[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: kathleen-kennedy.jpg (307 KB, 1019x569)
307 KB
307 KB JPG
*fumbles a four billion dollar franchise*
>>
>>215056757
It was such a systematic destruction I almost think it was a controlled demolition. Surely someone that spent as much time as she did around great filmmakers and producers couldn't be that incompetent?
>>
>>215056757
And Indy. And the MCU. And fairy tale adaptions. Truly remarkable.
>>
>>215056775
She's a woman after all.
>>
>>215056757
Lol, the Star Wars reboot was an insane success. The universe has never been more fleshed out and sovlful. The Mandolorian is the best thing which could have ever happened to SW.
>>
>>215056775
Look at Netflix compared to Yidsney stock. It's clear Yidsney has shifted their focus from making money entertaining to propagadizing children for social credit
>>
How the hell do you keep your job after slam-dunking a 40 year old golden goose into the fucking trash in 10% of the time?
>>
Meanwhile Netflix stock is just starting to feel the affect of propagandizing children in spite of profit. Really makes you think.
>>
>>215056757
>fumbles
lol it was perfectly panned and executed on purpose to destroy star wars and they did the same to star trek
>four billion dollar
money literally doesn't exist
>>
>>215056827
Her job was to use a massive franchise to brainwash children into her cult. Profits be damned. Larry Fink and Blackrock of the money printers make decisions for Disney now.
>>
>>215056847
Star Trek is interesting because it was already far left in terms of the politics in future space. But that wasn't enough they had to force LGBT propaganda over everything and even all the men they cast were gay. Destroying Star Trek to again propagandize children.
>>
>>215056775
Wasn't she basically Spielberg's shadow during Indiana Jones?
>>
>>215056817
It's all jews, man. The money is secondary, because they control finance too, and can always print more/move it around/buy each other out as necessary. Only people with propaganda as their primary goal would continue doubling down on things they know audiences hate.
>>
Star Wars and Star Trek were designed for humanity to aspire to. Yidsney took that and twisted until they could instead influence modern politics with unimaginative propaganda scifi.
>>
Star Wars never had that much in it in the first place. Besides a few side stories there wasn't much story to tell.
>>
>>215056880
Yidsney has been exposed over and over prioritizing woke while charging an exorbitant amount to attend their theme park. Yet absolutely nothing changes in the company. Trump becomes President and shakes up the whole SEC but that doesn't matter to any of these megacorp monopolies.
>>
have they even turned a profit yet?
>>
The future was female after all, meaning a giant financial and cultural disaster.
>>
>>215056906
The stories don't matter, it makes money from selling lightsabers to kids.
A big issue is that toys barely sell these days so they had to pivot to millennials because htey grew up with it and have the money to spend on it, and Disney thinks this current type of slop is what they're into.
>>
>>215056775
>I almost think it was a controlled demolition
You can't tell me it wasn't, they're doing the same to the Alien franchise now. Romulus was a better made TFA and Alien: Earth was made by an effeminate balding hack who doesn't care about the franchise and aims to subvert expectations, sound familiar?
>>
blade runner is next btw, get ready
>>
>>215056907
Part of me is glad Hollywood has gone all out on woke shit, as it creates a huge gap in the market for non-woke stuff generally, and I'm in the middle of writing something (not intended for Hollywood, obv). Should get back to it and stop prevaricating here.
>>
>>215056874
Yes. Then she married Spielbergs producing partner and the three of them started a production company together. The amount of high quality films she has overseen at Amblin and Kennedy/Marshall makes it very hard to believe she's as hopeless as her output at Lucasfilm has been. Whilst it's perfectly possible she just surrounded herself with talented men and tanked as soon as she was in charge on her own it's stupefying that someone could spend decades around filmmakers and producers of that calibre and be so clueless.
>>
>>215056866
Far left Star Trek is basically right wing now
>militaristic meritocratic racial realist heteronormative society
>>
>>215056880
>it’s so unusual for companies to keep doing the same thing over again even when it dosent work that it must be the Jews
Have you ever had a job?
>>
>>215056817
Not sure what you mean. Are you implying Netflix doesn't have highly politized 'woke' shows? That's what they are famous for.
>>
Nigga they are raking it in
>>
>>215056757
I would bang her.
>>
>>215057192
i was suprised she's 72, she actually looks pretty fucking good for her age
>>
>>215056757
letting women into male careers and hobbies was a mistake.
>>
>>215057078
Good grief. If you want to be that naive (or disingenuous), then I can't stop you. It's not worth the effort of attempting to explain the difference between a company producing X product and eventually suffering a decline in sales due to competition, or X becoming less popular, and jewish film studios, which effectively have a monopoly, switching from producing X to Y, when they could just as easily keep producing X (which is arguably even more popular than ever), and continuing to stubbornly produce Y over and over again, when all the data say it's financially disastrous. Although I guess I just did.
>>
It really is impressive how they managed to absolutely erode one of the biggest and most beloved pop culture juggernauts in history inside of ten years. Absolutely no one gives a shit about Star Wars anymore because Disney has been shitting out nothing but mediocre slop ever since they jumpscared everyone with that sweaty gorilla. Even when they had something potentially good, they always fucked it up somehow.
>>
I recently found out Kathleen Kennedy greenlighted and was the reason that nostalgia was dug up and raped a little bit with bad CGI and puppets for Jurassic Park 3 and it all made sense.
>>
>>215056827
gee it's almost like Disney Wars didn't fail at all and made shitloads of money
>>
>>215056757
>fumble
anon the jews are very intentional in dismantling all of western world. The definitive compass of which morality is derived in a secular world, Luke Skywalker, was top on the list of the jewish usurpers to destroy. Theres always a head jew hiding by shabbos goy, never forget that
>>
>>215056880
>>215057078
>>215057278
i do think they want to make money and they also know the best ways to do so. but they would rather try to put their own spin on it and do things their way, as sort of a way to validate their ideas. it's not like they can lose their home and there's only so much enjoyment you can derive from a bigger yacht, so chasing greater highs from sating your ego is more attractive than money.

