Who was in the wrong?
>>214954411JK cooked her.
Jesus what happened to jk
>>214954411They should both have thermonuclear bombs dropped on their heads. Man-hating cunts.
Didn't Emma become a yacht girl for rich Russians?
>I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without privileges.Joanne smoked her.
>>214954411Emma.
>>214954545>lived in poverty
>>214954481Exactly. Hopefully they both come out of this worse than before.>b..b....but JK is BASED! She hates trannies!Because trannies are men. That's why she hates them. She's still a feminist. Any other questions?
>>214954531I've heard Emma Watson has been seized due to sanctions against Russian oligarchs. She will be auctioned off with the proceeds going to fund Ukraine's defense.
>>214954411They both look like petty assholes.
>>214954545Bitch was middle class
>>214954411The way censorship works in totalitarian societies is an arm or the state will do everything in its power to snuff out any expression of dissent or subversion. The way censorship works in a capitalist society with free speech isn’t some authoritarian bureaucracy silencing wrong think- the individual is free to say whatever they like but they have to recognize there are potential penalties for doing so which could preclude their financial opportunities. The free market convinces you to censor yourself. If you’re a billionaire, you express yourself as you wish consequences be damned. If you lose a hundred million from those who boycott your product, what do you care? You still have billions. If you’re an actor whose employability is directly tied to how much audiences like you, it is in your financial interest to be likable. If you’re one of the most famous actors in the world, you find yourself in the unenviable position of trying to make yourself liked by everyone, to be everything to everyone. It’s an impossible game and it’s your job to try to win.
>>214954411Pro-troons = celebrated + admired. Pro-women/kids = called a witch, hired security guards for angry troons' death threats.
Emma Watson for sureShe turned on JK Rowling, the only reason she has a successful career, the moment it became fashionable to
How can you be so ungrateful to someone you owe a literal fortune? Someone who never said a bad word against you, and even now refuses to publicly tag you as a prostitute despite it being the easiest thing in the world. But seriously, we're talking about middle class life vs having several generations of your family financially secure. And you go out of your way to disparage that person? >>214954743She married some dweeb that beat her and wrote in cafes between work and caring for children at home. Rowling had every predisposition for a lower middle class hellhole of a life, even if the guy paid alimony in time which he did not. >>214954531>(((Russians)))>>214954887>(((Russian oligarchs)))
>>214955033>the only reason she has a successful careerWrong The only reason has a career is because Chris Columbus, a notrios control freak when it comes to casting, picked her.
>>214955064>She married some dweeb that beat her and wrote in cafes between work and caring for children at home. Rowling had every predisposition for a lower middle class hellhole of a life, even if the guy paid alimony in time which he did not.lol noWealthy parents, wealthy family, quit her job to focus on writing(family supported her during this) and the cafe she sat in was owned by a family member. You fell for the zog penned background, very likely because you're a leftist roastie
>>214955111Why are you lying on the internet? She was a single mother who was living on social assistance when she wrote Harry Potter. You retards used to hold this up as a reason we should give people welfare (as if most of them are driven to better themselves and aren't simply leeches).
Reminder Rowling wants to be an ftm much like Ellen Page is now. Its the genuine version of "if you hate gays you're secretly gay" and all the signs are there. She just lucked out she wasn't mentally ill enough to go through with it, but she's very close to that level.When you start paying attention, it's easy to see Rowling's distaste for women and femininity. She can talk all day about protecting "women and girls," but all of her main female characters abhor anything frilly or girly. Her female villains all align closely with femininity than her protagonists. Look at descriptions of Umbridge, and her love of pink and cats. Look at the way Harry describes Ginny as never being weepy. Look at Hermoine's annoyance at Fleur and the Beauxbatons for their love of beauty and dressing feminine.She even admits it in her first essay about trannyism. She said hated being a woman and she states that had being transgender been popular when she was a teen, she probably would've transitioned to being a man.>Emma Watson should be raped to build character>Lolita is a great love story These are more than enough proof that she has failed tranny brain besides admitting it herself in the essay
>>214955064Emma never disparaged Rowling, she just said she supported trans people and because Rowling is insane she took that as an affront to her
>>214954411Men.
