;_;
Why did they cut away when they were getting infected?
i saw a video recently analyzing 28 days later (the original) which made multiple clear points that it was an anti-white/anti-british movie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3qxr6VVqtMthe more you watch modern movies, the more you can see subtle nefarious elements that have been injected into the movie by the director, who is subconsciously (or consciously) transmitting their learned thoughts and trying to shape the public perception - this seems crazy until you realize that even a simple movie such as the original top gun was openly touted by the producer and director as a recruiting film for the US navyour senses are under attack on all sides and we lack adequate ways in which to defend ourselves in this era of constant psychological warfaresorry for derailing your thread, i just had to get this out of me
>>215514178I never felt anything anti-white about 28 days later. No I'm not watching your faggot youtube video. But I did feel like 28 years later was supporting the pride of white English.>Long bowman flashbacks>Most threatening infected is a giant fucking indian/muslim that the white man keeps trying to pacify despite it being a brainless killer.
>>215514579Nta, but I've seen the video. I see the anti-white sentiment all the time and get frustrated when people are dumb with connecting the dots in ways that don't make sense. I feel strongly about it and want this shit taken seriously. I was ready to call bullshit, but it sold me as it went on. The only reason you wouldn't buy it is if you haven't realized how far back the game goes. Steven Spielberg was planting seeds of deconstruction in the culture way back before anybody was aware of it. Intentional or not, people's hatred will show through. That's why they accuse everyone else's work of being poisonous. Projection.
>>215513948did they all tran out?
>>215514884>I was ready to call bullshit, but it sold me as it went on.i'm this anon >>215514178 and i'm exactly the samei thought the video had a silly title and didn't seem right in the first few minutes but by the end, the video's content is pretty much indisputable the more you think about it, the more it makes sense that an artist's beliefs will shine through their workit's common for traditional media like painting so why wouldn't it also be true for modern media like film? it's the exact same deal, just using a different medium
>>215514884>Steven Spielberg was planting seeds of deconstruction in the culture way back before anybody was aware of it.on the topic of steven spielberg, the first grave that you see the old private ryan walking past in the opening scene is a jewish grave, which is rare in that cemetery so obviously that specific spot was chosen for a reason. just food for thought
>>215515176>is that... a jewish director subtly acknowledging the jewish people who died fighting for America?>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH IT'S ANTIWHITE PROPAGANDA, I'M GOING EXTINCT, SAVE ME NIGGERMAN
>>215515228anthropologically and sociologically speaking, absolutely, yes, that's how societies change over time
>>215514178Schizo
>>215515450what i said isn't complicated or even esoteric, it's all taught in school but people just don't care anymore
>>215514884>I feel strongly about it and want this shit taken seriouslyFuck off sperg
The opening scene was really poorly edited
>>215515228It expresses preference, however mild. And you notice it a lot once you start paying attention. Fucking everywhere, every time. You might be used to seeing others in positions of influence all over your society, but the only reason that was ever permitted is because people talked themselves into thinking we were all on the same team and weren't all subtly working toward the promotion of our individual tribes. Turns out that's not true and everyone else is playing by totally different rules.>>215515672Why are you upset?
>>215513948Imagine the smell in that room. I bet all those lolis pissed and shat themselves as the infected beat them to death.Boyle and Garland.... THEY GET ME
>>215516116I'll fucking kill you pedo
>>215514178>not a single colored person in the movie>it's an anti-white film:/
>>215514178You've been shilling this video in every 28 thread. We get it.
>>215516092>Why are you upset?You are
>>215514178I have spoken to Wyatt Stagg before. He is extremely stupid and a compulsive liar who is pathologically motivated to see this in everything because he has the political equivalent of a cuckold complex.He is completely ignorant of how film production works or any kind of artistic process and cannot form a coherent theory of mind for someone making a movie. There are holes in his theories you can fit a planet through and he knows it. He'll tell you certain things *could* be so if you press him, things which could easily be confirmed (against his theories) if you were to investigate for five seconds yourself.28 Days Later is a coming of age film. Jim wakes up naked and helpless, is rescued by 'adults', meets a benevolent older man and meets a new family, grows in competence and starts to prove himself to an already mature woman. Then he loses his 'father' and has to navigate a more complex world of social dynamics and dangers. The benevolent father and family are replaced with a primordial tyranny of a dominating father and his 'boys'. Jim refuses to be a boy anymore and resists as a man. The soldier stuff isn't about race, it's about masculinity. The 'beta' soldier made to wear a pink apron and cook for the others. The way one of the soldiers being overwhelmed by his infected peers is shot comically to appear as rape (they bend him over the table as he screams).If you read the film this way 28 Years Later is not a surprise in the slightest. It's another coming of age story, this time about an actual boy. Jimmy paralleling the captain as a corrupt masculine ideal following the benevolent ones (his father and the doctor/druid). Boyle focuses on the bible quote on the message wall BECAUSE HE IS A CATHOLIC. HE ALMOST BECAME A CATHOLIC PRIEST. STAGG NOT KNOWING THIS IS DISQUALIFYING. IT'S ON WIKIPEDIA. HIS STARTING ASSUMPTION IS THAT ALL FILMS ARE MADE BY JEWS AND HE DOESN'T EVEN BOTHER TO CHECK. HE ASSUMED GATTACA IS JEWISH (director's new zealand).
>>215515086Kill yourself Wyatt. You haven't even seen Garland and Boyle's entire cinematographies. You haven't even watched their commentary track for 28 Days you lying pig.
>>215516230Okay.
>>215514178Why does this site always shill the biggest morons on YT? That retard SynthMan was idolized until he swallowed a dildo whole.
>>215514178this video is genuinely the product of a schizophrenic mind>dude literally everything is a conspiracy to demean white people
>>215516155Opening scene is white little girls being killed
>>215516698everyone in the film is white
>>215516698The opening scene is the annihilation of modern Blairite Britain.Which is then succeeded by a kind of perennialist fever dream of British history which produces stronger and healthier people.
Why didn't they just lock the door?So stupid
>>215517212You have to be non white to find this level of 'just pretending' 'bait' posting funny. Do you feel good? Did sending this make you forget you're indian for a moment?
>>215517212schizo meltdown
>>215514884Get a hobby retard lol
>>215514178I don't even need to watch the video you linked to know it's true, because pretty much every thing is designed to demoralize or denigrate White people. It's been going on for many years now, but it gets more obvious all the time.
