>>214489844
It would just be that scene stretched out to 90 minutes until it gets stale. We got the appropriate and proper amount of Les Grossman.

>>214489877
Correct. In the case of Les Grossman, less is more.

Well at least it's better than watching the millionth sequel of mission impossible or some other action slop

>>214489877
/thread

>>214489877
FPBP. Look at what happened to Jesus.

>>214489877
Based and checked

File: 1757608824498089.png (795 KB, 1142x1038)

795 KB PNG

>>214489949
I just don't understand. What is the point of setting up a bot to vomit chat gpt text on fucking /tv/? You can't tell me this is a human made post, nobody talks like that.

I have no idea who these people are

Still mad that the Cruise/Tarantino thing fell through
Even madder that those mediocre mission impossible movies stole more than a decade of Cruisekino

>>214489949
More or less
Les we forget

>>214490208
The front is Les Grossman

>>214490251
Next one is a comedy movie and he still wants to do his space movie, it has been 8 years or so since he asked for it.

>>214490156
What's it like being braindead

>>214489877
Anti-based. Tom Cruise has the skills and range to stretch out a Les Grossman movie to a full feature and make it entertaining all the way

OP posts with thumbnail sized images should be automatic bans.