Post everything related to LEGO! News, MOCs, Leaks, whatever. Play Well. FAQ:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YVt-4sibEMFOU8H484MpB-K6rNla5SIYdHZG8lyCHLQ/edit?usp=sharinghttps://www.brickeconomy.com/https://www.bricklink.com/https://brickset.com/https://rebrickable.com/>/lg/ Flickr Group:https://www.flickr.com/groups/legogeneral/>LEGO General Archive:https://archive.palanq.win/toy/search/subject/Lego%20General/>Third Party Information:https://pastebin.com/YHYxy2Ze>Retiring Sets Data:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rlYfEXtNKxUOZt2Mfv0H17DvK7bj6Pe0CuYwq6ay8WA/>General Resources:https://lgfag.neocities.orgPrevious thread: >>11757467
Shill.I can’t wait for the inevitable “aren’t you so excited about such and such leaks?!” just to shit up yet another thread and drive “engagement”. Do better goodsmile co.
Thinking about the 3in1 Creator Dragon if it was teal or light bley with reddish orange wings... mmmI'd even take magenta or dark purple with light aqua wings. Now that's a fucking palette. None of that green/red shit.I just want a source of creature parts in interesting colors.
>>11759204>Do better goodsmileNot until you buy our brick-shit.
>>11759211
IT'S UP>IT'S UPIT'S UP>IT'S UPhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXHp_QXmWbc
>>11759216Which one of these two homos is you?
>>11759200Reminder that Lego is asking for (You) to tell how they have fucked up:https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=FTUGHa1slUGUhupl30Vvqs2Wvh-cVf9As0yG8OZoWRJUREY2SjRBODkyR1pTUjJOUUg1R1g2SDdGWS4u
>>11759256>The LEGO Group has accused competing brick-building toy manufacturers of orchestrating a coordinated campaign to undermine its reputation, according to a statement released Friday by the company’s legal team.>In the announcement, LEGO said it has gathered what it describes as “substantial evidence” indicating that rival companies in the construction toy sector have worked together to spread negative claims about LEGO’s pricing and product quality. The alleged campaign reportedly took place across social media platforms, online forums, and e-commerce marketplaces.>The company claims that these efforts were designed to portray LEGO products as overpriced and inconsistent in quality—assertions LEGO strongly denies.>“These claims are not only inaccurate, but appear to be part of a deliberate and organized attempt to mislead consumers,” the company said in its statement. “Our products are subject to strict quality control standards, and we stand firmly behind their safety, durability, and value.”>While LEGO did not publicly name the companies involved, it characterized them as “competitors within the global brick-building toy industry,” some of which have gained traction in recent years by offering lower-cost alternatives to LEGO sets.>Industry analysts say the construction toy market has become increasingly competitive, with emerging brands challenging LEGO’s long-standing dominance. However, experts note that direct allegations of coordinated disinformation campaigns between competitors are rare and could signal a significant escalation in industry tensions.>LEGO’s legal team stated that it is actively investigating the matter and considering potential legal action against those responsible. The company also indicated it may pursue claims related to unfair competition and reputational harm.
>>11758805>Personally I feel like my issue with modern lore centric themes (Ninjago, Chima, Nexo Knights, Hidden Side, Monkey Kid, Dreamzzz) is that it feels hard to work these kind of sets into scenarios outside of the initial scene depicted in the sets.I have this same problem with EVERY new set. I look at the new Town leaks in >>11758726 and they use so many specialized pieces that I struggle to figure what can be made out of them except the exact model they made. The spirit of simply messing around and doing whatever you want that's so crucial to Lego suffers from how superficially nice-looking and polished the kits have become.
>>11758498Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't there a rumor about two 18+ sets ("Tahu helmet" and "Bionicle logo") coming out in 2026/2027?
>>11759258This is fake, there's no article that says this. I know, because I looked.
>>11759262Cope.
>man with figbarf: i am growing strongerTwo groups of fantasy mercenaries: the terrific trio known as the Helpful Hoods and the dastardly duo who call themselves Moonlighters (and their employer, Max Grotto)
>>11759264It doesn't exist. The cope is from you.
>>11759262By now it would have been covered by newssites like brickset or stonewars. The reddit spacing implies it's a copypasta made with ai to troll /lg/.
>>11759270Post MOCs retard.
>>11759267>>11759272Seeth
>>11759270>>11759271More Sonic sets, please
Thoughts on the Jangifesto?
>>11759270At least that boat and chopper JP set looks like it'd be fun to play with if you replace the skin-colored minifigs with proper yellow smileyfaces.
yay finally technic releasing interesting set
>>11759265neat figs
Finally got a lucky score on marketplace. The ad read "purging teenager room." Can't decide whether to build it or flip it. What are other anon's marketplace finds?
>>11759272>The reddit spacing implies it's a copypasta made with ai to troll /lg/.Perhaps, but there are news sites that do spacing like that.
>>11759305At this point I wouldn’t be surprised if it was all one guy.
>>11759280I've been saying forever that for their 20 years they'll re-remake the 2012 deatiny's bounty and it will be absolutely massive and use all sorts of new tech we seen with the temple bounty and whatever else comes after it in the next 5 years
Exo Force General Exo Force Board
>>11759278Agreed. Honestly TLG is just leaving money on the table by not doing sets based of the fairly recent Sonic x DC crossover. Just alter the prints on existing character head molds and make some minor tweeks to other prints. The fans will eat it up.
>>11759200Why doesn't Lego re-release old sets?I'm not talking about "nostalgic homages" with 5 times the piece count and 10 times the price. I'm talking about literally just making the same thing they already made and letting people buy more of it. There's a shitload of old sets I'd buy if I didn't have to pay the "rare collectible" tax on them.
>>11759386I just want simple sets that look like toy building block sets. (The brickbuilt stuff has been pretty good for this actually.) And not AFOL black box shit. I really want no stupid mario and animal crossing rounded square sets but it seems likely unfortunately since they were made for mario. I'd take that over afol black boxes though Also fuck you frog
>>11759378>Why doesn't Lego re-release old sets?Because they personally don't like you anon.
>>117592792011 Sep 22, Bloody Thursday, Highway 237 incident .
>>117592792010 June : abortive attempt at being a Reviewbrahhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHlcAKALGgM
>>11759378Betting they'd rack up the prices no matter what, didn't they basically do that with that woodsman tree?
>>11759425They say time’s a healer…
>>11759378No one tells you this, but Lego bricks are all interchangeable and mass produced and you can simply build any old set you want
>>11759444... but not for ever soul.
To the anon from the last thread, yeah I would prefer a monthly Lego comic over having to watch cartoons.>>11759373Thank for reminding me I'm missing issue #4.>>11759386I warned up to Lego Mario sets, mostly just the brick built figures. The actual sets are usually pretty awful and expensive. And I do not believe the smart brick Mario was a good idea and it looks like customers didn't like it either.>>11759301>Free LegoYou build it.
What are your guys thoughts on the animal crossing sets?
>>11759287>it's just a truckCan they at least bring back Technic Competition? or their weird scifi cars for Drome Racers?Technic figures? Anything aside from licensed vehicles?
>>11759474I hate the fact that the theme will be discontinued before they make a chrissy minifig
>>11759499I hate that the theme will be discontinued before making even a single good villager :,^(
>>11759386>Expectations for 2027 Mario sets?masonry brick but 2x2. maybe the pattern on opposite sides, maybe all 4 sides (?) 2x2 brick with "?" sticker on the side (maybe printed lol)if the One Piece Lego guy is "designing" the sets, I expect Mario-wearing-hat in $90 minimum set lol. honestly my expectations are right around where Animal Crossing is. on the very edge of seeming FANTASTIC but only if they had another minifig in every set. so I might get 1 just to have it, but each set will seem like it's too much $$ for what you get (if only they had one more minifig! argh!) so let's see if I can grab it on clearance next year (even though I would kinda have wanted it now)
>>11759474ONEMOREMINIFIGin each set, the theme would have been perfect.depending on which characters were the 1-more, I might have gotten them all, instead of 1 set each wave, and a few stragglers on clearance (I did wind up with several of them)none of my neighbors from my game got minifigs, so that sucks. but there are 500 characters so that's bad odds any way you look at it. even if you lump ANY of my 10 neighbors, that's only 2% chance. out of 100%did anybody tell Lego about the meme character? it's like free money they just leave on the table. it blows my mind how corporate people shy away from muh-controversy instead of leaning into it. Ankha is a chapter in the game. Lego could make a simple set without any reference at all to why she is popular. free money as people giggle and buy the set
Here's the Rocky moc alt built from 31162 so you don't have to buy the instructions
>>11759512>Ankha is a chapter in the game.Ankha is a *character in the game(dang spell check, but also me for not double checking, I guess)also I hope Lego is just doing a pause on the sets, pending Smart Brick success or flop, because there would be opportunities to do game synthesized sounds in AC sets that would match a whole/ lot better than the Star Wars did, or they could just forget-it and release more regular AC sets.
>>11759516He did, however, make a more accurate version out of 76217, free instructions. The retired set is at least double the price though
>>11759515yeah that was a cheeky poke at the lame One Piece thing, where they carefully designed the inclusion of the main character into only the most expensive setsA - cheap set: Luffy, not wearing hatB - kinda-expensive set: Luffy with stretch arms, but wearing the hatC - Expensive set: normal torso Luffy, wearing the hatA+B=Cthe main character is locked into high price. the joke was that somehow, they would do that with freaking Mario, too, if they could
wait the scatfag at lego is real? wtf
>>11759378>Why doesn't Lego re-release old sets?They have done this to several sets. Redbeard Runner for example had original 1996 release (set 6289) and then in 2001 they re-released it as 6290. https://brickset.com/sets/tag-Rereleased-Sets
>>11759512Given the villagers are the very soul of the animal crossing series, it’s a bit baffling they didn’t lean heavily into the villager minifigs. We have 15 sets and only as many unique villagers. It really does boggle the mind. What are the odds any individual person would be excited by even one of these? We really needed like 30-50 villagers in total. As it stands, you can’t really make a unique town. I don’t even know if there’s a representative of each personality type — is there?
