Previous thread: >>11575779NECA>2012 TMNT shipping from Wal-Mart.com>Garfello & Odie up for pre-order>Bodycount Casey, City at War Karai, Nightwater April, Nobody, Cyborg Donatello, Shredder Raphael up for pre-order>Movie TMNT: Dracula Shredder, Crimson Dracula Shredder (Target Exclusive), Blue & Gold Dracula Shredder (Wal-Mart Exclusive)>Mirage TMNT: Worms of Madness Shredder 2-pack, Chote>Last Ronin TMNT on shelves: Nightwatcher Casey Jones, Casey Marie & Motorcycle, Michelangelo (Lost Years, Snow Gear)>Archie Adventures TMNT: blue Cover Variant Bellybomb, Ace DuckMcFarlane Toys>IDW TMNT Page Punchers wave 1 is hitting Target (Leo, Don, Foot Ninja, Shredder)Playmates>1988 Remastered 6-pack hitting Targets>vintage re-release Chrome Dome & Scale Tail found in the wild>vintage re-release Mutant Module hitting Targets>vintage re-release Sewer Playset (Amazon) shipping>vintage re-release Foot Cruiser up for pre-order (Amazon)>black and white 84' Comic Book Mirage Turtles at Walmart>Mutant Mayhem head droppin' Turtles on pegsJoyToy>JoyToy Groundchuck, Dirtbag, and Rahzar shippingBoss Fight>Garfello & Odie up for pre-order>Useful Links:TMNTToys, a useful resource for TMNT toy history: http://www.tmnttoys.com/Necastore: https://thenecastore.com/Toyark: https://www.toyark.com/category/teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-toy-newsArchive:https://archive.palanq.win/toy/search/subject/TMNT%20General/
McFarlane's TMNT figures are hitting Target shelves now. $24.99.
>>11581168
NECA 90s TMNT going up for order on Walmart's collector con 10-9. Nothing new except the packaging. If you missed the accessory set, then you may want this.
>>11581175
>>11581180
NYCC Exclusive Conductor Shredder will be on the NECA Store starting 10-9 as well.
Why are you reposting images you got off Instagram?
>>11581183I need a Mikey, so Im down if I find one in-store.
LingJiHun TMNT going all the fuck out for your money. If any of these make it to production that'll be awesome.
>>11581188My wallet screams.
>>11581188
>>11581187He is the only one that doesn't lose any value from only having a happy face since he's a goof even in battle scenes. Shame about the other 3 not having serious faces.
>>11581191
>>11581188Baxter is kinda crazy. Guess they're making him a white guy too.
>>11581184Ugly, ugly, very ugly.
>>11581196
>>11581199Honey you're looking in a mirror, stop that.
>>11581200
>>11581191I love father/son customized shock collars!
The Foot is pretty uninspired, but it's fine.
>>11581198Bug head looks fine
>>11581196Rocksteady's middrift, woof.
>>11581172These actually look pretty good. Might get Shredder and a couple foot ninjas.
>>11581221Check the last thread. Shredder is a manlet. Smaller than even the BST AXN one.
>>11581224That's ok. They'll probably look fine with Playmates figures.
>>11581253They don't
>>11581274Got pics or...?
>>11581253I'm not sure. He looks like he'll be skinnier than Playmates April. Maybe the anon that picked it up last thread will pipe up and let you know.
Is there a reason you baked on page 3 nowhere near image limit?
>>11581338Because WonFest is going on with lots of new reveals. And because it doesn't matter.
The TMNT/Godzilla toys are hitting Target. I got Leo last night.
>>11581253Which ones? I've got an old original Casey and Rocker Leo, but I only have MM Leo
>>11581224
Whats the best Shredder if I want the original cartoon design, but not necessarily has to be the original cartoon artstyle?
>>11581354Uh, probably the ultimate neca Toon Shredder? The only other thing with a close color scheme is maaaybe the Super7 Shredder repaint. And an exclusive playmates vintage figure repaint from another Shredder's Revenge pack.
