[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


🎉 Happy Birthday 4chan! 🎉


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_5391.jpg (257 KB, 1179x1221)
257 KB
257 KB JPG
Rumors that they were not impressed with it
>>
no, rumors are saying they loved it
>>
>>215016877
it can't be any worse than birds of prey or blue beetle
>>
"UGH TOO WHITE!"
This is what happened^
>>
>>215016877
you mean like how "they" weren't impressed by S25?
>>
>>215016877
>Rumors that they were not impressed with it
and where are these "rumors" that are not even on the twitter screencap you made this thread with? may we see them?
>>
>all the people financially tied to my success say its good
kek
>>
>>215016949
Experts agree with the rumors, anon.
>>
>>215016949
Source: The Podcast
>>
File: sg.jpg (126 KB, 1080x1336)
126 KB
126 KB JPG
>>215016877
I just want my drunk white girl superhero kino
>>
>>215016877
It is so secret that The Hollywood Reporter knows about it, despite the screening only being for executives and a few trusted persons under Gunn. Right.
>>
rumors are saying all cocks were served on that screening
>>
>>215016973
We have the best rumors, everyone knows that.
>>
How the fuck did they already make this movie? Did they start immediately after superman?
>>
if WB doesn't like it that means its actually kino because they're famously retarded
>>
>>215016949
So you don't know
>>
>>215016877
After Superman flopping they are right in being scared
>>
>>215016877
>from the director of I, Tonya
might be kino
>>
>>215016877
That’s how you know it’s gonna be good, these are the retards that gave BvS a standing ovation.
>>
>>215017442
BvS was a masterpiece.
>>
File: Low ratting.jpg (392 KB, 1078x722)
392 KB
392 KB JPG
>>215016877
Superman (2025)
The movie cost $225M to make. Let's round to $300M with marketing.

It crossed $616m. It has 7.2 on IMDb, 7.2 on Metacritic user and 68 on Metacritic critic.

at best it broke even. in reality, it's rotten foundation. MCU had low reception, but at least earned more (slightly, but still more)
>>
File: shite career.jpg (103 KB, 960x960)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
Gunnbots like to talk about how Superman is not about making money but about "brand rebuilding."

Superman (2025) has average reviews. It only has a 7.2 on IMDb, a 68 from critics and a 7.2 from users on Metacritic. It's an average and forgettable movie. The DCU is DOA.

P.S. I'm not a Snyder fan. WB and DC are cursed. Both Snyder and Gunn suck.

P.P.S. Reeves is also a hack, and his movie sucked. I have no idea why such average, no name director is holding WB by the balls.
>>
Reminder:
Warner Bros. Discovery has around $60 billion in debt — about $35 billion is long-term debt, and the rest is short-term debt and other liabilities.

The majority of their films are box office bombs. Fantastic Beasts and the DCEU failed. Joker 2 failed. As far as I know, only Barbie, Minecraft, and Sinners have made money recently.

DC and Fantastic Beasts failed as franchises,( but reboots are imminent. )The CW was sold for zero dollars.

Zaslav’s salary in 2022 was $39.3 million. In 2021, it was $246 million
>>
>>215016877
>The Batman 2 died for this
what a cursed franchise
>>
>>215017524
Dated for October 2027, starts filming next April.
>>
>>215017524
>>215017549
Reeves is a hack who hasn't made a single good movie and who hates comics. What's the point of making Batman 2 if it will be just generic flick, like average CSI episode?
>>
>>215017281
they started before, its not written or directed by gunn and both projects were probbaly being undertaken simultaneously
>>
>>215016877
I JUST WANT LOBO
>>
>>215017039
only based if no niggers were serviced
>>
>>215017512
How do stock holders allow people to get paid that much ?
>>
>>215017641
>its not written or directed by gunn
Can't wait until gunn adds his own chungus onions batman to his universe
>>
>>215017037
They're panicking the fuck out, man. Superman bombed and cost them over 200m and that's after Joker 2 cost them just as much. DC is fucking poison and this movie was greenlit on the notion somehow Superman could make a billion. It didn't. Now they want to scrap this like Batgirl and are looking for any excuse.
>>
File: 1751611791514585.png (692 KB, 968x726)
692 KB
692 KB PNG
>>215017499
>>215017512
seethe synderjeets
>>
>>215016877
>supergirl is an alcoholic slut party girl

Gross!
>>
>>215016877
It openes with her fucking a black guy alien
>>
>>215017774
2025 was the number 1 movie in India
>>
>>215016877
Dang
>>
File: IMG_0292.jpg (139 KB, 1125x540)
139 KB
139 KB JPG
It’s not ov-
>>
Why not try doing something different in a superhero movie by having her do a nude scene?
>>
>>215016877
Oh fuck off, we're not doing this "MUH TEST SCREENINGS SAY LE BAD" weekly shit again. You did this garbage for like a year straight with Superman, recycling the same clickbait.
>>
>>215019774
Is PM joining the Justice Gang or the Suicide Squad?
>>
>>215016877
> According to THR, "Supergirl had a quiet screening on the Burbank lot with a select group of executives and a few members of James Gunn's trusted DC stable."