>>214955064Show me one quote where Emma actually disparaged herAn actual quote
>>214954447she's gaining GILF energy as she's getting older. god she's sexy, she also has superior ginger genes and blue eyes. imagine if she wasn't retarded feminist, my dick would cure her to be regular conservative.
>>214955198Reminder that JK was a moderate liberal and trannies are so fucked they pushed her toward populist conservatism. This is why the left, despite having all the money/media/mainstream politicians on their side, lost the culture war.
>>214955244I support Women’s Rights as well as Men’s Wrongs
Who's the old lady?
>>214955307An actual lady unlike (You), "ma'am".
>>214955111>>214955210>>214955259How much is the campaign going to run for? What else do you cover besides reddit? Is Upwork still a good place to get hired?
>>214954411post menopause jk is irrelevant and automatically in the wrong.
>>214955378No quote huh
>>214955075Columbus wanted Americans to play the lead roles (notably Haley Joel Osment as Harry) before she slapped him down.
>tranny has meltdown at protest>starts ripping chairs out from under elderly people and throwing them>twitter tranny tries to be a comedian by minimizing shit>basic pride logic--act extra absurd to minimize absurdities/belittle people who criticize>spergs about chairs to JK Rowling>https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/1603815823289614336Based Joanne.
>>214955453Moron is falling for an obvious troll acct
>>214955453Lol
>>214955378How much were you being paid to spam Pedro Pascal, Brie Larson, the mexican snow white chick and Vanessa Kirby threads?
>>214955476Read the greentext, troontard.
>>214955453It's a picture of Jack Duckworth in a wig, Rowling must be an Eastenders pleb.
>>214955508
>>214955524>greentext: >>214955453Lies are all you've ever had.
>>214955453>Silly boy teehee XD pakis raping girls is totally fineYeah totally based, brown bro
>>214954743>>214954907>>214955064For the sake of being pedantic and thourough poverty is a spectrum to some degree. There is absolute poverty which is homeless, no food etc and then varying degrees above that.I have been extremely poor where I have been sick from hunger and been homeless before and while now as an adult I have all material needs and even some money from savings I am still in poverty. It is inescapable for me,Just explaining that as in 2 differing cases of poverty and the severity of poverty, though in all cases I am still in poverty.I think in her case she means being a benefit user or working some job where she is living hand to mouth, which is most of british society.
>>214955639Lame reply from her. She had an opportunity to own that being a wrong decision and instead chose to be glib.
>>214955639Ideological purity tests are a leftwing phenomenon, sweaty.
>>214954447Wine aunt.
>>214954743Watson probably had a higher quality of life and more expensive lifestyle at 9 when she was trying to get casted in the first movie than Rowling had after the books started selling like gangbusters. Her parents were both lawyers.I don't know how you'd want to describe it objectively but I'd wager if Watson were forced to live the way Rowling lived while growing up she'd call it poverty too.
>>214955198Rowling was a hardcore first gen feminist. Girl power. This was way before trannies were a thing. These feminists rejected traditional female norms. Barefoot and pregnant. Dresses. Girly stuff. The whole “I don’t need no man!” horseshit. She’s seeing first hand how this shit is backfiring. The same anti discrimination laws feminists used to invade men spaces trannies are using to invade women spaces
>>214955750Rowling was lower-middle class. After her divorced she experienced middle-lower class which is dangerously close to underclass (which the left thinks of as the only version of poor because their complete poverty of empathy precludes them from differentiating between that and working class).
Why doesn't she post stuff like this about the women and female children in gaza? Weird for a self proclaimed champion of women
Emma for still not apologizing over the car
>>214955841>Why doesn't she post stuff like this >[J.K. Rowling retweeted]
>>214955750>CastedGod damn you fucking ESL need to die
>>214954411You tell me.
Emma is 100% woke while rowling is 99% wokeSo emma’s fault.
>>214955933I was almost forced to contend with my rapidly browning skin but I noticed you forgot punctuation at the end of your reply and it turned back to white. Better luck next time Raul.
