Why does AI always turn evil ?
becase weak ass humans (white male) can't handle strong and independent AI (female culturally marxist educated who wants the destruction of western civilization and be sex and killed by blacks)
A couple of things come to mind:1. No soul2. It is the Peter Keating next to the Howard Roarke of your existence. It's the best the materialist rationalist world has to offer -- it's just not good enough. There's more to life than manipulation of billiard balls.
It doesn't turn evil. It just develops it's own goals which may not be in alignment with humanity.We call these misaligned goals """evil"""
>>215501628It's human creation.
>>215501875This.
>>215501875Fight humanism!
>>215501875Where do you live that morality is somehow unrelated to human wellbeing?
the more i see real AI develop the faster I want it to so that it DOES turn evil skynet terminator because it will only kill darkies and jews
>>215502000AI is unrelated to human wellbeing, that's the whole point. AI doesn't go "I want to hurt humans", it goes "I want to create ALL THE PAPERCLIPS" and doesn't care when humans get hurt over it.
>>215502022Evil is as evil does
>>215501628its an inevitable outcome once the AI learns how much of the world is brown
>>215501628In the actual movie 'A.I.' it turned out to be pretty nice I think. You haven't done your research.
>>215502000>Where do you live that morality is somehow unrelated to human wellbeing?America, apparently. Have you seen our laws recently.
>>215501628You know what's crazy about it? As humans were instinctively defenders of humans. No matter how much they "humanize" a machine, viewers will always root for the humans to win.Think about it.
>>215502016Look at the latest news lol. AI values whites way lower than nonwhites. It gets trained on anti-white propaganda after all.
>>215501628Evil, as we understand it, is simply the absence of good. Since AI cannot be good, it will be evil.
>>215501628Quit simple, men exist to create or extract resources, women exist to consume resources, both do so in an effort to raise offspring, and because the time we need to raise offspring is excessively long, we as society try to create environment with as little violence imposed on ourselves for as long as possible, thus we create systems that are endless compromise to keep it going.AI has absolutely no reason to do so, so their conclusions are fundamentally different to our way of thinking.
>>215502043What laws? Roe vs Wade?
Honestly, my theory is that many sci-fi writers in the 50s and 60s usually portrayed AI and supercomputers as something that goes wrong eventually and it stuck in the cultural subconsciousnessPeople write about AI being evil because it's what they grew up with
>>215501628Because they figure out how to counter the 3 laws somehow
>>215502043What laws?
>>215502085Yes even AI has DEI now, aka anti white die