>>215516623>dude literally everything is a conspiracy to demean white people>the music industry is controlled by a handful of the same people who own all the record labels and virtually all the big hit songs that top the billboard charts, which are there not by popularity but because they were paid to be put there, are written by fewer than half a dozen songwriters>almost all modern popular culture in the west can be traced back to the influence of the long march through the institutions>national governments all over the west are bringing in unprecedented amounts of foreigners under the guise of labour shortages, even those a huge chunk of them don't work and the ones that do, drive down wages - this has been factually proven across the board>the united nations supports this - see: the 'replacement migration' paper and the adjusted definition of "indigenous" excluding european peoples from their own countries in an attempt to delegitimize them as a group>any political parties that are pro-homeland in any way are shunned and are actively fought against by their fellow political parties>the US government is full of dual citizen jewish officials and christian zionists who fund lobbying groups like AIPAC that have an iron grip on US foreign policy, which is why jews/israelis are found everywhere in events shrouded in mystery and let off the hook scot-free like the apollo affair and lee harvey oswald's murder - they display their vitriol for the west by degrading it in every single way that they can - also see how mossad operatives treat new CIA operatives who work in the middle eastand this is just scratching the surface. wait until you learn about russia's "active measures" program against the west and china's united front and "three warfares" hybrid warfare principle to kneecap the west so they can surpass us we are very much in a new cold war or whatever you'd like to call it right now and the anti-white rhetoric everywhere is simply a part of that
>>215518029Why would Danny Boyle and Alex Garland do that to you?
>>215518076and is 28 days later a part of that?
>>215518076Sister I did a ctrl+f and can’t find Danny Boyle in this. I think you forgot a section of your post.
Wtf is this thread
>>215518153danny boyle is well known to be a left-leaning type who sympathizes with modern urban youths, shall we say. he's just one of many people that were brainwashed during their school years by radical political extremists who had infiltrated the western education system after world war two everything flows>>215518266sorry but this has to be said so my fellow anons can have some awareness as to what the hell is going on today
>>215518383Danny Boyle is a Catholic moralist (his first film is a Hitchcockian morality tale murder drama). He's only ever been on board with progressivism as far as he's been able to reconcile it with his fundamentally nostalgic and old fashioned view of The Good. 28 Years Later is obviously a breaking point. A recognition that what he loves about Britain (he is a genuinely devout nationalist of the old school rather than skinhead kind) is in its past, its blood, and land. The spirit of his Olympic Games Ceremony was the idea of an evolving, 'hip' Britain which is still Britain. He loves the idea specifically of *integrated* blacks and non whites in general because in his mind this is a victory of Britishness. He doesn't get off on the idea of Britain becoming less British. He gets off on the idea of the wider world becoming MORE BRITISH. He doesn't want to Africanise England. He wants to Anglicise Africa. By 28 Years Later I think between Covid and The Woke it got too much. Like with Catholicism his faith was shaken because the real institution wasn't as pure as he was. He left the church but is spiritually MORE CATHOLIC than the average Catholic. He left progressivism because his ideals are still ACTUALLY PROGRESSIVE (now incompatible with degenerated and discredited woke, which is now just about power and abusing non-wokes with no remaining serious promises of world improvement). I haven't heard anything but I suspect hearing they turned on JK Rowling may have been Boyle's turning point (she was a big part of his Olympic Ceremony and an icon of Blairite Britain's global cultural relevance and prestige and a rallying point for the greater international english speaking world).Watching this film I get the impression Boyle no longer believes Britain has the power to make the entire world better. It's a fantasy of Japan style withdrawal. Reflection. Recovery. A nation and culture gone fallow to preserve and heal itself.
>>215516256the producers don't have to be jewish. It's enough to simply be immersed in this anti-white culture. Artists will subconsciously internalize anti-whiteness and regurgitate it. You concede that the culture is anti-white?And then, of course, you have the money power, acting as a gatekeeper to what gets made and distributed and what doesn't
>>215518673anon, danny boyle describes himself as a spiritual atheist and is a republican who publicly called britain a "small, shitty island". any sort of pride he had in the past has been subsumed by the sludge that is modern culture. think about it: when was the last time he made something that you could actually, objectively be proud of?
>>215516256>HIS STARTING ASSUMPTION IS THAT ALL FILMS ARE MADE BY JEWS AND HE DOESN'T EVEN BOTHER TO CHECK. HE ASSUMED GATTACA IS JEWISH (director's new zealand).
>>215518912>the cultureThere is no "the culture". There is everyone's individual experience of it. "The culture" does not make films. "Hollywood" does not make films. "They" do not make films. You have to ultimately trace things to specific minds. Even if you believe in the importance of the unconsciousness that is not an excuse to never be accountable or have to investigate anything. You can study the unconscious of a specific artist.Do you believe that DANNY BOYLE has internalised anti-whiteness? There might be a case for this. But if you're making a case that a film he directed is 'anti white' independent of any creative will, without asking this specific question, you are a retarded cretin and you should just drop the pretense of cultural critique and get a BLACKED subscription.My primary theory for unconscious inspirations behind 28 Days Later was that I suspected Alex Garland might have watched the anime 'Blue Gender' at some point (coming of age story about a guy who wakes up after the apocalypse and has to impress the action girl he meets to become a man). But that didn't get an English dub until after 28 Days, so unless Garland was watching anime in Japanese that didn't happen. You see, I had a suspicion, then I investigated and was able to clarify the picture, rather than just indulging in my vague unfalsifiable fantasy forever and feeling smart about it. That's what a real cultural critic does.>>215518917Boyle has the privilege of being humble because he actually believes Britain is great and he is privileged. Talking about your nation is for faggots from irrelevant fail-countries. All of the biggest 'white' national jingoists are from shitholes like Serbia and Macedonia. This is a man who believes he is lucky (because he believes his home is great) throwing the rest of the world a bone. "Oh silly old England it's nothing the whole world is great". You have autism if you don't see this. And 28 Years Later is the best film I've seen all year.
>>215518955Yes Wyatt that is a humiliatingly stupid mistake to be caught in your memes from thirdworld.party do not make this go away.
HEADING TO THE PROMISE LAND>HEADING TO THE PROMISE LANDHEADING TO THE PROMISE LAND>HEADING TO THE PROMISE LANNNNNND
why is there an ai bot replying to people itt?
>>215519000>But if you're making a case that a film he directed is 'anti white' independent of any creative will, without asking this specific question, you are a retardedwhy?I have a model; the media is anti-white. It's a good model. It can predict the kind of media that institutions will produce with an eerie degree of accuracy. It's better at predicting and explaining things than most other models. So the model is a useful way of putting what gets produced in contextAlso, it doesn't come down to Danny Boyle, it comes down to the institution and the money behind the production - there are thousands of potential Danny Boyles out there. Are you one of those people who believes that the money power doesn't have political agendas beyond simply making a profit? Anon, do you believe that the elites are concerned about what people think and might try to use their power to influence that?
>>215513948shit movie bordering on comedy
>>215519199"elites"Just go pay for BLACKED and leave those of us who care about film alone.
>>215519025Kino track
>>215519364well....yeah....the media and the distribution systems are centralized under the control of wealthy elites - and becoming even more centralized. Is this not the case?Can you articulate a single thought without mentioning the blacked porn site?
https://youtu.be/991JEvYfT9U
>>215514178>anti-whiteKek. You fags are so buck broken you can't even bring yourselves to use the word racism.
>>215519574anti-white is a more controversial term than racist
>>215519000>>215518673I appreciate your effortposting but non-brits aren't going to understand the way our self deprecation works. It's a concept so foreign to them that they'll never grasp its purpose.
