Hot Wheels losing detail over the years
>>11231513if you think thats bad you sure compare them to the ones from the 60s, those thing were way heavier too
>>11231521>if you think thats bad you sure compare them to the ones from the 60s, those thing were way heavier tooThis! and then some
>>11231513It’s the bottom, what does it really matter?
>>11231608Only paint the front of your house. No one's ever gonna see the back, so who gives a shit.
>>11231705I have to agree with him. The bottom was already barely detailed and flat looking. Basically an afterthought.I will say that the new ones look liike McDonalds shit compared to the old details, but the old details are still underwhelming as fuck.Basically, it goes from a 3/10 to 2.3/10 to a 2/10.I can't even give the 1997 a 4/10 because that would mean that's supposed to be almost average and there's no way unpainted flat detail is almost average.
>>11231513It would actually help your case if you used the same car.
Matchbox >>>>>>>hot wheels Incredible that the shittier brand won
>>11231513tbf the bottom of a c7 z06 is flat like that due to the underbody panels. Even the autoart is flat besides the painted control arms.
>>11232310This. Many modern sport cars have aero and airflow flooring.
My Ferrari f40 from the 80’s doesn’t look much different lmao. Turns out sports cars have underbody panels.
>>11231513As they lose detail over the years we gain them in the form of wrinkles
>>11232624damn man you owned us
>>11231513billions must die
>>11232297Corgi was better. I know that unless you bought the Juniors they were bigger, but working doors and other features were great. They now cater to collectors.
>>11231513Lots of supercars have flat bottoms for aerodynamics
Billions must ride
>>11232685That isn't trying to be an own, just an observation
Buy a real can chydniggertrannies
>>11233309Post bus pass
>>11231513new licensed castings have slightly better body details and while i agree with you to some degree, you've chosen a retarded pic for comparision, this >>11231828 is better>>11232624matter is neither created nor destroyed, it's transformed in something else>>11231521in terms of weight you're absolutely right, now to have a diecast body seems to be an IF, fuck all that plastic. But details wise 60s ones are shit, they're metal bricks on wheels with cool paints. Late 00s were when things got cooler: full metal, awesome paints, nice details and cool designs>>11233832>buy 90k sport car>Veeate>open hood to take a look at glorious N.Gin>plastic fantastic panel>woah just like those $0.99 toy cars!!!>you're not supposed to see that dirty, noisy, tangle of pipes, cables, belts and whatever. Nooo it's not classy! You only pay premium for our mechanics to rap... take care of you and your carman, fuck these gay compromises, fuck normies, fuck safety
>>11233832>not a single leaf under the hoodWhere do you live, the moon?
>>11237159tbf the engine barely fits in the car to begin with so you couldn't see anything other than the valve cover without the plastic anyways. Still, it's worse than the supercharged version of the 5.5 and the later 6.3 where you can see a little more besides the plastic.>>11237169I just clean it, anon
