Is Peter Jackson a complete fraud?
>>214407294Source?
>>214407294Seems like you are comparing a random studio session to Pink Floyd doing a huge elaborate thing about playing at pompeii Seems reasonable that the latter would have better quality footage
>>214407342Top is Peter Hackson's smeary vomit "restoration" of Get Back, bottom is the recent 4K restoration of Live at Pompeii.
>>214407294
>>214407294>Is Peter Jackson a complete fraud?Has been ever since he left Tom Bombadil out of the lotr trilogy
>>214407294i'm actually kinda perplexed about bottom toocause they made it yellowish or so i feelbut idki mean dvd wasn't like that if i remember correctly
>>214407355Except the original Get Back footage didn't look nearly this bad before Peter Hackson got his retarded hands on it.
Reminder
>>214407294All the footage from Get Back was shot on 16mm.Live In Pompeii was shot on 35mm.16mm is inherently more grainy than 35mm. Did Jackson go overboard with the digital noise reduction? Yes, but comparing it to 35mm footage is unfair.
>>214407639Explain this then >>214407593
>>214407593What's the movie? Looks very shit for a 4k cap.
>>214407711Lord of the Rings: The Two TowersJackson ruined the 4K release with noise reduction.
>>214407711The 4K remaster of LOTR, personally approved and overseen by Peter Jackson.
>>214407443>Has been ever since he left Tom Bombadil out of the lotr trilogy>lets waste 35 minutes in the middle of this journey to save middle earth on some whimsical, singing hippie wizzard who fucks trees that is completely inconsequential to the rest of the story.you fucking bookfags keeps complaining about tom bombadill being left out but not a peep about Saruman spending the latter part of return of a king leveling the shire to the ground and frodo having to lead an uprising against him.
>>214407745Looking at caps, I wonder if colors are accurate for either edition. Standard blu is very blue.
>>214407294YesFuck this boring ass movie, give me Da 5 Bloods over this shit any day of tha week
>>214407372>>214407294it's the new zealand company that did that "remaster"fun fact - cameron used that same company for his true lies and aliens and terminator "remasters"literally ai filters
>>214408010Outsourced to jeets no doubt.
>>214408010>fun fact - cameron used that same company for his true lies and aliens and terminator "remasters"There we go. I was going to post "this looks like that shit alien and terminator remasters"
>>214407443This type of retard is the reason why any discourse is impossible
>>214407849The last part sounds really lame, glad it was left out.
>>214407294He's the gen x Lucas
>>214407294Were all the Beatles made of plasticine, or just Ringo?
>>214408197it's because cameron lives in zew zealand because he fucking films avatar movies therepeter jackson did that shit with that ww1 documentary, then with the beatles documentary and then the fucking cameron did that with his films
>>214408535>in 4k everyone has plastic skin
>>214407294I always get Roger Waters and David Gilmore confused. Is there an easy way to tell them apart?
>>214407639>16mm is inherently more grainy than 35mm.not by that much, and certainly not justifying any noise reductionplenty of movies were shot on 16mm and were not butchered like this when they got a modern release
>>214407451Depends on which cut you're watching there's the 1972 cut DVD which seems like they just made a transfer of a VHS and then there's a restored 1974 cut which seems like an actual proper remastered DVD. You'll have to guess which is which because I forgot to label them.
>>214409108forgot the screens sorry
>>214409026Waters = dark writer with dark hair
>>214409130Why were colours thin in the 70's?
>>214409026One is a hack and the other is Roger Waters
Gilmour could use some AI smoothing.
>>214409026One is a hack and the other is David Gilmour
>>214409571I GOT ANOTHER CONFESSION TO MAKE
I saw the live at pompeii 2025 re-release in theaters. it was worth my time
>>214409231That helps a little, dark waters >>214409248>>214409248kek this doesn't help at all
>>214409247Periods in color film are often defined by new technologies in cameras, film stock and projection. With technicolor they shot everything on three separate strips of monochrome film in different colors which when projected resulted in a full color image. Looked great but cost a lot and you basically couldn't shoot outdoors since you couldn't control the lights to anywhere near the level you'd want. By the time the 70s rolls around they're releasing high sensitivy color film and now you can shoot in low light conditions and often without any artificial lighting at all but that came at the cost of colors being thin as you put it. This is when people lile Kubrick decides to make movies like Barry Lyndon which has several famous low light and/or natural light scenes that wouldn't have been possible to do in color until that point.
>>214410085nta but neat, thanks
>>214409130>The hair was longer
>>214409026Young Roger Waters looks like an uglier Adam Driver.
>>214410325>an uglier Adam DriverCap'n, she cannae hold!
>Overhead, the cityslicker>Hangs motionless upon the air>And deep beneath his gucci loafers>In labyrinths of seed and feed>The echo of a former time>chuck willowing across the sand>And everything is sneed and suck and fuck
I don't know what this thread is about exactly, but now is the good time to say that Criterion has been butchering movies for at least 10 years and more via third party hackjob companies such as Ritrovata, and as a result, hundreds of classic movies, mostly black and white ones have been completely ruined. Small wonder their criterion closet series has been completely zoggified.What mainstream movies outsource to jeets these days is CGI, color grading is done by millenial zoomer hacks at home.
>>214410796Unique post. Didn't expect that. Well done.https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/And%20deep%20beneath%20his%20gucci%20loafers/
>>214407294so he shaved his moustache after 2 years? so what?
>>214407427Me own White son, not the diverse grooming gangs, carjackers, rapists, stabbers...
>>214409026Waters was the ugly one in Pink Floyd's prime but he got better looking with age and Gilmour just went bald.
>>214411664in Britain all 4 of these guys would still be considered "lookers"not even joking, handsome men
>>214410801>Criterion has been butchering movies for at least 10 yearsTrue. I see waste of brains buying up all their releases blindly assuming that Criterion know what they're doing.Empty brand prestige is enough for people who don't want to think for themselves.
he ran out through the most rudimentary ai filter of the time and now it is forever dated to early the ai period forever
