[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: MOVIB32555__77668.jpg (228 KB, 864x1280)
228 KB
228 KB JPG
What's the worst film adaptation ever made?
>>
>>214170270
Bro you are cheating by posting that, like give people a chance to form a discussion or something before you just jump in and post the objectively correct answer.
>>
I've come around to this movie, ignoring all the terrible Jake shit with his mom.
>>
Was this an adaptation? I thought it was a sequel to the incredibly long and dragged out book series and not an adaptation.
>>
File: evolution_poster.jpg (81 KB, 300x443)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
>>214170270
>>214171135
>>214171207
>>214171314
>>
File: asterix konichiwa.jpg (159 KB, 1580x859)
159 KB
159 KB JPG
>>214170270
>Adapting a 6/7 book series where almost every book is +600 pages and turn it into a 90 min movie
>>
>>214170270
Are we finally allowed to talk shit about it?
You absolutely were not allowed to when it released. Any criticism was met with "UR LE RACIST INCEL!!"
>>
>>214171418
What are you talking about? Even racists like Idiris Elba.
>>
This was good
>>
File: Vegiit.jpg (340 KB, 720x896)
340 KB
340 KB JPG
>>214171366
Reboot when?
>Zendaya: So, hot-shot you want to fight Ms. Buu?
>Henry: Waku waku? *Kage Bunshin no Jutsu* No, I wanna rape you. BIG GANG BANG ATTACK!
>>
>>214171314
It was a sequel but you had to be a no-life nerd that had read all 8 books to understand WHY it was a sequel and not an adaptation.
And it all boiled down to "Ahh, Roland is carrying a prop that looks like a horn, that explains everything!"
>>
File: jungle book.png (904 KB, 1075x717)
904 KB
904 KB PNG
Jungle Book (2016)

Poor adaptation of the animated movie, even worse adaptation of the book. Completely misses the entire goddamned point of the story with its "ha ha we subverted your expectations, aren't we clever" ending where Mowgli burns down the entire jungle and then decides he actually belongs there instead of with Man.
>>
>>214172597
Horn of Arthur Eld, meant to indicate to anybody that read the books that it is the sequel to the 7th book.

I ain't ever heard of no eighth book, but I do admit, it is completely terrible compared to the books.

If I had it my way, I'd direct a Netflix series about the dark tower, with every book being a season. Then we'd get the real story. But Stephen King and Hollywood insist that nobody new come onto the scene, nor are they interested in subsidizing such works.

All to industry, all to the Crimson King, who conquers the world on the budget plan.
>>
>>214172597
The ending was a retarded cop-out to begin with because Stephen King doesn't know how to end a story.
>>
>>214172884
Who would you cast as the black lady who talks like buckwheat and has no legs?
>>
>>214170270
I think you posted it, OP.
>>
>>214172971
How old was Odetta/Detta/Susannah supposed to be, again? Maybe Zoe Saldana could work - obviously cast myself as Eddie.
>>
>>214172971
>>
>>214172884
It's not an "eight book" per se. It's a novella set between Wizard and Glass and Wolves of Calla, it's called The Wind Through the Keyhole. It's ok.
>>
>>214170270
The dreamcatcher. It's also the worst movie I've ever seen overall.
>>
>>214173341
It was a crappy book to begin with.
>>
File: file.jpg (80 KB, 600x900)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
>>214172971
Anybody with this look, to be honest.
>>
>>214173379
he wrote it while he was recovering from being hit by a car so it's not surprising
>>
>>214173593
Guy should've backed up to make sure.
>>
File: Winton_wish.jpg (102 KB, 852x639)
102 KB
102 KB JPG
World War Z isn't the worst zombie movie if viewed as it's own stand alone IP. Yet as an adaptation it's terrible. Being they basically ignore the book's content and just use the title. It should have been a short run cable series.
Except now we are a decade+ into endless zombie shit and spins offs of spin offs from Walking Dead etc. So the last thing we need is oh look, another zombie series. All book adaptions are some level of a monkey paw wish being granted. Like yaaa a film/show but something is always off....
>>
>>214173593
Maybe don't try to write a novel while you're doped up on painkillers.
>>
>>214170270
I know I watched that movie but I can't remember a single scene
>>
>>214172627
That's the one directed by Andy Serkis, right? He's a notorious shit director
>>
>>214173898
WWZ is legit and confirmed straight up Zionist propaganda
>>
>>214174346
No, it's the one directed by Jon Favreau
>>
>>214174188
Same.
I literally cannot remember anything from it.
>>
File: file.png (724 KB, 1197x497)
724 KB
724 KB PNG
>im sorry sweetheart but the man i replaced your dad with wants you out and I just can't help but spread my slit for money and stability even if it means sacrificing my child
Women lmao
>>
File: file.png (321 KB, 598x440)
321 KB
321 KB PNG
STEPHEN KING LOOK OUT!
>>
>>214170270
I haven't seen it yet, but don't get it. Matthew McConaughey as Roland seems kinda perfect, what with his Western drawl and all. And Idris Elba, a black man, playing the literal Man In Black seems a bit too on the nose, but he's charasmatic and naturally terrifying enough to make that work too. With such stellar casting, why didn't this movie adaptation of King's magnum opus succeed?
>>
>>214173341
AH come on it has its moments
>>
>>214175762
Dudditz looking like Dana Carvey from Master of Disguise was something I always got a kick out of.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.