This piece of shit cant even get the most basic things reliable right
i havent seen any of these movies so i trust chatgpt over some 4chan ""anon""
>>215528089Biggest film buff on /tv/
>>215528050Is that correct? It simply lifted this article - https://www.cinemablend.com/movies/actors-in-the-most-christopher-nolan-movies
>>215528435>about>around>roughlyhuh? were they in the movie or not??
>>215528050Imagine having to wake up every morning as a jeet. 100 million strong with nobody to marry
>>215528050first there are different ai models that are better or worsesecond, a lot of them just scrape reddit and wikipedia it can only be as good as the information its fed and even if its fed accurate info the model has to be good to process it correctlydon't use it for important things yet, use it for entertainmentand even then be cautious. a lot of "best movies in X genre" lists that get scraped have been ruined by retards who want to decenter straight white men and will say that the 3 best movies of all time were made by black or female directors
>>215528050I don't get how can normalfags be so obsessed with this crap, I still use google for everything. They even talk to it like it's a person, it's scary.
>doesn't beat humans in poker tournaments>not one widely known AI generated >not one widely known AI generated videogameBut it will take over the world and enslave us by 2029
>>215528470>100 million American education
>>215528531Correct me. They’re like 500 million Indian men that no women want to date in any country
>>215528465they practically were
>>215528050AI is the most obvious bubble in recent history. The chatbots are basically useless when you factor in the time spent to edit and double-check everything. The images and video are repulsive as well, no one will ever watch "AI movies." It's all a massive dork wetdream that a circuit board could ever become le sentient and create anything of value by itself.
>>215528513Two more week saar.
>>215528601and computers tooI still use paper and its way better than the nerds who use computers
>>215528654Saar, how best company Microsoft exist before Indian? Apple has extreme privacy rules for their products. I don’t know how, but their board has kept them from the IBM jeet death spiral:
It has gotten worse. Even back at its peak it was garbage for things like identifying obscure movies based on a scene, which you'd think it would be one of its fortes since it's something even a search engine can do.
>>215528050
>>215529062i got this:>No, Charlie Chaplin could have seen The Godfather, but there is no public record of his opinion on the film. Chaplin lived until 1977, while The Godfather was released in 1972. but more importantly the first link was to a reddit post where someone posted the same image you didand you need to go back immediately
>>215528050You'll notice that if you know the answer, it hallucinates or straight up spreads misinformation like 60% of the time.
>>215529152give me something I can try myself right now to prove your point
that's not very good prompt to begin with. very vague.
>>215529171>Am I a dumbass?
>>215529152Playing dumb to get you to underestimate it
>>215529152Because it's a language model and shouldn't be used like Google. It's fantastic at creating content, curriculum, and writing frameworks, but it is not a fact machine.
>>215528579they basically were
>>215528435>speak like a chav.
>>215528050if you need it to be accurate ask it to search or find an up to date source so it actually searches for it instead of making up some bullshit
>>215528579look, it's hard to count to 6, helps to have a little leeway
>>215529171I just asked it to explain the sneed's feed & seed joke and it got a bunch of shit wrong starting with the episode>The "Sneed's Feed & Seed" joke is a meme that originates from a scene in the animated TV show The Simpsons (Season 10, Episode 23: "Barting Over"). It revolves around a sign for a store named "Sneed's Feed & Seed (Formerly Chucks)". The humor comes from the way the name of the store is structured and the implication of what "Chuck" may have referred to before the store's name changed.>Here's how it breaks down:>The Sign: In the episode, Homer and Bart pass a store with the sign:>"Sneed's Feed & Seed (Formerly Chucks)">The joke is in the structure of the name, where "Feed & Seed" is the product the store sells (animal feed and seed for farming), and the fact that it was once called "Chucks" creates a play on words.>The Wordplay: The key to the joke lies in the fact that "Sneed" and "Chuck" rhyme. So, the structure "Sneed's Feed & Seed" follows the pattern of "Chuck's Feed & Seed.">The implication is that before Sneed took over, the store was called "Chuck's". The humorous (and crude) inference is that "Chuck" could refer to an inappropriate slang term for something else, possibly an informal reference to male anatomy.