>>11581356Thats kinda what i was thinking, but I was hoping there was an option that was a little less toony, to look good next to a masterverse skeletor and a gijoe classified Cobra commander
New 2012 Leo, his foot joint is completely stuck in place, this is my first neca figure. Ive tried heat and beating it with a hammer, won't budge, worried about breaking the joint too. I'm sure this happens often with Neca, are there any fixes to it?
>>11581397You mean those two? I think they look great together. Skeletor being slightly taller feels right to me. Hes a big ol buff dude next to a normal sized human. but I'd want Shredder to be more CC's height
>>11581349I like to mix and match as long as they look ok together. But I own most of the first wave of vintage, including 3 soft heads and a few from later waves and a lot of the 2012 collection.I actually like pairing the 2012 Turtles with the vintage villian mutants because they appear larger and more intimidating while most of the 2012 villians were scaled down to cut costs.Anyways, I'm reading that the Page Punchers are 5 inches tall so the Shredder would probably about the height of the 2012 playmates turtles.
>>11581396Reddit Reposter strikes out:https://www.reddit.com/r/NECATMNT/comments/1nvpfd1/neca_foot_completely_stuck/
>>11581184Any word on the price?
>>11581398Also a powerful interdimensional warlock if we're going by minicomic canon.
>>11581406Mety Toys
>>11581406>>11581409Damn, wish NECA would do stuff like this.
>>11581344So? You weren't even close to the image limit. Do you really need the attention that the front page of the catalog gives you?
>>11581427If you're not here to talk about toys you are welcome to leave.
>>11581427Have you tried crying about it?
>>11581431Ok, I'll talk about toys instead of pointing out that you are creating redundant threads like the Retrospammer does.Why is this Bebop design so shit? It doesn't even look like something Henson would have designed. It's ugly, and not in a good way.
>>11581442I feel like they went too cartoony with both of them.
>>11581442Yeah I agreed from the start these don’t look like Henson designs, but I’m also starting to see what anons were pointing out about how these wouldn’t even work as actual suits. I hope that these not being seen for a while means they’re still working on them.
>>11581396Silicon lubricant (sometimes sold as treadmill lubricant) + heat and gentle but firm pressure. Make sure to move the joint in a natural angle to it's rotation. Get a nice thin hobby knife in between the edges of the joint if you think there may be some paint causing it to hold, just enough to make sure there is a gap between the part and the ankle.
>>11581442It's not shit, the fact that you're making this lost proves you're only wanting to troll and anything you say is completely invalid. It 100% looks like a Henson design.>>11581458You are a moron then, they can work as suits, easily. People like you are what limit actual creativity in the field.
>>11581481He doesn't own the figure, you're responding to a bot. You wasted your time making a post.
>>11581458>I agreed from the start these don’t look like Henson designsThen you were wrong from the start.
>>11581483Or he's the same guy as the reddit poster who doesn't want to follow the advice of the midwits who think epic bacon is still a hilarious non sequitur. Try being helpful instead of an asshole, for a change.
>>11581450Tokka and Rahzar are just as cartoony
>>11581486You are dumb as fuck if you believe an ounce of that. It's a troll.
>>11581492Those giant eyes really do betray the otherwise edgy body designs, kinda like Ray Jay's Zoanoid in the Guyver.
>>11581504Have to keep them marketable to the kids.
>>11581442I know where this Bebop will end up.
>>11581165remind me which splinter this is. i don't hate it, even if I don't think he should ever be this upright
>>11581701The head makes me think the 2014 Bay version.
Got my Limited Run set. I am very...whelmed. They're good, they're fine. I do like how bright they are. I kind of just wish this was part of a whole new sub line or something. Repaint the vintage figures up real nice and bright like this, I dunno.
>>11581822Paint is a bit messy here and there, stray marks, nothing damning. If they did Bebop, Rocksteady, Shredder, and a pack in Krang in toonier colors like this? I'd buy it.
