[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1755801177904355.png (302 KB, 338x507)
302 KB
302 KB PNG
How was this movie so good? The special effects look better than the slop they show in cinemas today.
>>
What is this, I can't read the title
Is it Better Man 2
>>
>>215093641
dunston checks in
>>
>>215093641
underaged newfag
>>215093608
It had SOUL. Back then they atleast tried to make films with some effort, now they just keep putting out low quality low effort slop.
>>
>>215093608
Early 2010s was the last time they tried to put money and effort into special effects.
>>
If you swapped the titles around and made them 1. Dawn 2. War 3. Rise it would all make more sense
>>
CGI piss. the 2001 film did it better.
>>
>>215093858
yeah and the original movie was called planet of the apes but it wasnt actually a planet it was just earth



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.