>>214358199
It is quite weak though, considering its power can be altered by the perception of its victims.
It just took time for it to find people smart enough to catch on that.

How do normies find this incarnation of IT to be scarier than the original? It's so over the top and in your face, there's no room for suspense or uncanniness. It's an assault on the fucking senses and looks like an AI creepypasta. It seriously feels like the work of a middle schooler

File: library spook.webm (2.88 MB, 900x404)

2.88 MB WEBM

>>214358519
The first new IT is definitely vastly scarier than the original even if Curry is amazing.
The sequel is cheesy hammy tier though
The original is only scary if you're watching it as a kid which is quite fitting

>>214358611
I guess the reason I find the original to be scarier is simply the analog nature of it. Having more humanoid qualities makes me think it's slightly more plausible to happen irl