>Nobody.2.2025.2160p.AMZN.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.265-BYNDR>Nobody.2.2025.2160p.AMZN.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.265-BYNDR>Nobody.2.2025.2160p.AMZN.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.265-BYNDR>Nobody.2.2025.2160p.AMZN.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.265-BYNDR>Nobody.2.2025.2160p.AMZN.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.265-BYNDRBetter Brawl Saul...2!Only 10GB!
>>214202305>Nobody:>OP: Nobody.2.2025.2160p.AMZN.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.265-BYNDR
>>214202305Already?Did it bomb?
>>214202338yes
>>214202338Yes, it did. Nobody seemed like a fluke success but I don't think it warranted a second movie and they will pay for it now.
>>214202305John Wick at home
>>214202320
>>214202305I AIN'T WATCHIN THIS SHIT, NIGGA
>>214202305Kino
>>214202556They may have lost money on it, but not very much. >25 mil budget >36 mil box office >seemingly very limited marketing campaign >box office skewed toward North American ticket sales which is better than other international ones As flops go, it would be a minor one, a rounding error on Universal's books
>>214203758I read that last line in Chuck's voice
>>214203758>>25 mil budget >>36 mil box officeit deserved to flopshit movie
>>214202320kek
Nobody asked for this
>>214202338nobody wants to watch boomer fantasy core. people are getting fed uo with wick already
Good movie, better than the first.
>>214202305Good film, aside from Sharon Stone's character basically being the worst villain Derek Kolstad has ever written. Thankfully, she's only in the movie for less than 10 minutes.
>>214202305This really didn't need a sequel.The first one already felt like midlife crisis cope for Odenkirk
I liked it, thought the action was a bit stiff and slow though.
I thought the boat fight was cool, but the rest of the action was pretty lame.
>>214205112>Sharon Stone's character basically being the worst villain Derek Kolstad has ever written.It was not a good film and this was literally one of the worst parts. She was pointless.
>>214205566She's broke and will take anything these days.
>>214202305>Antagonist: "You're nobody! Time to die, old man!">Protagonist: "Nobody, huh? Heh. Well, when i'm through with you, you'll be nobody too"I clapped
>Who the fuck are you two?>Nobody 2Yep, it is kino.
>>214205613>She's broke and will take anything these days.I don't really blame her. I blame whoever wrote her stupid, pointless character.
>>214205034>Good movie, better than the first.this has to be shilling. the first movie was much better than this slop
>>214202305>Nobody>Went 2 see that movie
>>214203758Why do retards not realize that theaters take a chunk of the profits?Do you people legit think theaters show the movies for free out of the goodness of their hearts?
>no ilya naishuller>he made heads of state insteadcan anyone confirm if this is kino or slop?
>>214206696>john cena>nigdris stealba>some common brown slut>retarded name>nigger presidentthis is confirmed retard trash
>>214202320put me in the screencap
>>214205613Ohhh! What is this, Casino starring Bobby D?
>>214202305the script was 100% written by ai
>>214206608Nta, but let me walk you through this>25 mil budget>21 mil domestic gross>7 mil foreign marketMeaning the movie lost them 5-8 million in the end of the day. That's not a tragedy, and at budget this low, this is completely acceptable.>b-but cinemas take a part!Yes, and? The point is that this movie barely flopped and that means that there won't be a 3rd one (good), but the studio didn't lost some huge pile of money on cinema run. Now they are in good position to recoup whatever loss they had with streaming and home-media sales and rentals, ending up back to square one or having a mil or two of profit.Considering the current state of affairs, how bad the movie was and how little marketing was done - that's actually a success, and not a problem.>>214206696It's the sort of movie you play on a party around 3 AM when everyone is plastered and half of the people are already asleep. Think Cannon-tier quality.Has two or three funny montages, plot is barely there (but this is not a movie you watch for plot) and if you are old enough, you will notice they are constantly joking about Air Foce One with FordThat's about it.
>>214207714>Meaning the movie lost them 5-8 million in the end of the day. That's not a tragedy, and at budget this low, this is completely acceptable.Losing money isn’t acceptable, you retarded shill.The point of movies is to make money. This movie lost money because it was a bomb, dumbass.Maybe next time they should spend the money making a good movie instead.
>>214207762>Continues to miss the whole point that was made>Still argues with voices in his headMaybe next time you should notice that I said the movie was awful.
>>214207762Heist lost studio 10 million in cinemas, earning 29 mil on 39 mil budgetThen it earned - directly to the studio, with no middle man involved - 75 million in home media.Your move, retard
>kills female henchman>"That's what you voted for!"KINOINO
>>214207762It is perfectly acceptable, up to a certain margin and also fixed sums. Losing 10-15 millions is very easy to recoup from, and if you used any of the filming tax cuts, you get another 5-8 mil of "loss" that's still not a problem.Because that's still profit to the studio itself, even if it didn't make the budget back.Given how this movie was produced, all they needed was making 10 mil domestically. They did 9 just in the opening weekend. Anything after that is profit TO THE STUDIO, even if it barely made 36 mil against 25 mil budget. This wasn't a blockbuster, so no, they didn't need to earn 2.5 the budget to even turn green. They could be below half their budget and it would still be profit.The only thing that's gonna happen is no further sequels, as pointed out by >>214207714, since it wasn't profitable enough to justify making another. First movie did 58 mil against budget of 16, so it made blockbuster-like profit. Hence the sequel.
>>214202338the people are tired of wicklikes
>>214207956Judging by the last Wick - no, not really.What they are tired of are cheap and poorly made Wicklikes
>>214202494>>214202556It's a shame it bombed, but Bob Odenkirk seems like a nice dude, and I'm happy he's at least getting paid while his star is at its peak.
>>214208003Ballerina? That flopped
>>214208003They're sick of any John Wick like movie, that doesn't actually star John Wick.
>>214202305Wait what? When was the theatrical release? i thought it's still incoming but it already headed to streaming
>>214202305Boomer Fantasy or Söy Action ?
>>214208048I said last Wick.And explicitly noted they are tired of cheap knock-offs
>>214208447see>>214208164
