>in prison until he's atleast 77Holy shit that's brutal. Based off some words from 2003. His life ruined, will probably never see his child again and if he does, she'll always know he's a rapist.What's his brother (Francis from mitm) say about this?Will Diddy get a similar sentence?
>>214989618qrd on the tl;dr?
>>214989618The entire trial and sentencing was a deliberate warning by the city of los angeles to the church of scientology, telling them to reel it in
>>214989718>church of scientologyAre they really that bad?
>>214989743They're in the way of jews.
>Judge Ronald S. Coen ruled that the testimony of the alleged victims was credible and sufficient to support the charges(Which happened 20 years ago)>The jury foreman said that the panel of six men and six women leaned towards acquitting Masterson on all counts because they found the testimonies of the complainants inconsistent and implausible; for instance, one Jane Doe testified in court that Masterson threatened her with a gun during the attack, but a firearm was not mentioned when she reported to the police
>>214989795>Ronald S. Coen
>>214989795if they leaned toward acquittal what changed their minds?
>>214989795>12 competent adults all say the testimonies are inconsistent and implausible>one jewish judge says otherwise; go to jail for 30 years goyFuck scientology for killing two dogs though
>>214989795He's got to be able to appeal this right? This trial sounds like a complete stitch up
>>214989812>>214989838>>214989863>>214989910you guys fell for the scientologist shill >214989795the jury foreman quote was from the FIRST trial which DID end in a mistrial. the judge quote is from the 2nd trial where a new jury did find him guilty. the mistrial had 10-2, 8-4, and 7-5 all in favor of acquittal. i'm not sure what california law is so it might have to be unanimous one way or the other so that might be why there was a retrial
>>214989812>WHITE REPUBLICAN JUDGES!fucking commie faggot
>>214989618in yurop he would've gotten 2-3 years TOPS (with hard evidence)
>>214990339>On November 10, 2021, Los Angeles County Judge Ronald S. Coen ruled that the testimony of the alleged victims was credible and sufficient to support the charges, setting trial for August 29, 2022>The August 29 trial date was subsequently rescheduled for October 11, 2022... The jury remained deadlocked once deliberations resumed; consequently, a mistrial was declared on November 30, 2022. The jury foreman said...>they found the TESTIMONIES (plural) of the COMPLAINANTS (plural) inconsistent and implausiblePost nose
>>214990503>>214990539
>>214990592You may call him a liar, a swindler, a cheat...
>>214990539retardhttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/danny-masterson-mistrial-rape-case-jury-deadlocked-los-angeles/> "I find the jurors hopelessly deadlocked," Judge Charlaine Olmedo declared after inquiring whether there was anything the court could do to move them closer to reaching a unanimous decision. She set a March date for a retrial.> Jurors said they had voted seven times Tuesday and Wednesday without reaching a consensus on any of the three counts.> The jury foreman said only two jurors voted for conviction on the first count, four voted for conviction on the second count and five voted to convict on the third count.which is exactly what i said, 10-2, 8-4, 7-5, all in favor of masterson but guilt/acquital has to be unanimous, so i was rightyou're a scientologist shill for your manlet cult
>>214990948>the trial didn't go the way I like so we need to do the trial again>hmm? Double jeopardy? No that uh, that isn't uh... you know depending on the uh... context...
>>214990948You fumbled your post and instead of admitting you made a relatively minor chronological error you resort to pilpul and shysterism. Fuck off m8
>>214991198it goes both ways though anon. if you are innocent the state has to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt through unanimous 12-0what happened with danny wasn't double jeopardy because it was a hung jury. if he was found innocent or guilty then the state couldn't bring charges against him again which would fall under double jeopardy. that's the catch. mistrials happen all the time due to stuff like that or procedural errors, it doesn't mean double jeopardy was violated>>214991242except i didn't you retard. i said it was the judge from the second trial which is entirely correct. that's the trial that found him guilty. the judge didn't override anything. seethe and cope you faggot
