>tv works great, looks good>find out I need a 4k, 120hz, dolby atmos + vision >feel pressured to buy a new TVHonestly, is a 60hz tv really that bad? Or is upgrading worth it?
I just use a cheap projector and a white sheet on the wall. Looks big and brilliant even while the sun's out
>>214407455Meant to post this on /v/, but fuck it.
>>214407515I also run my audio through and amp/dac to headphones.
>>214407455Why do you need 4k?
>>214407455The best TV you can possibly get is a late model panasonic plasma.They have the black levels of OLED but none of the motion blur.No current tech can match it.
>>214409057Why did they stop making them?
>>214409144Because they require 15 times the power.
>>214409873shit
>>214409144>>214409873Also it's like having a fireplace on in the room, cozy in winter but brutal in summer.
>>214407455>120hzPointless for movies, because most modern televisions automatically switch to a 24hz mode when watching 24fps content anyway.
>>214409999interesting q-uads
>>214407455>4k, 120hz, dolby atmos + visionhow much (properly mastered) media is there really worth watching that justifies it.
>>214407455There's nothing wrong with a 1080p 60hz TV since literally every piece of media has been designed for 1080p 60hz for the last 20 years. If you ever upgrade get a projector.
>>214410592Almost none. Like probably 0.02% of currently available 4k movies.
>>214407455No
>>214410592>4kOnly good if it's a proper 35mm/70mm scan>120hzPointless for movies, pointless for games.>Dolby AtmosAlmost NOBODY has a fucking 15 speaker set up for this trash that according to several Atmos reviewers it's totally hit and miss>Vision/HDRBullshit artificial post processing that makes everything look worse. I don't understand WHY they keep pushing this shit. It's not going to display properly on most TVs, and most OLEDs are not bright enough to do HDR properly and LCD/LED/Projectors only emulate it.
I wish they could invent a slim CRT.
What's 60 herz ?
>>214410803>120hz>pointless for gamesNo it isn't retard
>>214409144They are heavy, expensive, power hungry, and prone to ghosting
>>214410903Physics prevents itThey made flat screen ones for a while though. We had a 1080i flat screen CRT in high school
>>214407455>Honestly, is a 60hz tv really that bad? Or is upgrading worth it?Depends if you are just buying a tv for a bedroom and dont care that much 60hz is fine. If you want the best tv for kino it should be a 120 or 240hz. If you know anything about 3:2 pulldown and how 24fps movies are shown on 60hz TV it involves repeating frames at an uneven rate since 60 does not divide evenly by 24. When you have a display that can display frames at a smooth rate you can tell and they look smoother without the scourge of digital motion smoothing.
>>214411480Yeah I have one of those that I use almost exclusively to play N64/Dreamcast/PS2 etc. era and older games and watch betamax tapes on, thing has the depth of a fucking fridge. The image looks great but it weighs an absolute ton too.
>>214410903Closest I had was a 20inch Sylvania with a "flat" tube. I still have it somewhere.
>>214412133>If you know anything about 3:2 pulldown and how 24fps movies are shown on 60hz TV it involves repeating frames at an uneven rate since 60 does not divide evenly by 24.3:2 pulldown hasn't been an issue on televisions for over a decade now. Modern televisions automatically lower their refresh rate when watching 24fps content, so no 3:2 pulldown is needed.
>>214413031Yeah, it took me years to adjust to TVs being generally light
>>214407455>Get 65" 8k 240hz tv>Just use it to watch old 480p seinfeld episodes
>>214407455i have a 4K 60 hz tv from TCL actually like in your pic and its good enough. why would i need more ?
>>214410803>>120hz>pointless for games.Even if you're a retard that doesn't think anything above 60 matters, 120hz still lets you do 40hz games and often comes with variable refresh rate
>>214413031this, I have a 32" RCA made in 1999 that I watch Laser discs and video tapes on sometimes
