Previous Thread: >>97263539Angry UB Posting For The Last Thread of 2025 edition>Most recent bracket system updatehttps://magic.wizards.com/en/news/announcements/commander-brackets-beta-update-october-21-2025>Outline article introducing the bracket systemhttps://magic.wizards.com/en/news/announcements/introducing-commander-brackets-beta>Current banlisthttps://magic.wizards.com/en/banned-restricted-list#commander-banned>Former Commander website, where you can learn the basics, and read the format philosophy laid down by the rules committeehttps://mtgcommander.net>Statistically see what everyone else puts in their commander decks based on what is posted to the internethttps://www.edhrec.com>Learn about PDH, Commander's budget pauper formathttps://pdhhomebase.com/https://www.pdhrec.com/>Deck list site: You can search for decks that other people have made. Authors often have comments that explain their deck strategy and card choiceshttps://www.archidekt.comhttps://www.moxfield.comhttps://www.tappedout.net>Find out what lands you can add to your deck, sorted by category, based on a chosen color identityhttps://managathering.com>Card searchhttps://scryfall.com>Proxy a deck or a cube for cheaphttps://pastebin.com/9Xj1xLdM (embed)>TQAre you excited to include wishes in your deck?
Thirty (30) starting life is objectively superior to fourty (40)
They aren't going to change the wish rule for one single card from a UB set
>>97272234>Are you excited to include wishes in your deck?I wish for Marvel to flop harder than Shamoo at Sea World
>>97272253Especially not one that already searches your library and so is perfectly functional in EDH as-is.
>>97272234>exactly fourwhy did they have to specify? If it just said "four" wouldn't it be the same?
>>97272280No, if it were just "four," you could fail to find a third and fourth and only present two. By requiring "exactly four", fail to find means you don't get any.
>>97272287fucking opposition agent here WE GOOOOO
>>97272234>4 mana draw the two best cards in your collection/deckGenuinely unreal card
>>97272345*The two worst of the four best.
Where is Lorwyn?Is she safe?Is she alright?
I lost to Tasha, the Witch Queen a couple days ago, but as per >>97272330 ("Every game posten on edhg is a win"), I actually won.Eat that you thieving piece of shit.
>>97272364It appears, in your anger (about UB), you have killed her.
>>97272369>It appears, in your anger (about UB), you have killed her.https://youtu.be/WWaLxFIVX1s?si=lFdtjKXKC-nyOHuA
>>97272369>i killed UWYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES
>>97272350Retarded post please die
Hi Im a time traveller. Heres the best to worst list from 2026Reality FractureStar TrekLorwynThe HobbitStrixhavenTurtlesMarvelPlease invest cautiously
>>97272460What UB setting is Reality Fracture?
RETVRN
>>97272472>What UB setting is Reality Fracture?The jacetice league, Cloud and Tifa team up to stop Kefka amd Bolas from unleashing an evil magical energy that would turn everyone gay.
>>97272417>pick four best cards>opponent gives you the two worst of the options presentedIt doesn't get you the two best, turbosperg.
>>97272488No
>>97272497You are incredibly bad at magic afraid to say.
>>97272488>>97272503from semen demonto childless haggrim
>>97272519The other 2 go into the library not the gy, btw
>>97272497this can't be a serious post
>>97272530I think you're just incapable of applying multiple modifiers. The two worst of the four best are still pretty good.
>>97272262It will make a billion+ dollarsEven Spider-Man was profitable and it was hamstrung by wotcs desperate desire to sell half size sets
>>97272535read the goddamn card
>>97272529>being so bad at magic you think this matterswhew
>>97272549>pick four cards>MUST be four, cannot fail to find due to specifying "exactly" four>have to be different cards with different names>you only actually get two of those>an opponent picks which two>they are incentivized to not give you the two best because they're your opponent>the ones you don't get are shuffled into your library, rather than being put in your graveyard, so you don't have immediate access to themI read the card. You don't get the two best ones.
>>97272551I mean it definitely matters but ok
>>97272551Are you retarded? Of course it matters. If they went into the graveyard, you'd be able to recur them immediately.
>>97272547>Even Spider-Man was profitableWas it? But I guess LGSs and/or investors got screwed more than WotC since WotC was able to move the product still.
