look at this fucking deformity, it's like they wanted to copy Mafex in the worst possible way, her chest looks like a teenage boy's chest, long arms, feminist nerd face with the teeth gap and everything, what the fuck this one looks like a Toy Biz
>>10952143Looks great. Best Legends female buck to date. Literally can't wait. Seethe.
>>10952143Ive accepted that domestic toy lines will never look like their source material, I dont know if thats due to the budget or the sculptors but they will once in a blue moon get a fig just right(i.e. Retro carded beast and spiral). Imports is our only saving grace when it comes to comic book accuracy. Sadly, the majority of collectors wont switch to imports and thus imports will never get the mass appeal and the mass output of new characters. If only we all just bought imports, maybe domestic toylines will get the idea and change.
>>10952143If you want a “good looking” female figure, buy a Barbie and stfu fag. No one cares if a plastic figure has a pretty face.Lol
>>10952143Did you really need to make your own thread for this?
Wanna see the gender swapped /toy/ complaining about how Hasgrul doesn't sculpt shafts anymore
>>10952143never forget what they took from us
>>10952143They. Are. Toys. For. CHILDREN.
>>10952175Only McFarlane makes women built like that.
>>10952182And. The. Majority. Of. Buyers. Are. ADULTS.hasbro needs to stop tiptoeing between this shit and just fully commit to adults, fuck them kids.
>>10952188Kidults. They're ashamed of attractive female bodies. Sweaty, ripped men wearing body paint is fine tho.
>>10952182children don't play with toys retard
>>10952172no one is asking for camel toe.tho now that you mention it...
>>10952184right?
You're not gonna get coomer-style bodies at a major department store, ever
>>10952253you're really pornbrained if you think a superhero action figure having exaggerated proportions has anything to do with cumming
>>10952265I don't but do you think the retailers and casual buyers (ie parents) agree
>>10952273I don't think most people care
>>10952284You're right, it's only a vocal minority on the Internet complaining about it.
>>10952143Tits aside since reductions are the norm for Legends at this point, I just don't really like anything about how this figure looks above the waist.
Hasbro has never made an attractive Marvel Legend what are you talking about?
>>10952216Yes.https://youtu.be/MFG5zFm6xcA?si=lNVlx5E7uQHavWz8&t=132
Threads like this are always reminders that too many people are allowed to voice thier stupid fucking opinions when they really should not be allowed too. I think the captcha needs to be a hard question in one of various categories like math, geography, history ... etc etc and if you can't answer it you don't get to post your stupid fucking opinion
>>10952487Sounds like an epic euphoric moment for a regular 1/12 collection kino such as myself.
>>10952143Is nobody else going to say the head looks like Val Cooper from XMen 97?
>>10952498Kinda sussy when you put it like that.
>>10952344wasp looks great.
>>10952487STFU
>>10952143Just jack off to a statue or use a pocket pussy, bro. Cleaning dried baby batter outta joints is a pain, it’s not worth it.
>>10952490Tastes like a tubular dolphin sprocket for a kinetic kangaroo fish lamp impllicitly for a fine beaver such as Toyota camry
>>10952184Lmao no he doesn't.
>>10952439>posts a custom
kek wholesome1/12kino spammer got banned.Anyways, why is she allowed to show thigh skin but madeline pryor wasnt?
>>10952143That's a trick question, they never did.
>>10952344>It takes a real man to be best girl
Tucked tits. No wonder Target wanted it. Target rapes kids.
>>10952188>And. The. Majority. Of. Buyers. Are. ADULTS.>hasbro needs to stop tiptoeing between this shit and just fully commit to adults, fuck them kids.fuck off , if they start doing that then have fun buying these figures for $60
>>10952165>No one cares if a plastic figure has a pretty face.>calls other fagShut up fag
>>10952143Now I can have inverted tits battle damage.
>>10952487prime example right here
>>10952643Alright that's actually pretty okay I stand corrected.
>>10952698if theyre better sculpted with better articulation, better joints, more accessories, than sign me the fuck up, I only have a handful of legends and theyre mostly villains. I'd buy a shit ton more if they were not kid toys.