>>11581823Still deciding on opening or not.
>>11581826I'm not sure the brief play value from the 90th iteration of these molds is worth it.
>>11581193plus his original figure had kind of a flawed face, the other three were more or less perfectthese other alt heads would have been good to have, at least yknow to use for certain scenes, but not for general display. I do want that campfire, though.
>>11581497You can't know that. I've found myself posting an identical toy post on a mentally deranged leftybot site like Reddit, but then posting the same thing on 4chan to get more sane yet brutal responses. Anyway, I'm in turtle fatigue. It's the same kind of thing where you hear Batman's origin story for the billionth time, but eke out a smirk anyway because it might have been done good. Again. I'm not sure what I can see from any producer fo Turtle figures from here on in that would make me go, "ooh!" and want to upgrade the figures I already have.
>>11581189hulkinhey what if they did a movie style Slash?>>11581191wait, are these actually licensed?
>>11581822meanwhile i appreciated being able to NOT use these colors in-game
>>11581895>Master, I need to tell->Did you get the giant rats? Oh, there they are. Splendid. Look at the EVIL in their eyes>I think.. Master, I believe those are opossums
>>11581895rahzar waiting for his master like a good boy
>>11581822None of the playmates reissues have interested me but I can't wait to get these. The colors remind me of the Mega Bloks classic turtles
>>11581881>wait, are these actually licensed?I think they might be? I'm so used to everything being third party or "legally distinct"
>>11581997everything that looks like this, at least.
>>11581826Probably better to leave them sealed and get a standard set to open if you really want to play with vintage turts.
>>11582555Neat.
>>11581482Oh my God NECAnon. Take some fucking pills. Remember how pedo you were about M3Gan? You’re seriously mentally ill. They look nothing like Henson designs. I’m a lifelong Henson fan. Bebop’s snout is way too short. You’re out of your very limited wheelhouse (which only consists of shilling).
>>11582623>no true Scotsman fallacy
>>11581482>>11581484>>11582623>Duh, Here's your goodboy rewards! Keep defending Mr. Randy for us!
>>11582623
>>11582671>>11582679kek
>>11582679Where did those little plastic pizzas and boxes come from?
>>11582708Zuru mini brands
>>11582716cool pic, kinda wish they came with something to hide the pegs
>>11582723Just didn't want to risk breaking anything.
>>11582607They look exactly like Henson designs, every one of your pathetic complaints (oh boo hoo his snout) is absolutely meaningless. You're making up bullshit reasons. You aren't a fan of anything, definitely not Henson and doubtful even TMNT.
>>11582750Rocksteady looks Henson but that's cause they obviouly ripped that Dinosaur's guy. But come on, Bebop looks shitty and very un-Henson, looks more like a Michael Bay style design
>>11583172No, it looks like a proper Henson design from the 90s. That's a suit actor, not a CGI creation.
Bebop looks like the pig dude from the Power Rangers movie
>>11583288He does!
These figures are fucking fantastic. Very impressed with them.
>>11583288holy shit I think you've hit on somethingexcept even he had better head proportions
>>11583303they do look fun, if tiny-noggin'd.were they really like that in the show?
>>11583325that movie was so wonderfully goofy... it was making all new costumes, so it was like "hey instead of any of the characters from the show, let's make a new one up to round out the main 3 villains""like what?" "uhh... a pig. just a pig guy." "awesome, go for it. i'm gonna go learn what CGI means."
>>11583325The proportions on the Henson Bebop are fine, you're working hard to complain about something. They're going for different looks.
>>11583341what's your life like, anon? are you enjoying it?there's always help, even if you think you're just stuck in a pattern.
>>11581442I said years ago about a 'what if' movie series on here. Including the planned 4th film - Eastman had concept drawings.But I just don't believe that these could have been wearable Jim Henson created suits in the early 90s. I can't picture a normal person inside.They should have got Henson veterans to design them. No offence to the creator of these. But there are nuances that don't quite register as 'right'.The goofiness is right. But these are firmly in fantasy land. And not very 'what if' - like a long lost design. It must be a hugely difficult task to get this looking and feeling right. But they're not quite there IMO.
