>the second half is le way worse than the firstabsolutely filthy pleb opinion
>>215373829The second half is fine, it just doesn't have as tight of pacing as the first half where you really can't exclude a single scene without breaking down the entire sequence. You could cut out at least 20 mins from the second half and it wouldn't be all that noticeable.
>>215373829the movie felt too short. Band of brothers was clears.
>>215373919>Band of Jews>goodLmao
>>215373829You're right, both halves are equally shit
The second half is better I don’t know how you can disagree. The steaks are higher (all pun) and the second half cast is superior.
The second half was ruined by the nonstop shooting in the sniper scene. Sniper fires a bullet.The entire platoon empties a dozen clips of ammo out of their machine guns.Cowboy yells "stop!"Sniper fires another bullet.Repeat.It was tiresome after the 3rd or 4th time. How many fucking bullets do they even have?
>>215373829Trvke, them in the shit is the best portrayal of wartime amorality ever put on film
>>215373829They say the same thing about Lolita and I chuckle every time. The second half is actually just as good if not better than the first half.
>the second half is le way worse than the firstJust like the movie Lolita>>215375797Just to brighten up your day with a chuckle :)
>>215375719Nothing that Platoon didn’t do better
M-I-C, K-E-Y, M-O-U-S-EMICKEY MOUSE!*mickey mouse*MICKEY MOUSE!*mickey mouse*
>>215375719Yeah, no. The second half of FMJ is great but Platoon unequivocally did it better.
>>215373829It was great all the way through, but the first half is certainly better.>>215376561True, and Barnes did nothing wrong.
>>215375108This scene shows the correct way to deal with snipers if you are a platoon of USMC infantry.
>>215376791Give away your position by firing randomly into walls?
ITS 1 1/2 hours out of a 2 hour movie How is that a “half”?
