[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: quen.jpg (112 KB, 1200x675)
112 KB
112 KB JPG
Someone recently reminded me that he exists and that I should finally watch Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, so I did. As a result, all of my previous grievances with him resurfaced and I can't fucking take this shit no more. I see all this praise for him like he's some great auteur. WHY? Listen here:

>dialog
Yeah yeah does he look like a bitch royale wit cheese nigger nigger. Whatever. The CHARACTERS don't speak like THEMSELVES. Every character in every movie is like a ventriloquist dummy through which TARANTINO is speaking like HIMSELF, but changing the voice. They don't feel like people who would truly talk like that out of their own choice. Some do, but that's because their personalities are just closer to The Tarantino Speechâ„¢ than others, but everyone is just a puppet with Tarantino up their ass, except that, while Kermit has a character of his own, different to Jim Henson, these puppets can only talk in the patented Tarantino Speechâ„¢.
>feet
It's not even funny anymore. Margaret Qualley's dirty fucking paws on the dashboard for so long that even that Family Therapy guy is raising his eyebrows. It serves NO purpose. Tarantino just wants to jack off to the footage on every rewatch, and doesn't realise (or perhaps give a shit about) how films are meant to appeal to not only the filmmaker.
>plot
What is the point? Huh? What even is the point of any of this shit?
>oh but anon not everything has to have a point
In those cases the most basic, essential point of any film, should be to give audiences something worth watching. You know, since childhood I heard people tell me that Pulp Fiction is a masterpiece and I should watch it. No joke, it took THREE TRIES over several years for me to finally sit through it from beginning to end. So I got to the end. OK. So? There was nothing there, man. Yeah royale wit cheese funny funny but I could just watch that scene out of context on YouTube and save myself an hour or two. (1/2)
>>
>oh but anon Tarantino explores many themes throughout his films, he even tackles important issues like racism and slavery
Django Unchained: whites bad niggers good, Tarantino made some brutal nigger revenge porn to jerk off to forever
Inglorious Basterds: whites bad kikes good, Tarantino made some brutal kike revenge porn to jerk off to forever
The Hateful Eight (I actually kinda liked this one, but still): whites bad niggers eh also kinda bad but obviously superior to the point where the movie ACTUALLY HAS A FETISH SCENE OF A CONFEDERATE'S SON SUCKING A NIGGER'S DICK AS PART OF A HUMILIATION RITUAL IN THE SNOW
...
Look, I realise I'm rambling at this point, but surely I'm not the only one who feels this way? And again, I actually enjoyed Kill Bill and The Hateful Eight but even then there were many things that broke my suspension of disbelief and made me remember that this is a masturbatory Tarantino film full of hopelessly pretentious shit. Nevertheless, it gets eaten up gleefully by his fanboys who... I doubt I'll ever understand.

Please let me know what you think. (2/2)
>>
If you didn't use an AI to write this you should seriously consider an eye exam, they catch all sorts of things with those now.
>>
>>214635893
What?
>>
File: IMG_8998.jpg (341 KB, 1070x1640)
341 KB
341 KB JPG
>>214635779

This you in the back, huh?
>>
>>214635779
>>214635793
>dear diary
>OP was incredibly based today
>>
File: IMG_5158.png (136 KB, 786x782)
136 KB
136 KB PNG
>two walls of text
R*ddit is down the hall and to the left.
>>
File: 465.png (1.18 MB, 1919x681)
1.18 MB
1.18 MB PNG
>>214635793
>the movie ACTUALLY HAS A FETISH SCENE OF A CONFEDERATE'S SON SUCKING A NIGGER'S DICK AS PART OF A HUMILIATION RITUAL IN THE SNOW
this is kind of the point of the ending where he works together with the racist confederate sheriff and 'wins' (but not survives) based on mutual trust, despite hating one another for numerous reasons and being hateful cunts besides
sam jackson the calvary spree killer was a competent guy who let hate cloud his judgement when he sees the general talking that hateful nigger talk, so he lets his guard down just long enough to goad the old man (with a story it's not even proven is true, based on his own questioning if the general/audience are "seeing pictures" in their heads) and gives an opening for them to poison the coffee - that's what gets a major asset in john ruth and the completely innocent/nice guy OB killed and leaves him open to getting castrated, despite his re-assumed competence and picking apart everyone's stories right after
>>
>>214636192
What, the bowtie guy?
>>214636262
>nooooo my tiktok brain can't focus if your post has more words than a fortune cookie prediction
>>
>>214636335
Tarantino is tiktok core faggot
>>
>>214636281
As I said, I actually kinda like that movie. The setting of a cabin during a blizzard makes it feel like a stage play in a theater and that draws me in. I also realise that Jackson was trying to rile up the confederate guy but Tarantino actually put effort into setting up and filming a scene in the snow where le evil racist man is humiliated and made to suck nigger dick. That means that Tarantino genuinely gets off on this kind of stuff, same as feet, which ties into my point that his movies are self-masturbatory with no thought toward "does this actually improve the movie"?
>>
>>214635779
tarantino is the most popular "auteur" in cinema, and normies "think" that popular = good so tarantino is peak so they keep parroting that he's peak filmaking. he's literally the kojima of /tv/

thought it also has to be said, tarantinoslop is probably the objectively best thing normoids have seen, considering the average level of slop they consume normally
>>
>>214637239
He does remind me of kojima in the way they both say "I like it so I'll put it in the game/movie". Well OK, I like cedarwood soap but I'm not gonna put it into a PIE I'm making for OTHER PEOPLE because that would be OUT OF PLACE and leave a BAD TASTE IN THE MOUTH.
>>
>>214637307
tbf i'm actually glad they do whatever the fuck they want and follow their vision unapologetically

it's just that the final result isn't that good most of the times, it's simply a skill issue on their part and nothing else.

i'd still take a hack's vision over soulless slop any time tho
>>
>>214636408
oh and to add to that, Sam Jackson does his monologue while LOOKING INTO THE CAMERA, which can't be interpreted as anything other than Tarantino shoving his niggerdick fetish down the AUDIENCE'S throat



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.