The age of man-made cinema is over. The time of slop has come.
Lol, how is the budget still in millions?
THESOULLONGSFORAUTHENTICITY
>under 30 millionlol, what the fuck. This is ai, why do you need so much money? Flow's budget was like 3 million.
>>214392790flow had like 5 assets and sets and was 15fps
>>214392731I hope this succeeds and Hollywood burns to the ground.
>>214392789...out of fucking Hollywood?>>214392772>>214392790Generative networks are hardware and power thirsty little slutsYou wouldn't know because you're dumb neets who think everything just happens on its own>>214392805I hope this fails and Hollywood burns to the ground anyways
>Budget of under $30 MillionHuh? Why is it still so expensive? AI films only work if the budget is drastically cut to make them.Godzilla Minus One was made with a budget around $15 million.AIdogshit won't survive if it's still going to be that expensive.
HOW DARE THEY HOW DARE THEY THIS WILL NEVER REACH THE HEIGHTS OF PIXELS OR THAT ONE SETH ROGEN MOVIE WITH HOTDOG FUCKING A BUN. OR THE ONE WHERE A WOMAN WANTS TO FUCK A SEINFELD BEE OR THE ONE ABOUT A GAY KID IN SPACE WELL THEY MADE MORE THAN ONE BUT WHATEVERSUFFER NOT THE AI TO MAKE ANYTHINGHERESYHERESY
>>214392731I'm curious what the method would be. Text to video would be very wild to see, so I doubt it. I imagine it's more like text to 3D model and then using AI to animate movements.
>>214392731This is going to flop hard and OpenAI fags are going to pretend that it has nothing to do with them
>>214392790>>214392801Flow was lovingly crafted by ex-soviet artisans running Blender on ten-year-old hardware. This shit will burn through render farms
the entire sales pitch for generative AI was the relative low barrier of entry in terms of both $$$ and time investment. fantasy of "anyone can make their own" for the common man. looks like hollywood still owns us
>>214392842>>>214392846You should read about controlnets
Its always a race to the bottom with these soulless kikes
>>214392877kojima has dogshit taste. i liked that shitty film blender did about cannibal gnomes more. at least you could jack off to the characters.
If a regular person can't make an entire AI film for under 10k then what is the point?The entire sales pitch for AI was that ANYONE could use it to make a film.Novelists were supposed to be in their underwear in their studies writing and entire film to be generated through AI.You're telling me that's not what's going to happen?AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!OH NONONONO LOOK AT THE TOP OF AI's HEAD.
AI generated digital effects are much, much better than the 30 Indian farms that are outsourced to. You can get mad at that sentence all you want, it's just a fact.
>>214392731They won't give fucking people $30m anymore. Some of the best movies were mid-budget movies. They've all but disappeared. I hate the new streaming media landscape and all the social media shit. I miss movies.
>>214392772Saaar I make the movei benchod
>>214392967What the fuck is the point of IBM fiddling around with all of these big vacuum tubes? By them having made such a thing, I was innately promised by God that I'd have a computer at my beck and call. I don't want them damn vacuum tubes in my house! It's been 5 years already and they're still fiddling! Tarnation, why don't they ask my permission or opinion?
>>214392984they do get made it's just that they're mostly prestige pictures. like eddington, elevation, old guy, civil war, etc.
>>214392825>out of fucking Hollywood?Yes, you salty bitch.
>>214392731>they’re this desperate for ai customers i can’t wait to buy a two story house after this shit blows up
>AI takes away human jobs>Humans become jobless and broke>Humans can no longer afford to spend>RecessionSo what is their end goal?
>>214393093GPT-2 had more soul than any Hollywood writer has
>>214393105Won't someone think of SAG-AFTRA?
>>214392877Did not like Robot Dreams at all, I get the point of the repetitiveness and the framing device but it just didn't work, the chemistry wasn't there even if the designs are cute.
>>214392877Never even heard of robot dreams but if le creatividad thinks it's good maybe it is, is it woke?