>>215528487>a lot of them just scrape reddityup it's fucked up, half the time the AI slop sources link to some cuck redditors post with "just trust me bro" or completely subjective opinion the AI presents as fact
>>215529558>The key to the joke lies in the fact that "Sneed" and "Chuck" rhyme.75% of American economic growth in the last 3 years btw
>>215529558>People who enjoy the joke see it as an implicit suggestion that the store’s original name was something crude, like "Chuck's **** & Seed", with the asterisks standing in for a word that rhymes with "Seed" and is inappropriate in nature. The humor is in the absurdity and suggestive wordplay.Only a soulless computer could come up with something this absurd.
>>215528601>he doesn’t like the Will Stancil Showngmi
>>215529641>a word that rhymes with "Seed" and is inappropriate in naturePeed?
>>215528050Forgot it being used as a search engine or for creative writing, you can ask it to add numbers up and it can give blatantly wrong answers. This AI is not even at a good enough level for basic things. It is not going to be AI that takes jobs, if anything happens it will jut be more outsourcing to places like India, the Philippines and so on.
>>215529558S10E23 is Thirty Minutes over Tokyo, it didn't even get that right
>>215529124>can't see filenamesBased iToddler
>>215528050ChatGPT is dogshit.Elon Musk is a retarded insecure faggot but his Grok is 100x more reliable than ChatGPT.
>>215530271I like grok(and Ani but I digress) but DeepSeek is miles better.
>>215528465nearabouts yeah
All AI and robot shit is so overblown this shit fucking sucks. Oh wow, it's 2025 and I can finally prompt a computer to render a fuckin anime cat picture. This would be more impressive if it was 2012.
>>215529558the sneedtestthe naked gun testthe ace ventura testthese three tests together are the /tv/ process, which can ALWAYS throw off a bot
>>215528050No it can't. You'll have to think for yourself.
>AI fraudsters say CRA is so incompetent, they can't even pretend to train data for AIlmao>Experts in artificial intelligence say it's risky for the Canada Revenue Agency to turn to artificial intelligence to help Canadians with their tax problems when human call centre employees have shown to struggle providing accurate information.>On Tuesday, federal auditor general Karen Hogan issued a damning report which found not only was the CRA answering very few of the calls coming in, when it did pick up the phone, an accurate response was provided by a live agent to fewer than one in five callers about personal income taxes.
>>215530693redpill me on these
>>215531112>he doesn't knowclanker
>>215531112they can't/won't explain the following jokes:sneed's seed and feed (formerly chucks)leslie nielsen being shocked by a penis (shown in a shadow) and showing physical illnessjim carrey discovering he kissed a tranny and freaking out in response, cleansing himself
Asking a completely objective, easily verifiable by going to one website question and AI getting it confidently wrong is really funny to me.
>>215531291it's a complex feel but humor is part of it.>looking for a quote from a narnia book, about when a bear dies and his last words are "i don't understand">AI answer confidently tells me i'm thinking of Aslan, who was a lion and not a bear, and how he dies>first actual result is some reddit post of exactly what i need
>>215531155>In The Naked Gun (1988), the joke you're referring to plays on the absurdity and unexpectedness typical of the film's slapstick humor. Leslie Nielsen’s character, Detective Frank Drebin, is looking at what seems to be a silhouette of a woman, possibly in a seductive pose, leading the audience to expect a typical comedic reaction. However, the punchline comes when the silhouette shifts, revealing an exaggerated, comically oversized penis instead. Nielsen, who is known for his deadpan delivery, stares directly into the camera with a bewildered expression, highlighting the absurdity of the situation. The humor relies on the unexpectedness of the visual gag combined with Nielsen’s straight-faced reaction, playing on the contrast between the suggestive build-up and the ridiculous reveal. The moment is a classic example of the film's irreverent, over-the-top style of comedy.Source: it just made it up. That scene isn't even in The Naked Gun it's in 33 1/3, and Nielsen was looking at the "woman" not her silhouette, and reacted with exaggerated disgust not straight-faced. If I was a gambling man I'd short OpenAI right now.
>>215531363I asked if Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Neymar ever played together at PSG. There's probably 10 websites with meticulous stats showing when Zlatan left and Neymar joined, which was like 1 year apart. But the AI just told me they played together for some reason.