>>11759474>What are your guys thoughts on the animal crossing sets?Why are you posting in an international building hobby desperately looking for friends?
>>11759604>we are so lost that only IP themes are theorized at this point
>>11759312Man this takes me back.Had plenty of the smaller mechs and the white stealth hunter, but they're all lost to time except for pic-related. Someday I'll buy a brand new sealed stealth hunter again..
>>11759200ATTN: LAN EMPLOYEESas you may have heard bricksie has turnedrelease your videos condemning and belittling him, you may delay your other review videos by one (1) business day in exchange
>>11759463>everevery
>>11759641Kek. I knew what you were going for. >how cold have we all become?
>>11759604I wonder how one can possibly be into all these shows and games simultaneously. Is this a consoomer thing?
>>11759665He gets paid to do it.
>>11759665thats not many things to be into, but who ever said anyone was into them all simultaneously? lego is trying to get a whole lot of different fans in at the same time>>11759668ban evading again carcrash?
>>11759474They're good if you like New Horizons. I'm curious what the summer one will be, did they say that's the final in the line? Anyway I feel like its a missed opportunity to ignore all of the other games, there could be some cute sets.
>>11759644He had places to go, he had people to meet.
>>11759673as far as I know there have been no "leaks" about the implied one summer set, except that there would be one. I don't even know if they were talking about the Tom Nook polybag that has been spotted in Target stores already (with the balloon present)I kinda remember hearing that AC was on pause due to Lego being overwhelmed with stuff to make, and it was not like... "done" and they would pick back up next yearmaybe a good break so they can get some new molds for different animals. maybe a non-unicorn horse would be easy, but also maybe birds, hippos, sheep, octopus legs, or any of the others
>>11759474Someone in the boardroom or decision making team is a clown for not having a cmf line ready to go with it like the amibo cards for the game, or any of the villagers people bully and abuse eachother in honour of, or beg to get from them on their islandAnimal crossing should have been a money printer but seems horribly mishandled
>>11759669What’re you talking about now? >carcrash Like the one on highway 237?
Never looked into the disney shit before, came out while I was out of the hobby, and was looking through the minifigs made for a set based on that shitty live action Little Mernaid film and found this rather odd design. The minifigure uses a non printed head with a hair piece that depicts the entire face itself. What would be the benefit of this over the standard method of hair pieces having a window for the actual face print underneath?
>>11759378This one set would be almost entirely "new" parts now because they don't have half the molds anymore, need to do the prints again, and don't produce light grey, dark grey and brown anymore (easy change, to be fair). With their part box system for themes, this would be the most retardedly wasteful product line you could come up with. And it would still be expensive as fuck.>>11759474Cute as a novelty but I'm not spending what they're asking. Stores around here never put anything on sale so I'm never getting anything.
>>11759512Depends on if they can print her face to the head. These heads are intended for a certain select of villagers, while also limiting some of their designs. Most of the animal heads have dual molding in certain areas. Some of which are made for certain characters like Lily, Fauna, and Audie. Julian is the only horse villager that's a unicorn, so I don't think they'll do any based off of that head. He's also triple molded for the white and two shades of blue. With the dual molds, Lego will print over or dual mold the same color plastic for other characters. Thinking of the limitations, I don't expect Ankha to have a unique dual molded head and she would just use the already existing cat head in dark blue. So it would probably make her short bob cut a bit longer now having to reach the bottom of her head. Looking at Sasha, her face print seems to go pretty low to the bottom of her head, so maybe enough for the yellow fur to reach and show off the bob cut at least in the front. The yellow stripes would only be on the back of her head not reaching the sides, because Lego hates side printing. The only 3D part of her is the cobra, which would probably just be printed on. Her tail, like Rosie they only did it in sky blue, so hers would just be yellow. Lastly dual molded arms, and just yellow legs. So with limitations, it's possible.
Remakes of old sets are a mixed bag, the Galaxy Explorer is one of the best sets since 2010 but then you see how ridiculously compromised Majisto's Workshop that it's just sad to look at. As a castlefag I would have been more then happy to buy the Forestmen Hideout remake but couldn't since I don't buy new Lego and won't pay aftermarket prices, meanwhile they let me buy this dogshit with no issue, thanks Lego.
>>11759782A dress wearing wizard is no match for my GITD
>>11759774game-Ankha seems totally do-able, even with a custom unique cobra piece to plug into the hat-hole on the existing cat head. people would be encouraged to buy the set just to get that cool cobra ornament piece
Which $80 Futbowl Golem are y'all getting?
I got my first lego One Piece set, the Going Merry, and the four wanted posters it came with are Luffy, Alvida, and Arlong x2? Are any of them rare?
>>11759812The posters all had equal rarity so none of them in particular are particularly collectable. That said it's really fucking shitty that they would allow repeats in the same set.
>>11759804none, only because I'm not into Futballbut I like these little art-action scenes. I hope Lego does other sports. for sure they could do Basketball (Lego already did!) but they can probably do Baseball, Tennis, Golf, Football, um... Hockey... I feel like I'm forgetting one, lol there's gotta be lots of sports that could get popular players in neat little art scenes.it's a win-win. get the exact minifig of your favorite player, and Lego gets to sell it with a bunch of pieces to jack-up the price.
>>11759804>Wasting money on Fifa shit no one will buy>Wasting money on Chinese shit no bug man will buy>Wasting money on developing the smart brick>Not producing a new castle line despite it having the largest demand of any original lego productWhat the fuck is Lego thinking?
>>11759836On the contrary I'm looking forward to the 711032 Rapist Ronaldo MOC
>>11759287This is the least shitty thing in the whole lineup so far, I still want the leaker gone and the spammer too but hey, pneumatic stuff aint dead, they should do much more vs these licensed carslops but still>>11759309>>11759305Froggy has been shown to be mentally insane before, so no surprise for me he generates ai shart walls of gibberish just to ruin quality here further and remove real posters and post more shitty shillshit to try and boost his paycheck, so tiresome
>>11759893Trying to deny there is a spammer at the point is pretty sus behavior. We all saw what happened last time he crashed out and blew up the thread with ebony and ivory.
For me it's the forrestmen.
>>11759897You do this thing where you jump back and forth between a semi-defensible claim (“a spammer exists”) to outlandish conspiracy (“the spammer exists and is paid by Lego to ruin and thin out the very thread he’s supposed to be marketing in, and he’s doing so by way of AI copypastas that portray Lego as entitled, vainglorious, and litigious” — how would any of that make any sense?).Even if I grant the spammer exists and is one man, none of the other dozen insane claims you tack on follow, and not one of them is self-evident.
>>11759893>>11759906>thinking everybody is the same guylol froggy projecting much?
>>11759908The irony, my god. You quite literally think everyone who pushes back on you is a single paid French shill you schizo retard
>>11759906You know not everyone is this “schizo” you’re referring to? Which is why I get the feeling you’re the one shitting up both sides of the bed.Post some legos. You won’t.
>>11759919I'm the schizo he is referring to please stop bullying him
>>11759395I meant the weird plates
https://youtu.be/d2qCfN10BHg?si=O2Kdtm0NvVSKFONsWas watching this video snd it touched upon a point I never considered with how old sets were designed. Because the system was so much smaller this allowed larger sets to often contain a vast majority of elements used in smaller sets giving the builder not justone big playset, but multiple smaller playsets if desired.
>>11759919>Post some legos. You won’t.Neither will you it seems
>>11759474I feel like it's really guilty of using very small parts to make the price/part count higher when everything is too small. I dont like the plates they use. But other than that its alright except for the weird as fuck villager and NPC choice. No Bob? No actual new villager from the game it's from? Alrighty then
>>11759804None. I'd rather burn my money than spend one dollar on Canadian Football slop.
Would if be weird if I had equal amounts of Spyrius droids and astronauts? Or should droids always be in the minority? Ignore the fact they are rabbits I just had a moment on bricklink...
>>11759919>not everyone is this “schizo”>which is how I know [schizo theory]????
>>11759968You should read and watch Satantango
look at my flat ugly spaceshit boy
>>11759936No idea, but you could headcanon it as a later point in time where they've automated more, for example.
>>11759978Can minifigures even sit in that? I don't think they'd have any space for the arms.
>>11759279>2013-2017: Successwhat about 2018-2026?
>>11759280Ninjago Legacy isn't evergreen, it's for anniversaries. Why would it have new sets in 2027?
>>11759978Can you show the interior?
>>11759698The tom nook polybag was leaked awhile ago, I didn't realise it was out though.I do hope that there's more sets coming though, it'll be a shame if they killed the line off without telling anyone.
>"Oh wow that Mosasaurus sure is lazy. Just a huge solid piece. Must have done it to cut down on costs...">Set retails for $100What the actual fuck are they thinking?
>>11760023a switch to the superior funwhole brick
>>11760024didn't last legacy wave for 10th anni have sets that came out the following year?
>>11760031Did you miss the brachiosaurus set? That thing was like 85 dollars for the worst tree you have ever seen, a truck, and one ugly dinosaur. Dino tax is absolutely insane. I imagine it's also the idea of hyperspecialized moulds being sooo expensive, pleaaaase we need out profit margins
>>11760031>What the actual fuck are they thinking?"Those gullible fucks would even buy it at 200..."