>The trade doesn't reveal any details, but a couple of reliable scoopers have claimed to have heard great things about the movie, and we wouldn't be surprised if some first reactions begin to filter through over the next couple of weeks.

Why do jeets always lie?
>>
File: IMG_9207.jpg (45 KB, 335x309)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
> The fact that Gunn and company felt confident enough to show the movie nearly a year before release is a strong sign that Supergirl is further along than fans expected, and that’s exciting news for DC watchers.

Guarantee the screening was to show WB executives how far along the movie was in post production and the release date is going to be moved back to
May 29th which the WB has saved for a DC movie
>>
>>215020078
WB is the most embarassing company in the business. Just a nut house of schizophrenics living in their own fucking bizarro world. This whole DCU has been a disaster in reality.
>>
>>215020113
Cry harder you Snyder loser
>>
>>215017019
It worked because they had a drunk girl on screen for the exact amount of time drink girls are entertaining.
>>
>>215020155
I will cry. Sure. OF JOY when Gunn is fired and ousted after Supergirl and Clayface bomb and Batman II makes bank and ends his Pedoverse. And then you will kill yourself and I will cry even harder from the euphoria.
>>
>>215020379
Nice jeet fanfic just like OPs post
>>
>>215020474
Superman 2025 was the number 1 movie in India jeet
>>
>‘The Flash’ Hailed as One of the ‘Best Superhero Films Ever’ After Early Screening
>>
>This weeks Peacemaker finale will mark the last of the Gunn-verse we'll see until June's Supergirl.

Way to kill the franchise momentum. Should have had Creature Commandos S02 or something to keep the hype train rolling.
>>
>>215016877
Sounds like the best DC movie since the Dark Knight
>>
>>215017753
>Saar Superman bombed oh my yes!

" By the numbers: Gunn's Superman draws 13 million views in 10 days of streaming, becomes biggest HBO Max movie launch since Barbie two years ago."

Gunn Chums Super Dunk on Snyderlings.
>>
>>215022051
Not going to kill momentum. Don’t want to over do it either. A Supergirl trailer likely going to drop by December. And with post production this far along it’ll be moved to May with zero competition. It’ll be same time frame as when Minecraft dropped
>>
>directed by an oscarb8 filmmaker who's never done action before
>spin-off to superman which had a disappointing box office no matter how many puff pieces claim it was a box office juggernaut
>starring literal-who for anyone who hasn't seen Game of Thrones
>in an era when social media users are actively laughing at stories of disney not understanding how to win back the male audience
I can't see any way this isn't a flop. I guess they can try and claim that it's low budget so it doesn't need to make much but that will be a very obvious cope.
>>
>>215017499
Super is unironic kino. The Belko experiment is also very underrated
>>
>>215022657
You’re brown. Course you wouldn’t understand
>>
File: DOA.png (134 KB, 744x363)
134 KB
134 KB PNG
>>215016877
>>215017019
>>215017774
>>215019774
>Supergirl
Gonna get mogged by Toy Story 5, Minions 3, Moana, and Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey
>Man of Tomorrow
Gonna get mogged by Spider-Man Beyond the Spider-Verse and Shrek 5

DCU = DOA
>>
File: sommelier .png (1.32 MB, 1008x1070)
1.32 MB
1.32 MB PNG
>>215022657
GOOD MORNING SAAR
>>
File: IMG_9117.jpg (60 KB, 399x501)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>>215017499
>>
File: over.jpg (48 KB, 640x480)
48 KB
48 KB JPG
>Matt Reeves is reportedly ending his Batman story with Part II, compressing what was planned as a trilogy into just two films which is similar to how Todd Phillips handled Joker. Sources say Reeves’ strained and difficult relationship with James Gunn, who has been sidelining him and causing delays, contributed to his decision to stop after the second movie. Reeves wants to deliver a strong, self-contained conclusion and step away from DC as Gunn pushes forward with other projects. Filming on Part II is expected to start later this year with a release planned for 2027.