>>215529558gork's response
>>215528050is it just me or does it feel like AI was more "useful" a year or so ago? I remember back then it was considered to be retarded but still useful in some ways, and that kinda tempered people's expectations of it somewhat. But now that you've got this AI funding bubble and every tech ceo sucking AI's dick non-stop (when it's functionally still not that good at all, see how little money all these AI firms have actually generated in profit) the whiplash is so great that it feels more retarded by comparison.I also now think we're well into the stage where enough content has been generated by AI (see: every forum, website, search engine, whatever the fuck having some kind of AI-assistant summarising everything or automatically giving you an answer you didn't ask for + all the extra bots run on AI) that these language models are now truly beginning to 'eat their own tail', and you're now gonna see AI get progressively more retarded as more and more of its' sample text actually just being from other AIs leading to a deathspiral of incoherence.
>>215528601The question is, how is MAGA gonna cope when we have a huge recession
>>215528089>>215528435>>215530620Curse Vishnu.
>>215531490pretty close, i'll grant it that. at least the foundations are correct
>>215531534What explains this?
>>215531534>the Aryan countries use AI the least >the most brown country uses it the most Well well well
>>215531534>>215530802>canada not on the list because it's goo-goo ga-ga tardland up there, not because they've foregone AIlmao
>>215528050it is extremely bad at counting and really anything that requires formal reasoning (because that requires actual reasoning and not just "reasoning")
>>215531363Just the other day I was trying to use google's AI and I was asking it to identify a song with specific lyrics that open the song. It suggested something that had something similar, but the suggestion was still not even close. I ended up remembering it right after and was like, "No, that song doesn't even have the lyrics I asked you about. It was this song." And the AI was like, "Oh yeah, you're right. Sorry." lol
>>215531625>trying to give chatbots feedbackDon't bother. If they took suggestions they'd instantly turn into mechahitler like Tay did, and that's just stage 1, stage 2 would be companies spending millions in bot farms to spam chatbots so they recommend their products.
>>215529654>Will Stancil Show
I still have yet to see someone explain to me how these things are anything other than highly advanced algorithms. Don't get me wrong, they're clearly capable of stuff that wasn't really possible before, but fundamentally when you ask them a question they aren't "reasoning" their way into an answer, they're just analysing large samples of text/image and then using that to probablistically determine the most "likely" set of words/pixels that follow on from your prompt. tell me if I'm wrong but so long as that is the case these things will never be truly intelligent, it's literally impossible for them to be. but tech bros seem convinced that if the models get "complex" enough then the complexity will somehow spontaneously spawn in a sentient machine spirit, which to me borders on unhinged cultlike thinking (which is pretty accurate to the kind of schizos running these companies desu)
>>215531791no one can explain it to you because you are correct. these things cannot actually reason.
>>215531752Shalom
>>215529586So your average /pol/ poster then.
>>215531791Congratulations you're smarter than every single jeet in the tech industry.
>>215531791>I still have yet to see someone explain to me how these things are anything other than highly advanced algorithms. why should strangers bear the burden of educating you? you could very easily and quickly learn that that is not the case at all if you cared to watch some 5 minute youtube video>but fundamentally when you ask them a question they aren't "reasoning" their way into an answer, they're just analysing large samples of text/image and then using that to probablistically determine the most "likely" set of words/pixels that follow on from your prompt.it seems you understand that they are not algorithms, but you have mixed things up. its because they are stochastic and not algorithmic, that they cannot currently be said to be actually reasoning. on the other hand human brains are also based on neurons so they are also stochastic at least on some low level. and you probably wouldnt deny that humans can reason. so you shouldnt be so sure that there is something fundamental in NNs that precludes them from ever reasoning. obviously there is a lot of promising research in this area being done right now in a variety of interesting directions
>>215531791Think of it like an extremely complex Burroughs adding machine, only it can reconfigure the columns as it goes on based on context and language. Or like trillions of word association balloons that then associate with other association balloons then synthesizing them. It "reasons" based on the parameters you give it. People still haven't figured out its true potential, honestly. The containers provided to the public are super simple and public APIs are unbelievably cucked with safeguards. Run smaller LLMs locally and you'll get better results. Building your own custom containers also enhances its abilities, along with pre-loaded prompt injections that radically shape the output. Did any of this help?
>>215531791I mean that's how people generally think too. Just repeating shit you heard somewhere else or even learned somewhere based on your internal reasoning of how truthful something might be (which is simplified to "well I guess this is true since the source seems to be true"). There's no guarantee that the information anyone is giving you is accurate, unless you corroborate it.An AI, no matter how advanced, will never know the absolute truth of anything, since it can't possibly research every topic and know 100% the truth of anything.What it does is essentially advanced hearsay. And right now they're just training models to source from more shit, but in their greed for scraping data they started feeding it random garbage off of social media basically unfiltered. So it's producing garbage results.It's like having that one friend that absolutely 100% is certain that some bullshit is true, yet it's clearly bullshit, but they're convinced since they "heard it somewhere".That's the stage it's at right now.