>>215519598It's a redundant term you retard. Targeting people for being White is racism. You just don't want to call it that because then you'd be admitting you don't like racism.
>>215519710whats wrong with being racist?
>>215519512You haven't articulated a single thought. You proudly boast of your refusal to think or investigate anything. A "model" which you use in place of investigation isn't even mental illness. It's just sheer fucking grinning idiocy. >I have a model; the media is anti-white. It's a good model. It can predict the kind of media that institutions will produce with an eerie degree of accuracy.This "model" isn't a tool for predicting the truth of something. It's TELLING YOU the truth of something. If it's not, tell me how you actually came to the conclusion that 28 Days Later is 'anti white'. However you did that is the actual "model" of your thought, as far as you may actually think (I doubt this and suspect you are just a shitskin who gets off on wasting peoples' time). >Also, it doesn't come down to Danny Boyle, it comes down to the institution and the money behind the production Have you ACTUALLY INVESTIGATED HOW THIS FILM WAS PRODUCED?>Are you one of those people who believes that the money power doesn't have political agendas beyond simply making a profit?"MONEY POWER" IS AN ABSTRACTION USED TO REFER TO REAL THINGS. HUMAN ACTORS WHO MAKE DISCRETIONARY DECISIONS AND HAVE TANGIBLE GOALS AND MOTIVATIONS. DO YOU ALSO BELIEVE THAT "THE ECONOMY" IS SENTIENT? THAT "AMERICA" MAKES DECISIONS? THAT "4CHAN" HAS A PERSONALITY?"ELITES" IS ALSO AN ABSTRACTION. "THE ELITES" CANNOT HAVE ANY REAL BELIEFS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT A MIND. THIS IS A GENERAL TERM USED TO REFER TO A BROAD COLLECTIVE ABSTRACTION. AN INDIVIDUAL ONE MIGHT CLASSIFY AS "ELITE" CAN HAVE CONCERNS. "THE ELITES" CANNOT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING YOU CHOOSE TO BELIEVE IS UNFALSIFIABLE IN ITS CURRENT STATE WHICH YOU REFUSE TO PURSUE FURTHER, BECAUSE YOU ENJOY WALLOWING IN A SENSE OF DEFEATED HELPLESSNESS, WHICH IS WHY I CALL YOU A KEKOLD FETISHIST?
>>215514178kill yourself
>>215514178Let me guesshttps://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/h3qxr6VVqtM/What a shock.Piss off, shill.
>>215514178Based and aware.
>>215513948>seconds before I burst in and announce Princess Di is dead>but...they already knew, somehow, some way...
>>215519735Christ
>>215519710no, let's take this out of lollipop fantasy land and bring it back into reality. The term 'racist' effectively means discrimination or a negative sentiment towards non-whites by whites. That's how the concept is implemented; the hate speech laws, the anti-discrimination laws, the narratives - none of it is universal, i.e. it's wrong to be 'racist' against any race, including whites. Anti-racists will be the first to tell you that racism against whites does not exist. So, we use the term anti-white instead of their construct where they've carved out an exception for attacking white people
>>215516698If there were black girls in the room you would have complained that there were black girls in the room and said something about "no blacks in Scotland in 2002, this is woke revisionism".
>>215519743>Anon, that was 5 years ago>wat?
>>215519769why is it wrong to be racist?
>>215514579Notice how they had to turn the until then wholesome father and son relationship into shatters by making the father a cheater. All movies do this now, subvert the strong father figure, right out of the frankfurt school textbook. Because a strong father is fascism and literally Hitler to the marxists.
>>215519710No, because according to marxists you cannot be racist to whites because white people are privileged and always the oppressor. Retard logic ofc, they just hate white people.
I just rewatched the other two films before seeing this one, and the medieval village of survivors in Years somehow had better security and protection than the American military district in Weeks where there were no guards anywhere and they just let kids wander out, and put no guards on anyone. At least the kid in Years had to create a distraction and even then he had to dupe the guards personally to ge them away from their post. In Weeks the US military had a possible infected person brought in from outside and she was just left alone in a room with no one guarding her. Then she was actually was infected and the commander of the entire base just walks there personally to kill her, and finds oh no, someone got infected by her in the meantime because there was no guard to prevent this from happening, and now there's infected everywhere. Weeks was a little dumb.
>>215514178the amount of seethe this video causes every time is a fantastic way to gauge shillbots and propaganda tourists
>>215519769Correct.
they skipped 28 months later so i won't watch 28 years later until they make months
>>215519825>wholesome>immediately shown to be pushy and dishonest>uses his son for social clout by exaggerating his deeds and putting pressure on himI like how "muh wholesome" to you means "flawless perfect person". All they showed was he was a flawed person.
>>215519850>>215519815samefag
>>215519850You mysteriously happen to be in threads to "see" it posted a whole lot, huh?
>>215519857What if you watch 28 Days now and wait 28 months to watch Years?
>>215513948Don't worry girls, I felt the same way watching Highlander II: The Quickening.
>>215516256>I have spoken to Wyatt Stagg before. He is extremely stupidI'm sure you have, we all definitely believe you.
>>215519844The basic premise of Weeks is dumb, them moving to resettle Britain just SIX MONTHS after a virus destroyed the entire country is ridiculous, you'd wait five years at minimum, if not ten or more. A military presence there attempting to find survivors or establish a secure base, maybe, but not resettling expat civilians and rebuilding like it was normal.
>>215519850Indeed
>>215519719You are extremely retarded
>>215519921>unprompted "Wyatt Stagg" defense force
>>215519866Cheating is not flawed person behavior, it is disgusting especially if your wife is sick and needs you more than ever. I never said anything about being perfect, do not put words into my mouth and twist what I said.
>>215519825It's a coming of age story. Spike comes to recognise that everything isn't perfect or neat. His father is not a bad person. But he is somewhat immature and emotionally weak. The reason he takes Spike onto the island in the first place is to avoid being stuck in the house with his sick wife, a move which almost results in disaster. Rather than take responsibility for this he tells everybody it was a big, brilliant exciting adventure and Spike did great. *And* on top of that he's started fucking Spike's schoolteacher. This film is about coming of age, maturity, fathers. What isn't said but is very important and implied, is that England was destroyed when the present 'adults' were all relatively young. Not just Jimmy. Spike's parents also saw the world die before they were adults, maybe they also lost their parents early and horrifically. The continuity of their culture and family lives were severed. Spike's father perhaps didn't have a father as he aged into manhood. He knows how to survive, but the finer points of human existence are lost on him and he copes immaturely and does harm to others in the process.Spike's father is not a strong father in many ways. But he is clearly an overall good man who is trying very hard. Have you ever spent a lot of time with a dying loved one? One whose mind was going perhaps? I have. It's probably the most uncomfortable and helpless you can ever be made to feel. I didn't deal with this perfectly when it happened to me. Spike's father is imperfect. Recognising this is an emotional shock. Spike runs away and meets a new 'father' figure in Dr Kelson, a man who has learned to sublimate his overwhelming grief into work, art, and philosophy. He helps Spike learn to deal with his own grief, and through this encounter Spike has grown as a person, and emotionally perhaps surpassed his own father, who he now does not hate but wants time apart from. And of course the next film is about Jimmy, a man truly turned bad by grief
>>215519825Why is he "strong"? Because he's skilled and ruthless at killing infected?
