge is "quoting the one image in this thread >>97149410 that is worth a second look", correct?Thing is that we have no way of knowing for sure which specific image (if any) you think is worth a second look, and no reason to trust that even IF you've picked a specific image, that you will hold to that if that image is successfully picked.You are, in essence, a stranger asking us to guess how many fingers you are holding up behind your back. We don't trust you not to change the number, because we have no reason to trust you, because this is an anonymous image board where you are just some random name. You have no reputation to bank on.If this were in real life then you could at least have, say, an envelope with your chosen image in it. Someone guesses, you say wrong, you show them the contents of the envelope to prove that you didn't just change your answer. But because we're online, there's no practical way for you to do that.It doesn't matter whether or not the game IS rigged. The fact is that it's easy to see how it could be, there's no way to determine whether or not it isn't, and nothing about you leads us to believe that it wouldn't be. Would YOU play a game under those conditions?
Ya know if there's some guy that wants people to reply to him, you can just not reply
>>97178163I know, right? It's almost as if you've all still failed the challenge in all that time.
>>97178167Oh yeah, sure it was!
>>97178212Christ, AI art really is shit at body proportions.
>>97178176It's also called magical realming.
>>97178218Share your prompts for genning an Anton Chigurh
>>97178192Still no guess? Retard confirmed.
>>97178229Who?
>>97178197If I hadn't picked an image, I wouldn't've posted >>97168267
>>97178238I will tell you, if you can call this coin toss
>>97178244You absolutely would have, as it would give off the illusion of integrity.
>>97178206They could also complete the challenge.
>>97178246Doesn't someone sooner or later point out that his philosophy is full of shit because he's the one choosing to toss the coin in the first place? There's nothing fair of balanced about it.
>>97178254To what benefit? What's in it for me? You merely stopping posting isn't enough, I want more than that.
>>97178249You really are a full-blown retard.
>>97178261You get recognition that you're not worthless.
>>97178271No, it's true. You'd already ascertained that almost no one would guess, so when one person posted four images you could easily just say that one of them was the chosen picture, giving off the illusion of having created a fair game, all while personally knowing that you'd never actually selected any of them and being reasonably certain that no one is going to narrow it down further.This is *entry level* con artistry, dude. I'm not even saying that it's what you're doing for sure, just that it easily COULD be. Especially on 4chan, where there are zero consequences for you since you can go back to being anonymous at any time, with no traceable posting history.
>>97178286Recognition from whom?
>>97178271He's right though.
>>97178257Nah it's totally reasonable, if you meet Anton you get murdered. I'm sure a judge would agree it was their fault
>>97178298Very nice aesthetics here, has the look of a real claymation set
>>97178288No, you really are retarded. I gained nothing from admitting one person got that close. In fact, the game should've been over pretty quick after that, but you retards STILL couldn't work it out. That's how fucking stupid you are.
>>97178294Gee, I wonder?
>>97178316>I gained nothingHe explained what you gained but you're too bad faith to admit it
>>97178296He really isn't. You plebs are that unaware.
>>97178322No, you're just too dim to get it. I'm already chock full of integrity, and I quite literally get nothing from you plebs believing it. In fact, my game is over more quickly by narrowing it down like that.I'm just still amazed that it still hasn't ended, I massively over-estimated your capabilities.
>>97178320I mean, if you mean you...you're some random anonymous schmuck. What is your recognition worth? Because for the life of me, I'm drawing a blank.
>>97178353>I'm already chock full of integrityWe don't know that. We don't know who you are. This is an anonymous message board. You have no posting history for us to check, no reputation to bank on. You are Just Some Guy.>and I quite literally get nothing from you plebs believing itAnd we lose nothing for doubting you and gain nothing from your recognition. So where does that leave you?>In fact, my game is over more quickly by narrowing it down like that.How do we know that for sure? Even if you actually admit that one of those four is in fact "the" picture that passes your arbitrary standards, how do we know you won't just do this again next thread, or the thread after that? We don't know you from a hole in the ground. You get that, right? You are just as much a nobody to us as we are nobodies to you.
