Ewan did not give a fuck during this movie.
>>215139965He's been a smartass since shooting his mouth off about the prequels
Great mobie, one of just a few I've bought on bluray over the last several years.
>>215139965Not a horrible movie but nothing prolific about it. Similar to Stephen King's writing since the mid 90s or so. Just okay.
Shit movie.
>>215140449>but nothing prolificshut up dumb pseud
>>215140867is prolific a difficult word? Jesus pick a book if you're impressed by that you faggot lmao
>>215139965The last act was like ready player one nostalgia bait but for horror
>>215139965it's a story about the kid from the shining, but it seemed really far removed from the material. weird vampires don't seem to belong in the shining, and yet you get all these member berries from the 1980 movie that don't integrate well. it's disorienting
>>215140889Prolific is the wrong fucking word, is the point. It makes zero sense in the context used here. Using a word you don't know the meaning of because you heard or saw other people using it and thought it sounded smart is the definition of psued you utter fucking imbecile how can you be so stupid?
GET
I still think "Grown up Danny and his teenage sidekick fighting the gypsy vampire Manson Family" is a retarded premise for a Shining sequel.
>>215141080Its in the Stephen King verse. Penny wise canonically happend in the same verse as the shinning a decade before. All Stephen kings books are connected in the same world.
>>215140449The book is even worse. It was like King was writing a different story, but decided to throw in Danny for some reason
>>215141774So the Maximum Overdrive thing happen to everyone?
>>215142581All Stephen King books take place in the same base universe, there are other universes which run parallel which are mostly the same except they head in a different direction. For example the Stand and IT run in the same timeline originally but split at some point where the The Stand starts and goes. Anything that is mass in call world changing is set in a parallel universe. It's like a tree with the same trunk but a bunch of branches.
>>215140449>Not a horrible movie but nothing prolific about it.
>>215140410The astral projection was the iconic scene. I dont know if it was featured enough on the trailer.
>>215142736Pennywise graffiti near a reservoir is mentioned in dream catcher. The virus from the stand is mentioned in wizard and glass.
>>215143153>iconicAnd prolific
>>215141220>implies creativity or inventivenessSome words have secondary meanings you dumb cunt. Perhaps if you read more you'd understand that. Un-fucking-believable the temerity of this faggot. You want to look up the definition of that too? lol stupid fucking nigger
>>215143277>AI OverviewSaar...
>>215143226Iconic is correct, motherfucker. highlight of the movie.
>>215143300crack a book nigger
>>215143277You are the one who picked a confusing word with conflicting secondary meanings, why are you mad that your vague semantics were interpreted incorrectly when you are the one responsible for the incoherent term?
>>215143380If I had known you'd shit down my neck over what I thought was a rather innocuous adjective, I probably would've chose something different lol
>>215143452Too bad you weren't being prolific enough to anticipate what actually happened.
>>215143380It's like the 3 amigo when he says plethora.
>>215143485Or perhaps I'm so prolific I anticipated the entire ordeal and you fell right into my trap, you prolific faggot. (In both senses of the word)
>>215143503Cool story bro, too bad you already admitting your jimmies got rustled because you didn't know what was going to happen.
>>215140449It was like 30 minutes too long.
>>215143559Obviously I was being facetious. Did I use that correctly? I should probably check with you first, I don't want to cause anymore linguistic issues for you whilst casually criticizing mediocre films.
>>215143578She should have had an intense, sapphic seduction scene with snakebite andy.
>>215143615>Did I use that correctly?No, you clearly didn't mean facetious, you meant to say retarded.
>>215143578>you think that's air you're breathing now?
>>215143578stupid hat
>>215143578Directed by Quentin Tarantino
>>215143651Mmk bud. Maybe I could've chosen a more precise descriptive anon but you could also not have been such a fucking cunt about the whole thing lol
>>215143762Maybe, but you would not have learned a prolific lesson about imprecise language that way.
>>215141080I don't mind the vampires but at the later half it just stops being about that and just becomes a homage to Kubrick's movie. Trying to ape as much as possible
>>215143830It becomes a ghost story set in a ghost hotel in the stephen king universe with a bunch of dead people from past stories whose souls were consumed by the magical ghost hotel from the shining.
>>215143797Perhaps perhaps...but the great irony is that while not as meticulous as I could or should have been, technically my choice of words wasn't incorrect. I hope you also learned a prolific and valuable lesson about the nuances of language and secondary meanings in prose here today friend.
>>215143860No I only learned that you are fine with your imprecision and that is why you got called a pseud because it was neither technically correct nor incorrect, you just wanted to show how valid your opinion is by using unnecessarily convoluted words that don't really communicate anything of value.
>>215143912I am not fine with imprecision. I've already conceded that while technically correct, it was a confusing choice I should've put more thought into. You however persist in your ambitions to act like a pedantic faggot and I must say you've been devastatingly successful at it.
>>215139965it's a garbage flick so can't blame him
>>215143999>I've already conceded that while technically correctNo, you only conceded that you were technically not incorrect, so I guess the lesson about imprecision in language hasn't totally set in yet.
2 english majors having a bitchfit. Fantastic!
>>215144031Point being your initial assertion that I used the word incorrectly missed the mark. I tried to extend an olive branch by conceding I see your point that my choice of words was easy to misinterpret but you will yield no ground at all. In fact you quite pompously claim to have been doing me a favor. I extended my hand and you ask me to bend over and grab my ankles. I will not be fucked sir.
>>215144162>your initial assertion that I used the word incorrectlyThat wasn't the initial assertion, the assertion was that you are a pseud because its not the right word to use in this context, its just a $2 word you used because you thought it made you sound smart and validate your opinion. You are already fucked because you are still a pseud who will go to retarded lengths to defend your pseudishness.
>>215144213I made no claims to being an intellectual. I casually derided a movie on the internet, writing one single sentence and you decided to be needlessly pedantic about it over a period of several hours lol. That's about the long and short of it in my view.
>>215139965Rebecca creeped the hell out of me in her roleI am kind of in love with her, but there she was pure evilGood movie, very underrated
