Why does Jurassic Park monopolize dinosaur movies and no others are allowed to be made?That movie 65 was mediocre asf but ok.
>>214323423Dino kino just came out last month.
>>214323423>That movie 65 was mediocre asfYeah i was really disappointed by it. The quiet place directors were not right for the project. The designs for the dinosaurs were far too much like creepy horror movie monsters. It completely failed to capture the awe and majesty of the animals you should have in a dino movie. Large predators like lions are still beautiful and majestic animals even if they're dangerous. The movie didnt understand that with all its creepy designs. We also never see large herbivorous dinos for some reason either.I guess the idea was they wanted people to feel happy instead of sad when all the dinosaurs get killed at the end by the asteroid? Very misguided movie.
>>214323500>>>>>>came out last monthTHIS is out? In the ‘plex?? I literally had no idea I thought it was an October/halloween movie release for some reason.
>>214323580>The designs for the dinosaurs were far too much like creepy horror movie monsters.That was the best part. All your gripes have nothing to do with why the movie was bad. I loved that the world of dinosaurs was just a horrible hive of disgusting predators eating each other so when they all get eradicated you can cheer for the good, nice animals like mammoths to show up.My problem with the movie was the action sequences were kind of eh. The cave part could have been scarier and dare I say a little longer to build suspense. And the final battle with the main beast made no sense I didn’t even get how they defeated it.>beast walks up to a hot water vent and stands there>gets blasted>lives>keeps standing there>gets blasted again>this time it doesn’t have a face after>diesThat was retarded and I didn’t get it, but other than that it was ok.
>>214323704>loved that the world of dinosaurs was just a horrible hive of disgusting predatorsBut the movie's climax had the nice Tyranosaur help them by fixing their spaceship to be upright so they could escape while he nobly stayed behind to fend off the meteor.
>>214323949wut
>>214323423>>214323580Doing good looking dinosaurs on the big screen is very expensive and would be risky without the JP brand. 65 tried but part of the reason it was lousy was that the budget wasn’t big enough.
>>214323628It was one of those very limited Fathom releases. Decent B-Movie.
>>214325041Really it doesn’t even get an actual release? What the fuck Jurassic literally has a monopoly.
>>214325281Eh I don't think it was about the Jurassic Monopoly, more that it was clearly conceived as a B-movie from the start (low budget, cast of B/C-listers, etc.)
We don't get many good creature features in general these days.
>>214323423The power of BRANDING. Anyone can still make dinosaur movies if they want, but none will have the brand power of JP.
>>214325378Was it good??
Come up with a dinosaur movie that isn’t a remake of Jurassic Park or its many sequels, a Children’s movie, b-movie slop, or what’s basically a documentary(this would include something like an adaption of Raptor Red).
>>214326399I would remake Carnosaur.
>>214326399Make an adaption of Raptor Red. Kill anyone who suggests adding voice over or narration.
>>214323500This was in theaters here but another movie I actually want to see isn’t playing anywhere within five hours from me.
>>214326399I have an idea but I keep it to myself because I don’t want the jews to steal it. I might write a book about it. Then I will sell the rights once it becomes popular and I make millions of dollars.
>>214323423There were dinos in 2005 Kong.
>>214326186>brand power of JP.It's sad that this is true when most of the JP movies aren't very good.
>>214326399But that's EASY.
>>214326212It was a solid 6/10, too long and very dumb but the dinos looked surprisingly good for the budget and the gore was satisfying.
