[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


i feel like there were two really good jokes
>breaks windshield and one is put back on
>wakes up in hospital where it's all a ruse for everyone to get busted
top notch jokes but the rest was just kinda meh
>>
i was laughing almost nonstop
>>
I tried watching this and really wanted to like it because i love the other naked guns but...it was kinda, boring. The jokes are all pretty mid "Take a chair...no thank you i have chairs at home. 5 minutes of sceen , actress walks out, walks right back in "On second thought i will take a chair". Ummm...ok? I stopped it about halfway. I wouldn't say its bad just barely ok. Ish. Kinda.
>>
>>214227228
My favorite was his voiceover saying "she had the kind of butt that would make any toilet beg for the brown". Most of the jokes were fine, not bad but not laugh-worthy. Some of the randumb humor like the owl was cringe, thankfully there wasn't much of it
>>
Loved the snowman part. War of the worlds was funnier
>>
>>214227228
I was extremely stoned, but enjoyed this a lot.
>>
>>214227228
It was more competent than it had any right to be
>>
>>214227228
>>214227278
It wasnt as good as the original naked gun, airplane, hotshots, and other zucker shit

But for a 2025 movie it was great.

>>214227278
Yeah I agree, not non-stop but that is mainly of how shitty I am feeling with the modern world but I did laugh a lot which has been years when watching comedy movies

I might actually rewatch this one
>>
>>214230537
>But for a 2025 movie it was great.
it gives me hope for the future of comedy movies. just give me silly bs jokes one after another. most comedies now have political undertones and it's all so tiresome.
>>
We need comedies back like these. Scary Movie parody series don't hold up well for me, corny and cringe, not as funny as they went along.
>>
>>214227228
11 minutes into it.
Rating so far: pure kino
The gags are all on point with the old series.
If it holds up, it's 8 or 9/10.
>>
>>214230949
>Scary Movie parody series don't hold up well for me, corny and cringe, not as funny as they went along.
scary movie 3 is a classic. not sure about the other ones.
>>
>>214231217
I think with Leslie Nielsen in it, did win for me. Obviously.
>>
>>214227228
its a lot of fun, but I did feel like it became less funny in the last 20 minutes when it becomes more focused on its lame action movie climax
>>
Sooo, I guess the fixed the "digital" by adding grain and filters, so that was good. The acting was actually decent, you could see Liam and Pam doing their best to match the way Frank and Jane used to talk, especially Pam did a great job. I also liked the henchman acting and face expressions, great casting. But the pace of the movie was all wrongb - at times I just wanted to watch a serious noir film and actually forget I'm watching a comedy. Jokes were mind of bad too, especially thr monologues they tried to literally mimic off the original Naked Gun were just so flat and felt wrong. So yeah, not terribly bad, but not good either. Not actors fault though, mostly the writing. Oh and music was mostly totally off - I get it they were trying to be funny with it, but it was all wrong because it was way too serious.
>>
>>214231306
agreed
>>
Comedy tends to be Satanic in general
>>
>>214228846
>Some of the randumb humor like the owl was cringe
Are you retarded? The owl had setup early on. The snowman montage was the only really randumb joke in the movie.
>>
>>214227228
Worse than ZAZ movies, better than Brooks movies.
>>
Needed more background gags desu.
>>
>>214231306
There was some dude who fell asleep in the back corner of the theater at my screening and started snoring extremely loudly as soon as the fight scene outside the stadium started. The comedic timing of it was so perfect it took me a while to even realize it wasn't part of the movie. Made everyone in the theater laugh when they figured it out too, always go see comedies with a crowd if you can, made the experience even better
>>
>>214227228
It was very dissapointing. People were praising it till the point I started to have faith in it.
Watched 30 minutes last night. Barely no background jokes, whole 2 minute sequences without any jokes, lot of old 20 year old references and some jokes that have been done 200 times in other movies.

This is NOT The Naked Gun, this was an average comedy.
>>
>>214232190
An actual relatively human non-shill post and the thread dies lmao
>>
>>214232225
>relatively human
Best compliment I received today anon, thanks.
>>
>>214227228
It was good except for the cringy snowman joke that went on too long and the silhouette joke they blatantly stole from Austin Powers.
>>
>>214231345
Give 5 examples.
>>
File: notgay.jpg (272 KB, 1080x1440)
272 KB
272 KB JPG
>>214227228

No. And Seth MacFarlane is a demonic homo.
>>
>>214227228
>i feel like there were two really good jokes

Much like the other Naked gun films. He whole thing is Smirk-worthy, but there are only really 2 or 3 jokes that will be enough to make you laugh out loud.

The Police Squad series it followed on from was stuffed full of jokes, running gags, slapstick and sight gags in the background and much better in general. Not that the films are bad, they're still more fun than most comedies, but I would have preferred more Police Squad.
>>
>>214232338
>the silhouette joke they blatantly stole from Austin Powers.
that's an old joke. austin powers stole it from someone else.
>>
>>214227228
it's just not the same
>>
>>214231217
3 a classic but 1&2 not?
>>
>>214231345
>Jesus doesnt like it when you laugh
>>
Barely any background gags and too many "serious" moments. They don't understand Zucker comedies at all.
>>
The OJ gag was alright.
>>
>>214233223
>3 a classic but 1&2 not?
1&2 were good, but they hit their stride in 3. i don't think i even watched any of the ones after 3
>>
>>214233378
>but they hit their
First two are made by different people than 3 and the rest
>>
This thread reeks of plebbit. I will never watch this movie as it as travesty and Liam Neeson is a shit actor.
>>
>>214227228
It didn't had to "be good", it had to be "good enough"
>>
>>214233291
needed more OJ jokes
>>
>>214231651
I didn't really notice the lack of them as I watched it but now you mention it yeah it was lacking in that, the only one I can think of was the messed up writing on the police squad door but they took that from the previous movies i'm pretty sure
>>
>>214233431
>It didn't had to "be good", it had to be "good enough"
agreed. the first trailer had me hyped, but then i was thinking it would be a letdown. it was good enough and at least we got an actual silly comedy.
>>
>>214233047
Police Squad's 30 minute format just works better for pure silly comedy.
>>
>>214227228
>>wakes up in hospital where it's all a ruse for everyone to get busted
that's the first scene of Brian de Palma's Mission Impossible 1
>>
>>214233682
>hat's the first scene of Brian de Palma's Mission Impossible 1
still funny
>>
>>214227228
it got few laughs and couple of chuckles out of me, that's better than most comedies since 2000.
it's unpretentious and with NO PROPAGANDA which by itself makes it worth of watch in these times
>>
>>214231306
it falls off hard after the first half hour but it never gets too bad and manages to sqeeze in couple more good jokes. maybe if they gave it another year of writing it would be packed from the start to the end, but even originals weren't that good



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.