>Pod is starting to follow suit after a guy tefari'd to save him from dying and I cast skull crack on myself so the voltron player would still kill him.ITS BEEN 6 MONTHS OF COMPLAINING ABOUT IT AND I'VE TOLD YOU ABOUT THE INTERACTION FROM THE START
All of this is a little beside the point. If the two best cards in your collection are legendary creature cards, you have a pretty dogshit collection.
>>97272567If you can recur them immediately you can also just tutor for them again immediately anon or cheat them into play since this is christmas wonderland and we have the necessary cards in hand (immediately too)... you truly are awful at magic.
>>97272573Please stop listening to the youtubers still forcing the clickbait of "wotc is le bad!"
>>97272581>wotc is le badit isn't??oof thanks anon, i was getting worried
>>97272581???? Were talking about the profitability of Spiderman and tbqh I know nothing about the profitability of certain sets nor have I ever claimed to. And I dont recall any youtuber talking about WotCs finances either which is what is being discussed.In summary: kill yourself.
>>97272579Frighteningly disingenuous post. There are substantially more ways to interact with cards in your graveyard than cards in your library.
>>97272579Oh ok you are just pretending to be retarded, got it
>>97272597There are enough of both to reliably have one in your hand when necessary. These numbers dont matter, like at all, as long as the card effect in question is represented on 10+ cards (it is) then thats enough to be a reliable presence in your deck.Again, sorry that youre genuinely terrible at magic.
>>97272597>>97272612>>97272615Also unconditional recursion is definitely rarer. Unless we are in black as well, or green, in which case tutoring or playing from your library is also represented enough.Nice selfie doe
>>97272619
>>97272577Been thinking of putting Wild Slash in my deck just to cuck the white player
>I can get my two best back after my opponent gave me my two worst with another spellWhy in the fuck wouldn't you just run a tutor for your two best to begin with instead of playing turtle shit first?
>>97272713Hes baiting
>>97272713you gaslight the worst player at your table into giving you the good cards
>>97272723Now this is based.
>>97272713>two worstThats on you for picking 2 garbage cards when you get to pick the best ones you have. Truly genuinely without a doubt, a terrible magic the gathering player.
>>97272581Rule of thumb: if a company is beholden to shareholders, it's gonna enshittify everything it touches. Hasbro is beholden to shareholders. WotC is owned by Hasbro. Therefore, it's subject to the same enshittification.
>>97272845Coke hasn't enshittified anything and it's been public for a century. Hell, they even retracted the big shitty thing they did (New Coke)
>>97272869>Implying New Coke wasnt deliberateZoom zoom
>>97272785Out of the best four cards you own, two of those are worse than the others. Those would be the worst of that particular subset.
>buzzing sound intensifies
>>97272869HFCS Coke is noticeably inferior to cane sugar Coke.
>>97272345>can't be used as an Entomb>doesn't send the cards into the grave>limited to legendary creaturesGifts Ungiven shits all over it.
>tempt with mayhem pic rel>the competitive yshtola player bitching and moaning nonstop refuses to copy it>he gets obliterated
Trying to find a commander to put this in
>>97272964
>>97273016I don't get it
>>97273016Oh hey, someone reposted my meme
>>97272488>>97272503
>>97272919>card is strong>ermmmmm it doesnt have these strengths present in <other color>>so its weak!Nope! Still an incredibly powerful card at an amazing rate.
>>97272964Its really tough. I have it in my first iteration of Ghyrson but its just way too much of a mana investment. Decent mana sink if youre set up for that, not being able to stack counters really hurts it as well.
>>97273093>>97272488>>97272503I was more of an Elspeth man myself.
>>97273085The fact that you made a meme of my earnest post and it's STILL being posted, tickles me pink, I'll be honest.
>>97273113It doesn't work in Ghyrson Starn. The opponent's land does the damage to the opponent and you don't control that source.
>>97273150Well its a good thing i never got around to playing that version.
>>97273162Lmao. You know what this is actually a really good suggestion. Thank you anon
>>97273162i like how roku is lowkey a 12/6 two-shotting people
>>97273172He's one of the more brewable commanders from the set. Obviously a 6 mana monocolored commander will only ever be a 1 or a 2, but big red is a fun archetype.
>>97273146>earnest post
