I'm not done shilling the greatest historical film of the 21st century, and it was made by Thailand.A completely and utterly forgotten film, Suriyothai (2001) depicts the 16th century ruined Kingdom of Ayutthaya, which later became Siam. During this period, there were 2 city states that encompassed Siam (Ayutthaya and Pitsanulok). This film takes place over a score of years where the Kingdom saw many invasions from the neighboring Honsawadee (Ancient Burma), lots of political drama, Kings dying, child kings being executed, poisonings, cousins marrying each other, all out war, espionage, etc.Featuring full scale 'lived in' outdoor sets (which still exist in Thailand today in abandoned form), temples, throne rooms, palaces, and massive scenes with thousands of extras and elephants on camera in a scale not seen since Lawrence of Arabia, this film shits on any historical film made by Hollywood. The film notably features the ancient 'royal language' of Thailand, so it’s hard even for Thai people to understand. It was supported by the Thai royal crown, and directed by one of their princes who went to film school with Francis Ford Coppola, so the actual budget of the film is still unknown to this day.The link below features both the Thai edition (5 hours long), and Francis Ford Coppola's edit. Watch the Coppola edit if you prefer something faster paced. Watch the 5 hour edit for an increased number of characters, less narration and exposition, longer rituals, a brighter color grade and more kino.If you like the film, spread it around so it can finally be brought to 4k as it deserves. If you watch it for anything, watch it so you can appreciate a dead, exotically beautiful and nearly forgotten culture (even by its own country).>Gladiator>Kingdom of Heavenlol lmao. This film shits all over them, giving out straight history with no B.S.Thanks for coming to my kino shill thread.https://gofile.io/d/XHiNJO
It's mediocre. Pretty sets with shitty writing.
>>214510977It’s a straight historical film not a fake melodrama like Gladiator anon. The writing is fine as it’s the literal history that occurred then. Go more in depth in your criticism. Are you angry that the hard dub is English? That’s not really the fault of the film. Be happy there’s subs at all.
>>214511051This certainly isn't historically accurate screenplay-wise.
>>214511083You must explain, not speak in generalization. I NEED SPECIFICS NOW!!!! I respect your opinion btw anon. I just think it’s wrong.
>five hours of thais yappingya no thanks bruv
>>214511130Then watch the Coppola edit (2 hours 30min). There’s nothing wrong with the Thai language though. You are confusing it with other SEA languages that sound like but noises (Khmer, Vietnamese)
Nice