All this situation made me think:>This AI-hating retarded troll popped up shitting those threads up with his troll sperging and non-AI pics.>All those "concerned about thread's quality" suddenly went silent and don't post at all.Looks like one of them finally decided to take his mask off and go full retard just to make people quit /slop/ entirely. But that's just my theory.
>>97178058Nice SCP
>>97178376You are mentality ill
Other possibilities that by his shitposting he hopes for janny to ban /slop/ threads altogether as attracting trolls and shitposters.
The warder keep watching...
>>97177484Is this one of my old "80's Cool guy" pics?
>>97178376Hello. I'm one of those concerned about quality. I am *ignoring him* because he's a pathetic troll, and you guys feeding him is just further proving my point about you helping to bring these threads down. And here you go again whining out of nowhere, like you claim others do.
>>97177474If an artist loses a job to (per your own admission) visually unappealing non-artistic ai slop, then of what value was that artist?AI has started the culling of shitty artists.
>>97178461>I am *ignoring him* because he's a pathetic trollThat does not, in fact, stop trolls, despite the common belief. The only thing that stops trolls is boredom, but it's not boredom due to lack of engagement, because if they're not being engaged they'll just keep poking to try and provoke it. In fact a *lack* of engagement from others can still be engaging for the troll since he views it as an excuse to keep posting.
>>97178494Makes sense. Ignored troll, who's still eager to shitpost, would simply become more obnoxious. Probably to the point of posting forbidden stuff, just to draw attention to himself. If not other posters, then jannies.
>>97178357How about your own self-worth? This challenge divides the haves and have nots in terms of artistic ability. It's your choice if you continue to engage in it while pretending you don't want to.
>>97178438Maybe. I just posted something neat from my stolen hoard while I replied.
>>97178372>We don't know that.Well now you've been told that.>And we lose nothing for doubting you and gain nothing from your recognition. So where does that leave you?Still enjoying myself, and you still failing.>How do we know that for sure?It's almost as if you'd know by now if you'd not spent the last few days pissing and shitting yourself. But I know why you chose to do that, because you genuinely are retarded and biologically incapable of completing this challenge.>how do we know you won't just do this again next threadOh I've made no promises for that. Mickey will return to Valhalla to slumber and feed for now, but no guarantees I won't come back.
>>97178376Were the people really trying to argue that these threads had any quality before? Fuck, it's like hearing coprophiles are debating the quality of faeces. Fascinating, really.
>>97178494>>97178510Then let them samefag. They come wanting responses, not to samefag with themselves. At least force the less desirable outcome on them. And let me remind you it's you, as usual, propping up these offtopic meta discussions in order to whine about your boogeyman.
>>97178589ok lets play the same game here pick the picture in this tread. it should pretty clear which one it is if you have ANY skill, it very easy since there are only few so far. i you will do the challenge or ? it is not like would dodge this simple task
>>97178598>pissing and shitting yourselfThat's been you. There is no behavior more embarrassing than trolling.
>>97178409It really doesn't go that deep, I came in thinking I'd get a couple of hours distraction with a fun game, call out a few of you retards for the talentless wastes of flesh that you are, and someone would complete the challenge and call it a night. Imagine my delight when I transpired like it did instead. All this gnashing of teeth, all initially believed to be (by myself) within your power to end, but I genuinely didn't realise just how many would lack an artistic eye here. It's my fault really, should've realised from the start that sloppers obvious couldn't do something so simple, but hey, we live and we learn!
>>97178461Doesn't seem like you are ignoring me, though. You're certainly trying to pretend you are, but it's more you're avoiding the challenge you can't complete, rather than me directly.
>>97178488You're confusing the slop being acceptable with you morons not having the ability to discern what art is, and you've stupidly decided slop is good (it genuinely looks like dogshit, which is why that whole tranny analogy is apt, you're inside a weird world thinking one thing, all the normal people see it for what it really is). The artist loses a potential customer because the customer is retarded, not because their art isn't good enough.
>>97177471Nice! That's one of my old gens!
>>97178494>The only thing that stops trolls is boredomProbably, but the issue we've got here is that I'm not a troll, the game offered is the solution, but it seems the players are incapable. I've been cruel, I've offered a football match to a bunch of quadriplegics and said it'll end if they score a goal.
