>Try to discuss any movie that isn't the FOMO subject the board is obsessing about or some shit meme'd to death>0 replies
I have ROMO, relief of missing out.
Prove your theory
I have FOCO, fear of coming outI'm OP btw
>>215061965>doesn't even discuss a movie at all>4 replies (counting this) and countingOP BTFO
>>215062071If anything it proves OP's point very well. You can have any excuse of a thread to NOT discuss /tv/ related stuff and the threads will get plenty of activity, but make a thread about something non-sanctioned by the /tv/ denizens and watch it sink to the archives. I made a thread about The Prisoner (1967) three days ago and it only got two replies.
>>215062119>thread about something non-sanctioned by the /tv/ denizensI recognize the sociolect. Please go back.
That's every board though. You make some retard bait thread and it gets 300 replies, but when you try to discuss the board's subject it's crickets.
>>215061965you probably just didnt try hard enough to actually dicuss something or have anything actually interesting to contribute in order to hook people and make them want to contribute. you probably didnt even ask a question other than "what did you think of it?" or even the retarded meme "what did i think of it?".