>>215519777It's not so much the white girls but the amount of them. Like 7 or 8 blonde girls in one room? Seems excessive. They could have had just one sister die, and it would be as effective
>>215519844I used to think this was all kind of dumb to the point it hurt the movie, then there was this virus that emerged in China...>>215519857More Kelson in the next movie. We might get something like a time-lapse of his grief leading up to constructing the bone temple. Would a brief interlude sequence of 28 Months satisfy you? I think it's actually quite possible they pull this with the next movie. Opening sequence of something like Kelson's wife dying followed by '28 Months Later'. Would be a great way to throw us off balance a little.>>215519921He's not exactly hard to find. He blocked me on twitter very quickly after I ratiod him and on youtube he makes distant one-liner replies.>>215519951Not an argument.
>>215519998It's all by design. Just look up Alex Garland's other movies, he does this intentionally.
>>215519857Based
>>215520040"this" what?
>>215519998The premise of the next movie is that Jimmy is batshit insane and runs a cult of hyperviolence. And also has a fixation on building an invincible clan of blonde people. It's all thought out at the very least.>>215520040I'm trying to figure out what you mean by this and I simply have no idea what you might be talking about.
>>215520063Well that comes to the other issue where this feels like half a movie
>>215520075well it is, kind of, but I think other than lacking a more traditional action focused climax (like Days had), I think it provides a pretty clear character arc in three acts, only the final scene really points specifically to a sequel
>>215519719I don't understand why this triggers people so much. You can analyze media through a classist lens, a feminist lens, an anti-colonialist lens, an anti-racist lens. It's all taken very seriously and holds sway in academic circles. But the moment you critically analyze a media product through a pro-white lens, everyone shits their pants and starts vomiting.And, of course, it's not like anti-whiteness isn't dominant in the culture. Thanks to social media, we have an exquisite electronic record of writers and producers telling us explicitly that they have a specific anti-white intention behind their works. The movie studios implement racial quotas and policies. Maybe WyattStagg is right, maybe he's wrong, but he's putting interesting ideas and critiques out there. He doesn't have to comply with this rigorous standard that you've invented of proving with 100% certainty that Danny Boyle had this intention or that intention. We don't place those constraints on other critics
>>215520127I love bong girls so fucking much
>>215520133Sorry your shilling of the video got called out bro. Try not to be so ratty about it, it's inevitable that someone notices.
>>215520036>Not an argument.i dont argue with low iq troons
>>215516256The tyranny is a caricature of what masculinity is a boogieman for a new progressive type of men to fight.It's like calling anything you don't like a nazi and then fighting it makes you a modern day hero.Film industry is plagued by the jews, you get your movie funded and supported if it supports their anti-white ideas.And come the fuck on, Movie beats you over the head with it's messaging of Race mixing, rewatch the fucking horse scenes, you gotta be a special kind of retard to not understand what it portrays.
>>215520057>>215520063His movies have an underlying anti-white and also an anti-Christianity bias once you start peeling off the layers. The Wyatt video exposes the anti-white theme.Here is a video about Annihilation and Sunshine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDBcx96HPGg
>>215520113"Analysis" which rejects investigation-based conclusions out of turn is not analysis. It's projection. Yes, most of what passes for "analysis" now is just people vomiting their pet obsession or learned phrase (it's satirising fascism!/refuting late capitalism!) at whatever's in front of them, but that doesn't make this correct. It makes you their equally retarded inverted parallel. Good job. You are now as smart as random nigger and woman diversity admissions in Ivy League.You have "an exquisite electronic record" do you? It's all very incriminating? I have listened to and read everything on the internet I could find of Alex Garland or Danny Boyle talking about these films. I read Alex Garland's novel 'The Beach' to better understand him. I watched Boyle's entire filmography and read about the production history of each work. I've seen everything Garland worked on. I read about their creative falling out following 'Sunshine'. I learned about how the protagonist girl of 'Civil War' is actually inspired by young Alex Garland's desire to become a correspondant and cover wars. Does your "record" contain anything which is not an abstraction or a quote infograph you saw on /pol/ of some random smarmy kike trash peddler saying "yeah I kind of want to stick it to boring white America when I make a movie"? Has it even occurred to you that these films are BRITISH so Hollywood is largely irrelevant here?"the movie studios" I'd bet my life without looking it up you couldn't tell me who produced 28 Days Later or how. If anybody cares, it was funded partially by the British government, partially by Fox Searchlight. Only contribution I've heard Fox made is that with the issue of different potential they really backed the plane flying over the lake ending where Jim survives, which I think was a great call. Fuck the Jim dies ending. Lame. Not done with you. Character limit.>>215520133Nigger.
>>215520277we are reaching levels of cringe that shouldnt be possible
>>215520113>>215520277Now, we were saying. Wyatt is *putting things out there*, yes. But the same can be said of feminist, anti-colonialist, and racist lens bearers. I don't believe this is inherently valuable. Also thin chance you're actually Stagg now because he also likes to insist that anybody holding his beliefs accountable has insane "standards". You don't have to have rigorous standards, but if things you suggest are completely disproven or seriously challenged by readily available information, and you refuse to acknowledge these challenges, no intelligent person is going to respect you. This is of course the internet so there are lots of degenerate retards to court, but as I told Stagg, you will be kept out of serious circles. I got that faggot giant giuli to apologise to me for endorsing Stagg's video. I'm not saying you can't say anything you can't 100% prove. This is ultimately about the workings of human minds. But human minds are not a black box. There is an art to exploring human acts. One which Stagg has no respect for. Probing at him in comments has made it plain he doesn't even understand why you should investigate a filmmaker to understand a film. *Movies come from the movie store*, more or less.You believe in evidence, you and him both proudly allude to "research", and your "exquisite electronic record". But the moment you start deliberately limiting yourself this is just story-building. Porn for your self satisfaction.I absolutely place this constraint on every critic. What the fuck is the point in anything short of this? Just animal noises. If your notion of a leftist critic is Nostalgia Chick and a rightist critic is Critical Drinker, then yeah maybe Stagg blows your fucking mind. But I am not a toddler posting from a slum in Bangladesh so yes I have a "rigorous standard" which leads me to dismiss 99% of statements about movies as excremental waste which should result in grievous punishment for the speaker.