>>11759386Donkey Kong big fig
>>11759782>As a castlefag I would have been more then happy to buy the Forestmen Hideout remake but couldn't since I don't buy new Lego and won't pay aftermarket pricesYou should be able to still find that for a reasonable price and you definitely should get it because it's one of my favorite sets of any modern castle stuff. It's a shame that we don't get small castle sets like that anymore and they are all locked behind GWPs.
>>11760077>>11760077Wasn’t the forestmen hideout a gwp?
>>11760096Nta but you can still get them on Amazon, eBay, Bricklink. Most GWP seem to go for $30-$40. I think even your final receipt from Lego.com will show that the GWP had an actual cash price and then it says $0.00 next to the price
>>11760020Yup, those seats are on jumper tiles, so they have just enough room to have two minifigs sit side by side>>11760026I hope this is a good enough angle, it doesnt really show off the bunk beads or bathroom that well
We fucking won!
>>11759474Kino. We just Ankha and Raymond minifgs in the final set.
>>11759820Guess you just have to buy another Going Merry set :)
>>11760164What the fuck is even the appeal of lego one piece? Feels like yet another bullshit excuse to not get a Lego Pirates theme
HALFWAY THROUGH APRIL AND STILL NO LEAKS OF BOUNTY HUNTER PURSUIT 2.0AAAAAAAAAAAAIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>11760156>we won!>lego is finally listening!Sorry, but we are never getting out of IP hell, and unless you classic castle or pirates or whatever else fans come out in huge numbers as a consumer segment, you’re going to be stuck in 18+ nostalgia throwback jail subsisting on a single fuckhueg set a year.
>>11760156I'm not going to watch the video, nice ad thogood click-bait vague-ness and the request for action is chef's kiss "...you NEED to say..."I don't know if this means Lego is going to do less Castle sets or no more Expensive sets, but click and find out!Lego only "listens" to the dollars. if nobody bought the $500 Castle, Lego assumes we don't want Castle. Lego has to see -ALL $X00 sets- decline in sales, to "listen" that customers no longer want $X00 sets, and THAT ain't happening
>fake site down to make it even worse to post on and to discuss shit onthey really want the only people left on this entire shithole to be shills huh
>>11760228I don't mind being price locked out of sets but it sucks being price locked out of entire themes and licenses I would otherwise be interested in.
>>11759312i remember buying the sentai fortress, got 2 of them at wal mart maybe around 2007 or 2008, can't remember what year but they were like $25 each. I had almost all the sets except the big green wheels one and the other building at the top. the yellow robot was my favorite. the second wave of exo force sucked though the jungle one.
>>11760245>it sucks being price locked out of entire themes and licenses I would otherwise be interested in.-Zelda-Star Trekboth things I am heavily excited to see in Legoneither one affordable to mesorry even the bump-down on the Zelda to what, $130? is too much.can I get a $20 set please? dang it.
>>11759345The problem with exoforce is it lacked interesting villains.
>>11760250$130 for some plastic blocks is ludicrous though.
>>11760268>$130 for plastic blocks is ludicrousHow? What if you get $130 worth of plastic blocks?
>>11760267The problem with exo force was the butt fucking fugly mechs and cringe westoid-totally-spies-anime aesthetic
>>11760269The zelda set is about 1.1 Kg.1.1 kg of plastic costs $1.10 dollars.The raw materials for that lego set could be purchased 118 times for the price you are paying for it.
>>11760268>$130 for some plastic blocks is ludicrous though
>>11760268>$130 for some plastic blocks is ludicrous though.exactly. that's why I did not get the Enterprise-D, either.it sounds silly to say out loud, but it makes me want to cry. I like Star Trek so much! I like Lego, too! but... it's like when you see somebody in a Lamborghini or a yacht, a private jet. other people own their own islands! those things are not for me. and now, neither is Star Trek Lego, apparently
>>11760286I’m not going to get into the myriad ways this claim is pants-on-head-retarded. But you realize this necessarily generalizes to any and all Lego products, right? If $130 set isn’t worthwhile because you can buy a kilo of unprocessed plastic for $1, it follows that a $10 set isn’t worthwhile for the exact same reason.
>>11760267Incorrect, MEKA-1 is sick as hell.>>11760270Incorrect and homosexual, most likely a Gaydam fan.
>>11760209Don't worry, mousecuck, more mouseslop is churning its way through the intestinal pipeline as fast as they can get it to your trough. Keep your eye on that sphincter!
does anybody have a scan code list for the new series 29 CMF? when I try to internet search it's all "do the App!" "the App is updated!!" and I'm like, sure, let me give permission to a random App use of my phone camera. sounds alright.and none of that gets me the list of CODES. argh am I the only guy on the planet that doesn't trust the Apps? I can use my own camera and look at a number just fine
Threepio Thief got the original vid pulled? kek
>>11760232carcrash my man, you need to calm down
>>11760300what a crazy situation.that guy 100% tried to rob that C-3PO.but... who drops off a loose bin of parts and walks away? what extreme TRUST that is. that seller kid should have sat down there and watched business-guy-thief look through the figures.you basically dangled a steak in front of a starving dog and looked away. of course that dog is going to eat the steak! muh-temptation-wuz-too-great. yeah that guy is scum, but it was also cruel to test him in such a devastating way (still, to be clear, more blame on the real criminal there)I hope that guy felt so much shame he became a better person. that's just me being optimistic
>>11760292The point is that the raw materials alone still only cost the company 0.8% of the price they are asking. Yes obviously there's mold injection, leasing, maintenance, transportation, licensing, and the myriad of other production costs inbetween but if the raw material alone is that fucking cheap it makes you wonder just how much the other processes actually cost lego. That $130 set could probably be sold for $70 and still net Lego a profit.
>>11760307My point is just that your objection persists irrespective of a set’s actual cost, so you’re not actually making an argument against the purchase of expensive sets like the Enterprise. From your argument, it necessarily follows that we ought not buy any set whatsoever (since every set is a “bad deal” in light of their dirt cheap raw materials).
>>11760297What app is it? I'll download a virus I dont care
>>11760307>That $130 set could probably be sold for $70 and still net Lego a profit.this part blows my mind. typically a company sells to the store, which then needs to make profit.so Lego sells to Walmart for $50, and Walmart sells it for $100.but then Lego also sells it for $100. and I know that involves their own website/warehouse or store/employees.... but still seems like Lego gets double-profits somehow>>11760323that's like the Trading Card Game argument, where you think they are little squares of freaking PAPER yet there is massive amounts of artwork, gameplay, designing, and countless other factors involved besides just the paper & ink
>>11760324>What app is it? I'll download a virus I dont carejust Google-search Lego CMF 29 codesand you'll find the app, but not the actual code numbers
>>11760294I love robots and mechs of all shapes and sizes, no real affinity for Gundam (though I love Syd Mead’s Turn-A design). I’m afraid Exo Force mechs just don’t have “the juice” or, rather, look like absolute dogshit. And it’s odd because, years earlier with the Life on Mars theme, Lego did in fact design a couple serviceable utilitarian western-style mechs.
>>11760336>>11760294I’ll say, i dug around a bit, and the white lightning looks pretty good, especially given its age.
>>11760323No. The point is that the company is selling a product for far more than what it is objectionably worth.
>>11760344Yes, sure, and that’s true whether they’re making a 20-30% profit on a small set or a 20-30% profit on a big set, you understand? So it follows from your view that one ought not buy ANY lego, yes?
>>11760245>Being priced locked out of themesNever thought it about it that way but I see it now. Jurassic Park and Animal Crossing for starters.
>>11760250These things aren’t for (you) now.You’re not the kind of fan they want.
>>11760353>We shouldn't buy any overpriced LegoYou're acting like I disagree with this sentiment
>>11760328Nta but personally I don't think trading cards are expensive but I do feel the reseller market makes them out to be more important than they actually are. Yes, it's just paper and ink compared to Lego. Cards are some shit that could be instantly ruined by holding it wrong or a spilled drink ruining the value. That's crazy. That's why it amazes me that people still buy shit like sports cards as investments with almost zero resale value (unless of course it's a famous player, out of the entire team during that season. In which case what is more important is the historical significance and not actually the baseball card being a baseball card). Like 2 years ago I got into Garbage Pail Kids cards and was excited for the future and during the 40th anniversary they did a tiny run of their anniversary cards. They got immediately scalped. And to make matters worse they were already going for like $80 a box MSRP. That's just way too much for paper and glue and ink, and I'm not going to support that shit so I bowed out and stuck with the Minifigures and comics.
>>11760371>they did a tiny run of their anniversary cardsForgot to mention, a tiny run only available on the Topps.com website. What kind of retard thinks celebrating the 40th anniversary in that way was a good idea?? How the fuck do you celebrate new cards without any cards being available to normal people?To go back on topic, Lego really needs to chill the fuck down. I love Lego Star Wars but feel like the Smart Brick and the $1,000 Death Slice are some of the dumbest shit they've gotten themselves into since the UCS Falcon and ATAT.
>>11760370>overpriced LegoBut, for you, “overpriced Lego” is redundant, because, like you’ve identified, all of it is made out of dirt cheap plastic and sold at exceptionally high margins. You’re opposed to buying Lego as such, right?
>>11760344Extremely bolshevik thinking. When does a profit margin go from acceptable to not? How is a company expected to grow and expand with small profit?
