[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1707274405235.webm (3.47 MB, 1280x720)
3.47 MB
3.47 MB WEBM
For a movie released in mid 2001, Shrek still looks pretty good
>>
File: 1707269589828.webm (3.45 MB, 1280x720)
3.45 MB
3.45 MB WEBM
>>
That’s because no pajeets worked on it
>>
Lost technology
>>
>>215528583
I just can't anymore into those fps.
>>
File: 1707538620550.webm (2.8 MB, 1280x720)
2.8 MB
2.8 MB WEBM
>>
>>215528583
It's the lighting.
Remember that next time someone tells you that raytracing isn't the future of gayming.
>>
>>215528583
That grass is like the average modded skyrim build
>>
look alright but would have to see 4k bluray to be sure



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.