lets not get it twisted, they still fully hope and believe people will spend money on their message, and they do get at least a little upset when it doesn't come to pass. they may acknowledge that the message is not received well, but they figure everyone else is wrong, not them. its really just bias and stubbornness. people want to see the world a certain way and they stick by it

i don't really consider it the same as propaganda, because they aren't earnestly trying to make people to think in a certain way. they are too self-centered to make propaganda. it's more like they are hoping for people to see how great they are and that people dickride them for their amazing ideas

t. no source but worked with creatives
>>
>>215057823
have you ever read the church committee report? Im geniunely asking you bc your take is so beyong delusional and naive im not sure if you are trolling. Anon, no one spends 400-500M on an iffy, questionably received story/topic/character, unless its directly effective propaganda. There isnt anywhere else better to place money to change opinions then movies and tv, it is literally recieved as reality to the brain. Which is why you see the pivots to live streaming "content creators" much easier to break the 4th wall
>>
>>215056775
>implying women can learn anything good
heh
>>
File: images(6).jpg (32 KB, 588x330)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
>>215056757
She did exactly what she was supposed to do. It's not as though she was a rogue agent.
>>
>>215057204
What the fuck I thought she was like 40
>>
>>215057895
Second girl is cute
>>
>>215057881
i think you fundamentally don't understand how people work so you invent conspiracies to explain how everything works
>>
>>215057961
i dont think you understand how money works, and no you dont need the entire film crew to go along with filming a homosexual as some sort of harbinger of morality. Or having the worlds foremost hero abandon everything for nihilism. But yes im sure creative differences with no ulterior motives just so happens to align with jewish ideology on gender, governance, and morality
>>
File: IMG_2279.jpg (487 KB, 1125x976)
487 KB
487 KB JPG
Women are so dumb it makes my brain hurt
>>
>>215056775
Being a coffee lady for greater minds doesn't make you a great mind too.
>>
>>215058000
>i dont think you understand how money works,
Neither do you, mr armchair analyst
>>
>>215057961
nta but you sound like you don't know much about the Federal Reserve system.
>>
>>215056775
She literally didn't take an interest in her inherited empire. Even her cringe virtue signalling about hiring women didn't lead her to any real action. Patty Jenkins never made her Rogue Squadron movie, just like all the other cancelled projects.