>>11760371>trading cards are expensiveI was simply using that as an easy example of hidden costs outside of the materials involved.it takes effort to "make" a Lego set outside of the small amount of plastic. (creative design, engineering, package art, instructions, all kinds of stuff!)I get the argument. all the invisible costs do not scale. it takes just as much (kinda) effort to create a $20 set vs a $500 setif you want to go extreme, Warhammer has probably the largest gap between tiny-amount-of-plastic and price. $50 for a single microscopic guy and you even have to clip it off the sprues, glue it, and paint it yourself lol (but there's art sculpting and gameplay efforts there, too)
>>11760378Yes.... why the fuck would you support this?
>>11760382Yeah because the exorbitant profits lego has been seeing has really been producing such great products like smart brick, fifa sets, and.... chinese garbage meant to appeal to literal communists.
>>11760387And without those margins a single failure of something like Smart Brick will kill the company for good. They're sure as hell not going to survive on the 100 people who just want more castles (only "fair" priced castles though).
>>11760397Most companies wouldn't make such a massive fuck up because they wouldn't waste money on such obviously fruitless efforts you dumb fucker. I am shocked some faggot is actively defending a massive corporation price gouging and pushing anti consumer practices.
Just got the Batman big playset. Building it now. Had the Batmobile from before. What's a good Carmine Falcone fig head? I think the hair will be easy, but is there a cool sunglasses moustache head?
Forgot the pic.
...and even more broken! Happy chicken jockey day.
For selling lego, particularly rare minifigs, do you guys prefer selling via ebay or bricklink? Setting up a store on bricklink for a few minifigs seems annoying but I feel like it would probably attract more people to the listings.
>>11760386OK, Jesus, that was like pulling teeth. I’m not coming out in favour of or against Lego’s Luxury Brand, I’m just taking issue with your argument which, initially, seemed to be targeted at high cost sets ($130, $400+ sets).
Seems like the Frog got banned, anyways gonna go to B&M to pick up some random bricks in a few days, maybe I'll get lucky but I doubt it outside of maybe finding some more cool technic stuff, also doing a full bucket full may be "fun" but gotta do some moving shit too and spray painting and building stuff, may even find more pneumatic shit if I'm lucky
>>11760477reporting is broken, toolol
>>11760518https://archive.palanq.win/toy/search/tnum/11759200/deleted/deleted/not fully updated but you can see in the archives manually the posts, seems to go back a few threads too, Karmic more than anything with how annoying he is. also fuck you capcha
>>11760518>>11760520nobody cares schizo, quit shitting up our Lego threads
>>11760524evading already? sad.
>>11760526We're all sick to death of you and the frogs constant back and forth, filling the thread so it gets buried in page 3 or 4. Either talk about legos or just shut the fuck up already. Gloating about someone getting banned is bitch made behavior you schizoid.
It's not fucking fair bros, why is best girl $40?
>>11760528You follow suite rat, nobody likes a fence shitter either.>>11760524
>>11760537Learn english mate
>>11760538Learn to not to reply to bait.
>>11760111CheckedHave you thought about making sliding doors for it? You'd have to sacrifice some space to make them fit though.
>>11760209A bunch of leaked star wars sets got delayed to 2027 cause of the fartbrick and mando movie, I dunno if that was one of them though.>>11760297Have any been found in the wild yet? They don't come out for another 3 weeks or so
>>11760624Someone said they found them but never posted results. The grocery store near me started stocking CMFs with the D&D series and doesn’t give a fuck about shelf dates but I still haven’t seen them in the wild.
It took me a long time, but I now judge sets solely on their cuteness level. If I see a set and my heart goes: CUTE thats all that matters. Arguing over price, price per piece, display sets or licence shit is kinda cringe desu. It all comes down if you like a set or not.
>>11760624>Have any been found in the wild yet? They don't come out for another 3 weeks or soyeah. I had a friend that saw them in a Kohls but there were only 3 left, so he passed on 'em (he typically gets 1 of each and didn't want to remember which numbers to skip when he eventually finds a full box to look through)the Kohls near me had a bunch of the new sets, those soccer things, the Mandalorian Razor Crest... but no CMFs. I don't know if somebody got them all or if they just didn't put them out yet
>>11760498Pretty sure you want to avoid ebay like the plague especially as a seller.
>>11760532Who?
>no one posting all the new ninjago leakslazy fucks!
>>11760697Fuck off Frog.
>>11760387>>11760400you being poor is a complete non factor for lego decision makinglego is charging exorbitant prices because their customers are paying themthe entire point of a business is to have the line go up. Whether what theyre doing is morally correct, or whether their products are objectively "good" or advancing the medium technologically, does not come into consideration in the slightest>I am shocked some faggot is actively defending a massive corporation price gouging and pushing anti consumer practices.and I am shocked some broccoli head managed to live this long and not understand the most basic principles of running a business. Nobody is defending anything btw, we are trying to explain to you that you not liking smart brick or fifa sets literally does not matter at all. You dont matter. Morality doesnt matter in running a business and lego is not breaking any consumer laws anywhere.Are they greedy jewish shitheads? Yes, they are. And they are allowed to be. And people pay for their overpriced shit and lego will keep upping the price ceiling as long as people keep paying
You can get this LEGO dildo for the low low price of just $160!
>>11760156How is the lego fandom so depressing and optimistic at the same time? Every time the needle shifts ever so slightly it's suddenly "WE WON!" or "We are so back, baby!" I mean look at Bioniclefags with a Toa minifig in the upcoming CMF. You would have thought we had won a war.
>>11760156How is it the Lego fandom is so depressing and optimistic at the same time? A small shift of the needle and it's "WE WON!" or "We are so back, baby!" Look at Bioniclefags and their Toa minifig.
>>11760720>>11760721Sorry I samefaged there. I kept getting error messages and thought my posts weren't getting through.
>>11760716>And they are allowed to be.That's where you're wrong kiddo. Greed isn't a virtue. Lego must be punished for it until they stop being greedy. Every person who defends greed (like you for instance) is evil and deserves to be tortured to death.
>>11760716all of this is truebut I can add that as long as Lego offers scraps to the poor; polybags, interesting $10-$30 sets, etc they can continue to hook new customers. they accept that loss (profit still, but non-max'd profit)and Lego shouldn't be considered one-thing at this point. they sell Duplo, flowers, brickheads, Technic, girly Friends, minifig sets from the latest Marvel and Star Wars slop, all kinds of things, and while they will work-together, it's not meant to be sold to the same customer. a little bit of crying is allowed when Lego thinks Harry Potter is just as good as Castle, so we don't get Castle, but when you see Lego did a bunch of Soccer sets, you shouldn't get upset at the "waste" of setsbottom line is I, personally, "vote" with my own dollars. I do want Star Trek Lego, but can't afford the one they offered. how did the rest of the world vote on that one? it's not up to me to count the votes
Ninjago summer reveals
>>11760739>That's where you're wrong kiddo. Greed isn't a virtue.Did I say it was? How is any business in the world virtuous? Are you retarded?
>>11760752I really like the new land bounty even if its smallerThe ultra dragon looks cool but I absolute despise the design on the great devourerThe whole point of the frills was to look like a crown so how do you fuck that up
Can't you 3D print knock off lego pieces?
no Punisher for you, capeshitters
>>11760759Retards in general (but especially in online spaces like this where everything must reduce to insult and disagreement) have a hard time disentangling descriptive and prescriptive claims. So if you say, “Lego will naturally market to wealthy non-discerning yuppies over poor cretinous 4chan whiners,” people think you’re making a moral claim and endorsing Lego’s behaviour instead of just describing it.
For some reason its slow to post so the rest are here if I can't post the rest:https://www.reddit.com/r/Legoleak/comments/1sm7a6g/ninjago_summer_set_images_from/>>11760763Eh, it's Legends so its more alternate reality stuff I guess
>>11760752>>11760763https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emTopgo3c2gnot a fan of the new land bounty, glad i picked up a temple bounty when it was on salethe new transforming dragon mech looks actually good, and we finally get a new wyldfyre with itother than that the twin mechs look pretty solid, but every other set is meh, the new elemental ice and fire monsters look pretty neat at least
>>11760772>>11760768>>11760752>the awful capcha is preventing leakshit dump spamWell, it now has that positive going for it.
>>11760776>official reveals are leaksyou are actually as low IQ as you appear huh
>>11760772Yeah but it just kinda ends up looking like some random snake and not THE snake.The devourer has a very simple and straight-foward design so when you take away the one thing that makes it unique it just no longer looks like itBut whatever it's clearly not the main build of the set and as long as this design choice doesn't bleed into the show or Legacy I'm good.
>>11760776>>11760778How long has this retarded anti-leak crusade been going on? I sort of come and go from Lego general, and the last time I was active here, I don’t remember threads being full of “fuck off froggy” and “kys pedo” and gruesome descriptions of self-harm and generally unpleasant, mean vibes
>>11760781>anti leak crusadeits literally just one mentally ill schizo
>>11760783Yeah, I’m asking about his crusade. When did this actually start?
>>11760785Idk probably whenever his parents didn't get him diagnosed for severe autism
>>11760785Sometime after the “new thread?” spamshit started. It sure gets annoying with half the thread filled up with pictures of instagram walls of text or the same reposts of reposts of reposts. I support the “schizo”. You want better “vibes”? Be the change you want to see. Post your legos, post a moc, post something you just got, post literally anything that isn’t some thinly veiled product engagement and stop bitching.
Absolute DC sets when?
>>11760814Fuck off.
>>11760799>>11760781This all started due to the one guy spamming the catalog with 50 threads along with flooding them with low quality “leaks”/official picture crap, so some pushback had to come from all that.
