[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_1654.jpg (27 KB, 554x554)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/terrifier-actress-sues-backend-deal-1236411032/
>>
>>215530240
the people should have sued the director for not having any nudity in the sequels

fucking bitch
>>
>>215530268
No one likes nudity in horror films dude. It’s gross.
>>
>>215530240
why are actors entitled to royalties? why should they get paid in perpetuity for a couple months of work?
>>
>>215530299
Cause they promised her in her contract they would pay her 1% of the movies gross revenue
>>
>>215530299
sez in the CONTRACT
>>
Director tore into her backend and then reneged on the deal
>>
>>215530299
So true. Only the publishers should continue to get paid. Whoever gets the rights to the movie should get paid for doing nothing.
>>
>>215530323
Seems incredibly dumb for them to agree to that, I hope she's making this up.
>>
>>215530437
It’s the people who made the tard clown horror movie… of course they're retarded
>>
Shit movies for people so desensitized that they are intellectually non-functioning.
>>
>>215530240
How much money was she expecting? The first movie only made $420k.
>>
>>215530437
probably not that rare in low budget movies where they can't pay the actors market rate and want to entice them.
>>
>>215530437
its a very common deal. usually the producers are jewish enough to ensure there are no profits, like with lord of the rings.
>>
>>215530437
>Seems incredibly dumb for them to agree to that
T1 was a micro-budger horror movie that premiered in 2016, but didn't start gaining popularity until 2 or 3 years years later. Terrifer 2 also had a tiny budget (director still had to raise funding via Indiegogo) and didn't even start filming until 4-years after T1 had first premiered. Nobody would have expected T2 and T3 to do so well. They probably agreed to her getting 1% since they felt bad for her having to be naked and hang upside down for her death scene in T1.
>>
>>215530475
>How much money was she expecting? The first movie only made $420k.
But it looks like her deal meant that she gets 1% of all future grosses from the franchise. T2 and T3 made over $100 million at the box-office alone.
>>
can i trick actresses to fuck me if I get a camera and offer them future profit
>>
>>215530291
>zoomer eunuch
>>
>>215530665
>But it looks like her deal meant that she gets 1% of all future grosses from the franchise
if thats the contract, then she should sue them. Thats a few mil right there
>>
>>215530691
If your production looks legit, yeah easily
>>
>>215530691
>Anon accidentally becomes Larry Flynt just because he was a virgin
>>
>>215530268
Dude what? The wholesome girl that gets bleach poured on her is titties out



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.