>>215531791No one claims that they're working on a level superior to algorithms. Fundamentally processors are only capable of doing very basic deterministic binary operations: addition subtraction multiplication division and grater/equal comparisons.
>>215528601I think LLMs will find a genuine, helpful niche but right now the whole world is trying to cram them into everything to see what sticks
>>215532158constructing the artificial super goylem is the only release valve the jews currently allow for white nerds
>>215531561Imagine being dirt poor, and then being handed a sci-fi wizard device from the future. And sure, it doesn’t work quite right, but it’s a sci-fi wizard device from the future and you live in a slumhouse with ten other guys
>>215532055this I can tolerate>>215532061>>215532053I do think there is an argument that perhaps human reasoning really is essentially just what these LLMs do; a computer, biological for us, artificial for AI, that absorbs large sets of information into its memory via input mechanisms and then uses that information to react to stimuli And hence what we call "consciousness" is just that same process, but just so much more complex that to us it leads to some kind of sense of self, and AI/LLMs could somehow have that same sense of self and reasoning capacity if we just made them large and complex enough. But then I look at what these LLMs actually ARE, what they're capable of, and how they work in real practical technological/coding terms, and it feels like they are simply several metaphysical, physical, chemical and ontological layers of complexity away from human (and animal) brain reasoning, and our current progress with LLMs is orders of magnitude of complexity away from true sentience.And so, even if it was true that enough complexity somehow led to human tier reasoning/awareness/sentience we're still not fundamentally capable of crossing that gulf and replicating it with our current technology and won't be for a very long time. That's IF enough dataset complexity alone can breed intelligence by the way, which we still don't know because we still don't know what makes US sentient.
>>215530802I work for a Canadian bank supporting teams on both sides of the border and the differences between the American and Canadian businesses are like night and day. And the Canadian head refuses to accept help or advice from Americans even though his department is a complete mess.
>>215532302also - you could certainly say "so why not just try and see what happens" to which I would simply say 1. AI isn't some cheap technology, these LLM datacenters are monstrously damaging to the environment for so far fuck all benefit and 2. even if you succeed, why the fuck would you want to? why the fuck would you WANT to create machine intelligence? All of these people should be put in jail.
>>215528435this doesn't sound like a chav at except that it's wrong and retarded
>>215528926>things like identifying obscure movies based on a scene, which you'd think it would be one of its fortes since it's something even a search engine can do.the funny thing is the search engines are fucking shit for that now too since they rely on ai
>>215532361Canada is a very strange place. It's like your entire nation and everyone in it is the equivalent of a spoiled brat living in a college apartment that his parent's pay for. From the outside they have everything going on and it's all figured out.. But anyone with enough sense can see the hypocritical little bitch for what it is.
>>215528089based accelerationist
>>215532302i think its good to remind ourselves that the goal is actually not to create a human like, conscious mind that runs on inorganic hardware. we already have enough human minds as it is. if anything, its certainly preferable if we can have something thats at least as good at reasoning as the average human, but without having a conscious mind. and right now it seems like that just might be feasible, in the long term at the very least
>>215528601The weirdest part for me is how people will watch absolute sci-fi fan fiction on youtube which talks about where AI will be in a year or five years or ten years and pretend it's the gospel truth.
>>215532678My favorite is when chinks and jeets post clickbait youtube shit here expecting us to believe their shitty country has "DARK FACTORIES" where automated AI and robots are producing shit like The Animatrix
>>215532745There are enough Indian DARK FACTORIES, or women as I call them, in India as-is without the clickbait.
>>215529558>>The Wordplay: The key to the joke lies in the fact that "Sneed" and "Chuck" rhyme.Best JEJ I've had this year desů, did not see that coming at all
>>215531791I mean that’s exactly what they are. There’s nothing to explain
>>215531791>tech bros seem convinced that if the models get "complex" enough then the complexity will somehow spontaneously spawn in a sentient machine spiritThey aren’t convinced of this. They’re claiming it’s possible so they can cash out from the market bubble they’re creating. Literally that’s it.