>>97178639Reminder that the alphabet people, like you, are overwhelmingly anti-AI, as every study on the subject has shown. In fact, trolls are even lower on the social rung than trannies -- even trannies admit they're trannies. People never admit to trolling.
>>97178645See? Even you deny being a troll, even though you're too stupid to hide it. That's how embarrassing it is to be you.
>>97178510Forbidden stuff? Wow, I've really gotten into your head this much over a simple game, you'd actively imagine some dark web conspiracy as an excuse for yourself?
>>97178616Cool, will do, just complete my challenge first and then I'll "pick the picture in this thread" for you.
How you thought it was gonna go...>Take that you polar bear piece of shit! Christmas has a new drink!
>>97178620I know, I know, projection is a common tactic for you plebs. Still, would be easier if you took a guess, though...
>>97178648Sure thing, transartist.
>>97178662How it actually went...>Holy FUCK those bears are huge!
>>97178659oh so you cant do it? that kinda sad if you had done this one i would done yours. it so easy right, just pick it whats the issue ?
>>97178652There's only so many times I can tell you it's not trolling, it's a simple game you're having a tantrum over. Still no guess?
>>97178663>>97178670Projection is what you're doing, arttranny, as the statistics overwhelmingly show.
>>97178673>oh so you cant do it?Well, the only way I wouldn't be able to do it is if you can't complete the challenge first... so, I guess the ball's in your court.
>>97178681Oh yeah, sure thing, I'm sure the whole world thinks you're real artists. I respect the pronouns of your machine-generated slop, transartist. Probably "shit/heap", right?
>>97178693Arttrannies are overwhelmingly anti-AI. They see it as a threat to their jobs and the environment. Sloppa is only taboo in leftist circles. You reveal yourself.
hmm boats a fun but i have to dial in the style to get the look right. kinda like guns it gets mixed up quite a bit. going to be fun to get a battlecruiser fire a broad side at a dragon
>>97178711>Arttrannies are overwhelmingly anti-AI.Is that why you make such dogshit? Can AI slop actually be good, but you transartists are intentionally trying to sabotage it? Ooooh it's fucking insidious of you.
>>97178684just choose a picture its easy dont run away
I'm surprised this thread is still up. It looks half filled with some argument and non-AI images.It almost makes me not want to post any gens here on the off chance it gets removed sooner or later.
>>97178671
>>97178721Still here, waiting for you to complete the challenge first. All up to you, I believe in you!
>>97178720This is cope. The statistics are overwhelmingly against you and now you're struggling to invent a narrative for it.
>>97178722theres probably a discord somewhere that will suit us better if anyone knows one
>>97178731I can only hope the statistics for unaliving themselves don't carry over to you transartists as well, for your sake.
>>97178722It makes me want to post all the more because I know my stuff mogs xers, and that's what makes xer angry.
>>97178722>>97178733Oh, now that's what I call samefagging!
>>97178740The statistics for trolls unaliving themselves is probably also very high. They are never happy people. Ever.
>>97178626Late to the party, what's the challenge?
>>97178741>invents a person in their head>claims that a robot spitting out slop is "my stuff"Yep, enslavement to delusion confirms you're a transartist.
>>97178757Cheer up, then!
>>97178769I know it mogs yours because you're too cowardly to put your work side by side with it.
>>97178765Cool, welcome. So there's a thread back here >>97149410 that has a single image in it that's apparently AI but has some merit to it. The challenge is simple, identify which one it is, which will then show whether you have some artistic intuition, or if you're just one of these slop plebs with no soul (hence their butthurt).
>>97178589>How about your own self-worth?But who are you to judge it? Again, I don't know you from a hole in the ground. You are not capable of giving me a sense of self-worth, due to 4chan's anonymous nature.>>97178598>Well now you've been told that.By someone that, for all I know, could be lying.>if you'd not spent the last few daysSide note, this is just emphasizing that whole anonymity problem I mentioned. I haven't actually been in any /slop/ thread for about a week. I did not, in fact, spend the past few days pissing and shitting myself, at least not about anything *you're* doing. But you didn't know that, because I'm an anonymous poster, same as you.
>>97176693Why are all the "related boards" 18+, but none of the blue boards slop generals there?