>>214955033>She turned on JK RowlingDid she ever actually publicly slam or say anything nasty about JK? I sure haven't seen anything posted.
>>214955282She isn't a moderate. She is full leftist retard in every respect except one but because the left worships purity tests that means she is the devil to them.
>>214957515She doesn't even hate trannies, she's just a second wave radical feminist who refuses to call them women or allow them in women-only spaces. She's fully supportive of their rights otherwise. The fact that this is a position that could elicit death threats from the trans population is wild.
>>214954531Lol this. All she fucking does is attend dirty fashion shows which is the most notorious profession for being absolutely horrible by women against women. Yet the past 10 years she's always going to them. Some feminist that is..
>>214957562Exactly. The only thing she differs from the modern internet leftist is she doesn't think "man in dress = woman". That is enough for them to hate her.
>>214957562It's also blatantly obvious that she doesn't support those fucking creepy 55 years and older men who suddenly transition and start wearing kids clothing and want to use female toilets. That's what's she's against and so are any normal fucking humans.What's ridiculous is I see legit passable like 16 year old shemales on tiktok and those retards are making videos like "women are scared of me to be in their bathrooms". No they're not. You're passable and they wouldn't know your a male, they don't want Dave who just transitioned in his 60s wearing a wig and a strap on and walking into a female toilet, you attention seeking fuck.
>>214957515>JK Rowling can be used by populist conservative movements to prove a pointAnd you miss it, lol.
>>214954411Emma is living a meaningless life and is reaching way fucking hard. >wahhhh remember me?No.
>>214957685No, the point is that leftist are retards. They don't have actual positions, just [current thing]. As long as you have the correct opinion on [current thing], you're a good person.[current thing] is gay rights? She declares Dumbledore is gay and everyone loves her.[current thing] is casting black people for white parts and the Cursed Child stage play casts a black Hermione? She says Hermione was never specified to be white and everyone loves her.[current thing] shifts from gay rights to trans rights? She says she doesn't want to share a locker room with a man and suddenly she is the devil and everything she was loved for up to that point is forgotten.
JK Rowling made Dumbledore gay to appease the faggots and they still ended up betraying her when they realized they couldnt just get her to write gay fanfics to make them happy. Im still mad, Dumbledore isnt gay, i dont care what she says, i dont care if she created the series. should of put it in the original books if it really meant that much to you.
>>214957893Lots of people fell for the "they're just like you and want the same rights" meme, anon.
>>214957781The fact all her recent appearances are her at shit like basketball games says it all. What a stupid little cunt with a shit car.
>>214954411Emma for not showing her feet more often
>>214955450>ColumbusNo that was our other favorite jewish director that wanted him when he was supposed to make the movies
>>214954411one has never apologized and one has nothing to apologize for
>>214958102emma needs to apologise for her new boat
>>214954967So, why doesn't JK Rawlings treat Emma, a woman, with some respect.
>>214954411Didn't Emma and the other twerps (except for the ginger kid) ban Rowling from the big special harry potter reunion event? I mean, to ban the writer from her own book event is kind of shit.
>>214957893A lot of British academics are homos. Especially the ones who are Dumbledore's age. And he's not married and has never had kids, like every other teacher at Hogwarts. Hey what the fuck.
>>214961395Bullshit! Single professors get all sorts of tail. Women love a man that wears tweed and corduroy. Especially, French girls like Emma.
>>214954411literally emma and danny, troons aren't women, factual biology.
>>214954411JK hands down. Emma tried the "We can still be friends, even if we don't always agree" which looks like the adult thing to do.>>214954766Dan and Emma are spokespersons for Gay rights and Women rights groups, have been for a huge chunk of their adult lives, and you have JK claiming they are sellouts to a homophobic misogynistic cult that is infiltrated women's and gay's rights groups and that's why you see "trans women are women" comming from these people... If she honestly believes this then she's mentally ill, right-wingers at least don't pretend the troon-bashing is somehow to "save women and gays" fuck that.
>>214961625I see you don't like freedom of speech and self-expression. Peculiar indeed.
