Could have removed this scene, and it would still be great. Completely unessarry.
>>215062016perhaps you are too young to remember the controversy, but it's arguable that this scene made the movie.
>>215062057I thought what made the movie, was that she was an author.
>>215062016there's countless movies that exist only because coomers keep them popular from some iconic sex scene90% of sex scenes are completely unnecessary for this very reason
>>215062143Yeah people couldn’t stop talking about the fact the film had a character who was an author
the therapist was hotter
>>215062016>Completely unessarry.Not to a generation of young boys who freeze framed that scene on their VCRs.
>>215062016>Completely unessarryYou know how difficult it was to see some beaver in the early 90s
>>215062016fuck you
>>215062057This, no one would remember this movie today without it
>>215062980incorrect
>>215062057Were silent gen niggers really so pressed for pussy that a mere glimpse of some coochie could create a cult classic centralized around clitorical cinema?
>>215062016Surprisingly hard to find a still shot of this in good 4k quality taken from the UHD Blu-Ray on the Internet
>>215064248Porn and the people who watched it were rightfully seen as outcasts and perverts back then.
>>215062016it's absolutely necessary as we need to know that she is a woman that can even control and manipulate police detectives
>>215064434This. It was supposed to show off her erotic capital. Virgins don’t get it since they’ve never had a woman try to seduce them before.
>>215062016faggot
>>215062980Correct
>>215064384Sounds kinda zesty ngl grandunc. You couldn’t have just telegraphed some booty pics?
>>215064384Boomers went to porn theatres and peep shows to jerk off in public like the degenerates they are
>>215064354>>>/gif/29582859there's compression, but there