>>215520338>I can't adress any of his arguemnts, so I'm just gonna call him "crinige"
>>215519969>The reason he takes Spike onto the island in the first place is to avoid being stuck in the house with his sick wifeNo that is just your subjective interpretation. He did it as a rite of passage so his boy could take his step into manhood, so he could acquire the skills to survive in a dangerous world. >His father is not a bad person. Like I said before, he cheated on his sick and vulnerable wife, this not only harms the wife but also his son, breaking apart the family. This is very bad behavior, I do not understand why you take it so lightly. >>215519988That is the point, he is not later on because he is intentionally written as not being strong. Until the cheating scene the father and son had a bond and the father was teaching his son skills on the trip so he could survive in a hostile world. This bond later gets shattered when he cheated and it breaks his family apart. Have you not noticed the lack of strong masculine father figures in media?
>>215520133>>215520158>>215520184>>215520338I'm starting to see why you rely so much on just spamming a video and not actually arguing yourself.
>>215514178Assume everything has an angenda unless proven otherwise, I guess. Someone is always trying to sell you something.
>>215519866>>immediately shown to be pushy and dishonest>>uses his son for social clout by exaggerating his deedOh please. Playing up and exaggerating his son's accomplishments is to be expected.>All they showed was he was a flawed person.They made a very predictable turn and I'm pretty sure anon is right about it. We are talking about patterns here, not one person being "flawed." Of course they made the good father a scumbag/ cheater/ cuck/ whatever. That was inevitable.
whats with these dimwittingly written uberlong posts, niggerjeetsalso where is 28 months later?
>>215520251The tyranny is primordial. THAT is why we see a statue of Laocoon. Ancient Greece and the classical world. The beginnings of civilisation as we recognise it. Jim's struggle has gone from an infant meeting nature to a boy meeting primitive society. And Jim rejects and overcomes this. The Captain wanted to make Jim another one of his "boys". And wanted to make rape slaves of his love interest and surrogate sister. It's not a caricature. It's horrible, but it's also I would say a rather respectful representation of masculinity at its base. Big boss man and his submissive lessers seeking women. There's the foundation of civilisation. And that is the plan. They aren't degenerate wreckers. The plan is to start *building* something to keep his men sane. They were being driven to despair by a sense there was nothing left to do. By killing organised soldiers Jim may even have hurt England's prospects at recovery. They could have killed many infected and organised many survivors. It's a balanced work. Jim is looking out for himself and his own. What else would you expect a man to do? The film is about becoming a man. He fights the other man and wins. You could say that he is fighting the foundational principle of civilisation by killing the most organised men he meets because he disagrees with the first act of subordination to the requirements of the civilisational project he encounters. You see, aren't movies interesting when you aren't a faggot?And as for the horses, Alex Garland is weirdly specific about race if you read the script. Picks the race of random infecteds in chase scenes. He specifies in script that Selena is black. But the soldiers aren't written as an international mixed race group. And no, the horse colours are not mentioned. He does say there are horses. As with Jim's resistance above, it's a suggestion things are changing, going wild. A theme of zombie films as far back as Romero.
>>215520266Jay Dyer is a boring insufferable faggot and I've clashed with him online too. If you actually learned anything from this video rather than merely experiencing vaguely affirming *vibes* you would simply explain what's going on to me. I'm sure if I watch these videos I will leave the experience angry and with less respect for Dyer than I already have. He's producing idiots like you so this can't be good.Annihilation I barely remember but Sunshine is interesting because the worldviews of Garland and Boyle clashing so heavily caused the plot to break down in the third act. Garland had two sequels written, things might have become clearer if we got those. If you haven't heard of those sequel concepts but are still trying to tell me to learn what Sunshine is about you'd better go kill yourself rather than reply to me again.>>215520338Sister you forgot to post your argument.
>>215520277>Yes, most of what passes for "analysis" now is just people vomiting their pet obsession or learned phrase (it's satirising fascism!/refuting late capitalism!) at whatever's in front of them, but that doesn't make this correct. It makes you their equally retarded inverted paralleExcept what he is describing is basically standard and universal. It is baseline cultural messaging in nearly everything.Also dude if you're not a chud randomly saying "nigger" and "kike" incoherently so that chuds will be more likely to listen to you is really annoying and dishonest.
>>215520471>>215520385>>215520356meds
>>215514178Wtf I hate 28 Days Later now
>>215520277>Has it even occurred to you that these films are BRITISH so Hollywood is largely irrelevant here?It is amazing how euros/ lefties continue to insist Europe is some sort of independent place with different values.Yes, Hollywood values dominate Europe too. You are the 51st state.>"the movie studios" I'd bet my life without looking it up you couldn't tell me who produced 28 Days Later or how. If anybody cares, it was funded partially by the British government, partially by Fox Searchlight. Only contribution I've heard Fox made is that with the issue of different potential they really backed the plane flying over the lake ending where Jim survives, which I think was a great call. Fuck the Jim dies ending. Lame.The same British government busy imprisoning its natives for complaining about being replaced?
>>215520459Hollywood is my favourite place in England. They would never betray me.>>215520475What is "incoherent" about my use of those terms? I use them to refer to the peoples in question. You could say I do so "insincerely" but if you were capable of appreciating the meanings of things this whole discussion wouldn't be necessary, would it?And again "baseline cultural messaging". Why do we have to defer to abstractions when looking at something right in front of us? We do not have to say "oh movies tend to be..." to reach conclusions about a specific film. It is obviously not the best approach. We should be trying to work out what this film ACTUALLY is. I don't care about baseline cultural messaging. I care about Danny Boyle and Alex Garland as artists. I will not overwrite specific observations with abstractions and generalisations, because I am not fucking retarded. If you allow people to do this to you you are extremely fucking stupid.>>215520511>It is amazing how euros/ lefties continue to insist Europe is some sort of independent place with different values.Yes, Europe is not Hollywood. That is why one is called "Europe" and the other is called "Hollywood". Also Danny Boyle is not "they" or "the jews". That's why we call him "Danny Boyle". 28 Days Later is not "the cultural baseline" it is "28 Days Later". Are you following yet? Do I need to draw some pictures?"Hollywood values dominate Europe" is a meaninglessly vague statement in this specific context. It is overridden by the fact I can look up and show you Danny Boyle's life story and statements and create a more specific picture of his character and worldview. Again, abstractions and generalisations are overwritten by specific observations. That's how learning works. Do you discard everything you know about individuals you've met in favour of statements about how broad classes of people tend to be? That's what you're all saying about art right now. How you've learned to "think".
>>215520511>The same British government busy imprisoning its natives for complaining about being replaced?No. Keir Starmer was not Prime Minister in 2001.
>>215519735every time
>>215520426White horses are bigger, represent the man - JimBlack horses are smaller, represent the women - SelenaEven in the fucking script it mentions:>It implies the way the world will changeliteraly alluding to the racemixed future>Do you think they're infected>No. I think they're doing just fineI don't understand how the messaging here is not super obvious.