>>10952182Just you typing like that tells me everything I need to know about you. No, they aren't toys for children. Children aren't buying them, parents aren't buying them for their kids. Hasbro is more than aware it's adults who buy them.
>>10952143Toybiz nor Hasbro has every made a good female figure ever. The only way they'd make a good butt is if it's part of the legs instead of the hip piece
>>10952622Hell of a kekkeroony
>>10952622he'll be back in a few days, he always is
>>10952848Sounds like a sussy moment to me
>>10952143I agree the chest is too small, but everything else about the figure is great. Once Hasbro figures out (remembers?) that big titties aren't evil, their female figures will be top of the line for their price.
>>10952745What your looking for already exists. They're called imports. Buy them and stop whining about $25 toys not being good enough for you. Whiner.
>>10952940Link to import Warbird figure please. Thanks
>>10952947Gotta wait for Mafex to get to her. Or maybe Revoltech but they seem to be using the Marvel Now era designs. Either that or accept that a $25 figure isn't going to be as good as $60 one and stop being a fag about it?
This figure is atrocious. Not even bad, but god awful. Everyone saying that it’s good are literal cucks that can’t see past its flaws. >>b-but look at the aRticulation! Just consoom and be excited for the next trashy figure. Never question or contest just consoom you’ve made it this far in life.
>>10952992I don't collect toys to cum bro
>>10953060>see>>10952265get help
>>10953064Sure that's why you have your own thread whining about her tits not being big enough.
>>10952595That ass is stock
>>10953072yes, everyone who disagrees with you is always the same person. life is much simpler this way.
>>10953091Not what I was implying. But ok
>>10953060Okay? With all the porn, hentai, rule 34, doujins, etc., available neither do 99% of people in the actual coomer thread. There's nothing wrong with wanting the figures you spend your money on to look attractive and I'm tired of newer prudish collectors trying to push this narrative.
>>10953151Anon, it's weird to buy and display coomer figures all over your home. Sorry that it bothers you, but ti's the truth. It doesn't make everyone else a prude, it makes you a sexual deviant.
>>10953169Anon, not every one is you, has your values, likes the things that you do, there are a variety of people. The fact that you are so quick to judge and label says more about you than them. One day I hope you grow up.
>>10953169I'll never understand why brutality and violence is acceptable amongst family and friends, but a little booba? the whole world goes mad.
>>10953215mostly immaturity
>>1095316imagine coming to a 4chan toy thread and telling someone what is and isn't weird to collect. capetards are something else.
>>10953169Equating a woman in a bathing suit with sexual deviancy is not even 20th Century prudishness, it's 19th Century prudishness. I don't know how old you are, but I hope you escape your puritanical brainwashing before you die or infect your own children.
>>10953214>defending having coomer toys displayed all over your home>tells me to grow uplol, lmao even. >>10953215There's nothing wrong with a little booba. It's just when it's done to excess that some of these coomers have it, it's pretty creepy. >>10953221Imagine coming to a 4chan toy thread and not being able properly quote someone.>>10953223Warbird isn't a coomer figure, I have no issue with it. It's when people in these threads want huge tits and her pussy lips visible through her costume that I think is too far. I'm not saying all of you are like this, but a vocal minority of you are and it reflects poorly on the rest of you who complain about these things. Sorry, but it's the truth.
I can only take a female superhero seriously if they're dressed sexy and have big boobs.
>>10953226>it reflects poorly on the rest of youThis is 4chins, not r*ddit. We're anonymous. No updoots. No le gold. It doesn't reflect on us at all.
>>10953230ThisHave a (You)
>>10953230Take my updoot!
>>10953230Just because we're anonymous doesn't mean someone saying something stupid on the side of the argument you're on, doesn't reflect poorly on all of you. Now who should grow up?
>>10953226go back faggot
>>10953226>There's nothing wrong with a little booba. It's just when it's done to excess that some of these coomers have it, it's pretty creepy.Equating huge titties with sexual deviancy is not only wrong in a general sense, it is particularly insulting and oppressive towards women who have huge titties. I'm sure you believe you have the best, most noble intentions, but in reality you are contributing towards women hating their own bodies based on negatively associations you perpetuate.
