[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>he watched the bluray/dvd/vhs
>>
>>214192435
why the fuck would i watch fuckin cinderella? that shit is for little girls
>>
>>214192495
you're such a tough manly man broski.. im sure you dont have a tranny fantasy in there
>>
>>214192495
Cinderella 3 is the best one though
>>
>>214192700
>troons out of nowhere
What that fuck is wrong people on this website kek
>>
>>214192435
am I supposed to think one of them looks better?
>>
File: Aladdin (1992) 35MM vs BD.jpg (2.93 MB, 1920x2160)
2.93 MB
2.93 MB JPG
>>
>>214194201
>magic wand select all
>point click color
>ctrl + g
>fill selection with color
>>
This shit makes me want to stop watching movies.
>>
why do boomers hate film grain?
>>
>>214194325
Why?
>>
File: 1747064515650019.jpg (635 KB, 1900x1267)
635 KB
635 KB JPG
>>214192435
I know left is old and right is new.
1. The coloring looks better in the old version but the lighting looks better in the new one.
2. This one looks so much better in the old version because the lighting is more somber.
3. The new one looks kind of better because the coloring makes the party and silhouettes pop more.
4. The new one looks better. The colors seem nicer and the quality increase is more noticeably a good thing.
5. The dingey colors and shadows kind of look better in the old one.
>>
>>214192435
Do you know back when movies were printed to film and projected on film; you could go watch the same movie at two different cinema locations and the movie could actually "look different" due to the chemical emulsion of the film reels and the brightness of the projector bulb, etc?
>>
>>214195675
>lighting looks better in the new one
absolutely not, everything looks flat in the digitally "polished" versions. perspective and shadows got washed out in the process of removing film grain.
>>
File: 220px-Everafterposter.jpg (27 KB, 220x319)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
This is the only version of Cinderella I actually like. No stupid singing and actually mostly realistic as if it was historical events that were changed into shit like the Disney version. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szP9U0uLl5U
Anyone else?
>>
>>214196364
I think I saw it when I was a kid. I'll put it on my watchlist and see it soon.
>>
>>214196364
>>
>>214192495
maybe you have someone to watch it with you incel



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.