She's the office lady who complains a lot but never does anything real then got plucked out of obscurity because they wanted a woman.
>>
>>215058162
nta, but why do you say that? Where to start on the Fed?
t. doesn't know much about the Fed
>>
>>215058162
i know how the fed works and how it has been making the economy more and more retarded since 2008, but even with speculation and money cheat codes being the name of the game, you still lose money by making bad products and gain money by making successful ones. they don't care if they make 30 or 50 million a year. as i outlined before, these people care more about the ego high from being successful when doing things "their way" instead of being conservative, derivative or rote.

it's the same core reason behind the "subverted expectations" epidemic, creatives simply refuse to follow good narrative rules established 2000 years ago because there's no fun in it for them. they want THEIR ideas to be proven best, not aristotle's.
>>
>>215056775
why didn't Dave Filoni say anything?
>>
>>215056757
She did exactly as ordered. Any other reasoning is mere cope
>>
>>215058323
He's a feminist.
>>
File: cringe reaction.jpg (81 KB, 850x948)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
>>215056817
>>215056848

Except that's retarded because then your company goes bankrupt and you won't be propagandizing anyone anymore because all of your assets (including the IPs) were seized by creditors. Even Scholmo's gotta pay the utility bill.
>>
>>215058295
im the anon being a facetious prick about conspiracies and propaganda. In a nutshell, 2008 nuked the worlds monetary system. What emerged, through whats called Quantitively easing, was essentially a 5th branch of government with investment firms owning majoritry shares in almost every single company on the S&P 500. (which gives voting power)
Now if you are Iger, greenlight a film that aligns with said investments firms agenda, recieve investments to the tunes of 100s of billions, the films revenue, profit is rendered moot.
Now, disney only needs to create a narrative not profitable product.
Thats not even mentioning any shenanigans into Iger wanting Disney to be bought by a tech behemoth. But making money on a film for Disney and WB is the last of the concern when it hits market
>>
>>215056757
thank you, I was so sick of star wars
>>
>>215058302
>they want THEIR ideas to be proven best, not aristotle's.
in other words, propaganda
>>
>>215056775
It was a lack of interest in doing literally anything with it. She was reported as letting anyone do whatever they wanted with the IP, not really caring about the quality or story. On the one had this led to Rogue One, Mando S1-2 and Andor being really well received. Everything else was a cluster fuck.
>>
>>215058323

Because she lets him shit all over the IP as the only marginally competent content creator left at Disney
>>
File: Good Disney SW.jpg (3.15 MB, 2160x4590)
3.15 MB
3.15 MB JPG
I liked some of Disney Star Wars, thoughlbeit. 90% of it is still shit, but there have been some pretty good entries. Let's hope Jedi 3 sticks the landing and Maul show doesn't disappoint.
>>
>>215056757
She genuinely thinks what she's making is good and the audiences are wrong. ESG tax credits make her financial box office flops actually successes in the eyes of Disney's board of governors.
>>
>>215056827
Weird what leadership, shareholders, etc get up in arms about and what they don't isn't it. Really makes you think
>>
>>215058867
no, i just explained the difference to you. maybe you need to read my post again, perhaps slowlier this time
>>
>>215059003
I liked those as well, it's just sad that everything else has been terrible. There is no excuse for the Sequels and the Kenobi show to been as bad as it was. You bring back McGregor and Haydensen and you give them a show with the production value of a Bollywood soap opera. It's just unacceptable.
>>
>>215056757
>adults arguing about star wars
grow the fuck up
>>
>>215057204
Well yeah, she has access to the best adrenochrome
>>
>>215056757
Do you think she was fucked or could there be a chance that she is still a virgin?
>>
>>215056827
Because her movies still made 4 billion of profit, plus all the merch worth another 15
People are missing the memo: it doesn't matter for the board if those movies COULD earned 4 billion each and were actually good. What matters is that they DID earn 4 billion total.
Currently Disney is busy making one shitty SW show after another, and they don't care about their quality. If one gets good by accident, then it's literally up to pure chance. If one gets utter shit, that's also pure chance. What matters is the fact they can saturate Disney+ with endless content, to justify subscription
>b-but unsustainable
Nigger, it's 1980+45. If you are expecting sustainable business model and approaching any company in longer term than 2 years forward, you are either insane, or were living in an Amish commune until last month.
>>
>>215058070
>Never represent any inuits or mongols in any of her movies
So much for representation.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.