>>11760716How do you not recognize that these practices are not good for the company in the long run? The reality is that when you go hunting for the big fish and specialize your tools to catch them you are left fucked when those fish die off.
>>11760828You're just poor and cant afford toys maybe you should collect something cheaper like pocket lint you peasant
>>11760828Lego is releasing more and more varied sets today than ever before. They’re selling more “high end” sets as a matter of proportion than in decades past, but it’s not as though 18+ black box statues have altogether replaced cheap sets. In terms of absolute numbers, it wouldn’t surprise me if you have more cheap sets to choose from today than 20 years ago. Right now, you can hop onto lego’s website and buy 400 sets for 25-50 Canadian funbucks and about as many for less than $25.
>>11760834>Hur dur you're just poor. Nice cope faggot. Not everyone is a displayslop corporate shill. Why would I bother buying the new shit when I can easily piece together sets and make my own MOCs using far cheaper aftermarket parts?
>>11760842I like big expensive complicated sets and I’m tired of pretending I don’t :^)
>>11760696Posting images was broken for me for awhile last night but the cmf forest maiden.
>>11760781Hmm feels like at least half a year now, the anti leaker guy is a nutter so we mostly ignore him. It was particularly annoying when he would spawn camp making a new general and then try and declare no leak as if he was a janny, instead of just making his own moc threads.Frankly I think it's connected to the failed moc thread attempt, the posts read the same level of deranged seethe as they did back then.
>>11760844>>11760834You already got wiped once.
What lego sets currently available are good parts packs? I don't buy new lego too often but I like making mocs and wanted to know which sets have newer useful pieces in them. Ideally around £30
>>11760873This
>>11760876I already have those 3 sets. Got them separately though. I'm just looking for a lot of new weird parts they've put out in the past 5 years or so.
>>11760864I don’t know what you mean, and additionally you’re relying to two separate people.
>>117608282025 was their best financial result in all of company history. You are a child and you think lego not appealing to you and your financial ability is this huge long term mistake. It literally isn't, the pokemon sets sold out instantly. You don't matter
>>11760858Yeah, people complain (rightly) about the leaker’s legendary spergout, but we also had like two weeks where the anti-leaker kept trying to pre-empt the leaker’s new threads (I guess because he didn’t like a new product being used as the thread image?), or where he’d post a new thread shortly after the shill had posted his, and so we had this retarded duelling generals period as though we were in the Nanboku-cho era with its northern and southern courts. Everyone needs to be at least 33.3333% less autistic and annoying please
Imagine being this mentally ill over plastic bricks, lmao
>>11760883Just dig through a flea market then>>11760894And you like being inside kids.
>>11760896That and janny inactivity.
>>11760898You need some new material, schizo
>>11760900Do you like getting banned?
>>11760897Imagine entering the 18+ SFW children's toy board on an anime website to discuss plastic building blocks and then acting superior to other posters.
Bricklink order, the ones without instructions are surfer rescue, throwbot torch, research glider and scorpian tracker.
>>11760718>He's crying about a gift with purchase>Not the fact that for like the second year in a row Lego isn't giving out a free trinket like the metal coins for free but now have to waste 2,500 VIP points for the trinket
>>11760852It was broken for most people yesterday. Pass users uploaded just fine though. Funny how that works.
>>11760906>noooooo please let me act like a manchild over childrens plastic toyslmao
>>11760920I only want you to recognize where you are posting right now, and deeply consider whether or not being the the most mentally stable poster here is worth acting superior about.
Posting any better here?
>>11760925>like being the smartest kid with Down’s syndrome
>>11760927I still can't do images for whatever reason but I'm able to post without them now semi reliably. What's the deal? Is this a captcha DDOS or something?
>>11760902I wouldn’t know, I’ve never been banned
>>11760929shits been borked for like 36 hours and the mods are being cagey about what's going on
>>11760935It’s a cloudflare thing. Jeet programmers I suspect. They rolled out an update and broke the functionality. GIGO
>>11760935Last year around this time the site got nuked right? I wonder if this will be an annual thing
>>11760925>we cant have civil discussion b-because we just cant okay, were a shithole and should always act as retarded as possiblelmao
>>11760938>CHICKEN JOCKEY!
>>11760908>now have to waste 2,500 VIP points for the trinketWe knew this was going to happen as soon as they let you scan barcodes for points
>>11760940Reflect on your own posts and see if they represent civil discussion.
>fifa world cup is on backorderwait people want that disgusting piece of shit
>>11760979>nooo please let me act like a manchild over plastic brickslmao
Why did the ucs set have to be mandalorianshit
>>11760986Those are bots, not humans. Also somebody quickly refresh biog
>Error: Upload FailedIs uploading images still down for others?
>>11761000it was apparently not because of the Disney series they made a bunch of sets for. which begs why it had to be that dumpster ass rebuild one from Disney instead of the yellow one from episode 1.
>sexually aroused to female lego minifigure
>>11761042Mostly yes. I’ve had about a 10% success rate on other boards. But cannot get in /lg/
>>11761042let's see
Absolute Batman will be in new lego batman game, sets when?
>>11761120Go fuck yourself.
Lego are idiots, they do a reveal video and then not post official pictures afterwards?
>>11761122Why?
>>11761124
>>11761123>>11761124You are the worst poster on this board.
>>11761125I love the new land bounty
>>11761128Legends cooked bros, $90 for pic related is a steal>>11761127Ok, why
>>11761129
>>11761129>>11761128>>11761125You have ruined all lego discussion for the past 4 years and continue to play coy, genuinely the worst scum.
>>11761131I think you get me confused pal, these are just official lego sets people want to see
>>11761132Nothing wrong in looking at new sets and preparing your financial savings to buy them
>>11761132>not even trying to change up how you talkGet banned again scum.
>>11761134Never has been lol, you got me confused sir. Also, these sets help people decide how to save money and spend on other sets and so on. Talk lego or leave sir.
>>11761135>>11761133>same phrasingGet a new gimmick rodent. People see through your shit and so do staff.
>the INSTANT the laggy capcha even slightly lets up the pedoshill starts flooding the general with goyslop againIt’s all so tiresome
>>11761139Speak english
>>11761141Go back to france rodent.
Gentlemen how do we stop black baseplate displayslop?
>>11761150Gun
>>11761120I like that Catwoman. She looks like a fighter pilot
>>11761137Huh?
>>11761150This and Himeji are two of my favourite sets, and they’re both black box black plate displayslop. And so help me god, if the Sagrada comes out and it’s black plate, I’ll love it too. >>11761129Don’t care at all about ninjago, but I love the way they’re playing with scale in this set. The (near?) life-sized katana jutting out looks very cool. What is “ninjago legends” anyway? Is it just like, the “premium” ninjago sets?>>11761139>>11761137>>11761134You need to settle down.
>>11761154>>11761155Die.
>>11761150lmao Zelda looks like she has some sort of raygun instead of a spell effect
>>11761162You appear not to have settled down
>>11761164Yeah, I like the set a lot, but I don’t display it with the stupid beam. It really should just be a ray of light, right?
>>11761164>>11761167I also don’t quite get why link is leaping from a tower. When does this happen?
>>11761167>It really should just be a ray of light, right?Yeah its a big ray of light
>>11761175What’s the best way to make this effect? 50 of the dish pieces the set comes with?
>>11761182Maybe one of these pieces in translucent yellow
>>11761091See this Absolute Catwoman. >>11761120
>>11761129how is that Ninjago set $90 but muh-Zelda set is $130?Lego inconsistency can be infuriating
>>11761190Lego is all about consistency
New katana holder piece coming in summer sets, dragon claws for the ninja too. The new tiger is called Zilvar and will be this summer antagonist probably, found in the cheapest set too. I think next year we might finally get a Chima crossover...
>>11761190Easy, ninjago set is an in house set, zelda is a licensed set so lego has to pay nintendo a license fee to use their IP. Lego owns ninjago so all money go to lego pockets meanwhile a part of the money on licensed sets go to the licensor, which is weird why lego focuses so much on licenses. I guess they found putting too much resources in making original stuff is more expensive than paying license tax and inflating prices foe profit.
>2 snakes and big snake in a 4+ setMust buy
>>11761197Fuck off
>>11761201Why are you so mean? You always derail lego discussion, so primitive
>>11761202You are the worst poster on this board. Fuck, off.
>>11761204Nah that's you, at least shill-kun talks about lego, you just have a tantrum all day
>>11761207Talking to yourself about leakshit that literally nobody besides yourself responds to does not count as discussion, it counts as spam, spammer.
>>11761208you think everyone is the same guy, you have truly been mindbroken
>>11761209And you have done the exact same shit on multiple occasions of accusing other anons of being me pedo-kun so seeing an ED page on you wouldn’t be too surprising at this point rodent.
>>11761211You're literally talking to a random poster, but your deranged mind has made it so you think everyone is your enemy, get some help mate
>>11761212And you’re defending the fucker who’s ruined this general for 4 years straight to this very moment and acting like everything is peachy up here and that there’s only one problem on this entire rotten site, funny.
>>11761214You are worse than he is. At least he posts klocki.
>>11761215You continue to defend his feces and expect this place to get better, thus putting you on the same level as him, congratulations.
>>11761216You are still worse than he is, why would anyone listen to you when all you want to do is burn everything down? Your'e not the plucky hero fighting the good fight, you're just an autistic schizo making threads worse for people using them.
>>11761217And you continue to defend him in this losing war in this hellhole of a general expecting anything to change, funnyroo.
>>11761219There is no war you retarded faggot. It's a fucking thread about childrens toys on a mongolian basketweaving forum. Have some self awareness jesus christ
>>11761221And yet you continue on with defending him, Strange, isn’t it?
