Hugh was so insanely funny, such a shame he turned out to be a massive nonce. They sort of recaptured that put-upon embattled energy with Mannion, but it wasn't the same.
The two specials after Langham and before Front are the show's finest hour though.Also how fucking shit was the last series when they added the Lib Dems?
>On 2 August 2007, Langham was found guilty of 15 charges of downloading and possessing level 5 child sexual abuse images and videos>5 Sadism or bestiality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COPINE_scale#The_SAP_scale
>>214472812Good show, like yes minister but wanting to bash your teeth in with prejudice>>214472853That's a unit of measure I wish I never knew about.
>>214472812>British politics show>lead actor turns out to be a noncePhenomenal casting
FUCK THAT IS BRILLIANTTHAT IS INSPIREDWHAT SOURCEGET INNNNIT'S THE ECONOMY, STEWPOTFUCK WHAT I REALLY NEED TO DO, IS SHOOT YOU ALL IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD. FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCKBUT I CAN'T, CAUSE ITS ILLEGAL Ok I'd like a small cappuccino, two extra shots, please
>>214473460Him as the minister in In The Loop was as good as Hugh, should've gotten him in Niccola's stead
>>214472832This, those twin episodes have some of the best comedy writing I've ever seen.>>214474156In the Loop was ruined by having far too many scenes with the Americans.
TROUSERS
didnothingwrong
>>214472812Didn't they make an American version?I think it was called The Thick As Shit
Oh great the triple. I'm a nurse killer, a banker and now I'M RAISING FUCKING TAXES
I love using the line "You've just taken a shit with your trousers on" Hardly anyone knows what it's from and it always gets a good laugh.
>>214472812IMO going from Yes, (Prime)Minister to The Thick of IT perfectly describes the trajectory and decline of modern Britain, the degeneration of the institutions and the people occupying them and as such should be required watching in political science. Because while it's subject is domestic, it fits every declining power.basically> what Britain think it is> what Britain actually is
>>214474631Wha- uh- wi- wha-?