>>215520617Let's keep going. Why does Alex Garland want this? Why did he decide to pursue this end through coded horse-colours embedded in a zombie film? Which parts of The Beach (novel) are predictively programming me for autogenocide or whatever the fuck it is you think is happening here?Also how did you faggots not kill yourselves after 28 Years Later came out? Where is the continuity of your reading of Days? Have you managed to identify (or construct through projection) anything which fits these ideas in his other films? Oh I'm sorry the jay Dyer video. Have your youtube dads done their entire filmographies? Or just Sunshine and Annihilation?The "messaging" I take from the horses is the idea of natural recovery. The horses are running "as if wild", meaning they are feral, but doing well. Like the people left in England. There is a suggestion that things can recover and life can become something other than hell under pre-civilised conditions. A promise delivered on and a premise realised in 28 Years Later. A film in which, like the horses, people persist in England. And some of them have become strong and free following the collapse of civilisation. Horse jumps the stone fence and goes his own way. Jimmy leaps the boulder wall and does whatever the fuck he wants.THAT is the connection to 'The Beach', a consistent thread running through Garland's work. The idea that there might be something better away from the noise and corruption of the modern world. And like in The Beach this freedom and simplicity is revealed to be two-sided. I can easily draw novel connections between all things Garland has worked on on the fly because I am not a nigger who needs to shelter my pet theories from interrogation to keep them safe. My understanding of these works, and all things, are *products* of interrogation. Which makes them very strong.Have your values ever stood up to a fight? If they haven't where does your confidence come from?
>>215520542>Yes, Europe is not Hollywood. That is why one is called "Europe" and the other is called "Hollywood". Also Danny Boyle is not "they" or "the jews". That's why we call him "Danny Boyle". 28 Days Later is not "the cultural baseline" it is "28 Days Later". Are you following yet? Do I need to draw some pictures?So do you not believe in categories at all? Or only when you're arguing against this issue.This is a bizarre line of defense.>There's no such thing as a "nazi." There's mr schdmit, and mr hans and mr steiner. Honestly no idea what this is supposed to accomplish.
>>215520830I do not believe that I should draw extremely specific and severe conclusions based on categorical thinking. Like say, that Alex Garland and Danny Boyle are genocidaires. Really that's the conclusion of the linked video. Do you not believe that such heavy charges deserve more serious investigation? Of course this is the internet and extremely serious and destructive charges based on hearsay, assumptions, and *vibes* are a popular sport, but that doesn't make it okay. You probably also believe that Woody Allen is a pedophile who married his daughter. Opposition to categories is not my line of defense. It's an attempt at explaining where you've gone wrong, for any potential good faith readers on the fence here. If we attempt specific readings of the films I believe that I can make a far stronger one than you backed far more heavily by what is readily observable. Your preferred reading is ultimately unfalsifiable. No, I cannot definitively prove it wrong. I cannot read a human heart (though you seem quite confident you can). Ultimately this class of thinking belongs in the same category as the "Silent Hill 3 is about circumcision" reading. If someone looks at something and sees something you cannot make him *unsee* it. I can explain what I see, explain flaws I think I've detected in your own perception and processing, point to agreeable matters of fact that support my reading and clash with yours. But ultimately if you refuse to change your mind that does not refute every contesting read. It just means you refuse to change your mind.>There's no such thing as a "nazi." There's mr schdmit, and mr hans and mr steiner.This is a very valid case to make under certain circumstances. If someone does something specific justified by principled opposition to "nazis" it is perfectly legitimate to respond by asking what nazism is, what the problem with it is, and whether or not that specific problem is here in this case. They won't let you say this for a reason
>>215516356Fatherless energy basically. Niggas around here need a confident white male to tell them what to think or they literally invert their penises and start dressing like a WoW character.
>>215519969It's odd that a film can have a lot going on with it but its actual story and how its executed is painfully average. It was just a boring film and reminded me of how good the first film was which is kinda ironic because it's like the old film is the parent and the latest film is the child.
>>215516256Blown the fuck out lol. all the replies are just seething because they have no response.
>>215519719Capslock is cruise control for cool
>>215519574Those are not absolute synonyms, you dumb fuck. Anti-white is more fitting.
>>215519769Its amazing to me that some people still struggle with this concept
>>215520692>Which parts of The Beach (novel) are predictively programming me for autogenocideHim bragging about how awesome his solo travelling was getting pussy and doing drugs while I rot away in my room like an incel.
>>215521281>>215519969A lot of contemporary films have this issue recently. Sinners is another: the film has like 5 or six sub-plots, multiple genre and tone shifts, multiple dance numbers, shootouts etc. but ultimately there ends up not being enough time for any of the plots or narrative elements to be well developed or satisfyingly resolved and all the themes being juggled end up being shallow and trite mess of nonsense as a result.Kinda like a JJ Abrams films, it made a big flashy splash for a few months and then instantly disappeared from pop culture, despite rave reviews and good audience attendence.
>>215521509I think its more just Garland t b h. Civil War, Warfare, & Annihilation are all just okay films that have an interesting premise but don't really pay off plotwise. Ex Machina is probably his best and I haven't bothered to watch Men.
>>215521498The protagonist of the novel is more like Will from The Inbetweeners than Leonardo DiCaprio. He does not have sex. He just thinks about video games and fails to make moral actions.
>>215521582Never read the book. My friend did while he was travelling the world and loved it. Made me really jelly.
>>215520923Its safe to assume that the movie making industry as a whole serves the purposes of a certain subset of people and that unless a filmmaker's aims are aligned with said purpose, they're not allowed anywhere near the apparatus of film making. Is one of those purposes "anti-whiteness?" Ultimately, I think the purpose is treating all of humanity as if we're the same mass of interchangeable, replaceable, and fundamentally indistinguishable units. "White people" being just one of the identities this purpose seeks to eradicate in service of this goal. I don't even know that it's primarily a human concern, although it manifests through human activity, ie government, entertainment media, etc. It seems to me to be some sort of metaphysical current. To say it doesn't exist because it's unfalsifiable is the crux of the problem, allowing this purpose to exist unopposed, operating in plain sight. Cue the Biblical quote about striving against Principalities. Phoneposting sucks.
>>215521773Fuck you. I would spit in your face if I could.
>>215521848Why are you upset? Was it the Ephesians reference?
>>215514178>only now figuring this out in 2025lol
>>215521870The overwhelming idiocy of suggesting the entirety of film production worldwide is an ironclad white genocide industry and all movies are made by people in on it or unknowingly serving it. Die, pol infograph casualty spastic. You’re a human writeoff. Drive a power drill into your frontal lobe.
>>215521988Not what I said.
>>215519850indeedyou say the term "anti-white" and the cockroaches come crawling out of the woodworkthat's how you KNOW it's a great video well worth watching
I'm surprised /tv/ is this clueless in 2025 but then again film isn't exactly a high brow hobby
>>215521988yeah! You beat up that straw man, anon!
>>215522208Moving pictures as a medium are designed to shut down higher brain function. They're functioning as intended. Evidenced by the hateful, rage filled monkey that wants people to kill themselves for daring to challenge his worldview.
