i think color grading is gayhere is a prime example of a show looking way better without it
>>215057341This is an accurate portrayal of Missouri, except in real life there are way more n___rs.
Why is everything shot like day for night scene?
>>215057341top - original releasebottom - criterion release
>>215058018kek no way
you mean over-stylized color grading because the picture on the bottom isn't raw camera input either
>>215058018i like the bottom because it focuses on the character more
>>215057341Color grading exist because digital film are being shot with low saturated format
>>215058058I like the bottom because he says daddy when I go deep. Doesn't mean he's kino
>>215058037the bottom would just be raw footage with saturation turned up while respecting the white balance and tones, top is just some ugly shit that spawns when you start cranking the sliders everywhere in post.
>>215058121you don't know what you're talking about
>>215058032It's fake.
>>215058018Beautiful, nice and improved.
>>215058018The Master IMPROVED by Criterion.
>>215057341you're noticing "bad vs good", not "with vs without". good colour grading generally isn't noticeable and that's the point, unless the scene is set in mexico
