[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
10/06/25(Mon)21:59:07 No.215070910
File: s-l1200 (20).jpg (270 KB, 1200x825)
270 KB
270 KB JPG
Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)21:59:07 No.215070910 Archived
DreamWorks wasn't fooling around in 2004. There is so much to unpack here.
>>
Anonymous
10/06/25(Mon)22:05:17 No.215071022
Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)22:05:17 No.215071022
Not really, you're the autistic spammer from co
>>
Anonymous
10/06/25(Mon)22:13:52 No.215071186
Anonymous 10/06/25(Mon)22:13:52 No.215071186
Shrek 2 and Shark Tale have a few flaws, but they're still way better than the mess that was DreamWorks' 2003 movie. I'd rather have a movie with too much pop-culture elements over a movie that has a bad storyline and an unlikeable protagonist.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.