>Let me make you fucking despise the main character
>>215417823the social network makes zuckerberg look like a chad
>>215417857This. If anything it's the most flattering biopic Zuckerberg could've ever hoped for. He's depicted as a Machiavellian genius.
Will there be one about Bill Gates? Pirates of the Silicon Valley makes him look better than he is in real life
The superior biopic generated within me admiration, contempt, sympathy and awe.
Biopics don't get made about really nice guys that never bothered anyone
>>215417823Did you ever consider that they just might be despicable assholes?
>>215417857I dunno, he literally financially ruins his friend Eduardo because his butt-buddy told him to. He has no spine and seems to be easily manipulated by others
>>215417823Why shouldn’t you despise Zuckerberg and Jobs? They’re Jews who steal. But then again, I’m not surprised you wanna run defense for a Jew. You’re all Haavaran in nature, you just don’t realize it.
>>215417895I ALREADY POSTED YOU
The Social Network is the best movie of the 2010s
>>215417924>anti-semites are letting us claim jobs as well nowgeee you gentiles really amount to squat huh
Has there ever been a good unbiased biopic?
>>215417938Of the 2000s.The Social Network came out in the 2000s.
>>215418011
>>215418036It came out in September 2010
>>215418060I know.2010 is the 2000s.
>>215418080No, it is not. Just like 2000 is not the 90's. Retard.
Jobs was massively overrated. There is no way to tell his story without damaging his image. The only good thing about the dude is his ability to anticipate consumer demand and his refusal to let his engineers dictate the design of his products.
>>215418169A decade is 10 years.The calendar starts at year 1.So years 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 make the first decade. Then it keeps going.The year 2010 is the last year of the 2000s. The 2010s started in 2011. Glad I could help.
>>215418169two thousand and ten is literally within the two thousandsnotice how i started by calling it "two thousand"as in is it's in the 2000s"2000 is not in the 90s"right because 90 isn't in the 2000s like 2010. Glad I could help with basic reading comprehension
Blonde (2022) underrated
>>215418251The year 2000 is the last year of the 1990s.Again, a decade is 10 years. And our calendar started at year 1.
The Social Network is such a fucking trip to watch. Were developers really seen as “cool” back in the 2010s?
>>215418311Have you even watched the movie? They're a bunch of fucking nerds.Also the movie takes place and was released in the 2000s.
>>215418362They were nerds who were constantly surrounded by women and having sex regularly.
>>215417823Glazing a guy for 90 minutes gets boring
>>215418311>Were developers really seen as “cool” back in the 2010s?Yes and they were all very obnoxious about it but yet all crippingly insecure and so it was just a very cringe and perturbing era.
>>215418389
>>215417823So which film did you prefer /tv/?
>>215418376No?The movie begins with Zuck sperging out and getting rejected by a woman.Then he spends all of his time coding with his jewish buddies.The moment they become rich, the best they can get are asian whores.
social network has a killer ost.trent reznor & atticus ross.
>>215418420Gilfoyle was the only “cool” character and even then it was still pretty Reddit
>>215417823Zuckerberg is portrayed as witty(that's on Sorkin, he just can't help himself) and ruthless, that's a VERY positive portrayal of that awkward dweeb.
I love that Steve Jobs got the rare form of pancreatic cancer that's actually treatable, but instead of treating it with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery, he decided to treat it with California bullshit like acupuncture, coffee enemas and carrot smoothies. Genius.
>>215418490he says while gargling horse paste instead of """"doctor approved vaccines""""
>>215418471It's killer all righthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvANWVMbt7A
will there be a biopic of job's fat sidekick?
>>215418490Thing is 90% of success at that level is luck so it’s no surprise that a lot of billionaires become superstitious. They erroneously attribute their success to quirky bullshit they do instead of dumb luck.
>>215418510What?
>>215418246>>215418251Fuck off bot.
>>215418478On his own merit, yes. I liked the episode where Rajesh bets him that he can't make any friends and he immediately befriends every single normie he crosses paths.But anyone who could code was trying to bask in the 'unicorn' era of computing. Those ones were the obnoxious little fuckwads.
>>215418541You either blindly trust doctors in the modern era and think others should do the same, which is hysterical, or you're skeptical of doctors which makes you a hypocrite for judging Jobs
>>215418454Kek, this is not what happens at all dumb fuck
>>215418454I think it’s weirder that IRL he made HotOrNot just to fuck with people rather than to get back at an ex. Sorkin was wise to work in the ex girlfriend angle.
>>215418575>.M...muh J..Jab!!!!111Shut the fuck up, and go back to Pol/.
>>215417981Jobs didn’t invent shit. He’s a glorified mascot.
>>215418575I just think Steve Jobs was a silly cunt.
>>215418657Time for a booster, buddy.That one shot wasn't quite effective enough even though it's 100% effective.
>>215417823because who are they going to do one on who isn't contemptible and relatively talentless in whatever they're known for? nobody anyone knows, besides maybe a musicianlike take tech, who is the most talented technologist who anyone has heard of? John Carmack? (an Id biopic has potential actually) who else - Brendan Eich or some similar marginally or dubiously talented but widely influential guy, Tim Berners Lee or whoever. those guys are boring and soulless - they can only be puff pieces. rest are all unknown outside enthusiast circles or total hacks like Jobs/Gates/etc.Now if they had any real taste, they'd do one on Bell Labs. there's your /g/ kino.Also, Mishima's biopic was good, but it was also done a long time ago (ie. when they used to make good movies still)
>>215417823That's been the case since Citizen Kane
>>215418535Did they tell you this on reddit?
>>215418757Shut the fuck up tinfoil-hat retard
>>215418951Don't get worked up now anon, you're at high risk for myocarditis from the untested, experimental gene therapy you took
>>215418711Jobs was a thought leader and visionary.
>>215418637>shut-in sperg incel devotes an inordinate amount of their time to pathologically spreading misogyny across the internetas things change they stay the same.
