The robot in this one is especially sad.

>>214491225
Pretty decent 7/10, special effects qre great. The expo dump at the start is awful though

>>214491225
Surprisingly decent followup to one of the best Sci-Fi movies ever made.
It's not amazing or anything, but 2010 is underrated.

I know many people like this movie but I think its terrible. A hackneyed dated cold war plot , dated 1980 computer effects that look like a commodore 64 video game. Its amazing how the original Kubrick one looks like it could have been made in 2001 while this movie looks like it belongs in 1984.

You're going to be choked to find out that it doesn't told a candle to the movie is sequelling, but it will be revealed to you that it was a very earnest attempt and the end result may be definitely of its time, it delivers something beautiful. The retrofuturuism (who doesn't want on to live in a house with dolphins), the fact they had to remake all the sets and models Kubrick destroyed, seeing how little Keir Dullea aged, seeing a quasi-Jaws reunion. seeing John Lithgow rock a beret, hearing Douglas Rain's voice again; it shoots for the moon in its ambition as a sequel to one of the greatest films ever made and even though it misses, its amongst the stars.

You'll like it. Hopefully. And by like it, hopefully enough to watch it again.

>>214491985
>Its amazing how the original Kubrick one looks like it could have been made in 2001
There was a kubrick expo in a museum in my city some years ago. Those amazing pieces are really just teeny tiny models. Very easy to capture with the right camera, of which kubrick had a ton(there was a whole room dedicated to his collectionof cameras and lenses). Point is, digital>special. And movie peoples have only gotten lazier since

>>214491563

I like to act out the opening exchange between Moseivitch and Floyd when I'm alone. It's a fun scene.

>>214491225
It's worse than Chinese ai slop orange cat videos on TikTok, you can watch that instead