>the tranny janny is still trolling multiple days and threads laterI didn't think it was possible to be that autistically obsessed with being a piece of shit. But I guess you have to be to do it for free around here.
>>97178818Holy shit, you're right. What the fuck, OP?
>>97178781Yeah, that's not really how it works. My work doesn't go side by side with "yours" (and by that I mean a machine's, you have no claim over it at all) because "yours" has no worth and no place anywhere near mine.Think of it like this, my work, while good and profitable for me, shouldn't hang next to something like the Mona Lisa, for a random example, because I'm good but not one of the greats like that, despite having worked on design projects for the Louvre. By an equal measure, "yours" wouldn't even belong in the bin on the street outside without it being an insult to every painting in that building. Do you realise how low down you are now? Probably not, you transartists are deeply delusional.
>>97178831That's a lot of words for someone who isn't an angry arttranny
>>97178800Okay so you're still struggling with irrelevant distractions. You either want to play the game or you don't, but this weird bumblefuck middle-ground is just sad. Want to make a guess?
>>97178844He's completely mogging you intellectually dude, we can all see it
>>97178818It's almost like this is a containment thread...
>>97178831>because I'm good but not one of the greatsThe Mona Lisa was considered one of da Vinci's lesser works, more or less unremarkable, until it was stolen in the early 1900s and gained international fame as a result, which is what catapulted it to becoming one of the most famous paintings in the world. By citing the Mona Lisa you're giving a great example of how the quality of a piece of art can have nothing to do with the quality of the work and everything to do with how the public *perceives* that work.
>>97178849You don't have to samefag, you just have to guess.
>>97178865I'm not him and it's true, he's completely got you by the balls
>>97178862>The Mona Lisa was considered one of da Vinci's lesser worksAnd that's just how good da Vinci was. But it's always funny to see people try desperately to grasp at straws over something intentionally given as a random example. Doesn't change a thing, my point is still made, still not seeing a guess
>>97178844I want you to sell me on why I should even play the game.Think of this as being like a convention. You've got a game, you've got an open table. So do dozens of other people who have their own games going on. What is it about YOUR game that makes it worth playing? You haven't offered me anything that's worthwhile.
>>97178870Okie doke, whatever weird fantasies you have, you go ahead. In between those points of delirium, maybe offer a guess.
>>97178826Even doing it for free this one is ripping us off.
>>97178876Point being you're showing your ignorance about the very stuff you claim to know.
>>97178877You either join or you don't, not up to me to force you. All this pantshitting from you all is very telling, though.
>>97178865Off topic old thread bullshit, no one cares to "guess" because you aren't important or relevant. Now post some sloppy or get the fuck out
>>97178894Because you think the Mona Lisa isn't great? Yeah, got me there! Still no guess.
>>97178904Still no slop
>>97178902Very on topic, considering it's very much about slop and very much about an image in the topic. But it's okay, I know you aren't guessing because you biologically can't, you genuinely have no artistic ability in your blood, so now you pretend it's because you don't care... despite all the effort you've continually shown to keep posting about how much you don't care...
>>97178902This is the failed artist janitor who hates these threads and all he wants to do is make them unusable. He has no point except to shit up the thread. Don't respond to it. Email hiromoot if the old admin@4chan.org still works.
>>97178915Nope, and still no guess. So thanks for confirming slop is artistically devoid of any value, much like yourself.
>>97178916I care about you shitting up this thread with no sloppy.
>>97178904Because you revealed yourself to have a layman's understanding of art history and got mogged by a slopper.
>>97178928I know that by contributing to this conversation I'm just replying to a troll, but is there any compelling reason why the other anons in this thread have any obligation to satisfy you or your desires? Like, what do they gain from meeting whatever impossible metric you're setting for them?