>>214392731>humans had to prompt and edit every step of the way>still took 9 months and $30mThis "AI" is fake and gay. Zero labor being saved here for a big expensive pile of slop.
>>214393142It's meh, but a lot of people liked it so I am not an arbiter of quality here. It's not really woke, but it's not really anything. The central concept seems like a metaphor for something, but I have no clue what lol. Some people said it's meant to be a gay romance, and you can kinda see that, but the director of the film said the movie is about friendship and was inspired by his own friend, so I guess it wasn't meant to be gay.
>>214393053>We believe the statement that you attribute to Thomas Watson is a misunderstanding of remarks made at IBM’s annual stockholders meeting on April 28, 1953. In referring specifically and only to the IBM 701 Electronic Data Processing Machine -- which had been introduced the year before as the company’s first production computer designed for scientific calculations -- Thomas Watson, Jr., told stockholders that “IBM had developed a paper plan for such a machine and took this paper plan across the country to some 20 concerns that we thought could use such a machine. I would like to tell you that the machine rents for between $12,000 and $18,000 a month, so it was not the type of thing that could be sold from place to place. But, as a result of our trip, on which we expected to get orders for five machines, we came home with orders for 18.”
>In December 2015, OpenAI was founded as a not for profit organization by Sam Altman...>chief executive officer of OpenAI since 2019>Altman was born on April 22, 1985, in Chicago, Illinois,[11] into a Jewish family>Altman has been a vegetarian since childhood.[135]>Altman is gay, and first disclosed his sexuality at the age of 17 in high school, where he spoke out after some students objected to a National Coming Out Day speaker.This is how "le based" brownoids on here simp for.
>>214392825Multireply faggot no one is reading your post lol
>>214393209>We, unsourced, believe you are a tranny missing the point of the post
>AI can't be kin-
>>214392938You are a soulless kike if you think AI isn't brilliant. Retard go be zoomtarded somewhere else trannyfaggot
>>214393162>>214393218But everyone hates Altman for closing OpenAI after Musk funded it to be openImagine being such a dimwitted narcissist you delete your post because "oops I forgot to greentext that part and hit Enter wrong!"
>>214393120Sagaftra can get fucked in his sagasstra
>>214393260AI isn't even real.It's Indians writing this stupid shit out and making the animations in real time you idiot.
AI destroys both hollywood AND leftist bluesky devientart tranniesWhy wouldn't you support it?inb4 muh indiansI'll take a few pajeetslop videos in my feed over leftoids getting btfo forever
>>214393239Go back to Twitter, you pathetic retard
>>214393281Yeah okay retard lol Indians can just do incredible things now. Dalit Pakistani
>>214393281Do you have a real argument?
>>214393105Modern feudalism.
>>214393292Not reading your blog, go be trans somewhere else. Bye bye LITTLE FAGGOT
>>214393105>So what is their end goal?Post scarcity.Imagine if the price of goods becomes so cheap that you only need to work one day a week to have a good life.BTW the cost of capital becomes cheaper too so it becomes a lot easier to start a business
>>214393255kek
>>214392772>Lol, how is the budget still in millions?The hardware probably accounts for most of the costs, AI just doesn't make itself. You'd also have AI developers working on tweaking the system to fit your needs and as the article states they'll be some actual artists and voice actors involved.
>>214393298>>214393302Real arguments for not using AI in the film industryfocus on the potential for job displacement, a decline in creativity, ethical and legal issues, and the diminishing of human connection that audiences expect from cinema. Unlike standard technological advancements, AI's ability to imitate and generate creative work threatens the foundational, human-centric values of filmmaking. AI stifles creative integrity and originalityFilmmaking is a collaborative, human-driven art form. Over-relying on AI threatens to make the creative process formulaic and sterile. Homogenization of content: AI models are trained on existing data, meaning they may be inclined to produce content that follows established, proven formulas. This reliance on data-driven insights to achieve mass appeal could result in a creative landscape dominated by risk-averse, generic stories that lack originality and surprise. Loss of unique human voice: The distinct voice and perspective of a human writer, composer, or artist could be overshadowed by an algorithm designed for efficiency. This reliance on AI could diminish the depth and nuance that comes from lived human experience, making the final product emotionally hollow. Erosion of artistic craft: The hands-on work of skilled artisans, from writers to visual effects (VFX) artists, is a core part of filmmaking. If AI automates or shortcuts these crafts, it could lead to a decline in craftsmanship and prevent emerging artists from developing their skills. It leads to mass job displacement
>>214393255ok now this is epic
>>214393345AI wrote this entire post and it's still wrong.>focus on the potential for job displacementGood?We don't need people wasting resources doing useless jobs.