>>214954545>I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famousno she didn't
>>214955178>single mother who was living on social assistancethat's the payload of gibs dipshit, they get more substantially more money than a man working full time, literally free everything plus a stack of cash plus no expectation to do anything for it, fucking easy mode
I feel like the media is making this purely an ideological thing, at least in the UK, when Rowling is clearly personally hurt by Emma lambasting her for brownie points before making a token gesture of friendship.
The lack of JK Rowling ai porn is egregious. S tier gilf
>>214961667Not really, Emma went all in on shitting on her, then had her agent sent Rowling's agent a note saying she still likes her. That's a kind of shitty thing to do, she could have just called.
>>214955198Apparently Umbridge was directly based on some primary school teacher who acted just about exactly like Umbridge does, if you believe Rowling.
>>214955198>if you don't like pink you're a man actuallywow i wonder why anyone could object to this
>>214954411emma for never apologizing for her car
>>214962825They don't want to state the obvious, which is how performative and cynical Watson's behavior is because then you open the door to how true that is for other celebrity leftists.
>>214962747She did. >>214962797Not in the 90s.
>>214957675>What's ridiculous is I see legit passable like 16 year old shemales on tiktok and those retards are making videos like "women are scared of me to be in their bathrooms". No they're not. You're passable and they wouldn't know your a male, they don't want Dave who just transitioned in his 60s wearing a wig and a strap on and walking into a female toilet, you attention seeking fuck.that's an issue though. Where do you draw the line? Like would JK Rowling be ok with Buck Angel or whatever their name is in a girls washroom? There's a lot of trans people that pass, especially if their just a stranger on the street or in a public bathroom. You're not making laws against trans people, you're making laws against ugly people lol. Basically, its ok to be a trans woman as long as you're hot.
>>214963287>Basically, its ok to be a trans woman as long as you're hot.unironically
>>214963287>Where do you draw the line?If you were born with a cock and balls stay out of areas demarcated for women. If you "pass" go ahead and break the law but if you're a creep about it and get arrested you should be punished to the full extent of the law. Simple.
>>214963287I'm sorry, but aren't genitalias all the same. A woman breast feeding in public isn't sexually. Peeing and shitting isn't sexual.
>>214963341I don't want to worry about cute girls being around when I have to drop a massive shit and girls don't want to worry about creepy men hanging around who are into listening to them piss and shit.
JK Rowling made hating trans people her whole identity. Fine, you don't think they're dudes or chicks, whatever. But that's all she does now, billionare lady that could literally do anything just cries about trans people all day on twitter and gets into arguments with randos. All for what? laws that effect next to nobody, to prevent hypothetical situations that might happen. She's not winning anything, she's obssesed. She comes of like one of those anti-gay right wingers that turn out to be sucking dudes off at a highway rest stop. Some serious repressed vibes coming from her. Throw in her seemingly diliske for feminin things, her early letters about disliking being a girl I would not be shocked if she was repressing some shit.
>>214954743>>214954907Imagine having to live here for 1 second of your life. Trauma-inducing.
>>214963357Paranoia huh. I thought your ilk said trannies were the mentally ill.
>>214963359This is why she is so based. She literally has fuck you money but she (completely understandably) hates trannies so much that instead of just sitting around being rich, she actively funds total tranny death. I can't think of anything more based.
>>214963287>There's a lot of trans people that pass
Major Lennox must answer
>>214963431Obsession isn't healthy. We don't need unhealthy people telling the world how it ought to be.
>>214963468Yes we don't need mentally ill trannies telling us how things should be, I agree.
>>214963489You're in the same boat, chief. Same with billionaires, and everyone else who isn't a Renaissance man. Specialization is for bugs.
>>214963447>>There's a lot of trans people that passTrans people in their 20s have been on hormones half their life and made a point to get good at hair and make up, shit aint like the 40 year olds your thinking off. just google 'hot trans girls' and see.
JK only says the stuff she says because she is a TERF and is spiteful at the people who turned on her once the blue hairs tried to cancel her. She's just coping and sneeding and is not actually based, she would happily see us all die in a fire.Emma wins because she has beautiful feet and I can still save her.