>>97178876>my point is still madeNot in the slightest! There's no inherent reason why you couldn't hang your personal artwork alongside the Mona Lisa, because there's no particular reason why, 100 years from now, something could happen to make your work considered a great work of art while the Mona Lisa fades back into obscurity.Let's use a literary example: I bet you've never even heard of Omoo or Typee, which were the most acclaimed and successful novels of Herman Melville in his own lifetime. But I bet you HAVE heard of his third novel which was considered a disappointment commercially and critically in his lifetime: Moby-Dick.Another literary example: Shakespeare wasn't writing timeless classics. He was writing to fill the cheap seats in the Globe Theater. Shakespeare's plays in his own lifetime were essentially the equivalent of the MCU today.Public perception is what matters in art, not the actual art itself. This is demonstrable fact. No piece of art has any inherent value no matter who created it; what gives it value is if people remember it.I suppose in that sense AI art is mostly worthless since it's unlikely any given AI image (say, this one, which I use as the portrait for my BG I/II character Iliira) is going to be remembered 100 years from now. But then again you could say the same of, say, any given piece of human-dawn art in a randomly chosen 3rd-party d20 splatbook from the early 2000s.So what's the difference?
>>97178947Stop fucking responding to it.That's just making it post more.
>>97178926I've been enjoying this odd conspiracy, but I do think I need to clear it up now, if only for their sake. I'm not a janny. I don't have any contact with them, I don't know who they are, I came into these slop generals a couple of days ago for the first time ever, saw nothing but slop as expected, but saw a single image that actually made me pause and give it some credit. I thought it would be fun to see if anyone else could spot it as well. Turns out... no, you guys genuinely just don't have any taste at all, and it's made you seethe. I'm just drinking up on it.
>>97178928Yep that's me, I'm so glad you could fuck up three threads with your bullshit. Now that you've done so fuck off & never come back without some sloppy
>>97178931Then complete the challenge, and it all ends. Magic, right?
>>97178935Ah so you don't think the Mona Lisa is great. Confirmed for retarded slopper with no artistic merit. No wonder you can't make a guess.
>>97178916>you've continually shown to keep posting about how much you don't careSetting aside your bad English here, does this not describe all your angry, impotent trolling against AI?
>>97178781neat >>97178952Interesting style still bing or something else ?
>>97178899>not up to me to force youTrue, I guess, but let me put it another way: if you were at a convention, and saw someone with a game and an empty table, but that person was whining about how no one would join his game, and was disparaging people for not joining his game, would you feel particularly inclined to join?In sum: - You can't offer anything to us for winning - We can't trust you to be running a fair game - You words make us think you wouldn't be fun to play withWho'd play a game under those conditions? Can something really be a "game" under those conditions?
>>97178943We've been over this further up. No one is holding you at gunpoint on this.
>>97178947>There's no inherent reason why you couldn't hang your personal artwork alongside the Mona LisaWow, delusional AND egotistical. You transartists really don't have a clue, do you?
>>97178948Well yeah, posting to or about me grants me power in this virtual dimension.
>>97178952It's funny you blame me for the threads being "fucked up", rather than this steady march of total morons who can't complete a simple challenge but will spend post after post crying over it.
>>97178971Well, am I wrong? Who's to say that 100 years from now, the Mona Lisa won't have faded back into obscurity?
>>97178953Nah, I admitted "defeat", so fuck off now. Still no sloppy. Post some sloppy, since I was so gracious.>>97178957Perchance. I got tired of getting locked out of Bing>in the style of Tim Burton, thin & angular body proportions, slopes & whorls, dark & heavily shadowed art, contrasting shadows, thick bold linework, Back lit, festive christmas glow, a dark & foreboding christmas forest in the snowPerchance doesn't always remember the full description though
>>97178949You revealed yourself when you immediately deleted >>97169030 and yet left all your shit posts up.
>>97178956Yeah, cutting a sentence arbitrarily to remove some of the context does tend to make bad English. But no, I do care about seeing if anyone can complete the challenge, whereas you all either don't want to do it and you don't need to post about it, or are that frustrated that you CAN'T do it. Your continual posts tell me it's the latter.
>>97178998You didn't "cut" anything, you made a very elementary grammatical error, same with how you're too low-IQ to remember the difference between "who" and "whom". You are clearly a masochist who gets off on being ridiculed by people smarter than you.
>>97178998>But no, I do care about seeing if anyone can complete the challengeEvidently, we can't, more due to a lack of care than a lack of effort, but the practical result is the same.So...what now?