>>11583470Yeah I think they feel too whimsical, like they're characters from Labyrinth just wearing street clothes
>>11583470I wonder if/when NECA ever drops a Kirby figure from those sketches. If any company does it'd be them with their deep diving.I wouldn't put it past them to do the Hallmark Turtle though it might be too similar to the Raph as Shredder figure they got coming.
>>11583303They look pretty good visually. But what about articulation? Can you show how far legs bend straight forward and knees backward?
>>11583470>But I just don't believe that these could have been wearable Jim Henson created suits in the early 90s.That's a you problem.>I can't picture a normal person inside.Again, that's a you problem. You can see where a person would fit inside without any issue. >But there are nuances that don't quite register as 'right'You are also incorrect there. There's everything about them that look right. And they had input from the Henson shop.>But these are firmly in fantasy land.Nope.
>>11583472Hi, welcome to TMNT, this must be your first day.
>>11583572
>>11583574
>>11581442I think what makes the bebop look wrong is it takes more cues from the Micheal Bay Bebop than the 80s design and Henson style. You have the purple mutton chops, the pot belly, and the spikes on the shoulders, it looks like they tried to make a "what if Out of Shadows but in the 80s" and not "what if Henson Bebop in Secret of the Ooze".
>>11583599>it takes more cues from the Micheal Bay Bebop than the 80s design and Henson style.No it doesn't. Like, at all, it's hitting the late 80s/early 90s punk look. It looks like a Henson design.
>>11583617You're wrong, because you are missing the point. 80s/90s punk or not, it's hitting more similarities to the Bay Bebop than original Bebop in addition to not looking like Henson style.
>>11583626Wow, seeing them side by side it is obvious they took a lot from the out of shadows bebop.
>>11583626This is egregious.
>>11583626You're wrong. They were never going to take directly from the cartoon design! It's a movie-ized design, same as Shredder and the turtles. They change things, they make it more realistic. No, it does not look like the Bay design, and it looks 100% like a Henson design.
>>11583628They did not
>>11583626Bebop has had those design elements before Out of the Shadows nimrod. They're nothing new to the character.
>>11583639Shredder and the turtles take after the mirage comics designs you dense fuck fake fan.
>>11583646No shit tard, but they're still movei-ized and the turtles take from the cartoon with the bandanas.
>>11583644Not in the time when the secret of the ooze came out, but for sure before this suck ass neca design did.
>>11583648They "movieized" as you so retardedly word it the comic designs, not the cartoon designs you fucking cock gargling phony.
>>11583626IDW Bebop has chops too, you're freaking out about nothing.
>>11583652They movie-ized the comic designs mixing with the cartoon designs you loon. Shredder never had a cape in the fucking comic, the turtles never had colored bandanas, they never were obsessed pizza in the comic...you're the fake fan.
>>11583653Oh, so Henson would use design elements from over a decade in the future? Retard!
>>11583660They're design elements from the 90s! Get your head out of your ass.
>>11583641They clearly did.
>>11583662Oh? Show me those 90s IDW comics. Retard!
>>11583663They clearly did not
>>11583668Your eyes fail you and your brain lacks the ability to comprehend, but just looking at them side by side it would be apparent to even individuals with the baseline of cognitive functions.
>>11583672They're not new elements to the character. You're reaching just to bitch.
>>11583599>>11583626Yeah, I see it now. It's basically Baybop Jr.
>>11583673They're post 90s bebop design elements that wouldn't have existed in the SotO movie. Retard!
>>11583674It is not.
>>11583678It is.
>>11583653IDW Bebop sucks too. You're not helping your cause.
>>11583675No one ever said these were for SoTO. Stop talking already.
>>11583682IDW Bebop and Rocksteady are great, so you're just showing what shit taste you have.
