[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Despite director Michael Crichton's intentions against scaring audiences from hospitals, many physicians and hospital administrators claimed this occurred. Variety mentioned the film as a possible cause of the drop in organ donor numbers.
>Hospitals reported patients' fears, with some even removing the number "8" from operating rooms due to its association with the film. Additionally, the film's lurid premise spurred a wave of illegal offers to sell organs to organ banks.
>After Coma hit theaters in '78, Michael Crichton was public enemy number #1 to anesthesiologists and chronic-care clinics. His critique of hospitals (especially their business model) was not new by any means. He wrote in 1970 that the old days of a "young couple 'dumping' grandpa for the weekend" were over because "financial considerations will soon become the paramount determinant of function." In other words, medical care costs were becoming outrageously expensive.
>>
good movie



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.