>>97178960Allow me to re-jig your analogy. I'm at a convention, there's a game on offer, I'm sitting waiting for patrons, but you know what I get instead? Retards coming up to tell me that they don't want to play, and not just once, but repeatedly, like I'm holding them hostage. They could walk on, they could just play the game, but they'd rather throw a tantrum. But it is fun watching them spaz on the floor like this.
>>97178984Cool, dont care. Now fuck off or post sloppy
>>97179008>So...what now?Everybody stops yapping and post slop
>>97179002>>97179008>>97179013Are you people really too retarded to just ignore it?
>>97179012This is you admitting you're a troll, even though you're too embarrassed with yourself to admit it directly.
>>97178986>Well, am I wrong?Yes. Your inability to discern quality to the point of thinking slop will outlast the Mona Lisa is truly astonishing.
>>97178722not like it matters you can repost sooner or later if it get nuked and different TT comes along >>97178741true i could post old collages showcasing my style as random slopper that considers his stuff to be somewhat diverse. (and High Quality. but who actually thinks their own gens are bad, most will rate themselves favorably) but i dont care enough
>>97179013I know you are desperate to have any excuse to spam your homoerotic OC, but can you please just ignore him?
>>97179014>Everybody stops yapping and post slopAgreed
>>97178989Cool, no need to respond to me, then. We've established you have no artistic talent.
>>97179012I don't think that tracks because the actual flow of the conversation began with a challenge, that was rejected, and you spazzed out about people rejecting, which led to further rejection, which has led to further spazzing out on your part.Un-jigging your re-jigging: you could just not insist on the challenge.
>>97178995I've deleted nothing, though. I can only assume someone posted something racist there?
>>97179036Still no sloppy
>>97179040>>97179048STOP RESPONDING TO IT.
>>97179002No, I'm saying you did, you moron. You cut the sentence down.Still don't want to make a guess? Shame.
>>97179008It's up to you, really. We know it's not due to lack of effort, you lot have already proven you're willing to put in tons of effort to distract from and avoid the challenge set, so it's definitely down to a mental inability. Whether you keep seething over that or not is in your hands.
>>97179052I greentexted the full context of your grammatical error, you imbecile.
>>97179021Really? People with a game waiting for WILLING participants is somehow a troll? That's really some mental gymnastics, are you sure you'd rather not put some of that effort into making a guess?
This actually has to be the most active this general has been in a while, and it's for all the wrong reasons
>>97179026>being proud of those gens
>>97179023I didn't say slop will outlast the Mona Lisa. I was talking about *your* art. You said:>my work, while good and profitable for me, shouldn't hang next to something like the Mona LisaI pointed out that the Mona Lisa has no inherent quality making it good. The perception of it being anything more than just filler work by da Vinci to make a few lira stems entirely from a famous theft in 1911 that resulted in it gaining international recognition that it hadn't managed to accrue on its own merits for four hundred and change years beforehand.So there's no reason why you couldn't hang your work next to the Mona Lisa. 100 years from now, your work could be world-famous and fawned over, while the Mona Lisa has faded back into the obscurity that it existed in for most of its existence.I then pointed out that AI art is mostly worthless because, if the quality of art is based on *public perception* rather than any innate qualities (it is), then of course most of it is going to be forgotten in 100 years. BUT, the same can be said of any given piece of human-drawn art from 2003 from a third-party d20 splatbook. So what's the difference?
>>97178989i still have to try it, most of my experience is just from bing. but it seems less censored than bing at least with horny text smut writing
>>97179029I am the bogeyman of legend, apparently. They'd rather spend all their time replying about how little they care about playing the game, than engaging in the game.
Late for my shift at the slop factory
>>97179051>>97179029>>97179016It doesn't matter if we respond to it or not. It won't stop. It posts unprompted when we ignore it. The janny ignores it.
>>97179034We'll see. Third thread's the charm, right?
>>97179091So what, just scroll past it instead of filling the thread with this pointless bickering. And I will acknowledge this post is ironic in that regard
This thread looks much better if you filter out all GIFs. Just saying. (I had no idea Tzaangors can be so flexible.)