>>11583683Once again showing your ignorance of the fandom. SotO was the movie that they wanted Bebop and Rocksteady in but got veto'd and did Tokka and Rahzar instead. Stay in your lane fake fan.
>>11583684Look in the mirror to see who has the shot taste.
>>11583689Keep showing how uninformed you are, these are NOT meant to be SOTO inspired or for that movie. It has nothing to do with the history of the movie itself.
>>11583626They would have been better off using the Laird concept sketches and adding Henson Creature elements to those.
>>11583694Oh, well then I guess that's why they don't look like Henson style. Thanks for verifying that.
>>11583697Except they do look like the Henson style, so you're just talking bullshit.
>>11583697Guys, guys, it's ok! They were never meant to look like something from Henson.!
>>11583695That wouldn't make any sense at all.
>>11583698See >>11583694They aren't meant to look like the designs from the movie that Henson worked on designs for, and that is why they don't look like designs Henson would have done for the movie.
>>11583700They are meant to look like Henson designs, which is what they look like. They're NOT meant to be for SOTO, there is a difference.
>>11583701>movie about mutant monster animals>has to make senseOk dumbfuck.
>>11583704See >>11583694SotO and the first movie are the movies Henson was involved with, these are not meant to be designed after that, therefore they succeed in not looking like designs Henson did for the 90s movies.
>>11583707Do you not know how to read? They're not SOTO figures. They ARE Henson designs, they're meant to be if they were in the first movie.
>>11583703This is autism
>>11583709See >>11583703 and >>11583646The first movie was bases on the first run of the mirage comic and the only movie where Bebop and Rocksteady were suggested was SotO which these are not based on, which means they aren't based on a Henson design, and that is why they don't look like Henson style designs.
>>11583709This is mental retardation.
>>11583709Why would Henson designs for the first movie take inspiration from OOTS and the IDW comics? That makes no sense.
>>11583714That's why these are What If figures, because they're being put into the FIRST movie, not SOTO. You really do have a learning disability. They are Henson designs, always have been and always will be.
>>11583718Exactly!
>>11583714Except they do look like Henson designs. So your whole argument is moot.
>>11583719>it's for what if they were put into a story that they were never going to be a part of>not what if they were put into the movie that they wanted to include them inYou're a real genius, aren't you? Retard!
>>11583718They aren't.
>>11583723See >>11583694They aren't supposed to look like henson designs.
>>11583725No, that would be you, since you don't seem to understand What If figures! Same thing with the yellow jumpsuit April they're doing.
>>11583727See >>11583626
>>11583727>They aren't goodFtfy
>>11583730Seen it, you're wrong and let the Bay movies live rent free.
>>11583732>They are goodFtfy
>>11583694You really shot your own argument in the foot here.
>>11583734>They are good at not looking like something Henson would makeFtfy
>>11583735Not really. Posting AI slop art doesn't change that.
>>11583626they thought we wouldn't notice
>>11583737>They are good but look exactly like something Henson would makeFtfy again
>>11583733It's not based on the Bay movies, or Henson designs, it's based on IDW.See >>11583653
>>11583738The Neca figures look like they were designed with AI slop so it's fitting.
>>11583743No it's not, it's based on Henson designs.
>>11583733I actually like OOTS, so your burn is as spicy as Nando's Lemon and Herb seasoning.The fact that multiple anons have said that the Bebop design sucks seems to be living in your head rent free though.
>>11583742>They are good samples that look exactly like something Henson would make in his toilet after eating indian and mexican food all dayFtfy
>>11583749See >>11583694They are not designed after henson's style.
>>11583752Oooh he's gonna need some ointment for that burn.
>>11583752>multiple anonsYou're adorable, I'm sorry you think there's multiple anyone agreeing with you. Trolls samefagging isn't anything.
>>11583754>They are Henson designed Bebop and Rocksteady that he would be proud of having helped createFtfy
>>11583763No, you made it worse. Now it's just incoherent nonsense.
>>11583764No, that'd be your post.
