/tv/ - >critics review a new movie >universally lauded >m - Television & Film

Anonymous

10/06/25(Mon)11:22:22 No.215059723

File: 1676981002633240.jpg (10 KB, 440x262)

Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)11:22:22 No.215059723 Archived

>critics review a new movie
>universally lauded
>marathon it
>it's shit
>okay, let's marathon it from another perspective
>still shit
>okay, try 3
>still shit
>ffwd.jfif
>okay, try 90
>still shit
>look up the reviews
>"the movie is a tour-de-force"
>"HOWEVER the lack of certain elements is supplanted by..."
>uhhhh.jpg
>marathon it again, this time with disdain
>it makes sense
>it's a shitty 3/10 flick with a milk-toast message
Why does this happen

Anonymous
10/06/25(Mon)11:26:14 No.215059769

Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)11:26:14 No.215059769

File: 1707162196914431.webm (1.43 MB, 352x736)

1.43 MB WEBM

>>215059723

Anonymous
10/06/25(Mon)11:30:40 No.215059829

Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)11:30:40 No.215059829

>>215059723
>listening to critics
>watching new movies
>"marathoning" movie
i really hope this thread is a ragebait shitpost
if so, bravo! otherwise please fuckin kill yourself

Anonymous
10/06/25(Mon)11:39:14 No.215059947

Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)11:39:14 No.215059947

Paid reviews and retarded trophy bait lovin' arthouse snob critics.

Anonymous
10/06/25(Mon)11:48:04 No.215060082

Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)11:48:04 No.215060082

File: 1752344866650698.webm (489 KB, 720x720)

489 KB WEBM

Anonymous
10/06/25(Mon)12:03:11 No.215060285

Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)12:03:11 No.215060285

>>215060082
kek, love the daughter's face with the eyebrow rising "maybe it's okay to say it?", of course she's not thinking that but it still funny.

>>215059769
~~I made this webum~~

Anonymous
10/06/25(Mon)13:01:25 No.215061175

Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)13:01:25 No.215061175

>>215060285
lol, nice comment. it does kind of look like that!

Anonymous
10/06/25(Mon)13:20:18 No.215061489

Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)13:20:18 No.215061489

>>215059829
You first, newfag.

Anonymous
10/06/25(Mon)14:11:59 No.215062417

Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)14:11:59 No.215062417

>>215059723
All reviewers are hacks. The only exception is armond white.