>>11761197thats a pretty cool piece but I can already see it not working with most of the weapons (and most of the Ninjago weapons). It'd be nice for muh knights, but they got much wider blades.
>>11761222>if you're not with me you're against meTouch grass my man
>>11761224>I KNEELnice throw jobber
Can ALL schizo posters fuck off?Also, WHEN are we getting new Simpsons Lego?? ALSO what are you guys expecting for May the 4th?
>>11761223looks to be at too high an angle for knight stuff anyway
>>11761226I expect you to be homeless.
>only in one colornice moves retards
>>11761200All these cool set reveals and instead of talking about them... its whatever this is right now
>>11761232Because they are shit, and why discuss shit when this is more productive.
Castle cmf line when?
>>11761239they did an all-Space CMF, it seems reasonable to assume they could do a Castle oneor does the D&D set count? I wouldn't think so, but they might think so...
>>11761234>shitIf you think the Legends sets are shit then you are gay bro. This is the coolest stuff ever made by lego, imagine if they did Castle sets like this. Like if this ultra dragon set was fright knights bat lord on a giant bat fighting majisto on a big buff green dragon with castle ruins in there you would say its the best thing ever.
action figure theme when
>>11761135
>>11761244>collector sets aimed at 12+yos>still the same 10 and 15 Dollar tier mechs and dragons with the shitty pre-bent limb pieces
>>11761249That dragon and mech set is 9+ actually, $90>>11761248$100 for this is insane
>>11761239Or... hear me out.... we just get a new fucking castle line already.
>>11761263no you will buy $400 BDP sets with ass instructions the poor bastard made reverse constructing his moc after 2000 iterations.
>>11761264*assy digital only instructions with 900+ pages for a 2k piece build
they printed the webs without any red under it
>>11761120How is Absolute Batman ok to do but not Punisher in BND sets? Absolute Batman is Halo level age range
>>11761120Is his batmobile gonna show up? Pls make it a set, I want a killer croc set too and Bane
I think I like the Frenchman more than the toadie defending the Frenchman. This place is horrible now because of the constant product placement disguised as “heckin authentic leaks yo!” Every single thread is the same garbage now. Go elsewhere if you want leaks. “Anti leaks” is a smokescreen to distract from the fact that it’s all spam now. It’s not “discussion” it’s “consumer engagement” and it’s blatant and sad.I don’t give a shit about “leaks” but leaks are indicative of the spammer. “Which characters from which show do you wanna see as minifigures” is also a big tell by spamboi.
Why hasn't Jang reuploaded his Harry Potter reviews?
>>11761289Nobody cares you faggot
>>11761290Some wounds never heal.
>>11761292Don’t you have more capeshit yidsney slop to shit out? Shut up babydick.
nobody else stopped...
>>11761289woah nice blog but uhhh who asked?
>>11761269damn this tank car looks cooltoo bad it will have the marvel license tax so i wont ever buy itIt would be easy to mock it into Nexo Knights tank.
He had places to go and things to do…
>>11761200Anons what is this? a vintage set or an upcoming? this looks fucking cool. a boat on wheels.i remember ninjago had something like that but this is coooooli want itit will probably cost around 100 eur so i will get it
Not enough froge in this thread for my tastes.If you aren’t wizard or frog posting are you even a real boy?
>>11761304Two forced memes, which part of south east asia are you from?
>>11761306>forced memeKek. Seeing the frog knights and wizards all the autists here posted was one of the most organic things we’ve had in quite a while.Post a single Lego brick you own… I’ll wait. Sea monkeys only own shonen gooner shit pushed by goodsmile co.
>>11761304>only person who posts their own OC in about 250 posts (I lost count) and the last post was mine>only reply gets this immediately It's dead jim
>>11761239I would buy two cases
>>11761314In the episode “wolf in the fold” he does in fact say “he’s dead Jim”.That’s kinda my whole point I guess. I miss OC and human posting.
>>11761263Why not both? They will either go fantasy or semi-historical with the theme, make the cmf line the other option.
>>11761303Thats a land version of the destiny's bountyEveryone thought this was gonna be a legacy remake of the og set but it seems like it's just a thing theyre bringing into dragons rising insteadI think you should get it tho it looks awesome especially when you take the boat off and it turns into two vehicles
>>11761314we've seen that image at least 6 times now, cmon bruh
>>11761329Still my OC.Post your own. I’m still waiting.
>>11761332No. Posting something that isn’t a Reddit repost. Get the facts straight. Also, I requested more OC. >90 percent of the thread is reposts >post something I actually own>get accused of spammingThis is where we’re at.
>>11761248>child bearing hips
>no buildings in new ninjago wavethat's not normal, right?
>>11761314Here's what I'm currently working on. I've been enjoying the warmer weather and wanted to make a small Paradisa-esque summer moc. It's not finished yet, I think I'll add the suggestion of a concrete boardwalk in the background and use more Paradisa pink and white there.
>>11761349I fuckin love that water.Wizards be winning.
>>11761289There appear to be multiple people “defending” the Frenchman (I know because I’m one of them). And “defending” doesn’t exactly capture it when all these posters do is call the “anti-leak” guy deranged and schizophrenic. I have no strong opinion one way or the other with respect to the “frog,” but the dude who replies to every single image of a newly released or upcoming product with some threat or insult is unhinged and needs to calm down. He is absolutely worse for these threads than the “leaker.” I’ve been accused of being “the frog” and told to kill myself multiple times simply because I said something positive about one of the new sets posted. And I’ve been told to kill myself as well for posting something Negative about these sets, presumably because the anti-leak retard is illiterate and just sees red whenever people are discussing “leaks” (whether it’s criticism or shilling, he can’t parse).
What was his endgame?
>>11761382Internet is serious business mkay?
>>11761386Im not taking this any more seriously than any other retard commenting on the state of these threads :^)
>>11761382>>11761289Going to the core issue, just stopping the leak spammer at the core, just rangebanning the spammer’s requests for minifigs/the leaks/other obvious shilling should be a priority for the monojanny here, but we all know what he’s busy cleaning up instead.
>>11761396And stopping the leaks would almost guaranteed slow down threads enough for us to not have 10+ threads on catalog at a time with 9 of them being dead, and even if that drags us out to being like biog in terms of speed, its better than the current awful state /lg/ is in right now.
>>11761382Yeah he spergs out because if you’re not part of the solution you’re part of the problem. >oh no this place is toxic! Waaaaahhh!Figga where do you think you are?
>>11761398Getting rid of the frog is the only real way to get this place to heal, no other one in sight.
>>11761398I just don’t really see it as a “problem” as such. I genuinely don’t care one way or the other that there are new Lego products posted in the Lego thread. I comment on the sets if I have some positive or negative interest in them, and I don’t comment on the others, and that’s really the only way I regard the “shilling.”
>>11761404Moreso the way the guy does it, ironically enough due to the site shitting itself hard earlier yesterday we got a way better and less intrusive post >>11760772 as a comp of all the images instead of spamming the thread, something’s that was requested out of the shillspammer for a very long time, but now the only time he does it is due to his spam machine jittering, funny how that works
>>11761404The fact that you can’t see the problem makes you part of it. “Leaks” get spammed here constantly now and that’s all there is. It’s just spamming and the same spammer(s) have ruined most of the generals on the board. >>11761401Agreed.
>>11761410Well you understand, from my perspective, I can’t be “part of the problem” inasmuch as I don’t recognize a real problem exists in the first place. >>11761404I do agree when you get, like, a dozen images in a row, it’s a bit of an eyesore. But it doesn’t seem to actually impede conversation (what little of it there is), save that each of those dozen images now has a corresponding “kill yourself pedo” post beneath it, and then those have a corresponding interminable meta-conversation beneath them. But none of that off-topic meta-spam necessarily follows from pictures of new sets.
>>11761417Then do your part and repo some of the spam to try and clear up the board, tired of the spam, I swear he's gonna die before he learns how to catbox or imgchest.
>>11761422You are the problem, so, no.
>>11761427I see you are very twitchy when the r word comes up, funny how that is
>>11761417The problem is that we used to not have new shitty threads every 72 hours with the same copypasta “which characters do you want to see” or walls of instagram text, ai generated “content”, and literal Reddit reposts.
Do I open and build this or should I be a filthy speculator and keep it sealed? It’s not something I’ve ever had an urge to do, but this does feel uniquely “collectible” relative to other promo sets I’ve owned.
>>11761436Just hotglue it and post it here for the funny
>>11759287Oh boy. Set rehash number 10,000. How many technic crane trucks have there been now?
>>11761438You want for me to cum on the pokemon center?
>>11761441Yes, it would be really funny
>>11759447Please, enlighten me as to the modern sets where I can obtain the gold mine and keep out signs, the bugle, and the Confederate minifigures as well as the villain minifigures, the sword flag, cannon and money box. I'll wait.Next time, don't respond so off the cuff in such an uppity, contrarian manner because you're just objectively wrong.
>>11761441The amount of seeth alone would be worth it. Open it (tear the box to shit too) put it together with kragle and jizz on it. Post results.
>>11761436It's got, what, one exclusive print? it's probably cheaper to part out on bricklink than buy off a scalper unless you're a box autist
>>11761447Ok, will do, give me like 3 hours>>11761450Will do what >>11761447 said
>>11761248>>11761245I don't get why they bother, the fans that liked action figures were chased away in 2017, the current action figures are hated by the current lego community, and their prices are overinflated. bring back cheap buildable robot people or stop doing this dumb shit
>>11761444Let me clarify, my literal-minded friend: you can get 99% of the way to this build with easily accessible, mass-produced, interchangeable bricks. For that last 1%, you can probably find adequate substitutions or use Your Imagination for the 20-year-old stickers and minifigures. Apart from that, I don’t recall saying you could source all these parts from sets currently on store shelves.