>>11583626Lol they literally just moved his ears down and called it a day. Lazy ass N*CA fucks.
>>11583768You literally need to get your eyes checked.
>>11583767Talking to yourself again?
>>11583706Wrong again, child.
>>11583773>I take my mutant movies made to sell toys to children very seriously, I am a mature adultOk fucktard.
>>11583770You figuratively need to take the stick out of your ass. Or maybe literally. I don't know what your lifestyle choices are.
Has anon tried saying it does look like henson and then a lame attempt at an insult? I bet that would convince people.
>>11583759>I'm sorry you think there's multiple anyone agreeing with youAfter seeing comments from multiple people on forums where samefagging isn't a thing, there is a consensus that the Bebop design is awful and looks nothing like what HCS would have designed. But across every toy forum I've seen them discussed, I've only ever seen one pathetic loser actually try to defend this garbage, so I'm willing to bet that the samefagging you claim is happening is either imagined or a coping mechanism.
>>11583793There is zero consensus. The Bebop design is not awful and does look like what HCS would've designed. I'm sorry you apparently decide to hang around the most miserable toy sites on the internet. Nevermind the fact that people bitch about literally anything.
>>11583796>He said miserably as he posted on /toy/
>>11583793>the internet doesn't like somethingNews at 11
>>11583799You sound so old grandpa.
We all agree they're bad, but which is worse? NotHCS Bebop or Rubber [terrible conductor] Shredder?
>>11583803They're not bad, at all. Quit trying to stir up shit.
>>11583803At least bebop can be used as an ugly bastard character. The shredder has no place in any collection. Wouldn't buy either tho until they hit Ross and Ollie's.
>>11583812Typical troll response
>>11583796>I'm sorry you apparently decide to hang around the most miserable toy sites on the internetBeing able to voice your honest opinion about a toy is the opposite of miserable.Hell, I can go into almost any thread on this board and say I think something looks shit and know I won't be attacked by a company sycophant for voicing my opinion. You are so miserable that whenever someone says they don't like something that NECA made, you take it personally. Despite your attempts to make this thread the most miserable place on the internet, there are anons here that can tolerate differing opinions.
>still no joytoy newsI've heard rumors of a van but I would have thought another wave would be up by now, hopefully they're not done, I at least hoped to get a Baxter and some alternate heads for the turtles
>>11583803Shredder is fine. It looks like the source material. It might be digging at the bottom of the barrel for ideas, but that's to be expected when the line has made nearly every cool character into a figure and needs to resort to obscure Glup Shittos like Creepy Eddie. Honestly, I almost want Shredder. It probably helps that I'm a sperg that likes trains.Bebop is an eyesore. It needs to be banished to prototype hell.
>>11583803>>11583812Your parents must have really hated you for you to grow up acting like this.
>>11583820Shit taste on full display here.
>>11583821>>11583822Are you going to troll everyone all weekend because people not liking a half assed Bebop hurts your feelings?
>>11583823It's weird how you've chosen to get mad over something like this.
>>11583803They are both equally bad in different ways.
>>11583838But they aren't bad at all, so that statement doesn't make much sense.
>>11583803Bebop is definitely worse. I'm genuinely interested in movie style B&R so it's disappointing to see how awkward they turned out. Conductor Shredder isn't a figure I ever wanted, I have no intention of getting it so I don't really know or care if it's badly done.
>>11583859It's not awkward at all, however, so there's nothing about it that would make it worse than anything else.
>>11583859Yeah, the shredder is a totally who cares situation.
>>11583830Talking to yourself again?
>>11583879People that actually buy toys, so not you apparently
>>11583886Post collection.
>>11583886Not sure why I should care if I never had any intention of getting that figureLike if they make a figure of Shredder's mom and it turns out crappy I wouldn't care either because I don't want a figure of Shredder's mom
TMNT x Godzilla figures better go online soonNo luck in two target stores I've been top
>>11583982Mine did, but they sold out before I could get anything more than Leo. I love how goofy he is.
