[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Iron Man (2008) was shot on film, but looks better than the digitally shot MCU movies.
>>
>but
>>
>but
>>
>>215510408
That's part of why it looks better, doofus
>>
>>215510427
I know, I was making a point that film is better.
>>
>>215510416
>>215510425
buttmind
>>
The problem with film is the fucking film noise/grain in some of them, is too distracting, I want some clean fucking picture
>>
I know the little tykes running around think Iron Man was some kind of breakthrough movie. Yes, film looks better. No, Iron Man is not the best movie ever made.
>>
>>215510469
You are the antithesis of the vinylphiles. Who say the pops and clicks add character.
>>
>>215510469
>>215510522
I like the grain. Looking at old movies is like looking at a window to another reality, a simpler time before iPhones and social media fucked us all.
>>
>>215510408
probably also because of the minimal CGI especially in the first act
>>
>>215510938
The first fiber optic cable in India was laid in 2009, a year after this movie. Only took a decade for them to ruin the entire motion picture industry.
>>
>>215510416
>>215510425
>>215510427
unc fell for the engagement bait



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.