>>215516256>>215518673>>215519000>>215519719>>215519969>>215520277>>215520349>>215520426>>215520542>>215520692how on earth can you write an essays worth of text in a thread and still not even refute the content of a ~23 minute video? you say that wyatt's view is terribly mistaken and full of logical hole without explaining how or why and then then you offer a contrary view which has even more logical inconsistencies than the video doesdo i have to bring up the fact that the british government spoke about implementing a two tier legal system in which one tier serves lighter punishments for non-white people and the second tier serves harsher punishments for white people? i genuinely do not understand how people can still be this blind when the barbarians are smashing down the gateswith your level of articulation, cognitive dissonance and your mention of arguing with some of those youtube guys on social media, you are definitely some sort of a mouthpiece or a shill, 100%
>>215522373Its amazing that they go through this much effort to defend their own destruction. They're willingly blind, or evil. Its hard to know which. "Why would the government lie to me, the taxpayer?"
>>215522373he's an ai chatbot trained on 4chan posts, don't bother arguing
>>215513948what are they looking at?
>>215522677I hate the fucking future. Behead all satans.
>>215522373If I could I would kill that stupid faggot kunley drupka for convincing his army of spastics that one can become *informed* through sensationalist infotainment. I have *refuted* the video, in terms you don't speak. Because you are fucking retarded. I have explained why it cannot be refuted (mostly) in the same way we can do '2+2=7' because these are errors in thought, not 'fact'. I have not said that England is a well governed country. I have not said that I like the state of things there. I have said that applying vague generalities to analyse specific subject matter is CRETINOUSLY FUCKING STUPID.What do you want me to 'refute'? Stagg is wrong about a few specific things (like Selena's line about the outbreak in 'the country', he actually gets the line wrong in a way which invalidates his entire interpretation of the scene if you know what she actually says), is missing obvious information about the production that throws things he says into serious doubt (like that the infected soldier was selected at the last moment. Well attested to, caused minor production problems. His race was obviously not a key element in mind. This is noted in the film's primary commentary track, which I have caught Stagg lying about having listened to).>>215522677Oh wow cool nigger image I'd better agree with you.
>>215522416>"Why would the government lie to me, the taxpayer?"We are talking about a zombie movie made in 2001 by Danny Boyle and Alex Garland.
>>215522373Powerful image
>>215521988
>>215522935>curation of the content of entertainment media isn't included in the governance of a population >especially not in the UKO okkk I didnt no that
>>215513948One of them is laughing during this scene, visibly unaware the camera has started, they forgot to cut it, if you notice it it ruins the mood instantly.
>>215523064>the only movies allowed in England are ones which further the cause of white genocideLife does fuck over good and sane people and there are stumbling blocks and barriers all through life top to bottom, but this is far from a complete or total system. Especially when the men in question started their careers.Just to be clear the argument is now "if the film wasn't a weapon of white genocide Tony Blair would have killed Danny Boyle and destroyed all copies of the film".I exaggerate slightly, but I do feel like I've already won because nobody has raised a single argument from the video except for one guy meekly suggesting the horses can be the backbone of the cause. If the video was a succession of killshots I think this thread would be constant repetitions of its ideas and observations. The picture it paints of course is just a picture, a collection of vague associations that feel right to an idiot caught in the rhythm of video editing and a man with aspergers pretending he has a deep voice by mumbling directly into his shitty microphone.The generalities get more general every few posts. The British government (who, which part, exercising what powers over whomstdve?) will stop you if your movie is not serving white genocide (how, to what extent, how do they check?).
>>215514178This has been going on for decades. No just in movies but in all media. THE SAME SHIT was going on in Germany before the war.
>>215516279What would any of that change?Furthermore the issue is not simply about one movie.
>>215516715As if that changes anything being said.
>>215523285If Boyle and Garland are genocidaires disguised as popular personal artists, there should be a thread of genocide across their entire lives of work (that work being genocide disguised as commercial art for personal gratification).Now do Millions, faggot. Do you even know what that is?
>>215523323You are not going to convert a single person.
>>215514178>it was an anti-white/anti-british moviebeing a white whiny youtuber makes more people anti-white than a movie ever could
>>215519825>capitalist movie made capitalistically by capitalists in a capitalist country>this is the marxists fault
>>215523354>I am not getting a check from the government so that means there is no marxism.
>>215523333Already have. I have no desire to chase crowds but I've got lots of great individuals in my circle. Who has Stagg got? 10k losers who work in warehouses who will watch his new videos? You think he's ever tried to talk to one of these people? Would he like them?In fact can you imagine this asshole talking in general? I imagine his mind is a kind of static void and that he has no positive interests of note.
>>215523333czecked
>>215523408Think about what you just posted.Why would someone as verbose and intelligent as me use a shithole like 4chan? Because I'm banned off of the entire front facing internet and my personal projects get sunk from above.
>>215523323If someone is a pedophile, it only makes sense that all of their sex partners were clearly children.
>>215523443is that because you are a bot
>>215514178Wyatt Stagg is one of the best commentators on popular media. His takedowns of Gattaca, Once Upon a Time in the West, and The Shining are also great. Cuckservative retards like Critical Drinker could never even dream of doing analyses at that level.
>>215513969Because the girls are dumb kids and were genuinely terrified irl, so they just ended the scene there instead of traumatizing them further.
>>215523323>If Boyle and Garland are genocidaires disguised as popular personal artists, there should be a thread of genocide across their entire lives of workwhy?Just admit that you don't like people pointing out the anti-white themes in films and tv shows and be done with it instead of sperging-out like this.
>>215514178>gets with black lady>white men soldiers bad rapists>black lady protecting and helping white girl>entire setting is nonchalantly "what if bongland was gone over night and you could kill your neighbors without regret"You really needed some fag to break it down for you?
>>215523725white people are capable of doing bad, non-white people are capable of doing good
>>215514579>But I did feel like 28 years later was supporting the pride of white English.This will be upended in the sequels to form a brexit bad, immigration good narrative. The viewer is like Spike, and now you and Spike are finding out his homogenous, safe island home is being racist or something and deserves to fall because they killed the heckin valid street shitting rabies humans. This doesn't mean Years is bad as a standalone installment, just that any patriotism included was intended to be defiled and ridiculed.
>>215523672>Wyatt Stagg is one of the best commentators on popular media[fake deep voice] "Ethan Hawke represents the jew">>215523692>why?What is the alternative? They made one project which was pure unconscious psychic genocide fuel then went back to being real authentic commercial artists working for their own gratification?This is a problem you can easily trip Stagg on. His theories implicate the entire culture industry to the point literally everyone who has ever worked on everything is a lying crisis actor, or he's wrong. Then he backpedals and says "unconscious motivations exist so you can't refute me" when you just saw him say in the video it's all deliberate and willful.I am asking you to explain how this film came to be, as what you think it is. Give me a theory of mind and life story of its creators. Do Boyle and Garland work for MI6? Are they even real filmmakers, or are all movies made by a cabal of esoteric marxists coding white genocide runes onto their chamber walls when they aren't outside making movies like 'Dredd', using men like Garland and Boyle as frontmen to distract you from what's really going on?These are real questions your worldview can't stand without an answer to. How did this movie get made? Who wills the white genocide and to what extent and what actions are they taking to make it so?Does Danny Boyle want to kill all white people? How does this factor into 'Millions'? At which point in his biography did he get recruited by the Jewish globalist cabal?
