/tv/ - Theatrical cut or directors cut for a first time v - Television & Film

Anonymous

09/14/25(Sun)19:07:18 No.214519043

File: llktnlbu.png (118 KB, 230x345)

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)19:07:18 No.214519043 Archived

Theatrical cut or directors cut for a first time viewer?

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)19:08:17 No.214519062

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)19:08:17 No.214519062

directors cut because you get to see tits and why wouldn't you want to see tits unless you're gay?

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)19:08:52 No.214519076

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)19:08:52 No.214519076

>>214519062
you also get to see old man balls and dick

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)19:09:02 No.214519082

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)19:09:02 No.214519082

directors cut is useless

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)19:09:58 No.214519096

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)19:09:58 No.214519096

>>214519062
Good point.

>>214519076
Oh God no.

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)19:10:24 No.214519104

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)19:10:24 No.214519104

that movie sucks balls, don't watch it. See Beethoven’s Nephew instead

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)19:11:24 No.214519117

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)19:11:24 No.214519117

>>214519104
No

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)19:57:59 No.214519953

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)19:57:59 No.214519953

theatrical is better

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)20:03:22 No.214520061

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)20:03:22 No.214520061

>>214519043
theater cut. never go all in until you're sure. time is precious

Anonymous
09/14/25(Sun)20:04:34 No.214520093

Anonymous 09/14/25(Sun)20:04:34 No.214520093

>>214519043
I honestly prefer the longer cut, I get peoples' criticisms but the pacing feels borked without it