[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


NOT FUCKING CANON edition

>Previously in the Mortal Realms:
>>98839515 #

>Official AoS website:
https://www.ageofsigmar.com

>Downloads, Rules Errata, and FAQs:
https://www.warhammer-community.com/warhammer-age-of-sigmar-downloads/

>Tools
https://runebrush.pa-sy.com/warscroll/

https://lordbaconbane.github.io/aoswarscrollcreator/

>4e Books
gofile.io/d/KAQe7n7f

>Anvil of Apotheosis hero creator (old):
https://aosg.github.io/

https://sigdex.io/

>Thread question:
Which Chaos faction do you like aestheticslly?
>TURBO HARD MODE TQ:
Are you gonna buy a Christmas box?
>>
File: HSMdeAwXIAA_VS8.png (378 KB, 738x858)
378 KB PNG
I'm sure the artist who does these is a poster or a lurker, just want to say you're really feeding us with your regular work and autism for the setting. I would say this on twitter, but grok suspended me and I'm too lazy to make a new account.
>>
>>98857264
ironic furry posting is still furry posting
>>
>TQ:

And no, 90% of the boxes they release never get my attention aside from one that was 40k. Didn't even want it, it was just so much better than the one before it so it was worth noting.
>>
I think I will buy a Christmas box, I might buy a couple, but ultimately I have more money than time so maybe I shouldn't buy any
>>
>>98857293
These guys are so cool. Need a slightly aztec themed blades of khorne refresh
>>
>>98857264
>TQ
I can’t associate slaaneshs asthetics without thinking how much of a pain in the fucking ass it would be to hobby with them. I think they have the coolest “chaff” all around, and their warriors are neat, but they still feel wanting.

>4/6

Khornes a mixed bag. It’s a real potential man, I like the brutal shields they have, but they are also due for a rebranding that we’ve seen from time to time, and the models are quite old. Also nuggergaunts are cool.

>5/6 with potential to be higher

Nurgle has knights, the models tell you all you need to know about their integration in aos and their corruption of ghyran. Could go more into them but I’m lazy
10/10 no notes
>1/6

>Tzeentch
I like kairics and tzaangors but they really don’t know what to do with tzeentch.
>6/6

Helsmiths are cool, they have a small range, but I do like the mechs a lot, 3/6 for now but depending on the lammasu being organic or not it could go down to
4/6

Then there’s skaven. They’re just skaven.
2/6
>>
File: Celestant Prime rumour.png (23 KB, 1061x250)
23 KB PNG
>>
File: yiff in hell.jpg (126 KB, 1031x809)
126 KB JPG
>>98857264
Furry "fandom" goes on >>>/trash/
>>
>>98857264
Have they even announced the AoS ones?
Anyway no
>>
>>98857269
They look like they… you know…
>>
>>98857328
thank fucking god

but that lowers the chances of vandus becoming our EXXXTREME vandus version
>>
>>98857264
>TQ1
I see the appeal in all chaos factions models bar DoT but I think that nurgle is head above others with skaven and STD sharing second place
>TQ2
I avoided spoilers so I don't really know whats in them. There are some factions I could expend but I have to go back to effective painting first
>>
>>98857328
BACK ME UP FELLOW LEAKERS. WE ARE LEAKERS BROS, GIVE US E-ATTENTION SO WE CAN PREEN! TGA is full of lying faggots.
>>
>>98857464
>TGA is full of lying faggots.
we know a specific few of them aren't lying
>>
>>98857465
Most are. People just ignore the "mistakes" in order to fellate an e-celeb.
>>
>horrible op
>fucked up the link to old thread
Sigh
>>
>>98857466
I'm not trying to say they aren't attention whores, but how do you rationalize them as just lying and making things up, when we've got track records of the stuff they get right?
Surely you can't genuinely believe someone can accidentally get right the names of undisclosed special characters.
Sometimes mistakes are just mistakes, not proof it's all fabricated.
>>
>>98857328
They're going to move to make it explicit that he's karl franz hoping it drives up its sales, aren't they?
>>
It seems we have two threads up at the moment. I suggest we move to the other one because it has the correct link to the previous thread, and it doesn't have softcore furry porn in the op.
>>98857348
>>98857348



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.