[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_5119.jpg (240 KB, 1026x1500)
240 KB
240 KB JPG
What if pulp fiction wasn’t written as well, didn’t have compelling characters, and was british: the movie
>>
It's better than Pulp Fiction by every metric.
>>
it's at least as good as Pulp Fiction, guy, or is this just another (((europoor vs amerimutt thread)))?
>>
>>214854346
Yeah…on opposite day!
>>
>>214854300
Movie is funny you're just retarded.
>>
>>214854300
It's undeniably better but I didn't really care for the boxing plotline. Bricktop was good but all the other actors didn't have the charisma or even a lot to do really.
>>
>>214854300
Hey anon! Do you like DAwgs?
>>
>>214854300
It insists upon itself.
>>
>>214854300
Ask your mom.
Who's definitely also your sister.
>>
>>214854300
stopped watching the movie halfway through years ago lol. im sure ill pick it up again some day, but yea
>>
Better than Pulp Fiction in every single way. Better acting, better characters, better music. Funny and memorable, one of the most rewatchable movies.
>>
>>214854300
I couldn't understand their accents.
>>
>>214854300
Guy Ritchie was already QT slop, then Aronofsky fell flat on his face copying Ritchie. Culture is in the toilet
>>
>>214854300
I dunno but something about Guy Ritchies british crime movies just fit the 00's so well
>>
>>214854300
pulp fiction fucking sucks.
>>
>>214854346
This guy knows.

Pulp Fiction feels too up its own ass.
>>
>>214855690
It is but that ass was previously unplunged before Pulp Fiction, Snatch is just a cheap, dreary copy.
>>
>>214854300
Yeah, but its miles better than any other Tarantino ripoff from the 90s and 2000s
>Killing Zoe
>Two Days in the Valley
>Things to Do in Denver When You're Dead
>Go
>Thursday
>Lucky Number Slevin
>Boondock Saints
>Way of the Gun
>Smoking Aces
All trash.
>>
>>214854300
ive rewatched snatch like 5 times. i only watched pulp fiction once. snatch is better
>>
>>214854346
This.
>>
>>214855821
There's a movie called Seven Psychopaths that I haven't seen because the title is so fucking tryhard it's embarrassing.
>>
>>214854346
came to post this
>>
>>214856153
I've seen it. Its a comedy by the same guy who wrote In Bruges and its very meta about being a kind of Tarantino ripoff.
>>
>>214855821
>>Killing Zoe
Who co-wrote Pulp Fiction with Tarantino?
>>
Lock, Stock is better.
>>
>>214855360
Huh?
>>
>>214855690
Especially the pipe laying scene was up the butt for sure.
>>
>>214856606
this anon gets it.
>>
>>214854300
One of my favorite movies as a teen.
>>
>>214856545
So it's a parody of a parody? ...umm ok. Not the decision I would make but who am I to judge.
>>
>>214856861
Nah



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.