>Actually the Confederacy were the good guys
>>214537017correct.
>browncoats (brownshirts?)>"we will rise again" (the south?)>preacher guy is allowed to be cool>fall in love with a whore and call her a whore to her face every day of her life>sex positive whore isnt so sex positive deep down>we keep this angry chud around because he's violent and huge and maybe we can fix him>big govt badthis show was pretty schizophrenic in hindsight
>>214537017Why does the media keep pushing for reparations to be paid to blacks? We know who owned the slave ships, the slave auctions, and the slaves themselves. Why not demand payments from those specific families rather than casting blame on the entirety of the white race?
>>214537103Who new Whedon was so based. What happened to him?
>>214537186if we're willing to give this human worm a diminutive bit of credit, i think he was actually trying to find a more convincing depiction of the "male feminist" archetype. malcolm reynolds was his attempt at presenting a "progressive" adjacent guy who is still allowed to be a patriarchal authority figure who is actually loved and respected and not 150% castratedthen the higher ups canceled the show and said uh no joss, we actually want all the men castrated. so he had to adjust big time and whatever fantasy he was aiming at is now gone for good
>>214537017https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-OujQhrjkg&ab_channel=Cracked
Whedon did have good taste in women
>>214537264what onions crap is this?
>>214537254yea he is actually good at male characters. Even Captain America with his>There is only one God, and I'm pretty sure he doesn't look like thatwas a great line that cucked liberal writers won't even try today