>>215523802Get your hand off your cock, the second movie isn't out yet. Nobody asked to read your cuckold fantasies.
>>215513948What am I looking at here
>>215523843https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLSJMVzmucUHere you go.
>>215523806are there any instances of anti-white messages in media?
>>215523843the very beginning of 28 years later
>>215519769Sad you have to state basic reality.
>>215519699Nta but it's because most have unironic inferiority complexes and can't understand making fun of themselves. I've literally had to stop using self-deprecating humor in public because they just assume you're asking to be shit on or have no self esteem, rather than poking fun.
>>215519710What the fuck kind of reddit mind is this?
>>215522917you sound insanely butthurt anon, maybe stop replying for a while
>>215513969no movie is going to show little kids being killed bro
>>215523859How come they locked the kids in the room instead of telling them to run?
>>215523772Never said they weren't, but this level of spotlight back in 2002 was pretty blatant propaganda. You never saw WMBF leading a movie. Nowadays it's quite tame.
>>215519769this isn't reality. the reality is white countries imposing their wills on non-white countries. waging wars and enacting puppet governments. the white soldiers and veterans are celebrated. the status quo is so normalized that nobody even questions it
>>215523408>that pictureChrist, is it possible to be that narcissistic and retarded?
>>215523868There are plenty of genuinely fucked up people who obviously hate whites making movies and I don't have to create absurd conspiracy plots to explain what's going on. David Mamet obviously has super hardcore race issues all over the place and writes about white people like he's some kind of alien observing us rather than a guy who lives in a country surrounded by them.Those are the cases that interest me. Most genuine 'anti white' stuff is just shit tv shows nobody watches fully conscious produced by ugly ethnic fail-dykes full of lines and plots about white male narcissism and entitlement (obscene projection). This stuff is always most likely to come out in places where nobody of note really gives a fuck on a personal level and nothing that will last is happening. Any real artist is going to put a lot of themselves into their work and nobody really interesting is so petty and fucked up in this way. Mamet probably is the smartest artist who actually hates white people on some level. Beyond that feelings get more complex. For example people say Spielberg hates whites, and that Private Ryan is a bloodthirsty movie. I disagree, I think Spielberg has something more like an NTR complex towards whites and Private Ryan feels weirdly fucked up because Spielberg earnestly REVERES the generation of whites (and brave past jews) who 'won the war' to the point it drives him insane and he feels like a worthless bug by comparison. The scene where Upham (who is his self-insert, not the jew) listens to the guy getting stabbed through the wall is possibly the most psychotically psychosexually neurotic thing ever made in Hollywood.You tell me where you think anti-white messages are actually landing. It's nowhere of note. Women are the brainwashed ones, and they just pick this up from lazy trash tv and the news (or as I call it, 'the jews').
>>215523990If anything we're not doing this enough you fucking retard.
>>215523923incorrect, watch more movies
>>215523990Well, aren't you a delusional retard.
>>215517212>you're all some kind of niggers or niggerlovers,You need to go back to hickville.
>>215523900Oh man I'd hate to be seen looking like I care about something. Imagine if a cool chill nigger saw me. How embarrassing.>>215523963Big theme of this movie is independence and strength. They locked the kids in the room because they had no faith in them or themselves, tried to merely weakly shelter them even when things were obviously falling apart. The child who stands up and then runs survives and then we meet him again at the end of the film. Now capable of shockingly effective violence, turning the tables on the infected. He becomes the opposite of his meek cleric father, as foreshadowed by the cross swinging upside down as he flees at the end of the opening sequence.
>>215524071You need to go back to R*ddit, also you're either underageb&, a delusional college kid or just generally a cooked zoomer
>>215521988You just have to fabricate some outlandish scenario to attack.
>>215516039they had very little time to keep fucking london closed off from traffic, and with so few crew.its pretty impressive what they did for the film on that budget, its all downhill from there for boyle.
>>215524157That is the exact idea that all of the propaganda wants to incept. That way when everyone is "killing nazis" no one will have a problem with it.
>>215524103>which scarecrow are you?You're yelling at monsters you made in your mind. Meds, cleetus.
>>215514178Kek I love how this pops up every time people are discussing this movie.
>>215524071>You need to go back to hickville.Right exactly, so obsessed with not wanting to be "a hick" just like the media taught you. That is why you ignore everything simply because you don't want to be associated with "hicks".
>>215524157If only
>>215523923Kek I just saw some C grade horror movie called Midnight Man that showed two kids getting obliterated in the opening sequence I was fucking floored
>>215524029Wyatt Stagg's videos do not promote conspiracy theories, though. A conspiracy theory is "we didn't land on the moon" or "you can fuel a car with water." Pointing out consistent messaging in movies is not conspiracy theorizing. As for Spielberg, there's plenty of overtly anti-White shit in his movies as well as the usual Jewish bride-gathering messaging. You should check out Mark Brahmin's writings on how Jewish propaganda works.
>>215524400What consistency? He's jumping between industries, artists, decades, cultural moments, hoping you're as big a retard as he is and you unconsciously take it for granted that "movies" all come from the same place. If we believe in consistency why am I the only one trying to make this a discussion of Danny Boyle and Alex Garland? Where is the CONSISTENCY here? Stagg has not seen all of their movies. How can he consistently track something he isn't even looking for. What is the thread of continuity between 28 Days Later and GATTACA? That they're both movies?If you say 'hollywood' I will find and kill you irl. Danny Boyle is Irish English and has primarily worked in England. GATTACA was directed by a blue eyed anglo New Zealander. These are important facts if you are not a nigger.As for Mark Brahmin, well at least you're telling me to read something. I don't care to dive through the dumpster of this guy's thought but I see he associates with Richard Spencer and tries to brand as a Jonathan Bowden successor. Would you believe I am a Jonathan Bowden superfan? I consider him a primary inspiration for my own critical thought. You should note that Bowden primarily framed his discussions around ARTISTS, and would talk about their LIVES and how that informs their WORK.
>>215524291you love that some annoying fuck is shilling his channel?
Neonazis are such jews.
>>215521345How annoying. Are you a teenager? Lots of the replies "have a response." What is the purpose of you saying this pointless comment?
>>215524618>What consistency?Jewish-controlled media, from religion to movies, works from a single intellectual framework which consistently posits Jews as the victors in an ongoing racial war against Aryans. This messaging is conveyed esoterically. "Revenge of the Nerds," "Gattaca," "Saving Private Ryan," "2001," and "The 40 Year Old Virgin" all tell the same exact story, with the same message, in different ways. When you understand how Jews create art from a symbolic you cease to be a spiritual nigger and start to be an Aryan.
>>215514178Trvke, it's slowly becoming a meme that "white man bad black man good white woman victim"