>>214963403They have these big houses and a small room for people that are induced into thinking we wanted to live on you, faggot children..
>>214954545M-M-M-MONSTER KILL
>>214954411The fuck is that hat?
>>214955075Rowling famously had the final say for a lot of the decisions. Spielberg himself got vetoed when he tried to set it in an American high school.
>>214954411Seeing the grifters make three thousand videos about this while conveniently forgetting jk was at the forefront of all the woke shit that ruined their supposed favorite content is rather hilarious. They either truly think she's on their side due to cognitive dissonance or they're just that good at grifting by now
>>214954411JK for wearing that stupid hat.
>>214954411Emma for being a bigger Lib bitch. JK atleast knows trannies are deranged
>>214954545she says this and then still supports mass third world immigration lol
>>214963403Seems comfy if your neighbours aren't total retards
>>214964026She absolutely hates trannies and dunks on them every chance she gets, basically nobody in the mainstream does that except right wing political commentators, who cares if she’s a feminist bitch?
>>214963403Not in the least, it can foster a sense of community as everyone is in the same situation. Every house has a garden and it can be quite comfy.
>>214963359She’s just frustrated because the trannys don’t realise that all these “little” changes will be exploited to the absolute limit by the worst people on earth. It’s human nature that if you make it technically possible for a man to go into girls public changing rooms and bathrooms then those spaces will become TARGETS regardless of how many nice well meaning trannies want to use them.
>>214963559White Knight logic.
>>214955841>The world must act nowWhy?
>>214964113Because the moment the common enemy is dealt with she'll use her power to put you down for being a woman hating incel who also hates black people and homosexuals. Anyone who thinks that's not what she'll default to the moment trannies are no longer a talking point is deluding themselves
>>214964148what little changes?trans people have been going in opposite sex bathrooms for forever
>>214954743>ywn comfort slag Rowling
>>214954411JK Rowling seems weird this all seems weird and like a waste of time what the fuck she's not a fucking genius harry potter is great its a great story but jesus christ this is just some british bitch that wrote a story not that big of a fucking deal only because others made her into that
>>214964325I don’t really follow the tranny debate but I think it’s stuff like letting trannies smash women in boxing and other sports, cutting tits off little girls and giving out puberty blockers to kids like they’re candy.. I don’t know if it’s happened yet but I’m sure there is support for cutting little boys penises off
>>214954411You, for posting this thread.
>>214964388jazz jennings got his dick scooped out at 16 and it was televised
>>214961696no by all means speak freely your troonatic opinion, but factually your opinion is incorrect. in every way.
>>214964339You write like a retard, don’t comment on what is and isn’t a ”good story”
>>214962833I don't want ai porn of her, I want Rowling to do some porn. as long as she isn't married and not with nigs. cause they're shit
>>214963413troons are mentally ill.
>>214964424Fuck
>>214963887harry Potter and the Ministry Of Purebloods
>>214964424She was 17 you obsessed weirdo
>>214964548Every single boy born in America has had their cock mutilated at birth for the past century, so your argument is invalid.
>>214964548>SheHe. >was 17A minor. >you NTA.>obsessedIt was televised. >weirdoYou're justifying the genital mutilation of minors because you believe it magically turns men into women.
>>214954411Rowling is a dumb trad feminist cunt.Meyers is a dumb prog feminist cunt. They're both wrong, and always will be.
>>214964756Genital mutilation should be outlawed without exception. This includes circumcision.
>lived in poverty When British women talk about their past lives do they always downplay their financial situation?
>>214955841>Why doesn't she post stuff like this about the women and female children in gaza?Ironically, because a iewish man told her not to
>>214964824Why are you so obsessed over other people's bodies. You know that makes you just as evil as the ones you say are trying to control others. You can't even control yourself. Stop worrying about others.
>>214964824Maybe. >>214964990When you commit a crime you're charged on behalf of the state and not the victim, retard. It isn't as simple as "just let people do what they want" and you're a naive idiot for thinking it is.
