[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: basedoldman.jpg (34 KB, 640x480)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DhSyFrxTxoc
He still got it, bros.
>>
Is he turning into the thing?
>>
yeah that was exactly what I expected
>>
I love how you can hear how mad she is at his answer when she asks him to elaborate
>>
>>215526202
I love John but fuck he's got some awful taste in video games.
>>
File: lynched.jpg (256 KB, 1440x1440)
256 KB
256 KB JPG
>>215526246
She got Lynched.
>>
>>215526202
Disappointingly, I agree. I had at least decent hopes for it, but yeah it was shit, really repetitive and on the nose, not funny, not clever, just nothing.
>>
>>215526271
Yeah watched it a few nights ago, I was expecting more. Seemed to be more made for women and maybe that's why it was really on the nose and simple.
>>
>>215526255
He was like 40 when video games came out
you're gonna have some weird taste xD
>>
>>215526246
It's typcially a lot easier to talk in an interesting way about how you don't like something, or talk about the flaws in something you're mostly positive on than to say anything at all about a work you just love entirely top to bottom. That he didn't have any way to expand on something he says he hated makes it seems like he's just lying about having seen it at all, if anything, which is pretty pathetic. If he wanted to dismiss it so lazily, why not just say he didn't see it because it looked terrible, or something?
>>
I didn't think it was clever or anything besides entertaining. The ending was like rated r goosebumps and that I liked, I dont think Carpenter is a fan of goosebumps
>>
>>215526271
>>215526299
If it was one hour shorter than it was, it would have been a good horror movie (for modern standards at least). When I was 2 hours in and the director was still doing those awful closed-up shots of the male characters telling the young chick that she looked beautiful or whatever, I was like
>"Yeah dude, I got it..."
>>
It was fun.
>>
>>215526301
I don't wanna do the math but surely he must've only been early thirties or maybe even late twenties during the heyday of Arcade stuff like Pac-Man.
>>
Are roasties trying to cancel John Carpenter now?
>>
>>215526202
I'm surprised he's watched it. I thought he was gonna say "Sorry I was too busy playing Borderlands The Pre-Sequel"
>>
>>215526328
Elaborating is for simpletons. John is an elite and pioneer.
>>
John Carpenter? The director of The Ward (2010) and Ghosts of Mars?
>>
>>215526328
He owes her no explanation.
>>
>>215526740
Born: January 16, 1948

Pac-man released: May 22, 1980
>>
File: RType.jpg (113 KB, 640x480)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>>215526912
It's astonishing that arcades went from Pac-Man to R-Type in just 7 years.
>>
>>215526899
We all make mistakes.
>>
>>215526899
Ghost of Mars rules though, even if it's not a good movie.
>>
>>215527024
Dont make me think about vidya right now bro, Im trying to cut back on my addiction
>>
>>215526912
So yeah early thirties then. I'm pretty sure he's been into vidya since those days.
>>
>>215526202
I thought it was at least watchable and had some redeeming qualities, but it's really refreshing to see somebody not performatively gushing over and sucking this movie's dick for once
>>
>>215526299
>Yeah watched it a few nights ago, I was expecting more. Seemed to be more made for women and maybe that's why it was really on the nose and simple.
I have no desire to see it and I never will. "widely acclaimed" horror of recent years always turns out to be astroturfed garbage, so I'll correctly assume that is true about the Substance.
>>
>>215527024
They went from Pong to Pac-Man in about the same timeframe. The medium evolved rapidly
>>
>>215527214
I just got done playing some Megabonk. Just unlock 'Spaceman.' But my go to right now is 'Megachad.'
>>
>>215526225
He's probably more cigarette tar than man at this point
>>
>>215526202
He looks like he's on a substance alright
>>
John carpenter will die in the next 0-5 years
>>
>>215526202
nigga lookin to marry a green eyed woman
>>
File: 1457584208193.jpg (106 KB, 1068x1600)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>>215526202
>I went to the first few (Masters of Horror dinners), and it was a lot of fun. It was just fun. Just have dinner, talk, insult each other, and tell jokes
>Then, you know, it sort of became something else.
>I think the night that got me was when David Cronenberg showed up and he is an old friend of mine. Unfortunately, he takes himself so seriously these days. He is an artist now,
>And literally, he was holding court in the middle of the room, and I came over to talk to him and he didn’t even look at me. I thought this is enough of this. Forget it. Goodbye.
>Eli Roth and his Hollywood hair... let him rule now. Darren Aronosfky secretly I think hates horror movies. Let the geniuses go. Let them be geniuses
>>
File: Gibson smoking.jpg (91 KB, 996x682)
91 KB
91 KB JPG
>>215526759
what male aren't they trying to cancel? Remember chud, patriarchy and shieet!
>>
File: Bret.jpg (170 KB, 1411x945)
170 KB
170 KB JPG
John Carpenter is the Bret Hart of horror movies.
>>
>>215529295
If you zoom in on his forehead it makes your phone screen dusty.
>>
File: carpentertweet.png (52 KB, 513x259)
52 KB
52 KB PNG
>>215529295
People tried to warn you about the jews, John.
>>
File: elevated.jpg (1.2 MB, 2888x2832)
1.2 MB
1.2 MB JPG
>>215529295
Best hater in the biz right now.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.