>>97179040I think you're intentionally misrepresenting the analogy then. To me, the challenge presented is the equialent of setting up the gaming table. It wasn't directed at anybody specific, it was an open invite. Rejection would've been not approaching the table, and very early on a couple of people did approach, and they failed the challenge. The retards then turned up to throw a tantrum about the game even being offered. The only spazzing has been from the transartists, I've been pretty good-natured throughout. Pic related, by the way.
>>97179048Yep.
>>97179111To continue your analogy, you are not merely waiting at a table, you are shouting and goading from it like a fool. Because you are a troll.
>>97179077Then you're arguing pointless things for no reason, my point was made, slop is to my work as my work is to the Mona Lisa. Simples.
>>97179124So you still don't understand your error even when I greentexted it (in its entirety) for you. You truly are just here to make a fool of yourself. Go learn the difference between who and whom. Your art college failed you.
>>97179086>I am the bogeyman of legend, apparentlyNo, you're just proving my point because I actually succeeded at your challenge a few posts back and you just blew right past it without even noticing, like I knew you would.It was >>97179040. You even breezed past it again here, >>97179111, despite directly responding to it.Of the four you supposedly singled out as being a near-hit, it's the best. It has no easily discerned technical errors, the lighting is good, the mood is conveyed well and it immediately invites questions. Who is the man? Who's the figure in red? Are we looking at a devil? Death? What is this meeting about? Where is it taking place? It invites questions, which is exactly what art does.Now I fully expect you to invent reasons why I'm wrong, because you never actually intended any of the four you singled out to be considered "the best", because this "challenge" was never issued in good faith to begin with, as evinced by the fact that I *posted one of the four you called a near-hit*, and you didn't even notice. Even if I'm wrong it should have at least merited a comment from you.You aren't just a troll. You are *demonstrably* a nogaems faggot, FOR A GAME YOU INVENTED.
>>97179123Where do you think I've done that, then? I've laid at the table and only dealt with those that approach it. But if you think I've somehow forced it on anyone, please do link it.Oh damn, image limit is reached, where we going to next, guys?
I told you all to stop responding. Stop feeding the faggot. But you all insisted on engaging the off topic troll.Fuck this. I'm out. Y'all can lay in this shit pile you made but not ignoring it.
>>97179135No, I understand the error you THINK exists, but only does if you do what you di and intentionally crop it. Sorry that it upsets you.
>>97179172Ha ha ha, still can't see it. You fucking imbecile.
>>97179078It's not censored at all for tits & dicks. Prompts can be hit or miss though. Usually if you include too much positioning or nudity you get horrible Cronenberg monsters though
Next thread>>97179191>>97179191>>97179191Again
>>97179197Stop putting related boards faggotry in the OP.Fuck.
>>97179140No, I didn't breeze passed it at all. I actually went and got a new gif especially for you, so that you'd know I'd acknowledged you, and even directed you to the gif. I made the mistake of thinking I could communicate in a slightly coded way so the plebs wouldn't understand but you and I would, but I stand alone still.Come one, come all, gather ye slop plebs and give homage to your saviour, this anon HAS COMPLETED THE CHALLENGE!I wish I wasn't at the image limit now, I would've gotten you something nice. Something with a crown, maybe confetti. Let's see if this works:
>>97179212Damn, it didn't work. It was supposed to be a crown emoji. It showed in the text box, just not in the post.
Well congratulations. The bickering got a board that normally lasts at least a few days dead in less than one
>>97179212And now, just to break you completely: I went onto Microsoft Copilot, fed it the four images, and asked it which of those four was the best.So, no. I didn't actually beat your challenge, a machine did. It was even the one that gave the basic outline as to WHY it was the best, the stuff about lighting and invoking questions. I don't know SHIT about art.So, please, give your awards and commendations to the entity that truly deserves it: Microsoft Copilot.
>>97179226That used to be normal. The lifespan, I mean. When these threads first started we often had several per day.
>>97179232Awww well, at least I get to keep the crown, then. You know, being the person that could do without trying what the machine also apparently did. It truly is a shame that not a single one of you has any artistic ability, but I think it's been proved well enough.Merry Christmas, sloppers!
>>97179250>It truly is a shame that not a single one of you has any artistic abilityDid a single one of us ever claim to?
Filling!
End!