This is why there will not be a Penguin S2 or Batman: Part III or the Gotham P.D/Arkham spin-offs. It's over. Clayface was also a Reevesverse movie which Gunn stole and shifted into his slate. Gunn won, sadly.
>>
>>215022757
>Anon doesn't know how RT works
>>
File: IMG_9209.jpg (53 KB, 495x619)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>215017499
Snyder’s only certified fresh movie, Gunn wrote the screenplay for it haha
>>
>>215022760
>Source, my ass
>>
>>215022786
Illiterate dumbass
>>
>>215017499
It's not an average movie.
Having just seen it is fucking worse than I thought after seeing it get shit on here. It's honestly shocking just how fucking terrible it is.
>>
>>215022051
>Creature Commandos
Didn't the first season flop with terrible reviews?
>>
>>215022707
>>215022754
>everyone who isn't simping for superman is indian
This is the weirdest shill campaign I've ever seen
>>
File: Spoiler Image (1.04 MB, 1230x1087)
1.04 MB
1.04 MB PNG
>>215016877
It's going to happen again isn't it gunnxisters????????????
>>
>>215022760
> In a recent interview with Collider's Steve Weintraub for The Penguin, Matt Reeves confirmed that his original vision for The Batman was always part of a larger trilogy, and The Batman Part II is just another chapter in the Dark Knight’s journey. Reeves reaffirmed that his plan for a trilogy remains intact, despite some recalibrations along the way.
https://collider.com/batman-matt-reeves-trilogy-update/

Faggots always lying just like OP.
>>
>>215017753
>Superman bombed
It made $125 million in net profit and BTFOd an entire MCU phase though
>>
>>215022903
>Published Sep 12, 2024
>>
>>215022921
it cost around 300 million usd. it's breaking point was 700million usd
>>
>>215020113
WBs handling of the dceu was a shit show, but I think that honor belongs to Sony. Outside of Spider-Man, which was saved by the MCU's involvement. What have they done? The Spider-Man extended universe?
>>
File: 1757607313605656.png (638 KB, 1080x1139)
638 KB
638 KB PNG
>>215022955
You are brown.
>>
File: 1754889494682834.png (63 KB, 1550x690)
63 KB
63 KB PNG
>>215022957
>saved by the MCU's involvement
The MCU has been taking superchad cock deep up the arse all year bruh
>>
>>215016930
They made multiple reshoots and the movie still underperformed
>>
>>215022971
>costs more
>crosses less
>has more profit

That's impossible.
Zazlav lied
People lost jobs
SAD
A
D
>>
>>215022757
less than half of those were actually good. Rotten tomatoes is not to be taken seriously.
>>
File: 1743734440717380.gif (1.46 MB, 245x260)
1.46 MB
1.46 MB GIF
>>215016877
Oh? That's a shame.
>>
File: 1754060160979287.pnga.png (850 KB, 1191x895)
850 KB
850 KB PNG
>>215023008
Still coping hard huh?
>>
>>215022971
>Confirmed that it cost more than Man of Steel
>Confirmed that it made less money than Man of Steel
>apparently, it somehow made 3x the profit of Man of Steel
I'm no scientist but these numbers aren't adding up.
>>
>>215022929
Nothing changed. If part 3 doesn’t happen it’ll be because Reeves taking forever like he did part 2. They’re not going to wait another six fucking years to get part 3 made
>>
>>215017442
If they liked it so much, why they cut 20 minutes?
>>
I wanna make love to her pussy, gently.
>>
>>215022903
matt reeves went to the james cameron school of sequel development.
>>
>>215023034
Its budget was same as MOS. It also made more money domestically where studios get a way higher percentage. It also had no big names taking a percentage of the profits like Nolan, Crow, Costner, Goyer and Zimmerman did
>>
File: fantastic flop 1.png (148 KB, 1836x313)
148 KB
148 KB PNG
>>215023034
>Confirmed that it cost more than Man of Steel
That's never been confirmed because it's brown disneycope tho
>>
>>215022971
>>215023034
Superman (2025)
Domestic (57.5%): $354,173,949
International (42.5%): $261,500,000
Worldwide: $615,673,949

Man of Steel (2013)
Domestic (43.4%): $291,045,518
International (56.6%): $379,100,000
Worldwide: $670,145,518

That means Superman (2025) actually earned about $63.1M more domestically but $54.5M less overall than Man of Steel.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.