Everything is muddy, the costumes are always leather and brown. Despite reality being the distinct opposite.
Vibrant colors weren't invented until the 1960s
This is a weird image. That knights surcoat on the right is wearing the arms of the Prince of Wales. Not everybody was wearing Princely armour in 1403.
knights wore heraldry so people knew who they werekikes don't want people to know this
>>214515940>uhhhhm achtually in reality everyone wore lgbt colored clothes every dayshut the fuck up nerd
Could you imagine how much this would cost though
erm chud the middle ages were backwards, antisemitic, evil, misogynic and you should hate it
ayo that nigga got a twig stuck in his face
>>214516061Henry V when he was the heir to the throne had an arrow shot into his face that was dangerously close to his brain. It had to be removed by a pair of pliers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8Nef1siUus
>>214516037that's why god invented taxes
>>214516091But that’s a fucking twig on his face in that picture
>>214515940Because if it looks like a renfaire people won't want to watch it.
>>214516134artist is a dumb dumb
>>214516130I meant for a movie lol.Imagine getting thousands of people armoured in full plate and surcoats.
>>214515985Its literally Henry V you fucking retard.
>>214516193yeah, the prince of wales, he wasn't king yet
>>214515940Zack Snyder
>>214516140Oh ok I thought it was some metaphor or some bullshit >>214516243Fuck no.
>>214515940It's not just medieval movies and shows. Watch older films and you'll be stunned at the amount of color.
>>214516243I'm pretty sure he never made a medieval movie, I would say people more like Ridley Scott are to blame who want to push a political agenda.
>no massive budgeted movie about the War of the Roses or the 100 Years Warwhy live. You'd think after they found Richard IIIs bones in a car park there would be renewed interest in reinterpretation his character in a film about his life but no.
>>214516254>>214516276Zack and his ilk started the whole 'grey faggotry edge coloring', the MCU took it up to hide the horrible cgi work their slaves did and it became standard issue in the industry.
your 11th century anglo saxons sir
>>214516219whats your point, no one said he was.
>>214516172If Hollywood based, it'll cost almost a billion to CGI in all the armor over a CGI battlefield where all the actors have CGI'd hair and faces. There won't even be thousands of people because they will use the CGI clone toolIf not Hollywood based, low millions and not even that if we're just talking about only full plate, surcoats and mooks to wear them.
>>214516331they were doing it in braveheart.
>>214516351>no inexplicably african normansmy ancestors are smiling at me, saxon, can you say the same?
>>214515940You will get the gloomy blue filter and you will love it
>>214515940People who do costume designs for these come from theatre and they only care about their own "creativity" and not historical accuracy.On the other hand why do films have to be historically accurate when it's okay for theatre, opera, books and every other medium to do anything they want? Artists shouldn't be forced to work in only one style.
>>214517385>People who do costume designs for these come from theatre and they only care about their own "creativity" and not historical accuracy.>that's why it looks less creative and colorful
>>214516138I hate renfaires because they're always just a medieval fantasyslop convention
>>214516351Ah yes the Southside Saxons
>>214517531I hate rennfairs because the cos players are insufferable assholes
renaissance fairs aren't even renaissance
>>214517385>Artists shouldn't be forced to work in only one style.you say this though the topic is specifically criticizing how all these artists are allegedly working in this one style only anyways. you'd think by your own logic, some one-of-a-kind costume designer will finally break the mold and result in a highly colorful medieval movie which has yet to happen
Technicolor is a lost art
>>214516351
>>214515940Cheap......or jewish demoralisation psy op
>>214515977I've met normies who actually believe colorful fabrics didn't exists before industrial era.
>>214515940>Despite reality being the distinct opposite.Nope. Dyes were expensive, and there were some colours that were literally illegal to wear for the lower social classes.
>>214518137Think about that statement again for a second.The very fact that sumptuary laws were introduced implies that the colours in questions were within the reach of commoners.
>>214518137>Dyes were expensiveSome dyes were expensive. Most were cheap but seasonal.
>>214516193Its funny you would think the arrow in his face would have tipped him off as to the identity of this "mystery" knight.
>>214515940It's part of woke leftism anti-white bullshit.
