Ewan did not give a fuck during this movie.
>>215139965He's been a smartass since shooting his mouth off about the prequels
Great mobie, one of just a few I've bought on bluray over the last several years.
>>215139965Not a horrible movie but nothing prolific about it. Similar to Stephen King's writing since the mid 90s or so. Just okay.
Shit movie.
>>215140449>but nothing prolificshut up dumb pseud
>>215140867is prolific a difficult word? Jesus pick a book if you're impressed by that you faggot lmao
>>215139965The last act was like ready player one nostalgia bait but for horror
>>215139965it's a story about the kid from the shining, but it seemed really far removed from the material. weird vampires don't seem to belong in the shining, and yet you get all these member berries from the 1980 movie that don't integrate well. it's disorienting
>>215140889Prolific is the wrong fucking word, is the point. It makes zero sense in the context used here. Using a word you don't know the meaning of because you heard or saw other people using it and thought it sounded smart is the definition of psued you utter fucking imbecile how can you be so stupid?
GET
I still think "Grown up Danny and his teenage sidekick fighting the gypsy vampire Manson Family" is a retarded premise for a Shining sequel.
>>215141080Its in the Stephen King verse. Penny wise canonically happend in the same verse as the shinning a decade before. All Stephen kings books are connected in the same world.
>>215140449The book is even worse. It was like King was writing a different story, but decided to throw in Danny for some reason
>>215141774So the Maximum Overdrive thing happen to everyone?
>>215142581All Stephen King books take place in the same base universe, there are other universes which run parallel which are mostly the same except they head in a different direction. For example the Stand and IT run in the same timeline originally but split at some point where the The Stand starts and goes. Anything that is mass in call world changing is set in a parallel universe. It's like a tree with the same trunk but a bunch of branches.
>>215140449>Not a horrible movie but nothing prolific about it.
>>215143153>iconicAnd prolific
>>215141220>implies creativity or inventivenessSome words have secondary meanings you dumb cunt. Perhaps if you read more you'd understand that. Un-fucking-believable the temerity of this faggot. You want to look up the definition of that too? lol stupid fucking nigger
>>215143277>AI OverviewSaar...
>>215143300crack a book nigger
>>215143277You are the one who picked a confusing word with conflicting secondary meanings, why are you mad that your vague semantics were interpreted incorrectly when you are the one responsible for the incoherent term?
>>215143380If I had known you'd shit down my neck over what I thought was a rather innocuous adjective, I probably would've chose something different lol
>>215143452Too bad you weren't being prolific enough to anticipate what actually happened.
>>215143485Or perhaps I'm so prolific I anticipated the entire ordeal and you fell right into my trap, you prolific faggot. (In both senses of the word)
>>215143503Cool story bro, too bad you already admitting your jimmies got rustled because you didn't know what was going to happen.
>>215140449It was like 30 minutes too long.
>>215143559Obviously I was being facetious. Did I use that correctly? I should probably check with you first, I don't want to cause anymore linguistic issues for you whilst casually criticizing mediocre films.
>>215143615>Did I use that correctly?No, you clearly didn't mean facetious, you meant to say retarded.
>>215143578>you think that's air you're breathing now?
>>215143578stupid hat
>>215143578Directed by Quentin Tarantino
>>215143651Mmk bud. Maybe I could've chosen a more precise descriptive anon but you could also not have been such a fucking cunt about the whole thing lol
>>215143762Maybe, but you would not have learned a prolific lesson about imprecise language that way.
>>215141080I don't mind the vampires but at the later half it just stops being about that and just becomes a homage to Kubrick's movie. Trying to ape as much as possible
>>215143830It becomes a ghost story set in a ghost hotel in the stephen king universe with a bunch of dead people from past stories whose souls were consumed by the magical ghost hotel from the shining.
>>215143797Perhaps perhaps...but the great irony is that while not as meticulous as I could or should have been, technically my choice of words wasn't incorrect. I hope you also learned a prolific and valuable lesson about the nuances of language and secondary meanings in prose here today friend.
>>215143860No I only learned that you are fine with your imprecision and that is why you got called a pseud because it was neither technically correct nor incorrect, you just wanted to show how valid your opinion is by using unnecessarily convoluted words that don't really communicate anything of value.
>>215143912I am not fine with imprecision. I've already conceded that while technically correct, it was a confusing choice I should've put more thought into. You however persist in your ambitions to act like a pedantic faggot and I must say you've been devastatingly successful at it.
>>215139965it's a garbage flick so can't blame him
>>215143999>I've already conceded that while technically correctNo, you only conceded that you were technically not incorrect, so I guess the lesson about imprecision in language hasn't totally set in yet.