>>10953251Did you stop reading at the part you quoted or are you deliberately ignoring where I specify what I'm talking about?
>>10953226>Sorry, but it's the truth.
>>10953263What is the context you're pretending I'm ignoring? The fact that these are figures and not real women? Having irrationally negative views towards representations of busty women is not materially different than having them towards real women - unless you think it's fine to be sexist towards images because they're "not real."
>>10952182>They. Are. Toys. For. CHILDREN.TRUTH!!!!That's why Peppa Pig, Bluey, etc have $500 Crowd Funded line add-ons. Fucking faggot.
>>10953390>DAD! Can you crowdfund this 1:1 scale of peppa pig, pleaseeeeeeeee!
>>10953088So show it stock.
>>10953251It's amazing how some of these people don't seem to realize the hypocrisy they're spouting. Not talking about exclusively this hobby either. The recent Stellar Blade video game controversy is a good example. The IGN France reviewer started ranting about how the main character was designed by someone who'd never seen a woman and it was completely unrealistic, only for the designer to have based her body on a Korean model and have a wife who also likes designing hot female characters.>>10953226>It's when people in these threads want huge tits and her pussy lips visible through her costume that I think is too far.The former is people wanting accuracy to the comic design, which I doubt you'd have a problem with if it was a male character, and I haven't seen anyone asking for the latter.
>>10953454Everyone should've gatekept the hobby better. Anyone who went to see MCU movies is at fault or talked about them with normal humans. If comics had remained what they used to be there would be a lot less terror to be had around sexy wimmens in comics because there'd be no normal human rats to complain about it.
>>10953627comics were already complete dogshit years before the MCU even started
>>10953629But they were sexy garbage.
>>10952182do the livestreams feel like they're aimed at children, dumbass?
>>10952698Neca, JADA, McFarlane, have no problem selling figures at retailers like target and walmart for adult collectors below import prices. I can find Elvira's expose huge titty cleavage at walmart just a couple aisles from the toy section and no one is throwing a hissy fit about it.
>>10952886>Once Hasbro figures out (remembers?) that big titties aren't evil, their female figures will be top of the line for their price.It's the super liberal design team that is doing the small chests. They buxxom body went into retirement for years because they refused to design anything with "that sexist body." It was only briefly pulled back out for reissuing Rogue and a few others on retro cards a couple of years ago and then sent back to the slammerTGAY4D
>>10954264Not him but with the way the people on them dress and act, yes. But they're probably just keeping the latest trendy non-threatening act up
>>10952959This shit isn't worth 25 dollars. How the fuck do you people pretend that the same 4 body sculpts recycled 400 times is acceptable.
>>10955964What makes you think it isn't worth $25?
>>10952175gross trannie, watch chyna porn if you want to wack off to this.
>>10956887>gay retard
>>10952143Why isn't this beautiful specimen worth 25? You can tell even with the mask she has a beautiful photoreal face and can reach all kinds of unusual poses with that new artistic articulation. Tell me her faults and convince me and I won't buy her and you'll successfully take 25 dollars from hasbro
>>10957570>Tell me her faults and convince me and I won't buy her and you'll successfully take 25 dollars from hasbroShe has small tits.
>>10957595I've accepted that unfortunate flaw. I don't think it lowers the worth below 25 though.
>>10957632Well, if you're fine with an collectible nit being an accurate depiction of the source material, there's nothing I can say that will talk you out of the purchase. If you don't have standards, that's a you problem. But the good news is that you're not alone.
>>10957653Only certain source materials would I require that and this isn't one of them. Now one could point out flaws of range, sculpt, unflattering poses that make the figure look worse subjectively and that could be swaying. Once the figure is out, rumors of QC issues could be detrimental.
Since we're still discussing this, I find it interesting that Hasbro has no consistent policy when it comes to titty sizes. For example, Ms. Marvel and She-Hulk are both clearly undersized. However, Monet St. Croix and the Classified Series Retro Scarlett, released in the last year with new torsos, both have big, honkin' yabbos.Rather than some rigorous puritanical policy, it seems like Hasbro has no real design standards and just lets the various teams do what they want without any consistent guidance or vision. This is why the Goblin Queen has no exposed legs when other figures do. This is why the Puff Adder wave Yelena Belova doesn't have double-jointed elbows when other figures do. It's all done adhoc and incoherently because the company at large is mismanaged and indifferent towards the quality of their products.