>>11761452I sincerely hope so.
Been fiddling with my Majora’s Mask scene. I think the mask-coloured border is probably too much (though that rainbow palette is such an important part of MM’s atmosphere), but I’m reasonably pleased with the spooky eye on the reverse of the Clock Tower gear
>>11761466One thing, I used dark red for the corners of the eye, which I think is accurate, but in most lighting, dark red and dark bluish grey give off the same value, so the red ends up getting washed out. I’m wondering if I should just swap the dark red for regular red.
>>11761132>>11761133>>11761135Is this the worst spider man movie wave ever made? Worse than no way home... they are so ugly
Did a complete tear down and now re building, I didn’t like how the rock work was flat, and I probably won’t make it as high as before
>Lego doesn't do guns so you can't have western sets or pirates stuff sorry>Ummm akchually Why the fuck is Lego like this? Also I find it halirous that they have at least two guns in this set but the 007 car didn't get a single one and you had to use a specific piece as a fake gun.>>11761228I said schizos FUCK off.>>11761230Ice Moves*>>11761272Holy moly.
At the lego store as promised, and apparently, this piece is WAY older than what I thought it was, I had 0 idea it was made all the way back in 2001 for Harry Potter and UCS of all things, but I now have one in brown, so so far today is going well here
>>11761521Yeah, what’s with Lego’s supposed anti-gun or anti-war principle? How does this jive with all the guns they’ve made over the years?
>>11761557I saw that rifle piece come back, now I need this to return.
This set is cool.But the waist articulation is genuinely ass. One ratchet joint does not hold up all of that weight well, especially with so much added onto the shoulders and the wings. They should have used the same technique as cole's titan mech.
Cleaning out my lego bin of all the megabloks I had mixed in. What the fuck am I supposed to do with all this garbage? Does an aftermarket for Megabloks even exist?
>>11761591Those silver tubes aren't megabloks
>>11761591Yeah there definitely is a small one but its still there, either take it to pbbg and ask if anybody there would do some BST with it or just sell it on ebay for 20 bycis after cleaning it>>11761567Got one or two of these>>11761523Finally managed to obtain one of the only Magenta technic and especially Bionicle-ish pieces with this hand here, if paired with a custom dyed/painted wrist for an evil hand or something, can’t hold anything really but it’s cool
any 3d printers here? how hard is it to find abs filament that is the exact color of lego's light and dark greys?
You really don't need any other colors. Lego was so much more vibrant with a limited saturated pallet
>>11761621agreed but they need Tan/Beige for hair and bread
>>11761627nope, yellow is perfectly fine(bread can be brown depending on the context), dont let the fact that tan is classic color lego color cloud your objective judgment
>>11761621Whats the black supposed to be
>>11761667Basalt bricks or something, remember some minecraft mod bricks used to build that big smelter
>>11761621>entire build only works due to the baseplate
>>11761667set is named shipwreck island. it's a little shelter made up of ship remains. in a play session you would normally put the cannon in front of the tree so figs can rest in the hut
>>11761673and yet you could do so much with it and so fast. its almost like pieces are actually useful instead of shitty 1x1 tiles and slopes with to smooth things out with overly specific colors hard to use on anything but the official build
>>11761679Nobody is stopping you from only building with a select colour palette and piece array thoughbeit?
>>11761682>thoughbeitFuck off.
>>11761617>>11761685Apparently its 6 pounds, so its 2.5 times as expensive as the 9 pound bag that was 7 pounds of lego but much more focused, got basically all pallets with Bionicle, A ton of regular System plus cool stuff I didn’t have, and topped off with a healthy lot of technic parts and even the materials to make a piston motor (that I will wash seperately), not bad for 4 hours of work, even got an odd duplo brick and some other stuff to pair up, no direct new pneumatic stuff found though yet
>>11761685whats wrong perchance?
>>11761690Also to whichever set designer did this, fuck you, this should be an illegal technique with how I’m having to bring out clamps to remove this
>>11761621https://youtu.be/d2qCfN10BHg?si=n-50qYFNpptPkkHdThis video went up a few days ago and it put into words why I think the old pallete works so well. He goes into detail about how Walter Gropius' "International Style" blew up across Europe in the 1920s and 1930s. Despite being so limited and simple these colors actually lended themselves well to the abstraction of reality over accurately depicting a specific concept that we see in modern Lego. He actually uses your specific set as an example versus the more colorful 2009 pirates line and how the larger color pallete and less abstraction of reality makes those sets look more juniorized.
>>11761704Break out ol reliable.
>>11761721I used a heavy clamp and pulled it out, anyways it’s ALL separated jesus christ my fingers are shredded, time to wash ALL this and make sure nothing goes down tue drain
>>11761721I use ol relaible but with my tshirt inbetween teeth and brick for purchase strength
>>11759200So which is your favorite slave /lg/? Mine is still the 2006 version.
>>117617381850 version for me.
>>11761248They really need to build out the parts library to execute these action figure sets at a smaller scale. Basically CCBS but shrunken down to Mixel size and still brick-compatible.
>>11761738epic dust on thoseinvest in a glass cabinet maybestore old sets in those giant ziplock bagsmy vote goes to the cheap set lolit's cuteI know it's black-shirt sarlacc survivor Boba from his show. the show could have been better like all new Star Wars, but I kinda liked the power rangers biker gang anywayand he did use the epic seismic charge on the sarlacc c'mon that was bad-ass. eat this! lol
Buildable Shrek!
>>11761825lol he’s doing dreamworks face
>>11761825Jfc with this guy. No one fucking asked.
>>11761825The minifig Puss is hilarious, he's not THAT short compared to Shrek
>>11761825Fuck off Frog.
>>11761825Donkey looking like shreks hand was just in his dussy>>11761848>>11761883Two terrible posts that do nothing to add to the thread.
>>11761883>>11761848Not the frog, I just thought the shrek set was funny. Shrek himself being something of a meme
>>11761884You’re just as bad if not worse. Nice thinly veiled “but I responded to the slop before I was a whiny bitch” attempt too. Go back.
>>11761888Wasting trips on this. Fuck right off with that shit.
>>11761892>>11761893exactly one minute apartim nooticing
>>11761848>>11761883>>11761892>>11761893>one “leak” image>a dozen whiny replies and countingSorry, maybe I’m confused. Isn't the leaker supposed to be responsible for the spammy, catalogue-flooding threads??
>>11761893I didn’t ask to waste trips. I just like Shrek, and I recall him being heavily meme’d during my youth on 4chan
>>11761909Shrek is love, shrek is life, ignore the schizo, we all try to
>>11761910Seems like you’re the one crashing out unc.
>>11761916I'm jestermaxxing and you are just framemogged, cortisol levels spiking? uh oh melty!
>>11761825this is one of the most insane gross things I can recall Lego ever doing. you can pull off his stomach and check out the eyeball he ate
>>11761921up there with the tiger butthole and the frog that got shit on
>>11761918Don’t you need to go OD on livestream frfr?
At this point this board needs a new jannie just to continually nuke the shill.
At this point salty schizo anon should go make a moc thread and stop trying to police our lego general
At this point the shills and leakfags should go make a leak thread and fuck off from the general.
And here froggy goes with his usual, KWAB.
>>11761932>>11761936I’m not even the frog or the shill or whatever else you fucking moron. I just like Shrek.
>>11761906Mood ruiner, which is something you will never understand bot.
>>11761938You are still gay.
>>11761938Are you going to get the CMFs?
>>11761941Posting a “Hype Kit” of one of pop culture’s most beloved characters is a “mood ruiner”? But whining endlessly about the endearing green fella isn’t?
>>11761738Yeah that big one is nice but I like the more playset one that came out a few years ago.
>>11761950And you are using the pedo language again, can’t help but go 5 minutes without revealing yourself as the shill. Every. Single. Time.
>>11761944Be that as it may, I’m not French or whatever. Not even French Canadian.
>>11761954You're gay, and should go back.
>>11761710>>11761621Its kinda why I hate modern sets. I mean look at the MCU shit. I love classic Marvel comics but it's impossible to a real green hulk now. Just that olive green shit. even modern City sets feel gaudy because they're using more left over colors from Friends sets like teal, neon pink and lime, and the sets look so over designed.
>>11761952I think the capitalization of and scare quotes around “Hype Kits” suggest the phrase wasn’t exactly being used in earnest.
>>11761567I got those from the Lone Ranger set. If I knew that was going to be the last Western set Lego would ever make I would have bought a ton of them.
>someone has posted something I do not like>do I ignore it and post about something I enjoy instead?>no no, I will proceed to have a tantrum and smear shit all over the wallsThe state of lego discourse in 2026
>>11761959some vendors sometimes have like 500 of them
Post some oc… oh wait you guys don’t own toys.
>>11761968I posted my updated Zelda tower and no one commented on it :^(People only want to post leaks and complain about leaks
>>11761135>>11761248
>>11761925this is the single most horrifying this Lego has done. a diver was eaten and digested by this squid. fun. right?! kids will think it's funny! see him in the squid's translucent stomach? haha he's a skeleton now because his flesh was already consumed7775 Aquabase Invasion2007
>>11761977That is funny and you're acting like people who get seriously upset over mean spirited Spongebob episodes
>>11761969I missed it in the minutia… which is part of the problem.
I repurposed Dumbledore's office into quarters for my mages. The wizard king makes a grim announcement.