>>215144031Point being your initial assertion that I used the word incorrectly missed the mark. I tried to extend an olive branch by conceding I see your point that my choice of words was easy to misinterpret but you will yield no ground at all. In fact you quite pompously claim to have been doing me a favor. I extended my hand and you ask me to bend over and grab my ankles. I will not be fucked sir.
>>215144162>your initial assertion that I used the word incorrectlyThat wasn't the initial assertion, the assertion was that you are a pseud because its not the right word to use in this context, its just a $2 word you used because you thought it made you sound smart and validate your opinion. You are already fucked because you are still a pseud who will go to retarded lengths to defend your pseudishness.
>>215144213I made no claims to being an intellectual. I casually derided a movie on the internet, writing one single sentence and you decided to be needlessly pedantic about it over a period of several hours lol. That's about the long and short of it in my view.
>>215139965Rebecca creeped the hell out of me in her roleI am kind of in love with her, but there she was pure evilGood movie, very underrated
>>215144336>I made no claims to being an intellectual.Except when you couldn't accept being a pseud so you tried to defend using imprecise language that for several hours as if you were some kind of authority.>needlesslyNo, you already admitted it was warranted and you sort of learned a lesson about imprecision in language.
>>215144399>pure evilNo she was pretty nice to all her vampire buddies, but vampires gotta eat.
>>215144429You sat in waiting like some kind of semantic predator and lashed out after one fairly benign criticism of Stephen King. Only for it to turn out your lazy rebuke wasn't even technically correct and you had to pivot from "you picked the wrong word" to "it's not my fault you were too vague" lol>you already admitted it was warrantedI tried to argue in good faith and see your side but you're determined to be an abrasive cunt unfortunately.
>>215144527It was her food are you evil just because you use a fork to stab your caloric victims even though you are pretty nice to your peers?
>>215144569>benign criticismI didn't even pick up on that because of the poor word choice, it seemed more like a vibe check than an actual criticism.>I tried to argue in good faithSo now that you have reverted back to arguing in bad faith, you take back your admission that it was warranted to call out your word choice?
>>215144581you are so wrong on so many levelsthis is not about eating/survival, we all know about itthis is about inflicting pain and taking pleasure from it - that is pure evil
>>215144776this is about inflicting pain and taking pleasure from it She didn't do that to her vampire peers though, she only did it to their food.
>>215144788Kosher and halal are specifically about minimizing suffering during slaughter, though.
>>215144914I don't know and don't want to know what your moral compass is, but I know it is wrongI never went hunting, but I went fishing with my grandpa, great timesTook the fish off the hook, gutted it and grilled itThat's it
>>215139965as far as I know he's been banging every female costar
Pretty good movie until the final act when they decide that they need to recreate EVERY iconic scene from The Shining and it completely goes to shit.
>>215144936You have obviously done neither and don't know what you are talking about, but the intention behind the halal and kosher is specifically to reduce suffering, not to be extra malicious for the lulz.
>>215145198Not necessarily and bolt guns didn't exist when halal and kosher slaughter were devised.
>>215145186He smashed Nicole Kidman while filming some movie so I wouldn't be surprised if he also tried with Margot and NatalieAllegedly he's the kind of guy who always makes you laugh and you know what comes after that
>>215139965Doctor Sleep has black ppl worship with the little girl, the way she was written in relation to other characters, to Ewan. She kept correcting him, demonstrating how she was more powerful, that kinda crap. like a little black Rey. and the movie wasn't all that good. it isn't fitting or convincing as a sequel to the Shining, especially not with the black worship
>>215145436In your next thread, ust type out "I hate niggers" and save yourself some time.
>>215145436For me, the most suspension-breaking part of Doctor Sleep was when the ghost hotel possesses Ewan and attacks the girl, but doesn't call her a nigger or even allude to anything racist. Soulless nostalgiabaiting.
>>215144581The subject in question is literally canonically evil because they go above and beyond the hypothetical you are posing. Their souls are torn apart by the acts they engage in for immortality. They are no longer human. You are retarded.
What was with all the RWBY references in this movie? Is the director a fan?
>>215146044Kinda based
>>215143277It's still about quantity. You're a dum-dum
>>215139965Wait there are people who still think the use of "prolific" was anything other than nonsense? It's an adjective, and psuedfag put it where adjectives go. Other than that, total nonsense.
>>215141774>Stephen King verseYeah I know he does this shit in his books, doesn't make it not cringy as all fuck.>Hey remember So n' So from my other book, he's dead now.
>>215139965It is kind of weird how he's managed to stay in the a-list since trainspotting despite having such a spotty filmography.
>>215143578Why does she wear the derpy lil hat
>>215147582He's a Bongistani, they don't have many good actors and they have a very limited pool, so they just keep casting the same ones over and over. Tbh what else are you going to do?
>>215147605She always wants to be wearing that hat.