>>214392790Marketing
>>214393345HOLY KEK
>>214393105desu I don't think there really is an end goal. Not beyond this quarter's profits anyway. Line must go up at all costs.
>>214393255All the funny AI stuff is funny for being ai, people will never accept it as an actual replacement for human made art. Even humor inherent to ai is rapidly falling off, helped along significantly by already driven into the dirt jeet jokes being further driven down
>>214393427>people will never accept it as an actual replacement for human made art.you dont know how wrong you will bewait 5-10 years
>>214392967>PCs 30 year ago vs now>Cell phones 20 years ago vs now>EVs 10 years ago vs now>Yea this new tech totally won't get cheaper and more accessible once it's picked up by mainstream markets, that would never happen.
Why should I spend $20 on a movie ticket to see something that objectively has less effort put into it?
>>214392731Oh boy more jeetslop CGI
>>214393427>people will never accept the printing press, it's falling off. monks transcribing books is the way to go>people will never accept electricity, it's falling off. oil lamps are here to stay>people will never watch movies on tv, why would they you can go watch movies in theaters it's not the same>people will never use the internet to communicate, it's just a series of tubes. I can send faxes just as well
>>214393765LLM’s aren’t any of these things
>>214393325>Imagine if the price of goods becomes so cheap that you only need to work one day a week to have a good life.just like my king henry ford wanted
>>214393537this. I thought AI was supposed to make everything free and democratizing. if they're expecting to get rich off this it's pretty much pointless. also, nine months for ai slop? and 30 mil? are you kidding me? it should take a weekend and cost pocket lint. otherwise it's not even remotely impressive.
>>214392877>running blendernot sure why you felt the need to list that.
>>214393288theres this old guy at my flea market who hand draws incredible posters with a graphite pencil for $15-$20, stuff twitter troons wish they could do that they'd sell for over $100. I can put sentimental appreciate on things like that.
>>214393898there's sentimentality then there's just underselling one's own talent. i'm sure that dude's stuff is easily worth $1000. $20 is just disrespecting himself
>>214392731>CritterzKill Crites
Aren’t they already being sued by warner brothers?
>>214392731For $100 and a blowjob I'll remake any movie so every character is wearing bikinis and showing tits and kissing
>>214393765>crypto will replace real money within two years>the metaverse will be the main way people interface with the interface by 2023>every game and company will incorporate the blockchainNotice the timeframe of all of these
>>214393288>Why wouldn't you support it?have you seen AI generated movies and pictures? why are my tax dollars funding that slop
What will they think of next?
>>214394209>have you seen AI generated movies and pictures?This technology is in it's infancy.It's not that hard to understand man
>>214392842>>214392790It problely still has a script, and the op says it will have actors, and some hand drawn sketches.So the actors mean Audio directors, and editors, and all the normal union graft and producer tax scams. It’s not really even worth it for a studio to make a movie for less than 30 million, Becuase less than that it is too hard cover up when they are greasing the investors money back and forth between their friends,With 30 million no one really notices when some useless nepotism baby gets a production assistant credit at $170 grand to do some “assistant” editing of the b footage through his “bedazzle production caunuga blvd inc” llc vendor.If the move cost $2 million it would be too obvious
>>214392825>$30m electricity billI bet you also believe they are your greatest ally.
>>214394281AI and still ugly.
>>214394281>Even AI can't create a pretty actressGrim.
