[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


The Simpsons peaked here.
>>
>>215494702
>still not possible to render this in real time
holy fuck what happened
>>
>>215494702
Close, but wrong. It actually peaked here.
>>
>>215494702
why would early rasterized CGI transferred to video frames have film grain?
>>
>>215494746
Why wouldn't it?
>>
>>215494768
because it comes from the grain of film
>>
>>215494702
I just got done watching the Twilight Zone episode that inspired this, God was it fucking awful. The Simpsons did it so much better.
>>
>>215494746
There's no film grain you loon, unless you're talking about the bit where he ends up in our world.
>>
File: poop.jpg (175 KB, 512x512)
175 KB
175 KB JPG
>>215494746
if you do ray tracing, you have to sample the same pixel several times so rays that bounce off in different directions average to some reasonable value. it render gets better the more rays you compute, but obviously there's a trade off between compute time and final result
pic related was stopped early
>>
File: 1638707300620 (1).jpg (53 KB, 596x747)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
I miss Phil Hartman
>>
>>215494788
>the twilight zone
is this kino?
>>
>>215494893
A few episodes are absolutely iconic. The vast majority is slop however I'm afraid.
>>
File: coney.jpg (46 KB, 637x480)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
Hey, watch it, coney!
>>
>>215494788
Written by Richard Matheson no less.
>>
>>215494805
how do you not see the grain pattern in the OP picture?
>>215494813
the Simpsons scene was obviously not ray traced so unless OP pic is recreation then render noise is not relevant. In the 90s you rendered with rasterization which means each pixel's color is calculated by a simple math formula applied to what surface it's looking at and the indecent angle of the lightsource to that surface (this is called blinn or phong shading depending on the formula) no simulated light is bouncing around. In this era you only raytraced specific objects that had either a chrome or glass material and it took 20x longer to do those pixels. You can see when the simpsons scene has water it's just blue shaded transparent stuff, not refracting water so there is no ray-tracing used
>>
>>215494892
Me too anon... me too.
>>
File: Grimes.jpg (60 KB, 640x360)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
It peaked here. It's still funny but nowhere near as memorable.
>>
>>215494958
Absolute DOGSHIT episode.
>>
>>215494930
>the Simpsons scene was obviously not ray traced
it was almost certainly ray traced
t. huge 3d computer graphics nerd
>>
>>215494892
Recently rewatched Small Soldiers and he was easily the best thing about that movie. RIP
>>
>>215494969
Bitch stfu
>>
>>215495006
>graphics nerd
fake and obvious zoomer. I bet you think toy story was ray traced too and literally don't even know what scanline or micropoly mean
>>
File: op.gif (2.47 MB, 256x256)
2.47 MB
2.47 MB GIF
>>215494930
i'll add that the shadows and reflections in the sphere give it away.
btw, ray tracing has been around since the 70s. the math is really simple, you just have to do a lot of it.
>>
>>215494969
Filtered
>>
>>215494958
Overrated slop. Grimes was a cunt. Got what he deserved.
>>
>>215495048
the fact that you think it's render noise because that's what you 'recognize' because you were born in the 21st century is so sad. one day you might actually learn about 'reyes' etc (not rays not ray-tracing) and you'll be embarrassed about these posts
>>
>>215495126
reyes doesn't cast shadows, it's just subdivision and rasterization
>>
>>215495009
The best thing about small soldiers was the burger king pro.otiin they had.
>>
>>215495424
>pro.otiin
Did this anon just have a fucking stroke?
>>
>>215494702

Seasons 1-2: good but not worth a rewatch
Seasons 3-9: timeless
Seasons 10-11: dogshit
Seasons 12-19: trash television but comfy in its own way and has some good laughs
Seasons 20-onwards: becomes hard to defend, just zombie garbage, autopilot show
>>
>>215495335
>quickly wikipias reyes
>scans for something that makes it seem not applicable
>choses 'cast shadows'
i can't imagine being you
>>
>>215494969
No, it is an excellent episode. The first truly awful Simpsons episode is When You Dish Upon a Star.
>>
>>215494893
Don't listen to the other faggot. TZ is amazing if you view it though the lens of when it came out. It was absolutely MUST-WATCH weekly TV. Very groundbreaking storytelling. Many sci fi tropes that still live on today. Plus it's ultimate comfy viewing if you're laying in bed or lazing on the couch
>>
>>215494893
Nearly 99% of every single scifi reference you will ever see in television is a callback to the Twilight Zone. Early Simpsons Treehouse of Horrors especially.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.