>>11761977Nah, darkest thing Lego did was in exo force with shadow crawlers using humans as fuel, ego will never be this balsy again, they also used martians as fuel in mars mission sets for astronauts ships
>>11761968Check out this broken shit
>>11761977There was a time kid's entertainment was much more messed up. An old cartoon I remember, the Inhumanoids featured a monster that its first act after being born was to eat its siblings. And not gently or off screen either. Oh, and the one of the guys watching was a human scientist whose body literally fell apart as he died in a swamp, just to be resurrected as the gross creature watching.https://youtu.be/FIZqpfJa_iY?si=AuyRjbk7pe1G7p_V&t=1213
>>11761799>>11761738lol, mousecuck
>>11761190Lego needs to actually incentivize people to buy Ninjago whereas they know millennial manchildren will buy anything that has the name Legend of Zelda on it
>>11761976There's no way this piece of trash is $100This has to be a joke
Lego action figures have always just been hilarious to me because what audience do they even appeal to? Lego collectors want minifigures, Basedlennials want giant dust collector statues, and action figure collectors want something that accurately depicts the source material with good articulation and paint work and fits into the same scale that they collect. Lego action figures don't scale with anything else, look like shit, have minimal printing and probably stickers too, you have to put them together yourself, and they probably cost 3x what a decent action figure would, being more on the cost level of a very high quality import figure. I guess kids are the target audience since they just buy stuff that looks fun? But what kid is going to spend $100 on a buildable action figure over just buying a cool set with a bunch of minifigures or buying several Hasbro action figures?
Why didn't you guys tell me Japanese lego twitter is based?
>>11762084>recycled post
>>11761349Kevin nash tee on the fig.
>>11762084Hydrocephalic Spiderman buildable figure? fucking gay modern pozzed Lego. seriously though the head looks like he has waterbrain
>>11762084Looks terrible. Definitely another "who the hell is this even for?" At $100 this isn't something a kid is just going to go in and buy, and it looks awful for an adult to want to buy. People assumed this was going to be along the lines of the recent Iron Man they did, and while that has limited articulation, it at least looks way, WAY better than this.
>>11761456Lol OK bud
Re built the rocks, and started adding detail to the bridge,
Is the DC theme cooked, bros? Look, I get that both Marvel and DC fall under the superhero theme and share the same budget, but come on, why can’t DC get some good sets?This year, for the Batman theme anniversary, we got four Batman sets, three Batmobiles, and a Bat logo. They introduced the whole Epic Moments series for Marvel with some really cool, affordable display sets, so why not do something like that for DC? Maybe a Superman movie set with a base showing Superman fighting the Hammer of Boravia in armor, or one for a Supergirl movie with Lobo on his bike on a base and Supergirl and Krypto flying in to attack him.In 2027, Marvel Studios is only releasing one feature film, Avengers Secret Wars, in December. That probably means five or six Secret Wars sets will drop around October 2027. But what will the Super Heroes theme release in the meantime? I guess we might get four Doomsday spoiler sets in 2027 and maybe some Spider Man comic stuff, but what else?I doubt Across the Spider Verse from Sony will get more than one or two sets at most, so that leaves some open slots. Will they do more DC stuff? Will they make sets for Superman: Man of Tomorrow? Will they do The Batman Part II sets? Those are going to be huge movie events, probably bigger than Spider Verse.The James Gunn led DCU is starting to build momentum, so I think after the success of Superman, LEGO should release a lot more solid DC sets in 2027. They moved quickly after the success of K-Pop Demon Hunters to release something, so why not do the same for DC?Sorry for the rant, but it’s frustrating how LEGO handles DC, even when we finally start getting good stuff. The new LEGO Batman video-game already got me hyped for the idea of Absolute Batman sets.Anyone else feel the same?
>$50 for thisThis is ridiculous
>>11762188I like the shorter cliff side. I’m very interested in following your progress. I have a similar idea just lack space. I want to make a custom 3X4 baseplate table for my castle/pirate setup.
>>11761728Why not stick it in doubled laundry nets and put it in the washing mashine on a low spin cycle?
>>11761921Aww, he even has the Breakfast Waffle Donkey promised!
>>11762197This is good but then you still have to rinse them again after. It’ll probably do the job better in the long run unless you’re taking a Q tip to each one to clean out the crevices.That gypsy stalker has some good tips on cleaning legos.
>>11762191This was also $50 btw.
The Hungarian is at it again.
>>11761132I think my favourite thing about this set is all the villains just fucking floating in mid air for no reason.
>>11762191I hope that black pig comes to PAB
>>11762188thanks for the moc updates dude, I loved all your previous ones, and it breaks up the faggots arguing about bs nicely. bridge is looking sick
Anyone else like the Marvel mini modulars? They are a good way to build a cheaper lego city and smaller scale but still look good.
>>11762218They are kino
>>11762190>Is the DC theme cooked, bros?it's bizarre that when I was growing up, the DC characters always seemed like they were more "for kids" with the Superfriends style and Adam West wholesomeness, and Marvel was connected with grown-up themes with muh-X-man-character drama (Spider-Man being the exception)but over time and recently in the last several decades DC has grown into this heavy grimdark max-serious flip of itself. even too serious for Lego to consider making sets for. and despite maintaining a slight tone of seriousness, Marvel also grew acceptable for kids, with the consistency of the MCULego still tries to sneak out some DC sets when they can, but I can understand why they hesitate. it's not really for the kids, and the adult stuff is too much. it's amazing they snuck in a fishnets Suicide Squad Harley into a Lego Movie 2 set!since I mentioned it, it would be fun to see Lego do a retro Superfriends Hall of Justice set. it would be a $X00 nightmare but they could follow it up with a $X00 Legion of Doom swamp helmet lair lol
>>11762218>cheaperAre you high anon?
>>11762272I mean, its cheaper than building a whole city from ground up like jang or bricksie did so yes>>11762271James Gunn Superman is for kids tho, even The Batman got and still gets sets
>>11762220>reddit repostTypical rat
Who would've thought the Lego Technic and City hot rods would be about the same size?
>>11762282>James Gunn Superman is for kids thoyou'd think so, compared to the Snyder extreme darkness, but that movie had a ton of not-kid-stuff including:Baby as hostage leveragecold-blooded murder of the hot dog vendorcold-blooded murder of the politician by Hawkgirlevil army of monkeys spamming internetgiant monster murdered despite Superman trying to save itSupergirl cameo! but she's drunk hot mess (I admit that's a good intro for her own movie, but not a kid-friendly insert to this one)Lois and Superman arguing like adults for muh-drama beatsthere's more I'm forgetting... it was an improvement, and most of those criticisms were them trying to be snarky edgy, but I think they failed to hit that now-for-kids! tone (personal opinion) the superpuppy was great but not enough all by itself>even The Batman got and still gets setsI feel like Batman kinda gets a pass, because he's BATMAN lol
>>11762191For that price? I'll just steal it.
>>11762083I like action figures and legos, I love the idea of lego action figuresit appeals to mewith that said, I'd rather build them myself than buy a set
>>11762359it also appeals to gundam model kit fans too since those are basically legos
>>11762363Gundam model kit builders are known to be huge Spiderman fans
>>11762359>I'd rather build them myself than buy a setat least 50% of Lego sets on the shelves should be that. Lego knows people are lazy and lack the skillz to do it tho, so here it is in a box for you>>11762363>gundam model kit fans too since those are basically legosa few years ago I tried to do a Gundam-style model to see what the hype was about, and it gave off serious Lego vibes. spend a lot of time building it, and when you are done, you got a cool thing. if the intent is to put the Lego on your shelf (and not to wreck it for MOCs) then the model kits are like, almost the exact same thing
>>11762209Same
Is dark red a known color to have issues? Needed new dark red arms for a minifig so I bought a donor ironman torso to grab them from there. Got the order and as I tried to take them off both immediately cracked off with barely any force applied to either. Maybe Chinese bootlegs?
New bread!>>11762402
>>11762404>sloppa political rage bait OPWhy?
>>11762406>Seeing politics in plastic toysLiterally meds
>>11762407>>11762404Ai pedo. I see people discussing your sins was making you extra antsy with how this board is fed up with you.
>>11762407Who do you think you are baiting here?
>>11762418I don't get it, what's your point?
It still makes me chuckle that she hasn’t seen the “fag” broken link in all this time. I broke that link months ago and it just keeps getting copied and pasted back in.
>>11762479Not like lgfaq exists anymore>>11762462Pedo
>>11762489Nope and no one has used or updated those links since like 2016. Just put the archive and last thread.
I hate the new thread. Can we have it deleted please?
I can’t wait for detailed “leaks” describing each new CMF in detail.
Actual new thread:>>11762528>>11762528>>11762528>>11762462My point is that you're a retard, don't worry though I have decided to fix your error. Feel free to thank me whenever you see fit (:
>>11762404>>11762532Oh god, we’re back in the warring threads period.
>>11762545The ride never ends.
>>11762532>>11762404Both of you deserve to be smited by Allah
>>11762545There is no "war", just use the thread meant to discuss lego and not the one meant to waste space on the catalog and encourage /pol/ack discussion.
>>11762566Both are awful, I am tired of these shillholes flooding this catalog
>>11762392brittle blue brickshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHnNNZbwaNQ
>>11762392Yes.Dark RedNew Brown (aka current brown)Dark BluePearl GoldBlue in technic pinsIn my experience all have brittleness problems from the 2012-2016 sets. Some say even earlier going all the way to 2008, but I dunno. It sucks cus 2012-2016 is quite a lot of sets and a TON of possibly defective pieces. Not all of them will be defective.
