[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Was expecting slop but I think I liked it better than the original. Am I retarded?
>>
>>215377219
No it's definitely better, the original is overrated
>>
>>215377249
I love the original so I was pleasantly surprised here. I need another like this but with at least double the amount of chainsaw kills.
>>
>>215377219
It's not better than the original but it's pretty good.
Though they ruined it by slicing his arm off like it was made of butter. Makes him a lot less menacing.
>>
This cover is better than the main cover for TCM 2003
>>
It's nowhere near as good as the Hooper duo, but I think 03 and the prequel are decent. Certainly better than that Elm Street remake. I like that they brought back Daniel Pearl for cinematography (speaking of which, wtf went wrong with AvP 2??)
>>
>>215377219
It has a better reputation now than when it came out, but I’ve never really seen the appeal. Doesn’t really do the fake seventies thing well, the cast look like overly buff Gap models, and it’s shot like a music video from that era (I know it’s Daniel Pearl, it’s not that it’s poorly shot, but that aesthetic was everywhere for a time). That being said, even I’ll admit it’s still one of the better ones in the franchise, because what a mess…
>>
File: tcm knock.webm (2.2 MB, 1300x1080)
2.2 MB
2.2 MB WEBM
too much biel's butt they said
>>
>>215377249
>No it's definitely better, the original is overrated
kys retard
>>
It was shit
>my TCM made it clear that the family was inbred and most likely cannibals for generations (hence the physical and mental deformities)
>in the 2003 version R Lee Ermey in the 1950s said "well, I guess we're gonna be cannibals now"
>as much as I love Ermey, the le psycho sheriff was lame
>I don't remember if it was the 2003 version or the sequel, but they found a woman (I think Leatherface's mom) who said "they bullied him that's why he kills). Leatherface never needed some sob origin story.
>>
>>215378494
>in the 2003 version R Lee Ermey in the 1950s said "well, I guess we're gonna be cannibals now"
>or the sequel,
>it was a prequel
Senile people should not talk about what they do not remember.
>>
>>215378970
>zomg you don't remember every detail of some shitty remake from 20 years ago
>>
>>215377219
No, the original is more of a comedy than a horror.
>>
>>215379035
go to bed bruce
>>
>>215379079
Go watch more shit remakes, faggot.
>>
Didn't the original have some weird dropped plot point about the fat wheelchair retard losing his knife?
His character felt so weirdly out of place and irrelevant even if he was literally /tv/
>>
>>215379094
stop crying bruce
>>
I honestly thought the R Lee Erney bits were way more compelling than any of the actual chainsaw massacre parts. Leatherface is just a lot blander in this film, closer to a Jason knock off than the squealing retard we know.
That being said its still a big step up from the most recent version where Leatherface was an even more of a generic slasher guy and had no family of freaks with him.
>>
File: 1688984983372456.png (303 KB, 937x556)
303 KB
303 KB PNG
this is a Biel TCM thread now
>>
File: jc biel titcm.webm (2.51 MB, 1280x720)
2.51 MB
2.51 MB WEBM
>>
Sadly, you are retarded. As is >>215377249.

It's terminal, I'm afraid.
>>
File: 220px-Erin_Hardesty.jpg (25 KB, 360x450)
25 KB
25 KB JPG
>>
File: TCM biel 24.webm (2.51 MB, 640x360)
2.51 MB
2.51 MB WEBM
>>
>>215380106
>>215379812
We need these in 4k now. 4k version exists.
>>
it's pretty good as far as 00's slashers go. the action is not well choreographed but the movie looks pretty good, the director clearly had a vision. cast is mostly good too
>>
>>215377219
>more gore
>hotter women
>better acting but still has the horror movie cheesiness
>fat wheelchair guy isn’t in it
>R. Lee Ermey joking about the dead suicide girl’s pussy being wet
Some remakes really are superior
>>
>>215381062
https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/211306399/#q211306399
>>
File: 1729536137545503.png (2.37 MB, 1920x1080)
2.37 MB
2.37 MB PNG
>>
its too clean and lacks the gritty rawness of the remake
>>
>>215378458
nta but the original tcm sucks dude. get over it.
>>
why did they maked chainsaw man so sexy in this
>>
>tcm
>dawn of the dead
>the crazies
>the hills have eyes
>wrong turn
the early 2k had kino remakes
>>
>>215383909
I really don't understand the adoration it recieves. Other 70s slashers like Black Christmas, Alice Sweet Alice and Halloween are all a hundred times better. The only interesting part of TCM is the dinner scene
>>
I like The Beginning better desu. Both are flawed, but that one is grittier.
>>
>>215385435
No way, man. The shots, imagery and final scene in TCM blow those away.
Original Halloween is the one I never understood the adulation for. Then again I dislike pretty much the entire franchise.
>>
>>215385435
I watched it with my brother, he turned to me at one point (probably after one of the scenes with the wheelchair) and said “is this supposed to be a comedy or satire or something like that.”
>>
>>215377249
fpbp
deranged tcm fags will melt down over this comment but it's the truth
>>
>>215385994
>watching horror with other people
ngmi
>>
>>215386062
Lucky it wasn’t a horror then.
>>
>>215377219
This and Friday the 13th 2009 remake are better than the originals
>>
>>215377219
Yes.
>>
>>215377219
As a young boy I used to find these things very scary

Then you grow up and you realise wage slaving for 50 years of your life is much much more scary
>>
>>215380106
Good but not this good
https://youtu.be/clcRlTPoPHQ
>>
>>215377945
AVP2 you mean the only aliens and Predator movie worth watching after Predator alien and aliens
>>
>>215377219
It's one of the better remakes
>>
>>215386441
Froday the 13th 2009 wasn't a remake
>>
Thoughts on this piece of crap?
>>
>>215377219
>sanitized remake
>better than the original
I assume you’re 27 or younger



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.