>>10952143this shit looks so badreminds me of some old Revoltech figures
>>10958231Yeah. Tired eyes and the weird upper lip.
>>10957765Its not a conspiracy like they think, its just dependent on the sculptor
>>10957765Completely off topic but this made me look at Monet who happened to be next to him, and yes her chest is quite large. She's just a nice figure though, except that I noticed her inability to move at her waist. The lack of articulation in that region results in a surprisingly stiff look, despite having the ball in the mid-torso. I get that with a thin torso it could result in it pretty ugly if they try to put a ball down there, or even worse if they do a straight cut.
>>10958406I think Hasbro finally figured out that ball joint for the upper torso and inverted hinge joint for the lower torso is the best scheme for articulation. It's the one Ms. Marvel has, and looks good on both a male and female body (when it's done right). This is why, despite her diminutive chest, I think the new Ms. Marvel figure looks great. If they fixed that one flaw, I think the figure would be pretty much perfect.
>>10958234I like TiredGirls
>>10958424According to industry leading action figure reviewer Anthonyscustoms, the reverse would be better. A ball joint at the waist and a hinge at the chest
>>10958458i'm gonna go with industry pros over that joyless groan factory on this one.
>>10956082Bad paint, bad plastic quality, inconsistent design, inconsistent scaling, no/bad accessories, and decade old posability tech.Let's be real, people buy this garbage because capeshitters don't know better
>>10958584the bad plastic quality is what really gets melike not to praise mattel as they clearly make cheap trash too but holy shit after picking up a couple origins figures its like night and day between the two companies there. Why can mattel afford to make solid plastic that doesn't bend under its own weight and hasbro can't?
>>10958593Anyone have that pic of a legends case filled with warped toys because the box sat in the sun?
>>10958593Soft plastic isn't bad it's just got more plasticizers added to make it less likely to break. It does this by bending instead.
>>10952152That's not the Savage She-Hulk.
>>10958593>>10960121soft plastics from Hasbro likely cost more, because it's custom made by chemical engineers who created it and formulated specifically for them, thus also increasing costs.PLUS, since children toy makers like Hasbro also need to test the plastic for safety reasons, that's another added cost. Collector lines don't need to do any testing and can use date rape drug laced plastics, covered in any lead laden paint they want.
>>10957765>Rather than some rigorous puritanical policy, it seems like Hasbro has no real design standards and just lets the various teams do what they want without any consistent guidance or vision.or most likely due to bad luck the local troon inside the ML team designed Jen and Carol, while the good guys designed Psylocke and Lilandra
>>10960493I'm commandeering this thread because I just discovered a comic-inspired She-Hulk was released in 2017 as part of the A-Force Heroines 6-Pack. Of course, you could argue the new She-Hulk looks better in almost every way, except for the chest. A side-by-side comparison really shows what a poor job they did with the upper torso on the new figure.
>>10960617I wouldn't say the chest on the old one looks "better" but the sizing is more accurate to sensational's art depictions.I'll probably still get it because it's She-Hulk.
And while I didn't read the comics this version of She-Hulk came from (haven't read anything since the Dan Slott run) I do like the torn street clothes look and the sculpt and textures are all well done.
>>10960617>back to discussing what I care about tits
>>10960652It's not just the size. It's also the way the old upper torso is cut to end along the bust line, giving it a more seamless, natural shape. The new upper torso, like a lot of female Marvel Legends, has a line of material beneath the bust line that ends in a harsh, arbitrary way. It doesn't even conform to real musculature. It's just there as a big, wavy eyesore.
>>10960617right could be painted as a man and would work
>>10960657Where'd her tits go?
>>10960501Why are adults not protected from chemicals by societal regulations?
>>10960824What kind of man would wear that outfit?
>>10961952This man.
>>10961966Still doesn't have as much leg exposure.
>>10956887You will never be a woman
